Historical land systems of Russia: trends, biases, and gaps in the literature
https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2026-4297
Abstract
This paper presents a systematic literature review of 210 peer-reviewed studies to analyze the state and trends of Land System Science (LSS) research on historical land use and land cover change in Russia from 2000 to 2024. The review reveals a significant and persistent geographical bias, with the vast majority of case studies concentrated in the European part of Russia (e.g., Belgorod, Tula, Moscow regions), while vast areas of Siberia, the Far East, and the Arctic remain critically understudied. Thematically, research is dominated by studies on agricultural land abandonment and forest landscape dynamics, with urban landscapes receiving scant attention. Long-term studies covering periods of more than a century are prevalent. However, their analytical depth is often limited by reliance on historical surveys or aggregated statistics. Satellite remote sensing, especially Landsat images, is the most common source of data. These images are often combined with other types of data. The use of historical cartographic sources (e.g., General Land Survey plans) is hindered by issues of accessibility, digitization, and often insufficient thematic detail for comprehensive landscape analysis. Consequently, studies often use just two time points and a single spatial scale, typically based on administrative rather than biogeographical units. The review identifies a clear linguistic and international visibility gap: 82% of publications are in Russian only, and a substantial portion appear in journals not indexed in international databases, limiting their global integration. Furthermore, a concerning number of studies (74%) do not systematically analyze the driving forces behind the observed landscape changes. This synthesis underscores the urgent need to address regional research disparities, enhance the methodological depth by integrating multi-source historical data and robust causal analysis, and improve the international accessibility of Russian LSS research. By doing so, the Russian LSS community can not only fill critical knowledge gaps within the country but also make a more substantial contribution to global land change science, offering unique insights from its vast and diverse socio-ecological systems.
Keywords
About the Authors
V. M. MatasovRussian Federation
Staromonetniy lane, 29/4, Moscow, 119017;
11 Pokrovsky Bulvar, Moscow, 109028
A. A. Aleinikov
Russian Federation
Staromonetniy lane, 29/4, Moscow, 119017
A. G. Purekhovsky
Russian Federation
Staromonetniy lane, 29/4, Moscow, 119017
A. N. Gunya
Russian Federation
Staromonetniy lane, 29/4, Moscow, 119017
References
1. Aleinikov A A. (2021). Historical and Geografic Factors of Intactness of the Primary Dark Coniferous Forests of Northern Ural. Russian Journal of Forest Science, (6), 593–608, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.31857/S0024114821060036.
2. Aleinikov A.A., Aleksutin V.E., Vozmitel F.K., and Gunya A.N. (2024). Long-term dynamics of forests with Pinus sibirica in the upper reaches of the River Kolva (Northern Pre-Urals, Russia) from 1938 to 2023. Nature Conservation Research, 9(3), 49–56, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2024.022.
3. Alix-Garcia J., Munteanu C., Zhao N., Potapov, P.V, Prishchepov A.V, Radeloff V.C., … and Bragina E. (2016). Drivers of forest cover change in Eastern Europe and European Russia, 1985–2012. Land Use Policy, 59, 284–297, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.014.
4. Alyabina I.O., Golubinsky A.A., Kirillova V.A., and Khitrov D.A. (2015). Soil resources and agriculture in the center of European Russia at the end of the 18th century. Eurasian Soil Science, 48(11), 1182–1192, DOI: 10.1134/S1064229315110034.
5. Andreeva O.V., Lobkovsky V.A., Kust G.S., and Zonn I.S. (2021). The Concept of Sustainable Land Management: Modern State, Models and Typology Development. Arid Ecosystems, 11(1), 1–10, DOI: 10.1134/S2079096121010029.
6. Angelstam P., Manton M., Elbakidze M., Sijtsma F., Adamescu M.C., Avni N., … and Yamelynets T. (2019). LTSER platforms as a place-based transdisciplinary research infrastructure: learning landscape approach through evaluation. Landscape Ecology, 34(7), 1461–1484, DOI: 10.1007/s10980-018-0737-6.
7. Arkhipova M.V. (2020). Forest cover changes in the center of east European plain over the last 150 years. Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 13, 825–834, DOI: 10.1134/S1995425520070033.
