Preview

GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY

Advanced search

Seagrass Carbon Stocks And Sequestration In Habitat Impacted By Tin Mining Activities In Bangka Belitung, Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2025-3459

Contents

Scroll to:

Abstract

Seagrass meadows are important blue carbon ecosystems. They are threatened by various anthropogenic activities, including mining, which affect the ecological health. This study investigates the impact of sea-based tin mining activities on the carbon storage capabilities of seagrass meadows in Bangka Belitung, Indonesia. The objective of the study is to quantify carbon stocks and sequestrations in these ecosystems and understand how mining influences these critical natural resources. The research was conducted at various seagrass sites with different levels of mining impacts. Carbon stocks and sequestration were measured using the Loss on Ignition method, and net primary productivity was calculated. Remote sensing data from Landsat 7 and Sentinel-2A satellites were used to monitor changes in seagrass cover over time. Sedimentation rates and total suspended solids were measured to assess environmental impacts. Statistical analysis, including correlation and cluster analysis, examined the relationship between mining activity and seagrass health. The findings indicate a significant decrease in seagrass coverage and carbon storage in areas with high levels of tin mining. Specifically, areas with intensive mining showed higher rates of sedimentation and total suspended solids, which correlated with reduced seagrass biomass and carbon sequestration. This decrease compromises the ecological role of seagrass meadows as effective carbon sinks, highlighting the destructive impact of mining activities on these ecosystems.

For citations:


Adi W., Hartoko A., Purnomo P.W., Supratman O., Hernawan U.E. Seagrass Carbon Stocks And Sequestration In Habitat Impacted By Tin Mining Activities In Bangka Belitung, Indonesia. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2025;18(1):97-104. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2025-3459

INTRODUCTION

Seagrass ecosystems play a crucial role in carbon sequestration, representing essential components of the marine environment. Although they cover a small fraction of the ocean floor, seagrasses contribute significantly to oceanic carbon storage, accounting for up to 20% of the ocean's carbon (Khairunnisa et al. 2023; McHenry et al. 2023). This capacity for carbon storage indicates their critical role in global carbon cycles and climate change mitigation efforts (Wahyudi et al. 2020; Mashoreng et al. 2021). Seagrasses can store carbon in their bodies and in the soil by creating biomass and trapping carbon particles that settle from the water. (Harahap et al. 2021; Hartoko et al. 2021). Although seagrass meadows can release small amounts of methane (CH₄) into the atmosphere, recent studies indicate that CH₄ emissions from these ecosystems are minimal and offset less than 2% of the carbon sequestered in their sediments (Yau et al. 2023). Incorporating seagrass ecosystems into the blue carbon framework further emphasizes their importance in mitigating anthropogenic CO2 emissions (Marbà et al. 2015).

Despite their crucial roles, seagrass habitats and ecological conditions have declined due to human activities, including mining. This poses a serious threat to their carbon sequestration potential (Fourqurean et al. 2012; Unsworth et al. 2019; McKenzie and Yoshida 2020). In Bangka Belitung, Indonesia, tin mining significantly impacts coastal waters. Water turbidity from mining activities impedes seagrass growth by reducing essential sunlight penetration for photosynthesis (van Katwijk et al. 2011; Adams et al. 2016; Yamamoto et al. 2019). Offshore tin mining, initiated in 2001, has expanded annually, escalating environmental pressure on coastal ecosystems (Ibrahim et al. 2018; Irzon 2021).

Previous studies has highlighted the importance of conserving seagrass ecosystems as global carbon sinks, with Indonesia's seagrass meadows offering valuable insights into their carbon storage potential (Alongi et al. 2016; Wahyudi et al. 2020; Hernawan et al. 2021). Seagrasses are known for their ability to sequester carbon and store it as organic carbon in underwater sediments, making them one of the vital blue carbon ecosystems for climate change mitigation (Wahyudi et al. 2020; Stankovic et al. 2021). Human activities can cause the release of carbon that has been in sediments for hundreds of years, which may lead to higher greenhouse gas emissions (Fourqurean et al. 2012; Luo et al. 2022). Effective conservation and management strategies are needed, given the ability of seagrasses to store carbon and act as significant marine carbon sinks (Dewi et al. 2021; Hernawan et al. 2021). This study hypothesizes that tin mining significantly affects seagrass carbon storage. To test the hypothesis, it assessed the carbon stock and sequestration in three mining-affected areas in Bangka Belitung.

