Preview

GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY

Advanced search

Four Decades of Tree Cover and Grassland Dynamics in the Foothills of the Western Himalayas – Chamoli District of Uttarakhand, India

https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2025-3904

Contents

Scroll to:

Abstract

The study investigates the dynamics of land use and land cover changes and their impacts on tree cover and grasslands in the Chamoli district of Uttarakhand over four decades (1983-2023). Using multi-temporal satellite data analysis, the research examines vegetation patterns across different elevation zones ranging from 683m to 7801m. The findings reveal significant variations in tree cover, with an initial increase from 224,027 hectares in 1983 to fluctuations leading to 323,554 hectares by 2023. Tree cover showed remarkable expansion at higher elevations, particularly in the 4149-5152m zone, increasing from 147 hectares to 44,189 hectares. This indicates significant upward migration. Grassland areas demonstrated considerable variability, expanding from 93,647 hectares in 1983 to 118,330 hectares in 2023. The study identifies a clear spatial pattern with consistently higher vegetation density in the southern region, while the northern portion exhibits notably lower coverage. This north-south vegetation gradient persists throughout the temporal sequence, suggesting underlying environmental and human influences. The research also highlights concerning trends in other land cover types, including an increase in barren land and a massive decrease in snow cover, indicating significant changes. These transformations have important implications for local ecosystems, biodiversity, and communities dependent on these landscapes. The findings contribute to understanding the complex interactions between climate change, land management practices, and vegetation dynamics in high-altitude regions, providing valuable insights for conservation strategies and sustainable resource management.

For citations:


Kumar R., Pandey B., Rathore J., Sharma Ch. Four Decades of Tree Cover and Grassland Dynamics in the Foothills of the Western Himalayas – Chamoli District of Uttarakhand, India. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2025;18(4):19-35. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2025-3904

INTRODUCTION

Climate change and human activities have significantly altered mountain ecosystems worldwide, particularly affecting vegetation patterns and land use dynamics (Rawat & Schickhoff 2022). Land use and land cover (LULC) are changing in the Himalayan region, which has a major effect on the local landscape. Examining how the landscape has altered over the last several decades shows important trends that shed light on how ecological conditions and biophysical markers have evolved (Flantua et al. 2007). Changes in vegetation migration to higher altitudes indicate warming temperature conditions in the region, leading to changes in vegetation composition and biodiversity (Grace et al. 2002; Holtmeier and Broll 2005; Holtmeier and Broll 2007; Harsch et al. 2009; Harsch et al. 2011; Holtmeier and Broll 2012). Trees and plant species that previously thrived at lower elevations have established themselves at higher altitudes (Kullman 2001; Liu et al. 2002; Jobbagy and Jackson 2003; Payette 2007). The altered landscape affects resource availability for both ecosystems and humans in the region. These ecological changes have direct socio-economic implications for the dependent population (Bagchi et al. 2004; Hansen et al. 2008). Local traditions are particularly impacted (Kumar et. al. 2025). The livelihoods of pastoral communities may be affected if grazing patterns need to change in response to shifts in vegetation and water supplies (Mishra 2001).

Worldwide, changing climates and land use practices are causing forests to encroach more into grasslands, reducing biodiversity, and altering ecosystem functions and services. Such alterations affect the socio-economic conditions of the people involved (Schickhoff et al. 2005). Higher altitudes, being more sensitive to changes, are experiencing rapid shifts. Himalayan ecosystems are particularly vulnerable to climate-induced vegetation changes. Shrubs and other vegetation are moving upwards in mountain regions. Forests encroaching into alpine meadows lead to changes in land cover and fragmentation of alpine habitats (Anderson et al. 2020). The rich biodiversity of the Himalayas helps to support local people’s livelihoods through their reliance on resources from the natural ecosystem (Joshi and Negi 2011). The local community’s livelihood depends mainly on traditional practices related to livestock and farming (Lefroy et al. 2000; Von Wiren-Lehr 2001). Any land-use change in forests or nearby ecotones will affect forestry, pastoralism, agriculture, livestock, Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs), livelihood services, and biodiversity. Land use and land-cover changes directly or indirectly influence the natural landscape, which in turn affects the services provided by the ecosystem (Quéttier et al. 2007). However, in the Himalayan states, livestock density and pastoralism are declining in many areas, which allows vegetation to move upslope in some regions (Suwal et al. 2016). These changes will significantly impact the livelihoods of forest-dependent communities. Climate change has a profound effect on vegetation growth. Therefore, the role of climate in changing the vegetation structure of any region cannot be ignored (Duffy et al. 2015). Vegetation growth is encouraged by warm climatic conditions. Higher elevations that previously lacked vegetation will develop growth and regeneration due to favourable and suitable conditions (Payette et al. 2007; Pepin et al. 2015). Globally, meta-analyses of treelines have shown that treelines in most regions are advancing poleward or upwards. Thus, regional responses of treelines can be linked to changing local or regional elements that influence treeline positions. An upward shift of vegetation has been observed in about 52% of studies worldwide (Harsch et al. 2009). Studies along the treeline ecotone in the western Himalayas indicate both an increase and a decrease in vegetation along the treeline zone (Rai et al. 2012). A common method for monitoring vegetation shifts involves analysing remotely sensed data (Purekhovsky et al. 2025).

Remote sensing helps to overcome the difficulties posed by direct observation in poorly accessible terrain. Remote sensing investigations indicated an upward shift of the treeline up to 388 m in Uttarakhand between 1970 and 2006 (Singh et al. 2012). The shift in altitudinal structure and change in vegetation has been attempted in the western Himalayas based on remote sensing tools (Singh et al. 2012; Sah et al. 2023). However, the lack of methodological errors and sufficient ground observation verification made these studies less accepted. Recent studies have documented significant land use and land cover (LULC) changes across Uttarakhand (Singh and Singh, 1987). The Garhwal Himalayan region has experienced substantial forest fragmentation, with the loss of forest cover and the loss of grassland cover in the Rudraprayag district (Forest Survey of India, 2019). Studies have documented shifts of 23-998 m in species’ upper elevation limits and a mean upward displacement rate of 27.53±22.04 m/decade in Himalayan ecosystems (Rana et al. 2019). Key species exhibiting these elevational shifts include Abies spectabilis, Betula utilis, and Rhododendron campanulatum (Rawal et al. 2025). More temperature-sensitive functional groups, such as dwarf shrubs, herbs, grasses, bryophytes, and lichens in the Himalayas, have migrated northwards to cooler climates (Rana et al. 2019). It is essential to comprehend these interrelated changes to create plans to lessen the negative effects of these changes, guarantee sustainable livelihoods, and preserve the ecosystem. The land use and land cover patterns in high-altitude regions have changed significantly, and this is especially evident in the Himalayan region. The Chamoli district presents a unique case study for understanding these dynamics with its diverse elevation gradient range. The changes at various altitudes limit the quantity and quality of forage, which directly impacts land use practices and local livelihoods (Tasser and Tappeiner, 2002). This study examines four decades (1983-2023) of land use and land cover changes in Chamoli, focusing particularly on tree cover and grassland dynamics. The research aims to quantify these changes across different elevation zones.