8. Avvakumova А.О. (2018). Land-Use Structure Dynamics Analysis Using the Earth Remote Sensing Data. Belgorod State University Scientific bulletin Natural Sciences, 37(2), 214–222, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.18413/2075-4671-2018-42-2-214-222.
9. Barmin A.M., Iolin M.M., Sharova I.S., and Golub V.B. (2011). Structure and Dynamics of Land Use in the Astrakhan Region. Geology, Geography, and Global Energy, 42(3), 143–149, (in Russian with English summary).
10. Bastian O., Grunewald K., and Khoroshev A.V. (2015). The significance of geosystem and landscape concepts for the assessment of ecosystem services: exemplified in a case study in Russia. Landscape Ecology, 30(7), 1145–1164, DOI: 10.1007/s10980-015-0200-x.
11. Belevantsev V., Chendev Y., Terehin E., Lebedeva M., and Solovyov A. (2019). GIS Based Analysis of Forest Cover Change in Belgorod Oblast, Russia: 1780s-2010s. International Journal of Geoinformatics, 15(4), 11–18.
12. Belonovskaya Y.A., Krenke A.N., Tishkov A.A., and Tsarevskaya, N.G. (2015). Natural and anthropogenic fragmentation of vegetation of Valday lake area. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya, (5), 67–82, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.15356/0373-2444-2014-5-67-82.
13. Belousova A. (2024). Influence of Landscape Features on the Dynamics of Forest Overgrowth on the Former Agricultural Lands of the Perm Krai. Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 17(7), 1014–1020, DOI: 10.1134/S1995425524700690.
14. Belousova A., and Bryzhko, I. (2021). Analysis of overgrowing of agricultural lands on the Perm region based on Landsat satellite images. InterCarto. InterGIS, 27(4), 150–161, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2021-4-27-150-161.
15. Belyaeva N., and Popov S. (2016). 200 years long record of forest cover changes in Vereya Uyezd, Moscow Oblast. Lesovedenie, (1), 44–54, (in Russian with English summary).
16. Bergen K.M., Loboda T., Newell J.P., Kharuk V., Hitztaler S., Sun G., Johnson T., Hoffman-Hall A., Ouyang W., Park K., Fort C., and Gargulinski E. (2020). Long-term trends in anthropogenic land use in Siberia and the Russian Far East: a case study synthesis from Landsat. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 105007, DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab98b7.
17. Beshentsev A.N., Petrov S.A., Borisova T.A., and Lubsanov A.A. (2024). Cartographic assessment of the long-term dynamics of the nature use of the delta territory by different-time topographic maps. Vestnik SSUGT, 29(2), 62–72, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.33764/2411-1759-2024-29-2-62-72.
18. Bocharnikov V.N., Steblyanskaya A.N. (Eds.) Humans in the Siberian Landscapes. Ethocultural Dynamics and Interaction with Nature and Space. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-90061-8.
19. Boillat S., Scarpa F.M., Robson J.P., Gasparri I., Aide T.M., Aguiar A.P.D., … and Brondizio E.S. (2017). Land system science in Latin America: challenges and perspectives. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 37–46, DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.015.
20. Borisova O.K. (2021). Landscape and Climatic Conditions in the Central East European Plain in the last 22 Thousand Years: Reconstruction based on Paleobotanical Data. Water Resources, 48(6), 886–896, DOI: 10.1134/S0097807821060038.
21. Broushkov A.., Vasina, A.I., Kiyashko N.V., Melnikov M.I., Osokin A.A., Chernyak Y.V., and Falaleeva A.A. (2024). Global warming and permafrost condition in Russia. Moscow University Bulletin Series 4 Geology, (6), 4–11, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.55959/MSU0579-9406-4-2024-63-6-4-11.
22. Bukvareva E, Zamolodchikov D., and Grunewald K. (2019). National assessment of ecosystem services in Russia: Methodology and main problems. Science of The Total Environment, 655, 1181–1196, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.286.
23. Bukvareva E., Grunewald K., Klimanova O., Kolbovsky E., Shcherbakov A., Sviridova T., and Zamolodchikov D. (2021). TEEB-Russia: Towards National Ecosystem Accounting. Sustainability, 13(12), 6678, DOI: 10.3390/su13126678.
