Preview

GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY

Advanced search

Environmental Controls Of Photosynthetic Parameters In Four Dominant Boreal Tree Species: Contrasting Responses Of Deciduous Angiosperms And Evergreen Gymnosperms

https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2025-4190

Contents

Scroll to:

Abstract

Boreal forests play a crucial role in maintaining the global ecological balance, acting as significant carbon sinks and mitigating the effects of climate change. This study examined how temperature affects photosynthesis in four boreal tree species – Pinus sylvestris, Betula pendula, Populus tremula, and Alnus incana – growing in a clear-cut of mid-taiga bilberry-type pine forest in southern Karelia, Russia. The Farquhar biochemical model was used to analyze key photosynthesis parameters, such as the maximum carboxylation rate by Rubisco (max), the maximum photosynthetic electron transport rate (Jmax), and the triose phosphate utilization (TPU) rate, under different leaf temperatures ranging from 20 to 35°C and light conditions. The results revealed significant interspecific differences in photosynthetic responses. At a leaf surface temperature of 25°C, the lowest Vcmax25, Jmax25, and TPU25 values were obtained for the 1-year-old needles of P. sylvestris (38.8, 70.7, and 5.5 μmol m-2 s-1), whereas the values were 1.5- to 2.4-fold higher for the leaves of B. pendula (93.5, 172.1, and 12.7 μmol m-2 s-1), A. incana (86.1, 155.1, and 11.4 μmol m-2 s-1), and P. tremula (58.6, 122, and 9.3 μmol m-2 s-1). Meanwhile, P. sylvestris and B. pendula had a broader optimal temperature range for Vcmax and Jmax (20–35°C), whereas A. incana and P. tremula had a narrower range (20–30°C), experiencing a decline at 35°C. In addition to having different levels of resistance to extreme temperatures, deciduous species also differed in their responsiveness to CO2 enrichment. This could lead to shifts in the composition of boreal forest species under changing climate conditions. P. sylvestris demonstrated greater stability at low light levels and a strong response to elevated CO2, indicating its high adaptability to future climate change. These results highlight the importance of considering species characteristics when predicting the carbon balance of boreal forests. They can be used to model the resilience of forest ecosystems under climate change and to plan further investigations, including studies of mature trees and the effects of additional stress factors, such as drought.

For citations:


Pridacha V.B., Olchev A.V. Environmental Controls Of Photosynthetic Parameters In Four Dominant Boreal Tree Species: Contrasting Responses Of Deciduous Angiosperms And Evergreen Gymnosperms. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2025;18(4):92-102. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2025-4190

INTRODUCTION

Boreal forests play a crucial role in maintaining the Earth’s ecological balance. As long-term carbon sinks, they mitigate the effects of climate change by reducing the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. They also regulate the balance of water and heat, directly influencing regional and global climates (Bonan, 2008; IPCC, 2023; Gushchina et al., 2023; Olchev, 2025). Meanwhile, the current climate, characterized by rising global temperatures, changing precipitation patterns and higher frequency of regional hydrological and meteorological anomalies (Mokhov, 2022), increases the risk of irreversible alteration in the structure and functions of forest ecosystems (Olchev et al., 2013; Groisman et al., 2017). Changes in the growth, productivity, and mortality of boreal tree species can affect taiga forests’ ability to absorb carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the atmosphere. It is crucial to understand and predict the consequences of climate change for deciduous and coniferous tree species because their capacity to absorb CO₂ through photosynthesis directly impacts the global carbon cycle and the overall state of forest ecosystems (Tselniker et al., 1993; Molchanov, 2007; Suvorova & Popova, 2015; Olchev & Gulev, 2024).