Study Area

Chamoli district is in the Garhwal Himalayas of Uttarakhand, India. It is a high-altitude mountainous area known for its varied topography, rich biodiversity, and ecological importance. The district is located between 30°05'N to 31°25’N latitudes and 79°10’E to 80°30’E longitudes. It covers an area of approximately 8,030 km². The terrain features steep slopes, deep valleys, and high-altitude meadows (Bugyals). Elevations range from 800 m to over 7,800 m, including peaks such as Nanda Devi (7,816 m). Chamoli has a temperate to alpine climate. The lower valleys receive moderate rainfall during monsoons, while higher elevations experience heavy snowfall in winter. The region is home to treeline ecotones, where the transition between subalpine forests and alpine meadows takes place. Major vegetation types include oak, rhododendron, and coniferous forests at lower altitudes, which gradually change to alpine grasslands. Chamoli is ecologically vital, shown by its diverse land use types. Chamoli is a critical site for studying treeline shifts, meadow dynamics, and ecological responses to climate change.

Methodology

The study uses a combination of remote sensing and GIS techniques to analyse changes in land use and land cover, vegetation density patterns, and treeline and grassland cover over time. Multi-temporal satellite images from 1983, 1993, 2003, 2013, and 2023 were used to detect changes in vegetation cover, grasslands, and treelines. Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data is also used to extract topographic parameters such as elevation. DEM processing and GIS-based spatial analysis help in understanding terrain characteristics that influence vegetation and land cover dynamics. To ensure consistency and accuracy in data analysis, satellite images were pre-processed, including stacking, mosaicking, and clipping, based on the study area. A pixel-based classification method, the Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM), is applied to classify different land cover types. Various research indices are employed to assess vegetation health and landscape changes. The Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was used to evaluate vegetation density. Additionally, the Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) was computed to further assess vegetation conditions. Land use and land cover classification was performed to differentiate between grasslands, forests, and other landscape features. Vegetation positions in each period were identified using image classification algorithms. Spatial interpolation was conducted to estimate vegetation positions between observed points. GIS techniques were used to overlay vegetation data with other spatial datasets such as land use, land cover, and topography. Grassland and treeline positions were extracted using classification results. The spatial and temporal distribution and shifting trends of meadows and treelines over different periods were analysed. Digital elevation models were obtained to analyse elevation-related factors affecting vegetation dynamics. The methodological framework can be seen in Figure 2 below.

Fig. 1. Study Area, A) India, B) Uttarakhand, C) Chamoli District

Fig. 2. Methodological Framework

Methods for assessing the quality of the classification

To ensure the reliability and accuracy of the LULC classification results, a comprehensive accuracy assessment was performed. The assessment process followed standard remote sensing classification evaluation protocols to provide a thorough evaluation of classification performance. Reference data for accuracy assessment were collected through a combination of high-resolution satellite imagery interpretation, field surveys, and existing land cover databases. Ground truth points were systematically distributed across the study area using a stratified random sampling approach to ensure representative coverage of all land cover classes, including agricultural land, tree cover, grasslands, built-up areas, snow cover, water bodies, and bare land. Reference points were selected based on the number of land cover classes.

Error Matrix Construction

The accuracy assessment was conducted using confusion matrices for each temporal period (1983, 1993, 2003, 2013, and 2023). The error matrix is a square array where rows represent reference data (ground truth) and columns represent classified data. This matrix provides the basis for calculating various accuracy metrics by comparing classified pixels with their corresponding reference classifications on a class-by-class basis.

Accuracy Metrics Calculation

Quantitative accuracy measures were derived from the error matrices. Overall Accuracy was calculated as the percentage of correctly classified pixels relative to the total reference pixels, providing a general measure of classification performance. Producer’s Accuracy, computed for each class, represents the probability that reference pixels are correctly classified, while User’s Accuracy indicates the likelihood that pixels assigned to a class truly belong to it. The Kappa Coefficient, ranging from 0 to 1, was employed to evaluate the agreement between classified and reference data beyond chance, with values approaching 1 denoting higher accuracy.

Results and Discussion

Temporal Changes and Deviation in LULC

Over the past four decades, land-use and land-cover changes reveal critical environmental and socio-economic dynamics (Table 1). Temporal analysis shows that tree cover fluctuated significantly. It initially increased from 224,027 hectares in 1983 to 346,453 hectares in 2003, reflecting successful reforestation and natural regeneration efforts. However, this was followed by a decline to 273,528 hectares in 2013. By 2023, tree cover had partially recovered to 323,554 hectares, showing renewed conservation efforts (an increase of 44.43 percent). Grassland areas have varied over the past 40 years. The area increased from 93,647 hectares in 1983 to 120,103 hectares in 1993, followed by a decline to 78,081 hectares in 2003. By 2013, grassland areas had expanded significantly to 199,293 hectares, but then decreased again to 118,330 hectares in 2023 (an overall increase of 26.36 percent). These fluctuations can be attributed to changes in agricultural practices, grazing pressure, and land management policies. Agricultural land saw an increase from 12,300 hectares in 1983 to 20,147 hectares in 1993. This was followed by a gradual decline to 16,148 hectares in 2013. By 2023, agricultural land had slightly recovered to 17,050 hectares (an increase of 38.62 percent). These changes reflect shifts in land use due to urbanisation, land degradation, and possibly changes in agricultural practices. Built-up areas have expanded dramatically, indicating urbanisation and infrastructure development. From 216 hectares in 1983, the area of built-up land increased to 9,349 hectares by 2023. This growth corresponds to population increases, economic development, and the expansion of urban areas. It highlights the socio-economic transformation in the district. Water bodies have experienced minor fluctuations over the decades. Starting at 2,985 hectares in 1983, the area stabilised around 2,917 hectares by 2023. These slight variations suggest natural changes in water levels influenced by climate conditions, human consumption, and water management practices. The area of barren land has increased substantially, rising from 69,784 hectares in 1983 to an alarming 209,677 hectares in 2023 (an increase of 200.47 percent). This increase indicates severe land degradation, likely due to deforestation, soil erosion, and possibly the abandonment of agricultural lands.