24. Chendev Y.G., Lupo A.R., Terekhin E.A., Smirnova M.A., Gennadiev A.N., Narozhnyaya A.G., … and Belevantsev V.G. (2023). Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Forest Vegetation and Their Impacts on Soil Properties in the Forest-Steppe Zone of Central Russian Upland: A Remote Sensing, GIS Analysis, and Field Studies Approach. Forests, 14(10), 2079, DOI: 10.3390/f14102079.
25. Chernova O.V, Ryzhova I.M., and Podvezennaya M.A. (2018). The Effect of Historical and Regional Features of Land Use on the Size and Structure of Carbon Pools in the Southern Taiga and Forest-Steppe Zones of European Russia. Eurasian Soil Science, 51(6), 709–719, DOI: 10.1134/S106422931804004X.
26. Danilov-Danilyan V.I., Klyuev N.N., and Kotlyakov V.M. (2023). Russia in the Global Natural and Ecological Space. Regional Research of Russia, 13(1), 34–57, DOI: 10.1134/S2079970522700472.
27. de Bremond A., Ehrensperger A., Providoli I., and Messerli P. (2019). What role for global change research networks in enabling transformative science for global sustainability? A Global Land Programme perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 38, 95–102, DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.05.006.
28. Dolgov Y.I., Sergeev S.V, and Nikonov A.V. (2018). To The 100th Anniversary Of Creating The Topographic Service Of The Red Army. Interexpo Geo-Siberia, 10, 46–57, (in Russian with English summary).
29. Dolman A.J., Shvidenko A., Schepaschenko D., Ciais P., Tchebakova N., Chen T., … Schulze E.-D. (2012). An estimate of the terrestrial carbon budget of Russia using inventory-based, eddy covariance and inversion methods. Biogeosciences, 9(12), 5323–5340, DOI: 10.5194/bg-9-5323-2012.
30. Dushkova D., Konstantinova A., Matasov V., Gaeva D., Dovletyarova E., and Taherkhani M. (2025). Urban ecosystem services research in Russia: Systematic review on the state of the art. Ambio, 54(4), 577–602, DOI: 10.1007/s13280-024-02102-8.
31. Ellis E. C., Klein Goldewijk K., Siebert S., Lightman D., and Ramankutty N. (2010). Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19(5), 589–606, DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00540.x.
32. Ershov D.V, Gavrilyuk E.A., Koroleva N.V, Belova E.I., Tikhonova E.V, Shopina O.V, Titovets A.V., Tikhonov G.N. (2022). Natural Afforestation on Abandoned Agricultural Lands during Post-Soviet Period: A Comparative Landsat Data Analysis of Bordering Regions in Russia and Belarus. Remote Sensing, 14(2), 322, DOI: 10.3390/rs14020322.
33. Fetisov D.M. (2014). Land Use Development and Changes in Anthropogenic Pressure in the Russian Amur Region. Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories, 6(2), 69–75, (in Russ.).
34. Filimonova L.V. (2021). Vegetation dynamics in the Kostomuksha State Nature Reserve (Russia) and surroundings against changes in the natural environment during the Holocene. Nature Conservation Research, 6 (Suppl. 1), 98–115, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2021.019.
35. Foley J.A., DeFries R., Asner G.P., Barford C., Bonan G., Carpenter S.R., … Snyder P.K. (2005). Global Consequences of Land Use. Science, 309(5734), 570–574, DOI: 10.1126/science.1111772.
36. Frolova M. (2019). From the Russian/Soviet landscape concept to the geosystem approach to integrative environmental studies in an international context. Landscape Ecology, 34(7), 1485–1502, DOI: 10.1007/s10980-018-0751-8.
37. Geist H.J., and Lambin E.F. (2002). Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation. BioScience, 52(2), 143–150, DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:PCAUDF]2.0.CO;2.
38. Goldenberg L.A., and Postnikov, A.V. (1985). Development of mapping methods in Russia in the eighteenth century. Imago Mundi, 37(1), 63–80, DOI: 10.1080/03085698508592588.