Photosynthesis is the physiological basis of plant productivity. There are many mathematical models that describe photosynthesis at various scales, ranging from molecular interactions in thylakoid membranes to a whole plant or ecosystem (Laisk et al., 2009; Hikosaka et al., 2016; Sukhova et al., 2021). The Farquhar approach (Farquhar et al., 1980; von Caemmerer et al., 2000) is traditionally used to model net photosynthesis in tree leaves and ground vegetation. It has proven effective in predicting CO₂ assimilation under various environmental conditions (Bernacchi et al., 2013; Busch et al., 2024; Stirbet et al., 2024). The model enables determining several key parameters, including the maximum carboxylation rate (max), maximum rate of electron transport for the acceptor molecule ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate regeneration under saturating light (Jmax), triose phosphate utilization (TPU) rate, as well as dark respiration (Rd) rate and mesophyll conductance (gm).

The parameters max, Jmax, and TPU are essential for modeling photosynthetic responses to environmental changes. max and Jmax depend strongly on external conditions, particularly CO₂ concentration and light intensity (Busch et al., 2024). Solar radiation directly impacts photosynthesis because it provides to energy for electron transport and CO₂ reduction. Light activation occurs through covalent and conformational modifications of enzymes that catalyze Calvin cycle reactions, particularly ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) (Laisk et al., 2009). Light also influences CO₂ diffusion between the air and the intercellular space of the leaf by regulating the width of the stomatal openings. An increase in air CO₂ content contributes to enhanced Rubisco carboxylation activity (Norby et al., 2005). Electron transport is also sensitive to environmental factors as it depends on the stability of the thylakoid membrane (Hikosaka et al., 2016) and can vary widely even within a species (Bernacchi et al., 2013). The third parameter that limits photosynthesis is TPU, which is related to the export and utilization of triose phosphates. TPU reflects the capacity to synthesize starch in chloroplasts or export metabolites to the cytosol for sucrose synthesis (Sharkey, 2024). Sucrose is then transported through the phloem to the plant’s heterotrophic tissues and organs. High rates of sucrose phosphate synthesis can deplete the pool of free inorganic phosphate, thereby limiting photophosphorylation (Sharkey, 1985; von Caemmerer, 2000). TPU primarily restricts photosynthetic carbon fixation under high CO₂, high light intensity, or low temperature (Bernacchi et al., 2013; Busch et al., 2024). The importance of assessing the temperature dependence of photosynthesis parameters is emphasized in the works of Medlyn et al. (2002), Lin et al. (2013), and Togashi et al. (2018). These parameters are crucial for predicting how vegetative cover will respond to the expected increase in air temperature and CO₂ concentrations in the future.

Some studies have shown that photosynthetic parameters can vary depending on a plant’s species or functional type (Medlyn et al., 2002; Lin et al., 2013). According to Wullschleger (1993) and Mandela et al. (2022), higher max, Jmax, and TPU values have been observed in annual herbaceous plants (75, 154, and 20 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹) than in perennial woody species (44, 97, and 5 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹). Interspecific differences in photosynthetic parameters have also been noted in forest tree species (Medlyn et al., 2002; Korzukhin & Tselniker, 2009; Pridacha et al., 2022) and are associated with leaf mesostructure, growth, and development in different species during the growing season (Tselniker et al., 1993; Oleksyn et al., 2000; Juárez-López et al., 2008).

The most common tree species in boreal forests belong to the genera Pinus, Betula, Populus, and Alnus (Afonin et al., 2008). Despite occupying similar areas and having a wide ecological amplitude, boreal tree species, particularly Pinus sylvestris L., Betula pendula Roth, Populus tremula L., and Alnus incana (L.) Moench, exhibit noticeable ecophysiological differences. In a previous study, we examined how microclimatic and edaphic conditions of clear-cutting influence the functional characteristics of evergreen gymnosperm and deciduous angiosperm tree species. We identified species-specific changes in the photosynthetic water and nitrogen use efficiency and nutrient ratios in Scots pine, silver birch, aspen, and grey alder along the “clear-cut site – bilberry-type pine forest” gradient of environmental factors (Pridacha et al., 2021).The interspecific features of the consistency of xylem hydraulic characteristics and CO₂/H₂O gas exchange parameters in the leaves of the different species indicates that Scots pine and aspen have a more efficient and safer hydraulic structure as compared with silver birch (Pridacha et al., 2023). However, during a three-year observation period in the warm season, lower photosynthesis and dark respiration rates were obtained in Scots pine than in deciduous tree species (Pridacha & Semin, 2024).