Table 1. Land Use/Land Cover percentage change, 1983-2023

LULC Classes

Area in Hectares

LULC Change (Percentage)

1983

1993

2003

2013

2023

1983-1993

1993-2003

2003-2013

2013-2023

1983-2023

Water bodies

2,985

3,015

3,056

2,668

2,917

1.01

1.35

-12.68

9.32

-2.28

Barren Land

69,784

1,00,912

91,845

1,17,622

2,09,677

44.61

-8.99

28.07

78.26

200.47

Tree Cover

2,24,027

2,86,714

3,46,453

2,73,528

3,23,554

27.98

20.84

-21.05

18.29

44.43

Built-up Areas

216

483

464

5,691

9,349

123.61

-3.84

1,125.29

64.28

4,228.35

Grassland

93,647

1,20,133

78,081

1,99,293

1,18,330

28.25

-34.99

155.24

-40.63

26.36

Snow Cover

3,77,885

2,49,255

2,39,413

1,66,976

99,606

-34.04

-3.95

-30.26

-40.35

-73.64

Agricultural Land

12,300

20,147

19,616

16,148

17,050

63.8

-2.63

-17.68

5.58

38.62

The dramatic rise in barren land highlights the urgent need for sustainable land management practices. Snow cover has significantly declined over the past four decades, from 377,885 hectares in 1983 to just 99,606 hectares in 2023, a drastic decrease of 63.64 percent. This reduction highlights the impact of warming trends, which have resulted in decreased snowfall and accelerated glacial melting. The sharp decrease between 2013 and 2023 shows the severity of climate change effects on high-altitude ecosystems. A temporal analysis of Chamoli district’s landscape over 40 years reveals critical environmental challenges and socio-economic developments. This change is a particularly concerning point regarding environmental degradation and the impact of climate change. Fluctuations in tree cover and grassland areas highlight the dynamic nature of ecological responses to a changing climate. The temporal analysis of land use and land cover over the last four decades reveals notable trends and shifts. Water bodies, with slight fluctuations, showed a decrease of 2.28 percent. Barren land has seen a dramatic increase of 200.47 percent. Tree cover has increased by 44.43 percent. Built-up areas have expanded tremendously by 4228.35 percent. Grassland areas have experienced varying trends with an overall increase of 26.36 percent. Snow cover has dramatically decreased by 73.64 percent. Agricultural land has increased by 38.62 percent.

Figure 3 shows the spatial distribution of land cover changes across five temporal periods in the study area (1983-2023). The multi-temporal analysis reveals distinct patterns of vegetation dynamics. These maps demonstrate the temporal evolution of landscape patterns and potential land use transformations within the defined geographic boundary.

Fig. 3. LULC of Chamoli District: a) 1983, b) 1993, c) 2003, d) 2013 and e) 2023

Elevation-Based Changes

The analysis based on elevation shows that several land cover types, including tree cover, grasslands, snow cover, water bodies, barren land, built-up areas, and agricultural land, have changed (Table 2). At an elevation of 683–2051 metres in 1983, grasslands covered 28,105 hectares, while tree cover was 91,268 hectares. By 1993, grasslands had reduced significantly to 12,316 hectares, and tree cover increased to 107,170 hectares. This trend continued in 2003, with grasslands slightly recovering to 13,430 hectares and tree cover reaching its highest at 126,178 hectares. In 2013, grasslands surged to 38,351 hectares, possibly due to conservation efforts or reduced agricultural pressure. However, they decreased again to 24,135 hectares in 2023. Built-up areas increased substantially from 216 hectares in 1983 to 7,763 hectares in 2023, reflecting urban expansion. Water bodies and barren land remained relatively stable with minor changes. At 2052–3053 metres elevation, grasslands increased from 22,831 hectares in 1983 to a peak of 52,801 hectares in 2013 before declining to 38,596 hectares in 2023. Tree cover followed a different pattern, increasing significantly from 111,228 hectares in 1983 to 142,469 hectares in 2003, then stabilising around 128,104 hectares by 2023. Barren land fluctuated considerably, with a slight increase in 1993 and a rapid increase by 2023. Built-up areas saw a gradual increase from 1993, indicating the spread of human settlements. Agricultural land fluctuated but generally remained at lower levels compared to other land cover classes. At the elevation of 3054–4159 metres, grassland cover showed notable variations. It initially increased to 56,752 hectares in 1993, decreased to 45,470 hectares in 2003, and then rose to 48,655 hectares by 2023. Tree cover showed substantial growth from 21,229 hectares in 1983 to 70,282 hectares in 2003, stabilising around 55,860 hectares in 2023. Snow cover and barren land also fluctuated, with significant decreases in snow cover by 2023.

Built-up areas and agricultural land remained minimal, reflecting the harsh conditions and limited human activity at these elevations. Furthermore, at the 4150–5152 metre elevation range, grasslands experienced significant changes, increasing dramatically to 37,174 hectares in 1993 and decreasing to 16,940 hectares by 2023. Tree cover increased from 11,147 hectares in 1983 to 16,190 hectares in 2023. Barren land and snow cover also saw significant fluctuations, with snow cover decreasing sharply by 2023. Built-up areas remained negligible, while agricultural land saw slight increases. The highest elevation range showed minimal grassland cover throughout the decades, peaking at 302 hectares in 1993 and minor growth by 2023. Snow cover remained dominant but decreased significantly from 155,069 hectares in 1983 to 80,374 hectares in 2023. There were no built-up area and agricultural land remained absent, reflecting the extreme environmental conditions. The 3054–4149 metre elevation range witnessed the most significant changes, particularly in tree cover and grasslands. Grasslands increased initially but saw substantial fluctuations, while tree cover showed considerable growth and stabilisation trends. Snow cover decreased drastically. The analysis reveals that lower elevations have seen significant urbanisation and agricultural activities, while mid to higher elevations have experienced changes in grassland and tree cover, reflecting both natural and anthropogenic influences over the decades.