39. Golubinsky A.A., Alyabina I.O., Shalashova O.V, and Khitrov D.A. (2013). From survey plans to land cover maps: data generalization in the cartographic materials of the General Land Survey in Russia (1765–1800). In: Proceedings of the 26th International Cartographic Conference, 1–7, (in Russ.).
40. Golubinsky A.A., Khitrov D.A., and Chernenko D.A. (2011). Final Text Of The General Land Survey: On Generalization and Analysis. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 8: History, (3), 35–51, (in Russian with English summary).
41. Grove J.M., and Pickett S.T. (2019). From transdisciplinary projects to platforms: expanding capacity and impact of land systems knowledge and decision making. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 38, 7–13, DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.04.001.
42. Gunya A. (2017). Land Reforms in Post-Socialist Mountain Regions and their Impact on Land Use Management: a Case Study from the Caucasus. Revue de Géographie Alpine, (105–1), DOI: 10.4000/rga.3563
43. Gutman G., and Radeloff V. (Eds.). (2017). Land-Cover and Land-Use Changes in Eastern Europe after the Collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Cham: Springer International Publishing, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42638-9
44. Herrero-Jáuregui C., Arnaiz-Schmitz C., Reyes M. F., Telesnicki M., Agramonte I., Easdale, M.H., …and Montes C. (2018). What do We Talk about When We Talk about Social-Ecological Systems? A Literature Review. Sustainability, 10(8), 2950, DOI: 10.3390/su10082950.
45. Hurtt G.C., Chini L.P., Frolking S., Betts R.A., Feddema J., Fischer G., …and Wang Y.P. (2011). Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands. Climatic Change, 109(1–2), 117–161, DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0153-2.
46. Ioffe G., Nefedova T., and Zaslavsky I. (2004). From Spatial Continuity to Fragmentation: The Case of Russian Farming. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 913–943.
47. Ivanova N.N., Fomicheva D.V., and Shamshurina E.N. (2023). Changes in the cropland areas over 250 years (case study a key plot in the Moscow region). Lomonosov Geography Journal, 78(3), 52–67, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.55959/MSU0579-9414.5.78.3.5
48. Jepsen M.R., Kuemmerle T., Müller D., Erb K., Verburg P.H., Haberl H., …and Reenberg A. (2015). Transitions in European land-management regimes between 1800 and 2010. Land Use Policy, 49, 53–64, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.003.
49. Josephson P., Dronin N., Mnatsakanian R., Cherp A., Efremenko D., and Larin V. (2013). An Environmental History of Russia. Cambridge University Press, DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139021043.
50. Kanischev V.V, Kunavin K.S., and Lyamin S.K. (2020). Resettlement in a rural region in the late 18th and early 19th century as an anthropogenic impact on the environment. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series History and Philology, 30(4), 589–597, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.35634/2412-9534-2020-30-4-589-597.
51. Khoroshev A.V, and Dyakonov K.N. (Eds.) (2020). Landscape Patterns in a Range of Spatio-Temporal Scales. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-31185-8.
52. Kitov M.V, and Tsapkov N.A. (2015). Assessment of the area of fallow land in the Belgorod region and other regions of European Russia for the period 1990–2013 years. Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Natural sciences, 15(212), 163–171, (in Russ.).
53. Klein Goldewijk K., Beusen A., van Drecht G., and de Vos M. (2011). The HYDE 3.1 spatially explicit database of human-induced global landuse change over the past 12,000 years. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20(1), 73–86, DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00587.x.
54. Klein Goldewijk K., and Verburg P. H. (2013). Uncertainties in global-scale reconstructions of historical land use: an illustration using the HYDE data set. Landscape Ecology, 28(5), 861–877, DOI: 10.1007/s10980-013-9877-x.
55. Kosenkov G.L., Kolbovsky E.Yu. (2012). Periodization and reconstruction of Historical Development of the Territory of the national Park @ Smolensk lakeland@ for Typology of the Cultural Landscape. Yarosl. Pedagog. Vestnik, 3(4), 232–238, (in Russian with English summary).
56. Kozykin A.V., and Nakvasina E.N. (2024). Study of the structure of land in the 18th–21st centuries using GIS-technology methods in Kenozersky national park. Geoinformatika, (2), 4–11, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.47148/1609-364X-2024-2-4-11.