Data on seagrass carbon storage in Bangka Belitung remains limited, despite their acknowledged important role. Previous studies have primarily focused on seagrass distribution and the environmental consequences of mining (Syafutra et al. 2018; Haryati and Dariah 2019; Nopiansyah et al. 2021; Akhrianti et al. 2023). This study seeks to fill the gap by examining the effects of tin mining on seagrass carbon dynamics to inform conservation efforts and sustainable management practices. This study aims to assess seagrass meadows' carbon storage and ecological condition in tin-mining-impacted coastal waters in Bangka Belitung, Indonesia. It specifically focuses on how tin mining affects seagrass carbon dynamics, an area previously underexplored. By quantifying seagrass meadows' carbon storage capacity in mining-impacted regions, this study contributes to understanding their role in climate change mitigation and the effects of anthropogenic activities on their function. The study was conducted on two islands, Bangka and Belitung, Indonesia, over two years, 2022 and 2023 (Fig. 1). Sampling focused on marine seagrass beds affected by tin mining activities near Bangka and in non-impacted areas around Belitung.

Fig. 1. Study sites in Bangka Belitung, Indonesia. Red boxes indicate sampling sites

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Grouping and Mapping of Tin Mining Impacts

Sampling areas were initially categorized based on the intensity of mining impacts. This involved creating a map highlighting the potential impacts of tin mining based on the Bangka Belitung Islands Provincial Regulation No. 3 of 2020 on Coastal and Small Island Spatial Zoning. The spread of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) can reach 16 miles from mining sites (Pamungkas and Husrin 2020), and TSS levels over 20 mg/L can harm seagrass ecosystems, according to Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 22 of 2021 on Environmental Protection, Organization, and Management. These factors were important in making this classification.

Seagrass Area Mapping

For temporal comparison, Landsat 7 ETM+ imagery was used to assess water conditions in 2000, a year before offshore tin mining began, while Sentinel L2A imagery from 2022 was employed for depicting the latest conditions. Landsat 7 ETM+ has a spatial resolution of 30 m, while Sentinel-2 offers a higher spatial resolution of 10–20 m with 13 spectral bands, making it particularly effective for seagrass mapping in shallow coastal waters (Traganos et al. 2018; Bannari et al. 2022). Sentinel was selected as its operation began in 2016, rendering it unsuitable for earlier assessments. Previous studies showed that Sentinel-2 can effectively map seagrass using its multispectral images to identify different seagrass species and the algae that grow with them (Nur et al. 2021; Bannari et al. 2022). Landsat, while operating at a lower spatial resolution, has been invaluable for its long-term data continuity, enabling researchers to assess seagrass dynamics and temporal changes over decades (Carpenter et al. 2022; Rosalina et al. 2023). Image processing, including unsupervised classification, was performed using QGIS software to determine changes in seagrass coverage over time. The satellite image acquisition dates are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Satellite data related to the impact of tin mining

Location

Sentinel L2A, Acquisition Date

Landsat L7 ETM+, Acquisition Date

Tin Mining Impact

Bakit

27/05/2022

23/05/2000

High

Tukak

08/06/2022

14/04/2000

Moderate

Tanjung Kerasak

18/07/2022

14/04/2000

Moderate

Pegantungan

08/06/2022

06/03/2000

Low

Tanjung Kelayang

08/06/2022

03/12/2000

Low

Seagrass, Sedimentation, and Carbon Measurement

At the seagrass meadow research site, quantified species diversity, density (shoots/m²), and coverage (%) at the seagrass meadow research site using three 100 m line transects and 50×50 cm quadrat transects (Hernawan et al. 2021). The amount of seagrass (measured in g/m²) and the organic carbon stock (measured in tC/Ha) were calculated using the Loss on Ignition (LOI) method (Fourqurean et al. 2012). Carbon Sequestration (CS) is defined as net primary productivity measured using the Eq. (1): CS = 1.743 + 0.087 (seagrass coverage), with units of tC/ha/year (Wahyudi et al. 2020). This Eq. (1) was chosen because it was developed using seagrass data from Indonesia, making it highly applicable to this study. The sedimentation rate was measured to assess the rate of sediment accumulation over time at the site, expressed in g/m²/day (Roswaty et al. 2014). The Total Suspended Solids (TSS) were measured gravimetrically, with results reported in mg/l (Wisha and Ondara 2017).

Statistical analysis

The statistical analyses provided a robust framework for understanding the impacts of tin mining on seagrass ecosystems by quantifying the relationships between mining activities and seagrass health metrics. These relationships were analyzed using PAST 4.03 (Hammer et al. 2001), a program made for statistical and graphical analysis, particularly in paleontological studies. The analysis used correlation and clustering methods to understand how different factors relate to each other and to group research locations based on their environmental traits.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Seagrass Coverage Decline

The study of seagrass meadows at five locations showed a big decrease in seagrass coverage, linked to the level of tin mining nearby (Fig. 2). Over the 22-year study period, the most significant decline was observed in Bakit. In this high-mining impact area, seagrass coverage decreased by 41.46 Ha/year (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, and Table 2). In contrast, Tukak, with a moderate mining impact, showed the least decline (0.27 Ha/year). These results highlight the harmful impact of mining on seagrass habitats, which matches the loss of seagrass reported in other studies (Brodie et al. 2020; Supriyadi et al. 2021; Sjafrie et al. 2022; Nugraha et al. 2023). The seagrass meadows at the study included nine types of seagrass: Thalassia hemprichii, Enhalus acoroides, Cymodocea rotundata, Cymodocea serrulata, Halodule uninervis, Halodule pinifolia, Halophila ovalis, Halophila minor, and Syringodium isoetifolium. The decline in seagrass coverage diminishes the ecosystem's ability to perform essential functions such as carbon sequestration and threatens marine biodiversity.