Table 2. Elevation-based changes (1983–2023)

Elevation (meters)

Year

Water

Barren

Tree- Cover

Built-up

Grassland

Snow

Agriculture

683 - 2051

1983

2140

18911

91268

216

28105

0

10588

1993

2184

23384

107170

477

12316

0

15171

2003

1984

800

126178

463

13430

0

14590

2013

797

7766

103758

4830

38351

0

12226

2023

1493

3105

108528

7763

24135

0

12653

2052 - 3053

1983

443

14535

111228

107

22831

0

1673

1993

430

7729

132847

238

13461

0

4816

2003

443

1701

142469

311

27596

0

4417

2013

185

12331

111709

834

52801

0

3534

2023

284

3445

128104

1321

38596

0

2610

3054 - 4149

1983

276

26718

21229

33

37765

40491

139

1993

277

15319

44361

53

56752

19612

151

2003

315

27897

70282

127

35470

5668

610

2013

257

18731

52131

148

65868

2367

1389

2023

373

21569

55860

187

48655

1130

1726

4150 - 5152

1983

117

7789

11147

27

14697

166415

0

1993

123

42123

11623

38

37174

97604

0

2003

113

49519

7307

47

11268

93820

0

2013

132

47273

13737

59

41877

59800

0

2023

289

109115

16190

78

16940

18092

0

5153 - 7801

1983

0

1813

66

0

228

155069

0

1993

0

12275

48

0

302

140441

0

2003

0

11910

31

0

276

139788

0

2013

0

31514

42

0

251

104674

0

2023

379

72442

71

0

103

80374

0

The changes are visible in high-altitude regions, particularly from elevations above 3000m. Between 3054m and 5152m, both tree cover and grasslands increased significantly in the last four decades. This indicates positive changes in vegetation cover, suggesting climate change impacts and shifts towards higher altitudes. Figure 4 below provides a comprehensive understanding of the prevailing scenario.

Fig. 4. Elevation-based changes in land-use patterns, 1983 and 2023

LULC Classification Assessment Results

The classification accuracy assessment across 1983, 1993, 2003, 2013, and 2023 demonstrated a steady improvement in reliability. In 1983, the classification achieved an overall accuracy of 82.34% with a Kappa coefficient of 0.79. By 1993, the overall accuracy increased to 85.39% with a Kappa of 0.82. In 2003, the overall accuracy further improved to 88.36% with a Kappa of 0.85. The 2013 classification showed a substantial increase, with an overall accuracy of 91.02% and a Kappa of 0.89. The highest accuracy was recorded in 2023, with an overall accuracy of 93.21% and a Kappa of 0.91. Overall, the results indicate a clear improvement in classification performance over four decades.

Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Tree Cover

The spatio-temporal analysis of tree cover distribution across different elevation zones was conducted (Table 3). It revealed significant variations over the 40 years from 1983 to 2023. In the lowest elevation zone (683-2052m), tree cover expanded from 91,268 hectares in 1983 to peak at 126,178 hectares in 2003, followed by a slight decline to 116,793 hectares by 2023. The mid-elevation zone (2052-3053m) showed the most substantial tree cover, increasing from 111,228 hectares in 1983 to a maximum of 142,468 hectares in 2003, before stabilising around 115,942 hectares in 2023. Notable changes occurred in higher elevations, particularly in the 3053-4149m range, where tree cover more than tripled from 21,229 hectares in 1983 to 70,281 hectares in 2003, though moderating to 52,967 hectares by 2023. The most dramatic transformation was observed in the 4149-5152m zone, with tree cover expanding from merely 147 hectares in 1983 to 44,189 hectares by 2023, indicating significant upward treeline migration. The highest elevation zone (5152-7801m) also experienced notable changes, from 66 hectares in 1983 to 3,870 hectares in 2023, suggesting potential climate-driven vegetation responses at extreme altitudes.

Table 3. Elevation-wise Area of Tree Cover (in hectares)

Elevation Wise Area of Tree Cover (In Hec.)

Elevation (in m)

1983

1993

2003

2013

2023

Tree Cover

Tree Cover

Tree Cover

Tree Cover

Tree Cover

683-2052

91268

107170

126178.35

116175.42

116793.72

2052-3053

111228

132847

142468.52

115253.22

115942.00

3053-4149

21229

44361

70281.71

52520.22

52967.29

4149-5152

147

1623

7306.70

5736.95

44189.70

5152-7801

66

1.3

31.38

1.75

3870.85

Figure 5 shows how tree cover has changed in the area between 1983 and 2023. The different colours on the map indicate the spatial changes over these years.

Fig. 5. Tree cover and pattern, Chamoli district

Temporal Dynamics of Grasslands

The distribution of grassland across different elevations in the district was analysed. The analysis revealed significant changes in grassland distribution over time and across various altitudes (Table 4). At lower elevations (683-2052 metres), the grassland area decreased from 28,105 hectares in 1983 to 12,316 hectares in 1993. This decline is likely due to human activities such as agriculture, urbanisation, and other development. However, grassland cover substantially recovered by 2013, reaching 38,351.36 hectares. This was followed by a reduction to 24,134.64 hectares of grassland in 2023, showing a 14 percent decrease over 40 years. This suggests continued pressure from human activity or other environmental changes. Grassland cover followed a similar pattern in the mid-elevation range (2052-3053 metres). It decreased from 22,831 hectares in 1983 to 13,461 hectares in 1993, and then increased to 52,800.87 hectares by 2013. It decreased again to 38,595.93 hectares in 2023, representing a 69 percent increase. These fluctuations indicate a dynamic interaction between human land use and natural processes, with periods of both recovery and decline influenced by grazing practices, forestry activities, and climatic factors. Higher elevations (3053-4149 metres) showed considerable variation, with an increase in grassland area from 37,765 hectares in 1983 to 56,752 hectares in 1993. This was followed by a decrease to 25,469.78 hectares in 2003. Grassland cover expanded significantly to 65,868.20 hectares by 2013 and declined to 48,654.96 hectares in 2023, a 29 percent decrease. These changes reflect the impact of climate change, human-environment relationships, and grazing pressures on the extent of grasslands at these altitudes.

Table 4. Elevation-wise area of grassland (in hectares).

Area of Grassland Based on Elevation (in Ha.)

Sr. No.

Elevation (in m)

1983

1993

2003

2013

2023

1

683-2052

28105

12316

13429.86

38351.36

24134.64

2

2052-3053

22831

13461

27595.86

52800.87

38595.93

3

3053-4149

37765

56752

35469.78

65868.20

48654.96

4

4149-5152

14697

37174

11268.36

31877.32

16939.94

5

5152-7801

228

302

276.30

250.99

103.27

In the highest elevation ranges (4149-5152 metres and 5152-7801 metres), grassland areas showed extreme volatility. The grassland cover increased significantly in 1993 but decreased considerably in subsequent years. By 2023, only 16,939.94 hectares remained in the 4149–5152-metre range, representing an 18 percent increase from the 1983 period. At the 5152–7801-metre range, there was a drastic reduction to 103.27 hectares. These trends suggest that harsh climatic conditions and land-use changes, such as grazing and environmental degradation, have severely impacted these higher altitude grasslands, making them less sustainable over time. The overall trends reflect how conservation efforts, agricultural practices, and climatic changes have shaped grassland distribution over four decades. The data suggest that lower and middle elevations have seen more significant human impact, whereas higher elevations show more resilience to change but still experience fluctuations due to environmental conditions. (A detailed examination of vegetation density can be seen in Appendix B, Table 1 and Figure 1). The trend of grasslands shifting upwards in elevation can be seen in the map below (Fig. 6) from 1983 to 2023. This upward migration can be observed through the changing colour patterns across the district. Each colour on the map corresponds to grassland elevation in different decades, indicating the distribution and movement of grasslands. In 1983, grasslands were primarily concentrated in lower and mid-elevation regions. However, over the years, a noticeable upward shift in grassland cover can be observed. In the earlier years, grasslands were more extensive at lower elevations, as shown by the significant green areas in the lower and central parts of the district in 1983. Over the decades, there has been a clear trend of grasslands receding from these lower regions, with a corresponding increase in grassland areas at higher altitudes. The yellow areas (representing 1993) and the orange areas (representing 2003) show a gradual migration of grasslands towards higher elevations. By 2013, as shown by the light blue areas, grasslands continued to extend further up, occupying regions that were previously not covered by grasslands. The most recent decade, 2023, represented by the red areas, shows a prominent presence of grasslands at the highest elevations.