Due to the low boreal tree species diversity, changes in CO₂ gas exchange parameters of each species resulting from environmental disturbances and climate change can significantly affect the carbon budget of taiga forests (Kurepin et al., 2018; Dusenge et al., 2020; Gagné et al., 2020). However, despite the recognized importance of assessing photosynthesis parameters for modeling and predicting carbon fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems (Laisk et al., 2009; Hikosaka et al., 2016), the impact of environmental changes on these parameters is still not fully understood. To address the lack of knowledge in this area, we examined the effects of temperature on photosynthesis parameters in co-growing an evergreen gymnosperm (Pinus sylvestris L.) and three deciduous angiosperm (Betula pendula Roth, Populus tremula L., and Alnus incana (L.) Moench) tree species in a clear-cut of mid-taiga bilberry-type pine forest. The choice of experimental design was based on the fact that clear-cuts are an ideal subject for studying how plant communities respond to environmental changes because the processes occurring in them are primarily influenced by natural factors. The working hypothesis of the study was that different tree species that grow together would show similar responses to environmental changes in the European North. Analyzing the relationship between photosynthesis parameters and environmental factors helps us understand the mechanisms of plant adaptation in response to environmental changes, particularly in the context of climate change.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area and tree-growing conditions

The study was carried out in July 2018 in the European part of the middle taiga forest zone (Republic of Karelia) on a 10-year-old, clear-cut of bilberry-type pine forest (62°10´28.1´´N, 33°59´58.8´´E). According to the Köppen climate classification system, the climate of the study area is humid continental with cool summers (Peel et al., 2007). The area is characterized by high relative humidity (averaging 75%) and significant precipitation throughout the year (550–750 mm), 350–400 mm of which falls during the snow-free period from May to October (Nazarova, 2021). According to the climatic means for the period from 1991 to 2020, the average annual air temperature is +3.6°C, with minimum and maximum values of –8.4°C and +17.1°C in January and July, respectively. The average air temperature during the growing season (May–September) is +13°C. The total radiation balance for the growing season is 1,130 MJ m⁻². According to data from the Kondopoga weather station, the growing season from May to September of 2018 in the study area was relatively warm (0.7°C <ΔTseas. < 3.0°C) and characterized by a precipitation deficiency relative to the long-term climatic mean in May, June, and July (44, 52, and 77% of the climatic means, respectively), followed by a rainy August (151% of the climatic mean).

The study examined 10-year-old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), silver birch (Betula pendula Roth), aspen (Populus tremula L.), and grey alder (Alnus incana (L.) Moench) trees growing in a clear-cut bilberry-type pine forest site. The young stand that formed through natural regeneration in the clear-cut are primarily Scots pine (70%), with a mix of silver birch and aspen trees. The understory consists of grey alder, willow, and rowan (Pridacha & Semin, 2024). Five model trees have been selected for each of the species in the clear-cut site. The highest recorded values for height and trunk diameter at the site were for grey alder (4.5 ± 1.3 m and 4.3 ± 1.7 cm, respectively) and silver birch (3.4 ± 0.2 m and 1.8 ± 0.2 cm, respectively). The lowest values were observed for Scots pine (2.3 ± 0.1 m and 1.6 ± 0.1 cm, respectively) and aspen (1.8 ± 0.5 m and 1.2 ± 0.4 cm, respectively) (Pridacha et al., 2021).

The soil in the site was an Arenic Albic Podzol. Roots were mostly concentrated within 2–25 cm depth. The ground water table depth was 1.2 m. The detailed characteristics of the vegetation and soil cover of the clear-cut site have been presented in previous studies (Pridacha et al., 2021; Pridacha & Semin, 2024).

