SEISMIC RISK CARTOGRAPHIC VISUALIZATION FOR CRISIS MANAGEMENT
https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2014-7-4-4-27
Abstract
Earthquake loss estimations before future events and following strong earthquakes
in emergency mode and their corresponding visualization are extremely important for proper
decision on preventive measures and effective response in order to save lives and properties. The paper addresses the methodological issues of seismic risk and vulnerability assessment, mapping with GIS technology application. Requirements for simulation models,
databases used at different levels, as well as ways of visualizations oriented for Emergency
Management Agencies, as well federal and local authorities are discussed. Examples of
mapping at the different levels: global, country, region and urban one are given and the
influence of input data uncertainties on the reliability of loss computations is analyzed.
in emergency mode and their corresponding visualization are extremely important for proper
decision on preventive measures and effective response in order to save lives and properties. The paper addresses the methodological issues of seismic risk and vulnerability assessment, mapping with GIS technology application. Requirements for simulation models,
databases used at different levels, as well as ways of visualizations oriented for Emergency
Management Agencies, as well federal and local authorities are discussed. Examples of
mapping at the different levels: global, country, region and urban one are given and the
influence of input data uncertainties on the reliability of loss computations is analyzed.
About the Authors
Nina I. Frolova
Seismological Center, Institute of Environmental Geosciences, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valery I. Larionov
Seismological Center, Institute of Environmental Geosciences, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Jean Bonnin
Institute of Physics of the Earth, University of Strasbourg
France
France
Aleksander N. Ugarov
Extreme Situations Research Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Boissonnade A.C. & Shah H.C. (1984) Seismic Vulnerability and Insurance Studies // The Geneva Papers, vol. 9, no. 32, pp. 223–254.
2. Bonnin J., Frolova N., Larionov V., et al. (2002a) Reliability of Possible Earthquake Impact Assessment with Alert Seismological Surveys Application. In: Proc. 28 General ESC Assembly, Genoa, Italy.
3. Bonnin J., Frolova N., Kozlov M., Larionov V. et al. (2002b), Experience of “Extremum” System Application for Operative Earthquake Loss Assessment. In: Proc. 28 General ESC Assembly, Genoa, Italy.
4. Bonnin J., Frolova N. (2004) Near Real-Time Loss Assessment Due To Strong Earthquakes: The State of The Art. In: Proc. of the XXIX General Assembly of European Seismological Commission (ESC2004), Potsdam, Germany.
5. Bonnin J. & Frolova N. (2010) Global Systems For Earthquake Loss Estimation In Emergency Mode. In Proc. XV International Conference “Protection of Population and Territories from Emergencies”, Emercom of Russia, Moscow, pp. 195–203.
6. Fournier d’Albe (1982) An Approach to Earthquake Risk Management, Eng. Struct., vol. 4, pp. 145–152.
7. Frolova N., Nikolaev A., Larionov V., et al. (2003a) Analysis of Real Time Earthquake Information Applied For Possible Loss Assessment. In: Proc. of the TIEMS 2003 Conference, Sofia Antipolis, France.
8. Frolova N., Kozlov M., Larionov V., et al. (2003b). Extremum System for Earthquake Risk And Loss Assessment. In: Proc. of SE-40EE, Skopje-Ohrid, Macedonia.
9. Frolova N., Larionov V., Bonnin J., Rogozhin E., Starovojt O., Chepkunas L. (2006) Scenario Earthquake Consequences And Seismic Risk Mapping: Case Study For The Northen Caucasus. In: Proc. of the First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, 3–8 September 2006, Paper Number: 1266.
10. Frolova N., Larionov V., Bonnin J. (2007) Simulation-based information systems for multihazard risk and near real time loss estimations due to strong earthquakes. In: Proc. TIEMS2007 Conference, Trogir, Croatia.
11. Frolova N., Larionov V., Bonnin J. (2010), Data Bases Used In Worlwide Systems For Earthquake Loss Estimation In Emergency Mode: Wenchuan Earthquake, Proc. TIEMS2010 Conference, Beijing, China.
12. Frolova N., Larionov V., Bonnin J. (2011) Earthquake Casualties Estimations in Emergency Mode, In: Human Casualties in Earthquakes: Progress in Modelling and Mitigation. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol. 29, Springer, 107–123.
13. Karnik Vit (1984), Existing Recommendations and Definitions on Disaster Insurance, The Geneva Papers, vol. 9, no. 30, pp. 3–7.
14. Karnik V., Algermissen S.T. (1978) Seismic Zoning: The Assessment and Mitigation of Earthquake Risk, UNESCO , Paris, pp. 11–47.
15. L arionov V., Frolova N. (2003a), Peculiarities of seismic vulnerability estimations. In: Natural Hazards in Russia, volume 6: Natural Risks Assessment and Management, Publishing House “Kruk”, Moscow, pp. 120–131. (in Russian).
16. L arionov V., Sushchev S., Ugarov A., Frolova N. (2003b), Seismic risk assessment with GIStechnology application. In: Natural Hazards in Russia, volume 6: Natural Risks Assessment and Management, Publishing House “Kruk”, Moscow, pp. 209–231. (in Russian).
17. L arionov V.I., Frolova N.I. (2006) Estimation of earthquake consequences in emergency mode at global scale. Proc. of All-Russian Conf. “RISK-2006”, Moscow, Publishing House of Russian University of People Friendship, 2006, pp. 138–140. (in Russian).
18. M itigating Natural Disasters: Phenomena, Effects and Options. A Manual for Policy Makers and Planners. UNDRO. New York: UN, 1991. 164 p.
19. Ranguelov R., 2011. Natural Hazards – Nonlinearities and Assessment. Acad. House M. Drinov, Sofia, 237 P.
20. Risk Assessment and Mapping Guidelines for Disaster Management, 2010. http://register. consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/10/st17/st17833.en10.pdf
21. S et of review seismic zoning maps OSR-97 A, B, C and other materials for Constructions standards and rules (1998 – SNiP “Construction in earthquake prone areas”. Moscow: Joint Institute of Physics of the Earth.
22. S hebalin N., Gekhman A., Shestoperov G. (1986) Development of improved version of seismic intensity scale (MMSK-86) on the bases of MSK-64 scale and scale of Joint Council on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering – 73. Report on scientific research study within the Federal Program 0.74.03, number of state registration 01814003271, Joint Council on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Academy of Sciences of the USR, Moscow, 1986 (in Russian).
23. S ushchev S., Larionov V., Frolova N. (2010) Seismic Risk Assessment And Management With Extremum System Application. Proc. of the XV International Scientific and Practical Conference “Protection of Population and Territories under Emergencies”, May 18–20, 2010 Moscow, EMERCOM of RF. M.: FGU VNII GOChS (FTs), 2010, p. 327–346 (In Russian).
24. T he Practice of Earthquake Hazard Assessment (1993). Technical Coordinators: Dieter Mayer-Rosa, Vladimir Schenk, Robin K. McGuire, Avi Shapira. Edited by Robin K. McGuire, IASPEI and ESC. 284 p.
25. U NISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction, 2009. http://www.unisdr.org/eng/terminology/UNISDR-terminology-2009-eng.pdf
Review
For citations:
Frolova N.I., Larionov V.I., Bonnin J., Ugarov A.N. SEISMIC RISK CARTOGRAPHIC VISUALIZATION FOR CRISIS MANAGEMENT. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2014;7(4):4-27. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2014-7-4-4-27
Views:
922
Email this article 