Fig. 6. Temporal trend of grasslands, 1983–2023

This trend highlights how grasslands have progressively moved from lower to higher altitudes over the past four decades. This shift can be attributed to various factors, including climate change, which has altered temperature and precipitation patterns, making lower elevations less suitable for grasslands. Additionally, increased human activities such as agriculture and urbanisation at lower elevations have contributed to this upward movement, pushing grasslands to higher altitudes where conditions are more favourable for their growth. A clear pattern can be seen with grasslands adapting to changing environmental conditions by shifting upwards over the years.

DISCUSSION

Land use and land cover patterns in high-altitude regions have changed significantly (Rawat and Schickhoff 2022). One of the critical influences of these changes is on tree cover and grasslands. The four-decade analysis of LULC changes in the district reveals complex spatio-temporal dynamics with significant implications for mountain ecosystems and local communities. Our findings demonstrate a paradoxical landscape transformation characterised by simultaneous forest recovery and environmental degradation. The substantial increase in tree cover over the study period, particularly at higher elevations, aligns with observations by Kumar and Khanduri (2024), who documented upward shifts in vegetation zones across the Himalayan region. The fluctuating patterns of tree cover, with initial increases followed by periods of decline and partial recovery, align with findings from other Himalayan regions where conservation efforts have competed with development pressures. Similar to observations by Rawat and Schickhoff (2022), who documented complex vegetation dynamics in high-altitude Himalayan ecosystems, our study found that tree cover increased by 44.43 percent over the study period. This indicates some success in reforestation initiatives despite intervening challenges.

These findings also support Tewari et al. (2017) and Walia et al. (2025) conclusion that Himalayan forests experience cyclic patterns of degradation and regeneration influenced by both natural processes and management interventions. The dramatic expansion of tree cover in the 4149–5152 m elevation zone (from 147 to 44,189 hectares) represents clear evidence of treeline advancement, consistent with Harsch et al.’s (2009) global meta-analysis of treeline responses to climate warming. This also corresponds with Schickhoff et al. (2015), who documented treeline shifts in response to warming trends across the Himalayas. The increased vegetation at extreme altitudes suggests a warming-induced habitat expansion for tree species, consistent with global observations of upslope migration of plant communities (Lenoir et al. 2008). However, this must be viewed alongside concerning degradation trends. The 200.47 percent increase in barren land and the 73.64 percent decrease in snow cover indicate severe environmental stress in the region. These findings point towards Immerzeel et al. (2020) research highlighting accelerated glacial retreat across the Hindu Kush Himalaya, with profound implications for water security and ecosystem stability. The reduction in snow cover is particularly alarming as it threatens the hydrological regime that supports downstream communities and ecosystems (Bolch et al. 2019). The fluctuating patterns of grassland distribution across elevation gradients (with overall increases of 26.36 percent) reflect a dynamic interplay between climate forcing and anthropogenic pressures. This supports Tasser and Tappeiner’s (2002) findings that mountain grasslands undergo complex transitions influenced by both land management practices and environmental changes. The upward shift of grasslands observed in our study is similar to the findings of Parmesan and Yohe (2003), who documented elevation shifts in numerous plant species globally in response to warming. The fluctuating grassland coverage, with overall increases at mid-elevations but volatility at higher elevations, has also been documented by Suwal et al. (2016), who documented elevation-dependent responses of alpine vegetation to climate change. These grassland shifts directly impact traditional pastoral livelihoods, as noted by Kassahun et al. (2008), who documented how changing vegetation patterns disrupt transhumance practices.

The dramatic expansion of built-up areas, by 4228.35 percent, represents the most striking anthropogenic transformation. This reflects the rapid urbanisation patterns observed throughout the Himalayan region by Dame et al. (2019), and Anees et al. (2021). This expansion exerts pressure on surrounding ecosystems and traditional land use systems, contributing to the fragmentation of natural habitats. These multifaceted changes have significant implications for local livelihoods, particularly for traditional pastoral communities. As noted by Bhusal and Awasthi (2024), shifting vegetation patterns disrupt transhumance practices that have sustained mountain communities for generations. The upward migration of vegetation zones forces adaptation in grazing patterns and resource use, potentially undermining traditional ecological knowledge systems (Mishra 2001). The interdependence between land use and land cover patterns has resulted in a landscape that is less supportive of traditional grazing practices, further threatening the livelihoods of communities that rely on these lands for sustenance. For sustainable management of the landscapes, integrated approaches that balance conservation with livelihood needs are essential. This requires technical interventions for land restoration and meaningful engagement with local communities. Their traditional knowledge can inform adaptive management strategies (Saxena et al. 2002). Future research should focus on investigating vegetation responses to climate change scenarios and developing adaptive management frameworks that incorporate both scientific data and traditional ecological knowledge. This integrated approach will be crucial for building resilience in mountain social-ecological systems facing rapid environmental change.

CONCLUSION

The land use and land cover of the district have changed significantly over the last few decades. Consequently, major alterations have occurred in the district’s landscape and ecology. Tree cover is most prominent at lower altitudes, decreasing as altitude increases. Built-up areas and grasslands are expanding across various zones, particularly at mid-altitudes. Snow cover dominates higher altitudes, between 5153–7801 m, but has shown a declining trend in recent years. The findings suggest that tree cover has fluctuated considerably, indicating successful natural and human-driven conservation efforts. Grassland areas have also shown variability over the past 40 years. Both tree cover and grassland areas have increased in recent decades. These fluctuations in tree cover and grassland areas emphasise the dynamic nature of ecological responses. The elevation range of 3054–4149 metres experienced the most significant changes. Lower elevations have seen considerable urbanisation and agricultural development, while mid to higher elevations have undergone changes in grassland and tree cover, reflecting both natural and human influences. These changes are noticeable in high-altitude regions, especially above 3000 metres. This suggests vegetation is shifting to higher altitudes. These shifts are not uniform and vary within each elevation range. The changes are attributed to various factors, including human activities, climate change, and natural succession processes. These trends highlight the dynamic nature of changes within the district, driven by varying land management practices.