Fig. 2. Potential Impacted Areas of Tin Mining and Changes in Seagrass Area (2000-2022)

Fig. 3. Seagrass and Sedimentation in Tin Mining Impacted Areas

Table 2. Seagrass Condition

 

Location

Bakit

Tanjung Kerasak

Tukak

Pegantungan

Tanjung Kelayang

Tin Mining Impact

High

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Low

Sedimentation and Total Suspended Solid (TSS)

Sedimentation Rate (g/m²/day)

146.93

135.11

129.04

61.59

94.15

TSS (mg/l)

26.29

17.3

22.01

16.53

15.24

Seagrass Mapping

Total Station

2

2

4

1

2

Seagrass Species

3

10

8

3

8

Seagrass Cover (%)

5.33

17.66

26.13

73.28

24.16

Seagrass Area in 2000 (Ha)

1,101.72

183.43

669.32

865.72

65.23

Seagrass Area in 2022 (Ha)

189.66

177.46

476.05

790.03

55.08

Seagrass Loss (Ha/Year)

-41.46

-8.78

-0.27

-3.44

-0.46

Seagrass Loss in 22 years (%)

-82.79

-28.88

-3.25

-8.74

-15.55

Seagrass Biomass and Carbon

Total Sampel

16

32

109

14

36

Biomass, Above Ground (g/m²)

1.03

18.51

15.37

33.82

16.75

Biomass, Below Ground (g/m²)

2.37

46.54

74.51

102.99

55.76

Total Biomass (g/m²)

3.4

65.06

89.88

136.81

72.51

Organic Carbon, Below Ground (tC/Ha)

0.006

0.138

0.216

0.262

0.122

Organic Carbon, Above Ground (tC/Ha)

0.003

0.055

0.045

0.101

0.047

Standing Stock Carbon (tC/Ha)

0.009

0.193

0.261

0.363

0.169

Carbon Sequestration (tC/Ha/Year)

5.33

17.66

26.13

73.28

24.16

Sediment Carbon

Total Sampel

35

9

34

44

79

Organic Carbon Stock (tC/Ha)

57.36

80.12

110.53

173.05

151.56

Sedimentation Rates and Water Turbidity

The results indicate significantly higher sedimentation rates in areas with high mining activities (Table 2 and Fig. 3). Bakit, the area with the highest mining impact, recorded a sedimentation rate of 146.93 g/m²/day, which is nearly double that observed in areas with lower mining impacts. These elevated Higher sedimentation rates are linked to more Total Suspended Solids (TSS), which makes the water muddier (Samper-Villarreal et al. 2016). The negative correlation between sedimentation rates and seagrass canopy coverage suggests that increased sediment deposition obscures light penetration, which is essential for seagrass health and productivity (Ahmad-Kamil et al. 2013).

Seagrass Biomass and Carbon Dynamics

Analysis of seagrass biomass revealed that areas with lower mining impacts exhibited significantly higher biomass (e.g., Pegantungan and Tanjung Kelayang averaging 104.66 g/m²) compared to highly impacted areas like Bakit (3.4 g/m²) (Fig. 4 and Table 2). The reduction of biomass in areas with high mining activities directly impacts the ecosystem's carbon storage capacity. These findings align with Greiner et al. (2013), highlighting the role of healthy seagrass meadows in enhancing carbon sequestration.

Fig. 4. Biomass, Carbon Stock, and Sequestration in Tin Mining Impacted Areas

Furthermore, an inverse relationship was observed between mining impact intensity, carbon stock, and sequestration in seagrass meadows. In high-impact areas, the carbon sequestration was as low as 5.33 tC/Ha/year, whereas, in low-impact areas, it averaged 162.31 tC/Ha/year. This inverse correlation supports the hypothesis that physical disturbances such as sedimentation impair the seagrass meadows' ability to sequester carbon effectively (Mazarrasa et al. 2018).

