Preview

GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY

Advanced search

Geographical ranks of ecosystem sustainability: evidence from a 66-year provenance trial of a keystone boreal forest species

https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2026-4718

Abstract

Understanding the spatial determinants of long-term forest ecosystem sustainability is a prerequisite for designing effective climate adaptation strategies. Long-term provenance trials serve as invaluable in situ laboratories for assessing the adaptive capacity of keystone forest species under novel climatic regimes. This study capitalizes on a unique 66-year-old experiment involving 44 climatic ecotypes of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) – a foundation species of the Eurasian boreal and temperate forests – in Belarus to quantify, for the first time, the relationship between geographical origin and a composite, multi-criteria ecosystem sustainability rank. A novel ranking system was developed, reinterpreting conventional mensurational metrics – stand survival, structural integrity, and biomass stock – as empirical proxies for adaptive capacity and functional resilience. The analysis revealed a pronounced, non-linear geographical gradient in sustainability. The Bryansk ecotype (Central Russian Upland) achieved the highest composite sustainability rank (1.4), significantly outperforming local populations. Northern and south-eastern ecotypes exhibited critically low adaptive capacity, with several provenances undergoing terminal stand collapse. The local Vitebsk ecotype, possessing the single highest radial growth rate, displayed only intermediate integral sustainability, demonstrating that current productivity and long-term resilience are decoupled. The findings provide direct, whole-life-cycle evidence that the geographical provenance of a foundation tree species is a primary determinant of ecosystem stability under a shifting climate. The generated geographical sustainability ranks offer a scalable, spatially explicit decision-support tool for selecting optimal seed sources and adaptive management trajectories to enhance the resilience of forest landscapes across the East European Plain.

About the Authors

Siarhei U. Rabko
Belarusian State Technological University
Belarus

Minsk, 220006



Liliya F. Paplauskaya
Belarusian State Technological University
Belarus

Minsk, 220006



Pavel V. Tupik
Belarusian State Technological University
Belarus

Minsk, 220006



Pavel Ye. Sulim
Belarusian State Technological University
Belarus

Minsk, 220006



Nebi Bilir
Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Forestry
Turkey

Isparta, 32260



Tatyana P. Novikova
Saint-Petersburg Forest Technical University
Russian Federation

St. Petersburg, 194021



Arthur I. Novikov
Saint-Petersburg Forest Technical University; Agrophysical Research Institute
Russian Federation

St. Petersburg, 194021

St. Petersburg, 195220



References

1. Aitken S.N. and Bemmels J.B. (2016). Time to get moving: assisted gene flow of forest trees. Evolutionary Applications, 9(1), 271–290, DOI: 10.1111/eva.12293.

2. Anuchin N.P. (1977). Lesnaya taksatsiya [Forest Inventory]. Moscow: Lesnaya promyshlennost. (in Russian).

3. Davis, M.B. and Shaw R.G. (2001). Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science, 292(5517), 673–679.

4. Ellison A.M., Bank M.S., Clinton B.D., Colburn E.A., Elliott K., Ford C.R. and Webster J.R. (2005). Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3(9), 479–486.

5. Gauthier S., Bernier P., Kuuluvainen T., Shvidenko A.Z. and Schepaschenko D.G. (2015). Boreal forest health and global change. Science, 349(6250), 819–822.

6. Khoroshev A.V. (2022). Geosystem Approach to Landscape Pattern and Process Studies in Russia. Current Landscape Ecology Reports, 7, 25–40, DOI: 10.1007/s40823-022-00070-x.

7. Lisitsyn V.I. (2024). Calculation of exergy of coniferous and deciduous stands. Forestry Engineering Journal, 14(3), 23–36. DOI: 10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2024.3/2.

8. Lisitsyn V.I., Novikova T.P. and Novikov A.I. (2023). Modeling the biological maturity age of pine and oak forest stands. News of the Saint Petersburg Forestry Engineering Academy, 246, 6–23. DOI: 10.21266/2079-4304.2023.246.6-21.