APPENDIX A

Classification Accuracy Assessment Results

The classification accuracy for the years 1983, 1993, 2003, 2013, and 2023 was assessed using error matrices. Corresponding user’s accuracy, producer’s accuracy, overall accuracy, and Kappa statistics are presented in Tables 1-5. In 1983, the overall accuracy was 82.34% with a Kappa coefficient of 0.79. By 1993, classification accuracy had improved, showing an overall accuracy of 85.39% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.82. In 2003, the overall accuracy further increased to 88.95% with a Kappa of 0.85. The 2013 classification achieved an overall accuracy of 93.87% with a Kappa coefficient of 0.89. In 2023, the classification reached its highest accuracy, with an overall accuracy of 93.21% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.91. Overall, classification performance demonstrated a clear improvement over the four decades, with both overall accuracy and Kappa values increasing steadily. The early years (1983–1993) recorded relatively higher misclassifications in barren land and built-up areas, whereas later years (2013–2023) achieved much higher reliability, particularly for tree cover, snow, and water categories.

Table 1. Error Metrics for Land Cover Classification – 1983

Error Metrix for Land Cover Classification- 1983

Reference Data

Classified Data

Total

Producers Accuracy

Agri. Land

Barren

Built-up

Grassland

Snow

Tree Cover

Water

Total

Agri. Land

78

6

3

8

0

2

1

98

98

79.59

Barren

7

54

5

11

4

2

0

83

83

65.06

Built-up

3

7

56

4

0

2

0

72

72

77.78

Grassland

12

8

4

118

2

1

0

145

145

81.38

Snow

0

3

0

1

52

2

0

58

58

89.66

Tree Cover

2

5

2

8

3

142

0

162

162

87.65

Water

1

1

0

1

0

0

47

50

50

94.00

Total

103

84

70

151

61

151

48

668

668

Kappa: 0.79

Users Accuracy

75.73

64.29

80.00

78.15

85.25

94.04

97.92

Overall Accuracy: 82.34

Table 2. Error Metrics for Land Cover Classification - 1993

Error Metrix for Land Cover Classification- 1993

Reference Data

Classified Data

Total

Producers Accuracy

Agri. Land

Barren

Built-up

Grassland

Snow

Tree Cover

Water

Total

Agri. Land

82

4

2

7

0

3

0

98

98

83.67

Barren

5

58

4

9

3

1

0

80

80

72.50

Built-up

2

5

61

3

0

1

0

72

72

84.72

Grassland

10

6

3

125

1

1

0

146

146

85.62

Snow

0

2

0

1

55

1

0

59

59

93.22

Tree Cover

4

4

3

6

2

148

0

167

167

88.62

Water

0

1

0

0

0

0

48

49

49

97.96

Total

103

80

73

151

61

155

48

671

671

Kappa: 0.82

Users Accuracy

79.61

72.50

83.56

82.78

90.16

95.48

100

Overall Accuracy: 85.39

Table 3. Error Metrics for Land Cover Classification – 2003

Error Metrix for Land Cover Classification- 2003

Reference Data

Classified Data

Total

Producers Accuracy

Agri. Land

Barren

Built-up

Grassland

Snow

Tree Cover

Water

Total

Agri. Land

86

3

2

5

0

2

0

98

98

87.76

Barren

4

63

3

7

2

1

0

80

80

78.75

Built-up

1

3

65

2

0

1

0

72

72

90.28

Grassland

8

5

2

130

1

0

0

146

146

89.04

Snow

0

1

0

0

57

1

0

59

59

96.61

Tree Cover

3

3

2

5

1

152

0

166

166

91.57

Water

0

1

0

0

0

0

48

49

49

97.96

Total

102

79

74

149

61

157

48

670

670

Kappa: 0.85

Users Accuracy

84.31

79.75

87.84

87.25

94.44

96.82

100

Overall Accuracy: 88.36

Table 4. Error Metrics for Land Cover Classification – 2013

Error Metrix for Land Cover Classification- 2013

Reference Data

Classified Data

Total

Producers Accuracy

Agri. Land

Barren

Built-up

Grassland

Snow

Tree Cover

Water

Total

Agri. Land

90

2

1

3

0

2

0

98

98

91.84

Barren

3

68

2

5

1

1

0

80

80

85

Built-up

1

2

67

2

0

0

0

72

72

93.06

Grassland

6

4

2

134

0

0

0

146

146

91.78

Snow

0

1

0

0

58

0

0

59

59

98.31

Tree Cover

1

1

2

4

1

155

0

164

164

94.51

Water

0

1

0

0

0

0

48

49

49

97.96

Total

101

79

74

148

60

158

48

668

668

Kappa: 0.89

Users Accuracy

89.11

86.08

90.54

90.54

96.67

98.10

100

Overall Accuracy: 91.02

Table 5. Error Metrics for Land Cover Classification – 2023

Error Metrix for Land Cover Classification- 2023

Reference Data

Classified Data

Total

Producers Accuracy

Agri. Land

Barren

Built-up

Grassland

Snow

Tree Cover

Water

Total

Agri. Land

92

3

1

2

0

0

0

98

98

93/88

Barren

3

70

2

3

1

1

0

80

80

87.50

Built-up

1

2

67

1

0

1

0

72

72

93.06

Grassland

5

4

2

134

0

1

0

146

146

91.78

Snow

0

1

0

0

57

1

0

59

59

96.61

Tree Cover

2

2

2

4

2

152

0

164

164

92.68

Water

0

1

0

0

0

0

48

49

49

97.96

Total

103

83

74

144

60

156

48

668

668

Kappa: 0.91

Users Accuracy

89.32

84,34

90.54

93.06

95

97.44

100

Overall Accuracy: 93.21

APPENDIX B

Spatial-Temporal Changes in Vegetation Density

Vegetation density can be used to study vegetation changes, acting as an indicator of environmental conditions and ecological shifts. Figure 1 and Table 1 show a clear altitudinal gradient in vegetation density, with dense forest at lower elevations and sparse or barren areas at higher altitudes. From 1983 to 2003, the general pattern remained consistent, with dense vegetation in southern lowlands and progressively thinner vegetation towards the northern high mountains. By 2013, a decline in dense vegetation was observed in lower and mid-elevation zones. In 2023, vegetation health improved in lower zones, while higher elevations experienced reduced vegetation density. The lower zones showed resilience and recovery, whereas high-altitude regions continued to face ecological stress.