The detrimental effects of mining on seagrass ecosystems have been demonstrated by several studies indicating a decline in seagrass area and health due to various mining activities. Rosalina et al. (2019) and Adi et al. (2024) described how mining waste affects seagrass ecosystems. This includes metal accumulation and altered seagrass dynamics, leading to less biomass and disrupted ecological functions seen in this study. Studies on Bintan Island and Taka Bonerate National Marine Park also report significant seagrass area reductions and health declines due to increased turbidity from mining activities (Supriyadi et al. 2021; Nugraha et al. 2023). Moreover, the broader decline of seagrass meadows in Indonesia, as noted by Sjafrie et al. (2022), reflects a trend where development and mining operations, including dredging and land cover changes, exacerbate the vulnerability of these ecosystems.

Statistical Analysis

Employing the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) and Euclidean distance, the cluster analysis revealed significant spatial differences among the sampling locations (Fig. 5). Bakit, experiencing the highest impact of mining, displayed the greatest differences. In contrast, Tanjung Kerasak and Tukak, areas with moderate mining impacts, showed close similarities. This analysis supports the spatial differentiation of the study sites into three distinct groups based on the degree of mining impact.

Fig. 5. Cluster Analysis of research location (left) and correlation between research variables (right), significance (P<0.05) shown in a square box. Sg.Sp= Seagrass Species; Sg.C= Seagrass Cover; Sg.Ext/Yr= Seagrass Changes (Ha/Year); Sg.Ext = Seagrass Change in 22 year (%); Bm. AG= Biomass Above ground; Bm. BG= Biomass Below ground; Bm. Total = Biomass above ground + below ground; Sd.OCS= Carbon Organic Sediment; Sg. OCS. BG. W= Seagrass Carbon Organic Stock Below Ground; Sg. OCS. AG. W= Seagrass Carbon Organic Stock Above Ground; Sg. OCS. Total Seagrass Standing Stock Carbon; Sed.Rate Sedimentation Rate; TSS Total Suspended Solid

Pearson’s r correlation statistics were used to examine the connections between sedimentation rates, seagrass canopy cover, and carbon stocks (see Fig. 5). The results indicate a significant negative correlation (p<0.05) between sedimentation rates and both seagrass canopy cover and sediment carbon. This means that higher sedimentation from mining harms seagrass and reduces carbon stored in sediments. On the other hand, there were positive correlations found between seagrass cover, biomass, and above-ground organic carbon stock, indicating that areas with healthier seagrass canopies tend to have higher biomass and carbon storage capabilities. These findings are crucial for understanding the dynamic interactions within seagrass ecosystems under stress from anthropogenic activities.

These statistical findings not only reinforce the visual and descriptive observations made during the study but also provide a quantitative basis for the conclusions drawn concerning the impacts of tin mining on seagrass ecosystems. The significant correlations and spatial distinctions highlighted by the analyses underscore the complex nature of the interactions between environmental disturbances and ecological responses in these critical marine habitats.

Ecological and Conservation Implications

The degradation of seagrass meadows due to tin mining activities poses significant risks to marine biodiversity and the livelihoods dependent upon these ecosystems. Our findings emphasize the urgent need for conservation strategies that mitigate the impacts of such anthropogenic activities. Establishing protected marine areas and regulating mining practices near critical habitats are potential measures that could be taken to preserve these valuable ecosystems (Sugianti and Mujiyanto 2020; Tebaiy et al. 2021; Rifai et al. 2022).

Seagrass conservation and restoration in turbid waters present unique challenges and require tailored strategies to ensure ecosystem health and sustainability. Turbidity, influenced by factors such as water depth, canopy complexity, and sediment resuspension, plays a crucial role in shaping seagrass habitats and their associated ecosystem services (Samper-Villarreal et al. 2016). The stability of seagrass ecosystems, particularly in shallow coastal lagoons, relies heavily on feedback processes linked to the stirring up of sediments and the reduction of light (Adams et al. 2016; Park et al. 2016; Lanuru et al. 2018). Understanding these interactions is essential for effective conservation and restoration efforts.

Restoration initiatives have shown their potential to recover the health of coastal ecosystems rapidly. Programs such as the establishment of marine protected areas have been effective in maintaining ecosystem health and enhancing organic carbon storage in seagrass meadows (Adams et al. 2016; Stankovic et al. 2021; Tanner et al. 2021). In Asia, where seagrass beds are a critical component of marine biodiversity, conservation efforts are crucial for protecting these valuable habitats and the services they provide. The work by Sudo et al. (2021) highlights the importance of understanding the distribution, temporal changes, and conservation status of tropical seagrass beds to inform and tailor conservation strategies effectively.

Using advanced techniques like remote sensing to map how much seagrass there is can give important information that helps improve conservation and management efforts in turbid waters (Koedsin et al. 2016). These techniques are useful not only for monitoring the current state of seagrass meadows but also for predicting their responses to environmental changes and human impacts.

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows that in areas affected by mining, there are major decreases in seagrass growth and the ability to store carbon. This was determined by looking at data on biomass, sediment rates, total suspended solids (TSS), and organic carbon levels.