9. Loarie, S.R., Duffy, P.B., Hamilton, H., Asner, G.P., Field, C.B., & Ackerly, D.D. (2009). The velocity of climate change. Nature, 462(7276), 1052–1055.

10. Mátyás, C. (1996). Climatic adaptation of trees: rediscovering provenance tests. Euphytica, 92(1-2), 45–54.

11. Mikhailova, M.I., Chernyshov, M.P., & Rebko, S.V. (2023). O luchshikh geoekotipakh sosny obyknovennoy [On the best geoecotypes of Scots pine]. Forestry Engineering Journal, 13(4), 58–71. (in Russian).

12. Naydenov K., Senneville S., Beaulieu J., Tremblay F. and Bousquet J. (2007). Glacial vicariance in Eurasia: mitochondrial DNA evidence from Scots pine for a complex heritage involving genetically distinct refugia at mid-northern latitudes and in Asia Minor. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7, 233.

13. Nielsen S.N., Müller F., Marques J.C., Bastianoni S. and Jørgensen S.E. (2020). Thermodynamics in Ecology - An Introductory Review. Entropy, 22(8), 820, DOI: 10.3390/e22080820.

14. Novikov A., Lisitsyn V., Tigabu M., Tylek P. and Chuchupal, S. (2021). Detection of Scots pine single seed in optoelectronic system of mobile grader: Mathematical modeling. Forests, 12(2), 240. DOI: 10.3390/f12020240.

15. Novikova T.P., Tylek P., Mastrangelo C.B., Drapalyuk M.V., Kharin, S.V., and Novikov A.I. (2023). The Root Collar Diameter Growth Reveals a Strong Relationship with the Height Growth of Juvenile Scots Pine Trees from Seeds Differentiated by Spectrometric Feature. Forests, 14(6), 1164, DOI: 10.3390/f14061164.

16. Pan Y., Birdsey R.A., Fang J., Houghton R., Kauppi P.E., Kurz W.A., Phillips O.L., Shvidenko A., Lewis S.L., Canadell J.G., Ciais P., Jackson R.B., Pacala S.W., McGuire A.D., Piao S., RautiainenA., Sitch S., and Hayes D. (2011). A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science, 333(6045), 988–993. DOI: 10.1126/science.1201609.

17. Rabko S.U., Paplauskaya L.F., Tupik P.V., Bilir N., Novikova T.P., and Novikov A.I. (2026). How actinometric processes impact geographical trial plantations? Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica, 29(1), 81–86. DOI: 10.15414/afz.2026.29.01.81-86.

18. Rumyantsev D.E., and Vorobeva N.S. (2023). Vliyanie solnechnoy aktivnosti na rost osiny [The influence of solar activity on aspen growth]. Ecological Monitoring and Ecosystem Modeling, 34(1-2), 128–142. (in Russian).

19. Sandlerskiy R.B., Petrzhik N.M., Jargalsaikhan T., and Shironiya I.I. (2023). Thermodynamic Parameters of Khubsugul Mountain Forests (Khordol-Sardag, Mongolia). Biology Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 50(Suppl. 2), 226–238.

20. Savolainen O., Pyhäjärvi T., and Knürr T. (2007). Gene flow and local adaptation in trees. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 38, 595–619.

21. Sokolov S., Kamenskij V., Novikov A., and Ivetić V. (2019). How to increase the analog-to-digital converter speed in optoelectronic systems of the seed quality rapid analyzer. Inventions, 4(4), 61, DOI: 10.3390/inventions4040061.


Review

For citations:


Rabko S.U., Paplauskaya L.F., Tupik P.V., Sulim P.Ye., Bilir N., Novikova T.P., Novikov A.I. Geographical ranks of ecosystem sustainability: evidence from a 66-year provenance trial of a keystone boreal forest species. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2026;19(3):146-151. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2026-4718

Views: 19

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-9388 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1565 (Online)