Table 1. Vegetation density and pattern, 1983–2023

Elevation

Vegetation Density (Hectares)- 1983

Very Low

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

683 - 2051

1605

6314

44466

64243

31167

2052 - 3053

4329

8044

20877

51127

66087

3054 - 4149

9463

45035

41914

13576

8952

4150 - 5152

15336

147827

5160

78

57

5153 - 7801

17656

129615

241

49

11

Elevation

Vegetation Density (Hectares)- 1993

Very Low

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

683 - 2051

486

16999

27203

51562

51546

2052 - 3053

6368

21030

20769

36357

65940

3054 - 4149

14857

28101

41171

20721

14090

4150 - 5152

41289

87824

38597

743

5

5153 - 7801

44778

98360

4981

0

0

Elevation

Vegetation Density (Hectares)- 2003

Very Low

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

683 - 2051

538

15591

30507

58360

42801

2052 - 3053

7865

18432

22644

38816

62707

3054 - 4149

15556

30933

41793

17120

13538

4150 - 5152

41667

107084

19379

320

6

5153 - 7801

45669

99381

3070

0

0

Elevation

Vegetation Density (Hectares)- 2013

Very Low

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

683 - 2051

24

20738

59729

64369

2936

2052 - 3053

0

30156

64865

53583

1859

3054 - 4149

2

47397

63112

8325

104

4150 - 5152

313

146880

21264

0

0

5153 - 7801

1753

145789

580

0

0

Elevation

Vegetation Density (Hectares)- 2023

Very Low

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

683 - 2051

159.38

1799.18

16771.09

60883.38

80112.62

2052 - 3053

12.82

1798.5

29994.15

60050.16

70554.39

3054 - 4149

32.67

24928.79

71805.48

20377.86

10875.35

4150 - 5152

2954.88

148357

29518.86

148.59

0.36

5153 - 7801

5170.91

152745.5

1157.97

0.21

0.03

Fig. 1. Vegetation density and pattern: a) 1983, b) 1993, c) 2003, d) 2013 and e) 2023

References

1. Anderson, K., Fawcett, D., Cugulliere, A., Benford, S., Jones, D., & Leng, R. (2020). Vegetation expansion in the subnival Hindu Kush Himalaya. Global Change Biology, 26(3), 1608-1625. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14919

2. Anees, M. M., Sharma, R., & Joshi, P. K. (2021). Urbanization in Himalaya—An interregional perspective to land use and urban growth dynamics. In Mountain landscapes in transition: effects of land use and climate change (pp. 517-538). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70238-0_23

3. Bagchi, S., Mishra, C., & Bhatnagar, Y. V. (2004, May). Conflicts between traditional pastoralism and conservation of Himalayan ibex (Capra sibirica) in the Trans-Himalayan mountains. In Animal Conservation Forum (Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 121-128). Cambridge University Press. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S1367943003001148

4. Bhusal, P., & Awasthi, K. R. (2024). Challenges to Transhumant Pastoralism Due to Socioeconomic and Ecological Changes in Nepal’s High

5. Mountains. In Lifestyle and Livelihood Changes Among Formerly Nomadic Peoples: Entrepreneurship, Diversity and Urbanisation (pp. 167183). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51142-4_7

6. Bolch, T., Shea, J. M., Liu, S., Azam, F. M., Gao, Y., Gruber, S., ... & Yao, T. (2019). Status and change of the cryosphere in the Extended Hindu Kush Himalaya Region. In The Hindu Kush Himalaya Assessment (pp. 209-255). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92288-1_7

7. Dame, J., Schmidt, S., Müller, J., & Nüsser, M. (2019). Urbanisation and socio-ecological challenges in high mountain towns: Insights from Leh (Ladakh), India. Landscape and urban planning, 189, 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.017

8. Duffy, P. B., Brando, P., Asner, G. P., & Field, C. B. (2015). Projections of future meteorological drought and wet periods in the Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(43), 13172-13177. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421010112

9. Flantua, S. G. A., van Boxel, J. H., Hooghiemstra, H., & van Smaalen, J. (2007). Application of GIS and logistic regression to fossil pollen data in modelling present and past spatial distribution of the Colombian savanna. Climate Dynamics, 29, 697–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00382-007-0276-3

10. FSI. (2019). India state of forest report 2019. Forest Survey of India. https://fsi.nic.in/forest-report-2019

11. Rawal, R., Dasila, K., Kishor, K., & Tewari, L. M. (2025). Pattern of forest structure and species regeneration along with elevation gradients and aspects in evergreen oak forest belt of the Western himalaya. Discover Plants, 2(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-025-00381-3

12. Galvin, K. A., Reid, R. S., Behnke Jr, R. H., & Hobbs, N. T. (2008). Fragmentation in semi-arid and arid landscapes. Consequences for Human and Natural Systems. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/1305

13. Grace, J., Berninger, F., & Nagy, L. (2002). Impacts of climate change on the tree line. Annals of Botany, 90(4), 537-544. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf222

14. Hansen, M. C., Stehman, S. V., Potapov, P. V., Loveland, T. R., Townshend, J. R., De Fries, R. S., & Di Miceli, C. (2008). Humid tropical forest clearing from 2003 to 2005 quantified by using multitemporal and multiresolution remotely sensed data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(27), 9439-9444. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804042105

15. Harsch, M. A., Hulme, P. E., McGlone, M. S., & Duncan, R. P. (2009). Are treelines advancing? A global meta‐analysis of treeline response to climate warming. Ecology Letters, 12(10), 1040-1049. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01355.x

16. Harsch, M. A., & Bader, M. Y. (2011). Treeline form: A potential key to understanding treeline dynamics. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20(4), 582-596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00622.x

17. Holtmeier, F. K., & Broll, G. (2005). Sensitivity and response of northern hemisphere altitudinal and polar treelines to environmental change at landscape and local scales. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 14(5), 395-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822X.2005.00168.x

18. Holtmeier, F. K., & Broll, G. E. (2007). Treeline advance-driving processes and adverse factors. Landscape Online, 1, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.200701

19. Holtmeier, F. K., & Broll, G. (2012). Landform influences on treeline patchiness and dynamics in a changing climate. Physical Geography, 33(5), 403-437. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3646.33.5.403

20. Immerzeel, W. W., Lutz, A. F., Andrade, M., Bahl, A., Biemans, H., Bolch, T., ... & Baillie, J. E. M. (2020). Importance and vulnerability of the world’s water towers. Nature, 577(7790), 364-369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1822-y

21. Jobbágy, E. G., & Jackson, R. B. (2003). Global controls of forest line elevation in the northern and southern hemispheres. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 9(3), 253-268. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00162.x

22. Joshi, G., & Negi, G. C. (2011). Quantification and valuation of forest ecosystem services in the western Himalayan region of India. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 7(1), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.598134