The strong association between mining intensity and the degradation of seagrass meadows, which are vital for carbon sequestration and marine biodiversity, suggests the need for immediate conservation efforts and a re-evaluation of mining practices to protect the seagrass ecosystem from continuously degrading. Management actions should prioritize protection, particularly in areas heavily affected by mining activities. The findings of this research have significant implications for policy-making and environmental management, particularly in promoting sustainable mining practices that consider the ecological value of seagrass meadows. This study calls for protective measures to safeguard the role of seagrass ecosystems as critical carbon sinks and biodiversity reservoirs. These actions are essential not only for the preservation of marine ecosystems but also for contributing to global climate change mitigation efforts. In addition, this study also fills a knowledge gap regarding the impact of tin mining on seagrass carbon dynamics while providing a foundation for future research and conservation strategies to ensure the sustainability of seagrass habitats in Bangka Belitung amidst increasing anthropogenic pressures.

References

1. Adams M.P., Hovey R.K., Hipsey M.R., Bruce L.C., Ghisalberti M., Lowe R.J., Gruber R.K., Ruiz-Montoya L., Maxwell P.S., Callaghan D.P., Kendrick G.A. and O’Brien K.R. (2016). Feedback between sediment and light for seagrass: Where is it important? Limnology and Oceanography, 61(6), 1937–1955. DOI: 10.1002/lno.10319

2. Adi W., Hartoko A., Purnomo P.W., Supratman O., Pringgenies D. and Hernawan U.E. (2024). Ecological condition of seagrass meadows around sea-based tin mining activities in the waters of Bangka Belitung Islands , Indonesia. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 209(PA), 117151. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.117151

3. Ahmad-Kamil E.I., Ramli R., Jaaman S.A., Bali J. and Al-Obaidi J.R. (2013). The Effects of Water Parameters on Monthly Seagrass Percentage Cover in Lawas, East Malaysia. The Scientific World Journal, 2013, 1–8. DOI: 10.1155/2013/892746

4. Akhrianti I., Nugraha M.A., Pamungkas A. and Gustomi A. (2023). Total suspended solid distribution as impact tin mining at surrounded Pangkalpinang seawater Bangka Island. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1207(1). DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1207/1/012029

5. Alongi D.M., Murdiyarso D., Fourqurean J.W., Kauffman J.B., Hutahaean A., Crooks S., Lovelock C.E., Howard J., Herr D., Fortes M., Pidgeon E. and Wagey T. (2016). Indonesia’s blue carbon: a globally significant and vulnerable sink for seagrass and mangrove carbon. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 24(1), 3–13. DOI: 10.1007/s11273-015-9446-y

6. Bannari A., Ali T.S. and Abahussain A. (2022). The capabilities of Sentinel-MSI (2A/2B) and Landsat-OLI (8/9) in seagrass and algae species differentiation using spectral reflectance. Ocean Science, 18(2), 361–388. DOI: 10.5194/os-18-361-2022

7. Brodie G., Brodie J., Maata M., Peter M., Otiawa T. and Devlin M.J. (2020). Seagrass habitat in Tarawa Lagoon, Kiribati: Service benefits and links to national priority issues. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 155(May), 111099. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111099

8. Carpenter S., Byfield V., Felgate S.L., Price D.M., Andrade V., Cobb E., Strong J., Lichtschlag A., Brittain H., Barry C., Fitch A., Young A., Sanders R. and Evans C. (2022). Using Unoccupied Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to Map Seagrass Cover from Sentinel-2 Imagery. Remote Sensing, 14(3), 477. DOI: 10.3390/rs14030477

9. Dewi S.K., Setyati W.A. and Riniatsih I. (2021). Stok Karbon pada Ekosistem Lamun di Pulau Kemujan dan Pulau Bengkoang Taman Nasional Karimunjawa. Journal of Marine Research, 10(1), 39–47. DOI: 10.14710/jmr.v10i1.28273

10. Fourqurean J.W., Duarte C.M., Kennedy H., Marbà N., Holmer M., Mateo M.A., Apostolaki E.T., Kendrick G.A., Krause-Jensen D., McGlathery K.J. and Serrano O. (2012). Seagrass ecosystems as a globally significant carbon stock. Nature Geoscience, 5(7), 505–509. DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1477

11. Greiner J.T., McGlathery K.J., Gunnell J. and McKee B.A. (2013). Seagrass Restoration Enhances “Blue Carbon” Sequestration in Coastal Waters. PLoS ONE, 8(8), 1–8. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072469

12. Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T. and Ryan P.D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 9. https://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/past.pdf

13. Harahap Z.A., Khairunnisa, Susetya I.E. and Rahayu Y.P. (2021). Estimation of carbon stock in seagrass communities in Central Tapanuli. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 944(1), 012064. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/944/1/012064

