Preview

GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY

Advanced search

New trends in urban environmental health research: from geography of diseases to therapeutic landscapes and healing gardens

https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2019-99

Full Text:

Abstract

Urban living style is associated with various negative impacts on human health, e.g. connected with the environmental problems. Thus, promoting health of urban population is nowadays one of the most challenging issues of the 21st century together with the growing needs for sustainable development and establishment of the biophilic or livable cities. It is increasing awareness among researchers and health practitioners of the potential benefits to the health from activities in natural settings and especially from regular contact with nature, which can be perceived as a preventive medical tool. This paper discusses the close relationship between the concepts of health-supporting landscapes and sustainability in modern cities based on literature review and case studies from EU, Russian and Australian projects. We first review the historical and modern paradigms (of the various disciplines) which determine the discourse in nature – human health and well-being research. This includes examination of Hippocrates «naturalistic history», Humboldt’s concept of natural garden design; Oertel ‘s ‘Terrain Kur’; «salutogenic approach» of Antonovsky; McHarg’s Design with Nature; Ecopolis programme, Wilson’s biophilia and some other approaches. Then there is a comparative analysis of structural similarities and differences in the past and current scientific schools devoted to understanding human – landscape interaction. One of the principal arguments is that nature also has another value for health, regardless of natural remedies. It includes, for example, the healing of space, outdoor training trails in parks, everyday use of urban green spaces and peri-urban recreation areas for sport and exercises. We provide an analysis of some examples based on the modern concepts of biophilic cities, therapeutic landscapes, healing gardens, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions. This article also discusses the main types of healing gardens and therapeutic landscapes and suggests the framework of design principles of healing and therapeutic landscapes. The analysis proved that healing gardens and therapeutic landscapes provide multiple benefits and can be regarded as nature-based solutions. These essential aspects of multifunctionality, multiculturality and social inclusion are well intertwined with the approach of biophilia.

About the Authors

Diana Dushkova
Humboldt University Berlin; Lomonosov Moscow State University
Germany

Department of Geography, Berlin;

Faculty of Geography, Moscow



Maria Ignatieva
University of Western Australia, School of Design
Australia


References

1. Agavelov V., Brudny A., Bozhukova E., Kavtaradze D. et al. (1985). Ecopolis Programme. Tsukuba: The International Exposition.

2. Antonovsky A. (1979). Health, Stress and Coping. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass publishers.

3. Belčáková I., Galbavá P., Majorošová M. (2018) Healing and therapeutic landscape design – examples and experience of medical facilities. Archnet-IJAR, 12 (3), 128-151. DOI: 10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i3.1637.

4. Beyer K.M., Kaltenbach A., Szabo A., Bogar S., Nieto F.J. and Malecji K.M. (2014). Exposure to neighborhood green space and mental health: evidence from the survey of the health of Wisconsin. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11, 3453-3472.

5. Brink P., Mutafoglu K., Schweitzer J-P., Kettunen M. et al. (2016) The Health and Social Benefits of Nature and Biodiversity Protection. A report for the European Commission (ENV.B.3/ETU/2014/0039). London/Brussels: Institute for European Environmental Policy.

6. Cooper Marcus C. and Sachs N. (2013). Therapeutic Landscapes: An Evidence-Based Approach to Designing Healing Gardens and Restorative Outdoor Spaces. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

7. Curtis S. (2004). Health and Inequality: Geographical Perspectives. London: SAGE Publications.

8. Da Rocha A.C. (2009). The value of health in the writings of H. D. Thoreau. Environmental values, 18, 201-215.

9. Dushkova D. and Evseev A. (2012). The Russian North: Environment and human health risk assessment. In: H. Kremers and A. Susini, eds., RISK Models and Applications. LNIS 6 – Lecture Notes in Information Sciences. Berlin: CODATA Germany, 89-102.

10. Dushkova D., Ignatieva M. and Melnishuk I. (2020). Urban Greening as a Response to Societal Challenges. Towards Biophilic Megacities (Case Studies of Saint Petersburg and Moscow, Russia). In: J. Breuste, M. Artmann, C. Ioja and S. Qureshi, eds., Making green cities – concepts, challenges and practice. «Cities and Nature» Series. New York, NY: Springer (in press).

11. Dushkova D. and Haase D. (2020). Not Simply Green: Nature-Based Solutions as a Concept and Practical Approach for Sustainability Studies and Planning Agendas in Cities. Land, 9 (1), 19. DOI: 10.3390/land9010019.