57. Kraemer R., Prishchepov A.V, Müller D., Kuemmerle T., Radeloff V.C., Dara A., … Frühauf M. (2015). Long-term agricultural land-cover change and potential for cropland expansion in the former Virgin Lands area of Kazakhstan. Environmental Research Letters, 10(5), 054012, DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/5/054012.
58. Kukushkina O.V, Alyabina I.O., and Golubinskii A.A. (2018). Experience in Reconstruction of Agricultural Land Use for Balakhna District of Nizhniy Novgorod Gubernia in the 18th–19th Centuries (on the Basis of Cartographic Sources). Eurasian Soil Science, 51(7), 803–813, DOI: 10.1134/S1064229318070062.
59. Kurganova I.N., Karelin D.V., Kotlyakov V.M., Prokushkin A.S., Zamolodchikov D.G., Ivanov A.V., … Shmakova N.Y. (2024). A Pilot National Network for Monitoring Soil Respiration in Russia: First Results and Prospects of Development. Doklady Earth Sciences, 519(1), 1947–1954, DOI: 10.1134/S1028334X24603377.
60. Kuricheva O.A., Avilov V.K., Varlagin A.V., Gitarskiy M.L., Dmitrichenko A.A., Dyukarev E.A., … Kurbatova Y.A. (2023). RuFlux: The Network of the Eddy Covariance Sites in Russia. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk Seriya Geograficheskaya, 87(4), 512–535, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.31857/S2587556623040052.
61. Kusov V. S. (1993). Quality of maps of land-surveying and the possibility of their use for retrospective mapping. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya, (3), 66–76, (in Russ.).
62. Lambin E.F., Turner B.L., Geist H.J., Agbola S.B., Angelsen A., Bruce, J.W., … Xu J. (2001). The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 11(4), 261–269, DOI: 10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3.
63. Levchenkov A. (2016). Changes in the cultural landscape of the Kaliningrad region’s periphery in the 19th/20th centuries. Baltic Region, 1(8), 93–114, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2016-1-8
64. Levers C., Müller D., Erb K., Haberl H., Jepsen M.R., Metzger M. J., …and Kuemmerle T. (2018). Archetypical patterns and trajectories of land systems in Europe. Regional Environmental Change, 18(3), 715–732, DOI: 10.1007/s10113-015-0907-x.
65. Liu M., and Tian H. (2010). China’s land cover and land use change from 1700 to 2005: Estimations from high‐resolution satellite data and historical archives. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 24(3), 2009GB003687, DOI: 10.1029/2009GB003687.
66. Loiko S.V., Tkacheva A.A., Istigechev G.I., Kuzmina D.M., and Kulizhski S.P. (2024). Historical Context for Abandoned lands and land use in the area of Luvic Greyzemic Phaeozems of the Northern Pritomye (West Siberia). The Journal of Soil and Environment, 7(3), 1–26, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.31251/pos.v7i3.283.
67. Lyuri D.I., Goryachkin S.V, Karavaeva N.A., Denisenko E.A., and Nefedova T.G. (2010). Dynamics of agricultural lands of Russia in XX century and postagrogenic restoration of vegetation and soils. Moscow: GEOS. (in Russ.)
68. Lyuri D.I., Nekrich A.S., and Karelin D.V. (2018). Cropland Dynamics In Russia In 1990–2015 And Soil Emission Of Carbon Dioxide. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya, (3), 70–76.
69. Magliocca N.R., Rudel T.K., Verburg P.H., McConnell W.J., Mertz O., Gerstner K., … Ellis E.C. (2015). Synthesis in land change science: methodological patterns, challenges, and guidelines. Regional Environmental Change, 15(2), 211–226, DOI: 10.1007/s10113-014-0626-8.
70. Makenova S.K., and Stepanov A.S. (2017). Dynamics of Land Use Structure Formation in the Northern Zone of the Omsk Region. Omsk Scientific Bulletin, 118(1), 3–7, (in Russ.).