14. Hartoko A., Sembiring Y.T. and Latifah N. (2021). Seagrass Cholorophyll-a, Biomass and Carbon Algorithms Based on the Field and Sentinel-2A Satellite Data at Karimunjawa Island, Indonesia. Science and Technology Indonesia, 6(3), 121–130. DOI: 10.26554/sti.2021.6.3.121-130

15. Haryati U. and Dariah A. (2019). Carbon emission and sequestration on tin mined land: A case study in Bangka Belitung Province. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 393(1), 012097. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/393/1/012097

16. Hernawan U.E., Rahmawati S., Ambo-Rappe R., Sjafrie N.D.M., Hadiyanto H., Yusup D.S., Nugraha A.H., La Nafie Y.A., Adi W., Prayudha B., Irawan A., Rahayu Y.P., Ningsih E., Riniatsih I., Supriyadi I.H. and McMahon K. (2021). The first nation-wide assessment identifies valuable blue-carbon seagrass habitat in Indonesia is in moderate condition. Science of The Total Environment, 782, 146818. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146818

17. Ibrahim I., Haryadi D. and Wahyudin N. (2018). From Charm To Sorrow: The Dark Portrait Of Tin Mining In Bangka Belitung, Indonesia. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 360–382. DOI: 10.20319/pijss.2018.41.360382

18. Irzon R. (2021). Penambangan timah di Indonesia: Sejarah, masa kini, dan prospeksi. Jurnal Teknologi Mineral Dan Batubara, 17(3), 179–189. DOI: 10.30556/jtmb.Vol17.No3.2021.1183

19. Khairunnisa K., Harahap Z.A. and Farahisah H. (2023). The Variability of Sedimentary Carbon Stock in Seagrass Ecosystem in Central Tapanuli, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1221(1), 012081. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1221/1/012081

20. Koedsin W., Intararuang W., Ritchie R. and Huete A. (2016). An Integrated Field and Remote Sensing Method for Mapping Seagrass Species, Cover, and Biomass in Southern Thailand. Remote Sensing, 8(4), 292. DOI: 10.3390/rs8040292

21. Lanuru M., Ambo-Rappe R., Amri K. and Williams S.L. (2018). Hydrodynamics in Indo-Pacific seagrasses with a focus on short canopies. Botanica Marina, 61(1), 1–8. DOI: 10.1515/bot-2017-0037

22. Luo H., Liu S., Ren Y., Jiang Z., Wu Y., Zhang X., Li J. and Huang X. (2022). Eutrophication decreases Halophila beccarii plant organic carbon contribution to sequestration potential. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9(August), 1–11. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.986415

23. Marbà N., Arias-Ortiz A., Masqué P., Kendrick G.A., Mazarrasa I., Bastyan G.R., Garcia-Orellana J. and Duarte C.M. (2015). Impact of seagrass loss and subsequent revegetation on carbon sequestration and stocks. Journal of Ecology, 103(2), 296–302. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12370

24. Mashoreng S., Nafie Y.A. La, Selamat B., Isyrini R. and Amri K. (2021). Changes in seagrass carbon stock: implications of decreasing area and percentage cover of seagrass beds in Barranglompo Island, Spermonde archipelago, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 763(1), 012014. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/763/1/012014

25. Mazarrasa I., Samper-Villarreal J., Serrano O., Lavery P.S., Lovelock C.E., Marbà N., Duarte C.M. and Cortés J. (2018). Habitat characteristics provide insights of carbon storage in seagrass meadows. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 134, 106–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.01.059

26. McHenry J., Rassweiler A., Hernan G., Dubel A.K., Curtin C., Barzak J., Varias N. and Lester S.E. (2023). Geographic variation in organic carbon storage by seagrass beds. Limnology and Oceanography, 68(6), 1256–1268. DOI: 10.1002/lno.12343

27. McKenzie L.J. and Yoshida R.L. (2020). Over a decade monitoring Fiji’s seagrass condition demonstrates resilience to anthropogenic pressures and extreme climate events. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 160(August), 111636. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111636

28. Nopiansyah D., Adi W. and Febrianto A. (2021). Struktur Komunitas Gastropoda Di Ekosistem Lamun Di Pantai Puding Kabupaten Bangka Selatan. Journal of Tropical Marine Science, 4(2), 59–64. DOI: 10.33019/jour.trop.mar.sci.v4i2.2123

29. Nugraha A.H., Syahputra I.P., Dharmawan I.W.E., Arbi U.Y., Hermanto B., Kurniawan F., Roni S., Wibisono G. and Rivani A. (2023). Sebaran Jenis dan Kondisi Tutupan Lamun di Perairan Kepulauan Riau. Journal of Marine Research, 12(3), 431–438. DOI: 10.14710/jmr.v12i3.36274