12. Duzenli T., Tarakci E., Yılmaz S. (2017) A study on healing effects of hospital gardens. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 26, 12, 7342-7352.

13. Dzik A.J. (1997). Looking for Dangerous Places: Some Aspects of Medical Geography and Disease Mapping. West Virginia Medical Journal, 93, 250-253.

14. EC – European Commission (2015). Towards an EU Research and Innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions & re-naturing cities. Final Report of the Horizon2020 Expert Group on Nature-Based Solutions and Re-Naturing Cities. Brussels: European Commission.

15. Elings M. (2006). People-plant interaction: The physiological, psychological and sociological effects of plants on people, farming for health. In:

16. Hassink J., van Dijk M. (eds). Springer agriculture book. Dodrecht: Springer, 43-55.

17. Frumkin H., Bratman G.N., Breslow S.J., Cochran B. et al. (2017). Nature Contact and Human Health: A Research Agenda. Environ Health Perspectives, 125 (7), 075001. DOI: 10.1289/EHP1663.

18. Gesler W.M. (1992). Therapeutic landscapes: Medical issues in the light of the new cultural geography. Social Science and Medicine, 34 (7), 735-746.

19. Groenewegen P.P., van den Berg A.E., de Vries S. and Verheij R.A. (2006). Vitamin G: effects of green space on health, well-being, and social safety. BMC Public Health, 6, 149. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-149.

20. Gupta K.P., Kumar P., Pathan S.K., Sharma K.P. (2012). Urban neighborhood green index – a measure of green spaces in urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 105 (3), 325-335.

21. Hankey S. and Marshall J.D. (2017). Urban Form, Air Pollution, and Health. Current Environmental Health Reports, 4, 491-503. DOI: 10.1007/ s40572-017-0167-7.

22. Hartig T., Mitchell R., de Vries S. and Frumkin H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 207-228.

23. Hartig T., Mang M., Evans G.W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment ex- periences. Environ Behav. 23(1), 3-26.

24. Humboldt A. (1806). Ideen zu einer Physiognomik der Gewächse. Tübingen: Cotta Verlag (in German).

25. Ignatieva M. (2000). Ecopolis – towards the total holistic city: lessons in integration from throughout the world. In: G. Stewart and M. Ignatieva, eds., Urban biodiversity and ecology as a basis for holistic planning and design. Proceedings of a Workshop at Lincoln University, Lincoln University International Centre for Nature conservation, Publication № 1. Christchurch: Wickliffe Press, 102-105.

26. Ignatieva M. (2018). Biodiversity-friendly designs in cities and towns: Towards a global biodiversinesque style. In: A. Ossola and J. Niemelä, eds., Urban Biodiversity: From Research to Practice. Oxon: Routledge (Routledge Studies in Urban Ecology), 216-235.

27. Janke K., Propper C. and Henderson J. (2009). Do Current Levels of Air Pollution Kill? The Impact of Air Pollution on Population Mortality in England. Health Economics, 18(9), 1031–55.

28. Jiang S. (2014). Therapeutic landscapes and healing gardens: A review of Chinese literature in relation to the studies in western countries. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3, 141–153.

29. Kabisch N. and Haase D. (2018). Urban nature benefits – Opportunities for improvement of health and well-being in times of global change. Newsletter on Housing and Health, 29, 1-11.

30. Kaplan S. (1992). The restorative environment: nature and human experience. Role of horticulture in human well-being and social development: a national symposium, 19-21 April 1990, Arlington, Virginia. Portland: Timber Press, 134-142.

31. Kearn R.A. and Moon G. (2002). From medical to health geography: theory, novelty and place in a decade of change. Progress in Human Geography, 26, 587-607

32. Landrigan P.J. and Fuller R. (2015). Global health and environmental pollution. International Journal of Public Health, 60 (7), 761-762. DOI: 10.1007/s00038-015-0706-7.

33. Lawrence R., Capon A. and Siri H. (2017). Lessons from Hippocrates for contemporary urban health challenges. Cities & Health (1) 1, 72-82. DOI: 10.1080/23748834.2017.1372967

34. Lips-Castro W. (2015). A brief history of the natural causes of human disease. Gaceta Medica de Mexico, 151, 749-761.

35. Li X, Meng Q, Li W, Zhang C, Jancso T, Mavromatis S. 2014. An explorative study on the proximity of buildings to green spaces in urban areas using remotely sensed imagery. Ann GIS 20 (3), 193–203. doi:10.1080/19475683.2014.945482.

