DEBRIS FLOW AND LANDSLIDE HAZARDS UNDER CERTAIN TYPES OF ATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION
https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2012-5-2-68-77
Abstract
About the Authors
Nina KononovaRussian Federation
Institute of Geography RAS, 29 Staromonetny, Moscow 119017, Russia
Irina Malneva
Russian Federation
All-Russian Research Institute for Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology (VSEGINGEO), Noginsk District, Moscow Region, Russia
References
1. Dzerdzeevskii, В. (1962). Fluctuations of Climate and General Circulation of the Atmosphere
2. in extra-tropical latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere and some problems of dynamic
3. climatology. Tellus, Vol. XIV, No. 3. P. 328–336.
4. Gensiorovsky, Yu.V., Kazakov, N.A. (2009). Activation of exogenic geological processes in
5. South Sakhalin 22–24 June 2009. Georisk. № 2. P. 56–60 (In Russian).
6. Kononova N.K. (2010). Long-term fluctuations of Northern Hemisphere atmospheric
7. circulation according to Dzerdzeevskii’s Classification. – Geography, Environment, Sustainability
8. Journal. Russian Geographical Society, Faculty of Geography of M.V. Lomonosov
9. Moscow State University, Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences. No.01 [3].
10. P. 25–43
11. Kononova, N.K. (2011). Fluctuations of Atmospheric Circulation over the Northern Hemisphere
12. in XX – the Beginning of XXI Century. http://www.atmospheric-circulation.ru
13. Kononova N.K., Malneva I.V. (2007). Estimation of mud flow and landslide hazard on the
14. island Sakhalin in the next decade The Proceedings of Int. Geotechnical Symposium
15. “Geotechnical Engineering for Disaster Prevention & Reduction”. July 24–26, 2007, Yuzhno-
16. Sakhalinsk, Russia. Kazakhstan Geotechnical Society, CIR Publisher of Korean Publishing
17. Company, Seoul. P. 180–183.
18. Landslides and Mudflows (in two volumes), (1988), UNEP/UNESCO, Moscow, 378 p.
19. Lin, P.-S., Lee, J.-H. (2008). Risk assessment of potential debris flows in the watershed of the
20. Chen-Yu-Lan River. Debris flows: Disasters, Risk, Forecast, Protection, Proceedings of the
21. Int. Conference, Pyatigorsk. P. 62–65.
22. Ma D., Huang H., Xie H., Zhong D. (2008). Some characteristics of debris flow hazards
23. in mountain urban areas, China. Debris flows: Disasters, Risk, Forecast, Protection.
24. Proceedings of the Int. Conference, Pyatigorsk. P. 66–69.
25. Malneva I.V., Krestin B.M., Gonsirovsky D.G., Kononova N.K. (2008). Assessment of activation
26. of hazardous geological processes in the area Major Sochi and Krasnaya Polyana. Razvedka
27. I okhrana nedr (Exploration and conservation of mineral resources), № 6. P. 29–33
28. (In Russian).
29. Methods of permanent forecast of exogenic geological processes, (1984). Edit. A.I. Sheko
30. and V.S. Krupoderov. Moscow, “Nedra”, 188 p. (In Russian).
31. Musohranova L.A., Gensiorovsky Yu.V., Kazakov N.A. (2010). Vulnerability of the residential
32. areas Sakhalin region to the effects of dangerous natural processes and measures taken
33. to protect it. Gradostroitelstvo (Urban Planning), № 6. P. 33–39 (In Russian).
34. Natural hazards in Russia. Exogenic Geological Hazards / Edited by V.M. Kutepov, A.I. Sheko
35. (2002). Moscow: Publ. Firm «KRUK», 345 p. (In Russian).
36. Sheko, A.I., Malneva, I.V. (2002). Debris flows. Natural dangers of Russia (in 6 volumes). Volume
37. Exogenic geological dangers. Edit. V.I. Kutepov and A.I. Sheko. Moscow. P. 65–87
38. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Kononova N., Malneva I. DEBRIS FLOW AND LANDSLIDE HAZARDS UNDER CERTAIN TYPES OF ATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2012;5(2):68-77. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2012-5-2-68-77