30. Nur S., Nurdjaman S., Dika Praba P Cahya B. and Haidar Dzar Al-Ghifari K. (2021). Integrating sentinel-2 spectral-imagery and field data of seagrass coverage with species identification in the coastal of Riau Islands, Indonesia. Borneo Journal of Marine Science and Aquaculture (BJoMSA), 5(2), 78–82. DOI: 10.51200/bjomsa.v5i2.2710

31. Pamungkas A. and Husrin S. (2020). Pemodelan Sebaran Sedimen Tersuspensi Dampak Penambangan Timah Di Perairan Bangka. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Teknologi Kelautan Tropis, 12(2), 353–368. DOI: 10.29244/jitkt.v12i2.27875

32. Park S.R., Kim S., Kim Y.K., Kang C.-K. and Lee K.-S. (2016). Photoacclimatory Responses of Zostera marina in the Intertidal and Subtidal Zones. PLOS ONE, 11(5), e0156214. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156214

33. Rifai H., Hernawan U.E., Zulpikar F., Sondakh C.F.A., Ambo-Rappe R., Sjafrie N.D.M., Irawan A., Dewanto H.Y., Rahayu Y.P., Reenyan J., Safaat M., Alifatri L. ode, Rahmawati S., Hakim A., Rusandi A. and Wawo M. (2022). Strategies to Improve Management of Indonesia’s Blue Carbon Seagrass Habitats in Marine Protected Areas. Coastal Management, 50(2), 93–105. DOI: 10.1080/08920753.2022.2022948

34. Rosalina D., Herawati E.Y., Musa M., Sofarini D., Amin M. and RisjaniY. (2019). Lead Accumulation and Its Histological Impact on Cymodocea serrulata Seagrass in the Laboratory. Sains Malaysiana, 48(4), 813–822. DOI: 10.17576/jsm-2019-4804-13

35. Rosalina D., Jamil K., Arafat Y., Amalia R. and Leilani A. (2023). Mapping of seagrass ecosystem on Bontosua Island, Pangkep District, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 24(4). DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d240411

36. Roswaty S., Muskananfola M.R. and Purnomo P.W. (2014). Tingkat Sedimentasi di Muara Sungai Wedung Kecamatan Wedung, Demak. Management of Aquatic Resources, 3(2), 129–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/marj.v3i2.5016

37. Samper-Villarreal J., Lovelock C.E., Saunders M.I., Roelfsema C. and Mumby P.J. (2016). Organic carbon in seagrass sediments is influenced by seagrass canopy complexity, turbidity, wave height, and water depth. Limnology and Oceanography, 61(3), 938–952. DOI: 10.1002/lno.10262

38. Sjafrie N.D.M., Triyono, Zulpikar F., Rahmawati S. and Hernawan U.E. (2022). Preliminary study on community’s perception of seagrass restoration on Pari Island, Seribu Islands Regency. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 967(1), 012028. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/967/1/012028

39. Stankovic M., Ambo-Rappe R., Carly F., Dangan-Galon F., Fortes M.D., Hossain M.S., Kiswara W., Van Luong C., Minh-Thu P., Mishra A.K., Noiraksar T., Nurdin N., Panyawai J., Rattanachot E., Rozaimi M., Soe Htun U. and Prathep A. (2021). Quantification of blue carbon in seagrass ecosystems of Southeast Asia and their potential for climate change mitigation. Science of TheTotal Environment, 783, 146858. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146858

40. Sudo K., Quiros T.E.A.A.L., Prathep A., Luong C. Van, Lin H.-J.J., Bujang J.S., Ooi J.L.S., Fortes M.D., Zakaria M.H., Yaakub S.M., Tan Y.M., Huang X. and Nakaoka M. (2021). Distribution, Temporal Change, and Conservation Status of Tropical Seagrass Beds in Southeast Asia: 2000–2020. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.637722

41. Sugianti Y. and Mujiyanto M. (2020). Current Status and Species Diversity of Seagrass in Panjang Island, Banten. ILMU KELAUTAN: Indonesian Journal of Marine Sciences, 25(1), 15–22. DOI: 10.14710/ik.ijms.25.1.15-22

42. Supriyadi I.H., Cappenberg H.A.W., Wouthuyzen S., Hafizt M., Rahmawati S., Alifatri L.O. and Suyarso S. (2021). Seagrass Condition at Some Small Islands in The Taka Bonerate National Marine Park, South Sulawesi Indonesia. Jurnal Segara, 17(2), 83. DOI: 10.15578/segara.v17i2.9575

43. Syafutra R., Adi W., Iqbal M. and Yustian I. (2018). Short communication: Dugong dugon Müller, 1776 (Sirenia, Dugongidae) in Bangka Island, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 19(3), 773–780. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d190310

44. Tanner J.E., McSkimming C., Russell B.D. and Connell S.D. (2021). Rapid restoration of belowground structure and fauna of a seagrass habitat. Restoration Ecology, 29(1). DOI: 10.1111/rec.13289