23. Kassahun, A., Snyman, H. A., & Smit, G. N. (2008). Impact of rangeland degradation on the pastoral production systems, livelihoods and perceptions of the Somali pastoralists in Eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Arid Environments, 72(7), 1265-1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.01.002

24. Kullman, L. (2001). 20th century climate warming and tree-limit rise in the southern Scandes of Sweden. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment, 30(2), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-30.2.72

25. Kumar, R., Krishnia, P., Kumari, V., & Sharma, C. (2025). Perception on Livestock Changes and Its Socio-Economic Implications Among Agro-pastoralists: A Case Study of Agro-pastoralists in Joshimath Block in Chamoli. Revista Geográfica de Chile Terra Australis, 61(1). https://doi.org/10.23854/07199562.2025611.kumar2

26. Kumar, S., & Khanduri, V. P. (2024). Impact of climate change on the Himalayan alpine treeline vegetation. Heliyon, 10(23). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40797

27. Lefroy, R. D., Bechstedt, H. D., & Rais, M. (2000). Indicators for sustainable land management based on farmer surveys in Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 81(2), 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00187-0

28. Lenoir, J., Gégout, J. C., Marquet, P. A., De Ruffray, P., & Brisse, H. (2008). A significant upward shift in plant species optimum elevation during the 20th century. Science, 320(5884), 1768-1771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156831

29. Liu, H. Y., Tang, Z. Y., Dai, J. H., Tang, Y. X., & Cui, H. T. (2002). Larch timberline and its development in north China. Mountain Research and Development, 22, 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741(2002)022[0359:LTAIDI]2.0.CO;2

30. Mishra, C. (2001). High altitude survival: Conflicts between pastoralism and wildlife in the Trans-Himalaya. Wageningen University and Research. https://www.proquest.com/openview/bcc9af586e5c20df06673f312fbd04ff/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

31. Parmesan, C., & Yohe, G. (2003). A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature, 421(6918), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01286

32. Payette, S. (2007). Contrasted dynamics of northern Labrador tree lines caused by climate change and migrational lag. Ecology, 88(3), 770-780. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0265

33. Pepin, N., Bradley, R. S., Diaz, H. F., Baraër, M., Caceres, E. B., Forsythe, N., ... & Mountain Research Initiative EDW Working Group. (2015). Elevation-dependent warming in mountain regions of the world. Nature climate change, 5(5), 424-430. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2563

34. Purekhovsky, A. G., Gunya, A. N., Kolbowsky, E. Y., & Aleinikov, A. A. (2025). Methods Of Studying The Alpine Treeline: A Systematic Review. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY, 18(1), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2025-3735

35. Quétier, F., Lavorel, S., Thuiller, W., & Davies, I. (2007). Plant‐trait‐based modeling assessment of ecosystem‐service sensitivity to land‐use change. Ecological Applications, 17(8), 2377-2386. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0750.1

36. Rai, I. D., Singh, G., Pandey, A., & Rawat, G. S. (2019). Ecology of treeline vegetation in western Himalaya: anthropogenic and climatic influences. Tropical ecosystems: Structure, functions and challenges in the face of global change, 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-98113-8249-9_9

37. Rana, S. K., Rawal, R. S., Bentz, B. J., Linde, E., & Price, M. (2019). Climate-induced elevational range shifts and increase in plant species richness in a Himalayan biodiversity epicentre. PLOS One, 14(2), e0212200. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057103

38. Rawat, D., & Schickhoff, U. (2022). Changing climate scenario in high altitude regions: comparison of observed trends and perceptions of agro-pastoralists in Darma Valley, Uttarakhand, India. Mountain Landscapes in Transition: Effects of Land Use and Climate Change, 429-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70238-0_18

39. Sah, P., Sharma, S., Latwal, A., & Shaik, R. (2023). Timberline and climate in the Indian Western Himalayan region: changes and impact on timberline elevations. In Climate Change and Urban Environment Sustainability (pp. 205-225). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7618-6_12

40. Saxena, K. G., Rao, K. S., Sen, K. K., Maikhuri, R. K., & Semwal, R. L. (2002). Integrated natural resource management: approaches and lessons from the Himalaya. Conservation Ecology, 5(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26271822

41. Schickhoff, U. (2005). The upper timberline in the Himalayas, Hindu Kush and Karakorum: a review of geographical and ecological aspects. Mountain ecosystems, 275-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27365-4_12

42. Schickhoff, U., Bobrowski, M., Böhner, J., Bürzle, B., Chaudhary, R. P., Gerlitz, L., ... & Wedegärtner, R. (2015). Do Himalayan treelines respond to recent climate change? An evaluation of sensitivity indicators. Earth System Dynamics, 6(1), 245-265. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-2452015

43. Singh, C. P., Panigrahy, S., Thapliyal, A., Kimothi, M. M., Soni, P., & Parihar, J. S. (2012). Monitoring the alpine treeline shift in parts of the Indian Himalayas using remote sensing. Current Science, 102(4), 559-562. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24084105

44. Singh, S. P., & Singh, J. S. (1987). Forest vegetation of the Himalaya. The Botanical Review, 53(1), 80-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858183

45. Suwal, M. K., Shrestha, K. B., Guragain, L., Shakya, R., Shrestha, K., Bhuju, D. R., & Vetaas, O. R. (2016). Land-use change under a warming climate facilitated upslope expansion of Himalayan silver fir (Abies spectabilis (D. Don) Spach). Plant Ecology, 217(8), 993-1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-016-0624-7

46. Tasser, E., & Tappeiner, U. (2002). Impact of land use changes on mountain vegetation. Applied Vegetation Science, 5(2), 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2002.tb00547.x

47. Tewari, V. P., Verma, R. K., & Von Gadow, K. (2017). Climate change effects in the Western Himalayan ecosystems of India: evidence and strategies. Forest Ecosystems, 4(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-017-0100-4

48. Walia, K., Kumari, Y., Garima, & Mehta, A. (2025). Ecosystem Recovery and Resilience After Forest Fires. In Forest Fire and Climate Change: Insights into Science (pp. 119-145). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89967-6_7


About the Authors

Roosen Kumar
Department of Geography, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi
India


Bindhy Wasini Pandey
Department of Geography, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi
India


Jitender Rathore
School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech
United States


Chetna Sharma
CSRD, School of Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University
India

New Delhi



Review

For citations:


Kumar R., Pandey B., Rathore J., Sharma Ch. Four Decades of Tree Cover and Grassland Dynamics in the Foothills of the Western Himalayas – Chamoli District of Uttarakhand, India. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2025;18(4):19-35. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2025-3904

Views: 944

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-9388 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1565 (Online)