36. Maas J., Verheij R.A., de Vries S., Spreeuwenberg P., Schellevis F.G. and Groenewegen P.P. (2009). Morbidity is related to a green living environment. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 63, 967-973.

37. Malkhazova S., Mironova V., Shartova N. and Orlov D. (2019). Mapping Russia’s Natural Focal Diseases: History and Contemporary Approaches. Basel: Springer Nature. DOI. 10.1007/978-3-319-89605-2.

38. Maller C., Townsend M., Pryor A., Brown P., Leger L.S. (2006) Healthy nature – healthy people: ‘contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promotion International, 21 (1), 45-54. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dai032.

39. Marcel M.R., Stadler J., Korn H., Irvine K. and Bonn A. eds. (2019). Biodiversity and Health in the Face of Climate Change. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02318-8.

40. May J. M. (1959). The Ecology of Human Disease. New York, NY: MD Publications Inc. McHarg I.L. (1969). Design with nature. New York, NY: Garden City.

41. Oertel M.J. (1886). Über Terrain-Curorte zur Behandlung von Kranken mit Kreislaufstörungen, Kraftabnahme des Herzmuskels, Lungenkreislauf etc. Leipzig: Vogelverlag (in German).

42. Pavlovsky E.N. (1966). Natural nidality of transmissible diseases. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

43. Pötz H. and Bleuze P. (2012). Urban green-blue grids for sustainable and dynamic cities. Delft: Coop for Life.

44. Revich B. (2018). Priority factors in urban environments that affect the quality of life for metropolitan populations. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 29(3), 267-273. DOI: 10.1134/S1075700718030115.

45. Raymond C.M., Franzeskaki N., Kabisch N. et al. (2017). A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environmental Science & Policy, 77, 15-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008

46. Rohde C.L., Kendle A.D. (1994). Human well-being, natural landscapes and wildlife in urban areas. English Nature Science Publications, Royal Jubilee Hospital Patient Care Centre Project. Pacific Green.

47. Russo A., Ignatieva M., Cirella G. T. et al. (2017) Biophilia: Nature-based solutions for sustainable cities. In: M. Ignatieva et. al., eds., Three pillars of landscape architecture: design, planning and management. S.-Petersburg: S.-Petersburg State Polytechnical University, 105-112.

48. Schweikart R. and Kistemann T. (2013). Mapping health and health care. Kartographische Nachrichten, 63(1), 3-11.

49. Söderback I., Söderström M. and Schälander E. (2004). Horticultural therapy: the «healing garden» and gardening in rehabilitation measures at Danderyd hospital rehabilitation clinic, Sweden. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 7 (4), 245-260.

50. Soga M. and Gaston K.J. (2016). Extinction of experience: the loss of human-nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14, 94-101.

51. Souter-Brown G. (2014). Landscape and Urban Design for Health and Well-Being: Using Healing, Sensory and Therapeutic Gardens. 1st ed. New York, NY: Routledge.

52. Stigsdotter U.A., Grahn P., Stigsdotter U.A., Grahn, P. (2002). What makes a garden a healing garden? Journal of Therapeutical Horticulture 13, 60-69.

53. Sullivan W.S. and Chang Ch.-Y. (2017). Landscapes and Human Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(10), 1212. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14101212.

54. Tzoulas K., Korpela K., Venn S. et al. (2007). Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, 167-178.

55. Valencius C.B. (2000). Histories of medical geography. Medical History. Suppliment, 20, 3-28.

56. van den Bosch M. and Bird W. (2018) Oxford Textbook of Nature and Public Health: The Role of Nature in Improving the Health of a Population. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

57. WHO-UNEP Health and Environment Linkages Initiative (2008). Health environment: managing the linkages for sustainable development: a toolkit for decision-makers: synthesis report. World Health Organization. Available at: www.apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43946 [Accessed 1 June 2019].

58. Williams A. (2017). Therapeutic Landscapes. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315551166.

59. Wilson E.O. (1986). Biophilia: the Human Bond with Other Species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

60. Wood C.J., Pretty J. and Griffin M. (2016). A case-control study of the health and well-being benefits of allotment gardening. Journal of Public Health, 38, e336-e344.


For citation:


Dushkova D., Ignatieva M. New trends in urban environmental health research: from geography of diseases to therapeutic landscapes and healing gardens. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2020;13(1):159-171. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2019-99

Views: 469


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-9388 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1565 (Online)