45. Tebaiy S., Mampioper D.C., Batto M., Manuputty A., Tuharea S. and Clement K. (2021). The Status of Seagrass Health: Supporting Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in Misool Marine Protected Area, Raja Ampat, Indonesia. ILMU KELAUTAN: Indonesian Journal of Marine Sciences, 26(3), 136–146. DOI: 10.14710/ik.ijms.26.3.136-146

46. Traganos D., Aggarwal B., Poursanidis D., Topouzelis K., Chrysoulakis N. and Reinartz P. (2018). Towards Global-Scale Seagrass Mapping and Monitoring Using Sentinel-2 on Google Earth Engine: The Case Study of the Aegean and Ionian Seas. Remote Sensing, 10(8), 1227. DOI: 10.3390/rs10081227

47. Unsworth R.K.F.F., McKenzie L.J., Collier C.J., Cullen-Unsworth L.C., Duarte C.M., Eklöf J.S., Jarvis J.C., Jones B.L. and Nordlund L.M. (2019). Global challenges for seagrass conservation. Ambio, 48(8), 801–815. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-018-1115-y

48. van Katwijk M.M., van der Welle M.E.W., Lucassen E.C.H.E.T., Vonk J.A., Christianen M.J.A., Kiswara W., Inayat al Hakim I., Arifin A., Bouma T.J., Roelofs J.G.M. and Lamers L.P.M. (2011). Early warning indicators for river nutrient and sediment loads in tropical seagrass beds: A benchmark from a near-pristine archipelago in Indonesia. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62(7), 1512–1520. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.04.007

49. Wahyudi A.J., Rahmawati S., Irawan A., Hadiyanto H., Prayudha B., Hafizt M., Afdal A., Adi N.S., Rustam A., Hernawan U.E., Rahayu Y.P., Iswari M.Y., Supriyadi I.H., Solihudin T., Ati R.N.A., Kepel T.L., Kusumaningtyas M.A., Daulat A., Salim H.L., … Kiswara W. (2020). Assessing Carbon Stock and Sequestration of the Tropical Seagrass Meadows in Indonesia. Ocean Science Journal, 55(1), 85–97. DOI: 10.1007/s12601-020-0003-0

50. Wisha U.J. and Ondara K. (2017). Total Suspended Solid (TSS) Distributed by Tidal Currents during Low to High Tide Phase in the Waters of Sayung, Demak: Its Relations to Water Quality Parameters. Journal of Marine and Aquatic Sciences, 3(2), 154. DOI: 10.24843/jmas.2017.v3.i02.154-162

51. Yamamoto T., Malingin M.A.C.L., Pepino M.M., Yoshikai M., Campos W., Miyajima T., Watanabe A., Tanaka Y., Morimoto N., Ramos R., Pagkalinawan H. and Nadaoka K. (2019). Assessment of coastal turbidity improvement potential by terrigenous sediment load reduction and its implications on seagrass inhabitable area in Banate Bay, central Philippines. Science of The Total Environment, 656, 1386–1400. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.243

52. Yau Y.Y.Y., Reithmaier G., Majtényi-Hill C., Serrano O., Piñeiro-Juncal N., Dahl M., Mateo M.A., Bonaglia S. and Santos I.R. (2023). Methane Emissions in Seagrass Meadows as a Small Offset to Carbon Sequestration. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 128(6), 1–18. DOI: 10.1029/2022jg007295


About the Authors

Wahyu Adi
Aquatic Resources Management Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Diponegoro University; Aquatic Resources Management Faculty of Agriculture Fisheries and Marine University of Bangka Belitung
Indonesia

Jl. Prof. Soedarto No.13 Tembalang, Semarang, 50275; Gang IV No. 1 Balun Ijuk Merawang, Bangka, 33172



Agus Hartoko
Aquatic Resources Management Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Diponegoro University
Indonesia

Jl. Prof. Soedarto No.13 Tembalang, Semarang, 50275



Pujiono W. Purnomo
Aquatic Resources Management Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Diponegoro University
Indonesia

Jl. Prof. Soedarto No.13 Tembalang, Semarang, 50275



Okto Supratman
Aquatic Resources Management Faculty of Agriculture Fisheries and Marine University of Bangka Belitung
Indonesia

Gang IV No. 1 Balun Ijuk Merawang, Bangka, 33172



Udhi E. Hernawan
Research Center for Oceanography National Research and Innovation Agency Indonesia
Indonesia

Jl. Pasir Putih I Ancol Timur, Jakarta, 14430



Review

For citations:


Adi W., Hartoko A., Purnomo P.W., Supratman O., Hernawan U.E. Seagrass Carbon Stocks And Sequestration In Habitat Impacted By Tin Mining Activities In Bangka Belitung, Indonesia. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2025;18(1):97-104. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2025-3459

Views: 1387

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-9388 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1565 (Online)