71. Matasov V. (2016). Methodological aspects of the analysis of the spatial structure of land Kasimov district at the end of the XVIII century. Geodesy and Cartography, (3), 59–64, (in Russian with English summary).
72. Matasov V., Prishchepov A., Jepsen, M.R., and Müller D. (2019). Spatial determinants and underlying drivers of land-use transitions in European Russia from 1770 to 2010. Journal of Land Use Science, 14(4–6), 362–377, DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2019.1709224
73. Meyfroidt P, Roy ChowdhuryR., De Bremond, A., Ellis E.C., Erb K.-H., Filatova T., … Verburg P.H. (2018). Middle-range theories of land system change. Global Environmental Change, 53, 52–67, DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.006
74. Meyfroidt P., Lambin E.F., Erb K.-H., and Hertel T.W. (2013). Globalization of land use: distant drivers of land change and geographic displacement of land use. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(5), 438–444, DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.04.003.
75. Meyfroidt P., Schierhorn F., Prishchepov A., Muller D., and Kuemmerle T. (2016). Drivers, Constraints and Trade-Offs Associated with Recultivating Abandoned Cropland in Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, (2), 55–103, (in Russ.), DOI: 10.14530/se.2016.2.055-103.
76. Moon D. (2013). The Plough that Broke the Steppes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556434.001.0001 Musievskiy A. (2013). Dynamics of forest cover and forest fund structure of the Voronezh Region. Forestry Engineering Journal, 3(3), 13–21, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.12737/1767.
77. Newbold T., Hudson L.N., Hill S.L.L., Contu, S., Lysenko I., Senior R.A., … Purvis A. (2015). Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature, 520(7545), 45–50, DOI: 10.1038/nature14324
78. Novenko E., Shilov P., Khitrov D., and Kozlov D. (2017). The last hundred years of land use history in the southern part of Valdai Hills (European Russia): Reconstruction by pollen and historical data. Studia Quaternaria, 34(2), 73–81, DOI: 10.1515/squa-2017-006.
79. Novenko E., Tsyganov A., Mazei N., Kupriyanov D., Rudenko O., Bobrovsky M., …
80. Nizovtsev V.A. (2019). Palaeoecological evidence for climatic and human impacts on vegetation in the temperate deciduous forest zone of European Russia during the last 4200 years: A case study from the Kaluzhskiye Zaseki Nature Reserve. Quaternary International, 516, 58–69, DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2018.06.028.
81. Ogureeva G.N., Leonova N.B., Buldakova E.V., Kadetov N.G., Arkhipova M.V., Miklyaeva I.M., Bocharnikov M.V., Dudov S.V., Ignatova E.A., Ignatov M.S. et al. (2018). The Biomes of Russia. Map. Scale 1:7,500,00. Second Revised Edition. 2018. Available online: https://www.elibrary.ru/ item.asp?id=36725020 (accessed on 25 November 2025).
82. Pazur R., Prishchepov A.V, Myachina K., Verburg P.H., Levykin S., Ponkina E.V, … Bürgi M. (2021). Restoring steppe landscapes: patterns, drivers and implications in Russia’s steppes. Landscape Ecology, 36(2), 407–425, DOI: 10.1007/s10980-020-01174-7.
83. Plieninger T., Draux H., Fagerholm N., Bieling C., Bürgi M., Kizos T., … Verburg P.H. (2016). The driving forces of landscape change in Europe: A systematic review of the evidence. Land Use Policy, 57, 204–214, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.040.
84. Postnikov A.V, and Melnikova E.B. (1980). Maps and related materials of the XVIII—XIX centuries as sources for studying changes in the natural environment of Central Russia. In: The use of old maps in geographical and historical research. Moscow: Moscow branch of the Geographical Society of the USSR, 42–65.
85. Prishchepov A., Schierhorn F., Dronin N., Ponkina E., and Müller D. (2020). 800 Years of Agricultural Land-use Change in Asian (Eastern) Russia. In: M. Frühauf, G. Guggenberger, T. Meinel, I. Theesfeld, and S. Lentz (Eds.) KULUNDA: Climate Smart Agriculture. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 67–87, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-15927-6_6.
86. Prishchepov A., Müller D., Baumann M., Kuemmerle T., Alcantara C., and Radeloff V. (2017). Underlying Drivers and Spatial Determinants of post-Soviet Agricultural Land Abandonment in Temperate Eastern Europe. In: G. Gutman and V. Radeloff (Eds.), Land-Cover and Land-Use Changes in Eastern Europe after the Collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 91–117, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42638-9_5.
87. Prishchepov A., Müller D., Dubinin M., Baumann M., and Radeloff V. (2013). Determinants of agricultural land abandonment in post-Soviet European Russia. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 873–884, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.011
88. Romanovsky V., Drozdov D., Oberman N., Malkova G., Kholodov A., Marchenko S. … Vasiliev A. (2010). Thermal state of permafrost in Russia. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 21(2), 136–155, DOI: 10.1002/ppp.683
89. Schierhorn F., Müller D., Beringer T., Prishchepov A., Kuemmerle T., and Balmann A. (2013). Post-Soviet cropland abandonment and carbon sequestration in European Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 27(4), 1175–1185, DOI: 10.1002/2013GB004654
90. Shapovalov D.A., Koroleva P.V., Dolinina E.A., and Rukhovich D.I. (2018). Assessment of Waterlogging on the Change of Types of Land Use of Arable Land of the Tambov Region in 1968–2018 by Methods of Retrospective Monitoring of the Soil-Land Cover. Belgorod State University Scientific bulletin Natural Sciences, 42(3), 358–379, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.18413/2075-4671-2018-42-3-358-379.
91. Shilov P.M., and Kozlov D. (2019). Soil-agro-ecological assessment of the arable land of the Valdai upland based on the general survey. Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin, (98), 5–36, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.19047/0136-1694-2019-98-5-36
92. Singh S.J., Haberl H., Gaube V., Grünbühel C.M., Lisivieveci P., Lutz, J., … and Wildenberg, M. (2010). Conceptualising Long-Term Socioecological Research (LTSER): Integrating the Social Dimension. In: Long-Term Ecological Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 377–398, DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8782-9_26.
93. Smirnova O.V, Bobrovsky M.V, and Khanina L.G. (Eds.). (2017). European Russian Forests. Their Current State and Features of Their History. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, DOI: 10.1007/978-94-024-1172-0.
94. Tishkov A. (2012). Conservation of Russian Arctic biodiversity. Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 5(3), 48–63, DOI: 10.24057/2071- 9388-2012-5-3-48-63
95. Trapeznikova O.N. (2017). Historical analysis of the dynamics of agriculture in the forest zone of the East European plain. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya, (2), 87–99, (in Russian with English summary), DOI: 10.15356/0373-2444-2017-2-87-99.
96. Turner B.L., Lambin E.F., and Reenberg A. (2007). The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(52), 20666–20671, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0704119104.
97. Vampilova L.B., Sikan A.V. (2023). Changing the Species Composition of Karelian Forests: A Historical and Geoecological Approach. Regional Geosystems, 47(1), 126–144. DOI: 10.52575/2712-7443-2023-47-1-126-144.
98. Velichko A.A., Grichuk V.P., Borisova O.K., Gurtovaya E.E., Zelikson E.M., and Barash M. (2016). The Last Interglacial paleotemperatures of the Northern Hemisphere. Maps.
99. Verburg P.H., Erb K.-H., Mertz O., Espindola G. (2013). Land System Science: between global challenges and local realities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(5), 433–437, DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.08.001.
100. Vinogradova O. (2020a). Dynamics of Agricultural Land Use in North-West Russia and the Baltic States. Bulletin of the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University. Series: Natural Sciences and Medicine, (1), 18–29, (in Russian with English summary).
101. Vinogradova O. (2020b). Transformation of the landscape structure of the Kaliningrad region as a result of the dynamics of natural use systems for 80 years. Scientific Notes of the Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, 6(3), 181–199, (in Russian with English summary).
Review
For citations:
Matasov V.M., Aleinikov A.A., Purekhovsky A.G., Gunya A.N. Historical land systems of Russia: trends, biases, and gaps in the literature. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2026;19(2):186-201. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2026-4297
JATS XML
