Parameters of CO₂ gas exchange

Field measurements of key photosynthetic parameters were conducted in July 2018 in the clear-cut bilberry pine forest site on the leaves of B. pendula, P. tremula, A. incana and on the 1-year-old needles of P. sylvestris. Measurements were taken during daylight hours from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on intact leaves in the middle part of the plant’s crown. A portable photosynthetic system LI-6400XT (LI-COR Inc., USA) was used for the measurements. The system was equipped with a CO₂ injector, a standard 2 cm × 3 cm leaf chamber, and a LI-6400-02B LED light source (LI-COR Inc., USA). Healthy, fully formed leaves without visible damage were sampled from all plants using a uniform method with three biological replicates for each species. All the experiments were conducted under similar weather conditions.

The photosynthesis measurement program involved obtaining light and carbon dioxide response curves for photosynthesis parameters at leaf (needle) surface temperatures ranging from 20°C to 35°C. Both response curves were measured separately at each leaf temperature (20, 25, 30, and 35°C). The range of leaf temperatures was chosen based on the plant growth temperature (20°C), a reference temperature (usually 25°C), and temperatures above 20°C (30–35°C). The average leaf adaptation time to chamber conditions was about 15 minutes. The CO₂ response function of CO₂ gas exchange in leaves (A/Ci-curve) was determined by sequentially changing the CO₂ concentration in the leaf chamber (400, 300, 200, 100, 60, 30, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, and 1600 μmol CO₂ mol⁻¹) at a saturating light intensity of 1600 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹, in accordance with the device’s standard configuration (Busch, 2024). A/Ci-curve measurements were also performed under lower light conditions (400 and 100 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹) in a leaf chamber at a leaf surface temperature of 25°C. The relative humidity in the measuring chamber was set to 50% to prevent stomatal closure during the measurements.

The light response of photosynthetic parameters (A/Q-curve) was determined by measuring the intensity of CO₂ gas exchange at various PAR values (1600, 1200, 900, 600, 300, 150, 100, 75, 50, 25, and 0 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹) under constant CO₂ concentrations (400 μmol CO₂ mol⁻¹) and relative air humidity (50%) in the leaf chamber. The A/Q-curve measurements were also performed at higher CO₂ concentrations (800 and 1200 μmol CO₂ mol⁻¹) and a leaf temperature of 25°C.

The CO₂ response curves (A/Ci-curve) were used to calibrate the key parameters of the Farquhar photosynthesis model (Farquhar et al., 1980) as modified by Sharkey et al. (2007): maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax), electron transport rate at light saturation (Jmax), triose phosphate utilization rate (TPU), and dark respiration rate (Rd). The temperature dependencies of Vcmax, Jmax, and TPU were obtained by statistically evaluating a set of the photosynthesis parameter values at various leaf temperatures. Based on these dependencies, the standardized Vcmax25, Jmax25, and TPU25 values were obtained at the selected reference temperature of 25°C (Sharkey et al., 2007; Sharkey, 2016).

The parameters of the light response curve model, particularly the value of photosynthesis at saturating PAR values (Amax), were calculated using a modified Michaelis–Menten function (Kaipiainen, 2009; Pridacha et al., 2022). Detailed procedures for assessing the carbon dioxide and light-response functions of CO₂ gas exchange have been reported in previously published studies (Sharkey et al., 2007; Sharkey, 2016; Busch, 2024).

The CO₂ gas exchange rates for P. sylvestris needles in our study were converted to the entire needle surface area. To calculate the surface area of the needles, we used a simplified method to determine their specific linear density (weight of unit needle length) (Tselniker, 1982).

Statistical analysis

Statistical data analysis was performed using Statistica 13.3 (TIBCO Software Inc., USA). Regression analysis was used to process the experimental data. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. The diagrams show the means and their standard errors.

RESULTS

The classic biochemical Farquhar model and regression analysis of photosynthesis light response curves accurately describe how leaf photosynthesis responds to changes in ambient CO₂ concentrations and light conditions, with an R² value ranging from 0.95 to 0.99 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Sample A/Q-curve (a) and A/Ci-curve (b) plotted for 1-year-old needles of Pinus sylvestris (Ps) and leaves of Betula pendula (Bp), Alnus incana (Ai), Populus tremula (Pt) at leaf temperature of 25°C using the LI-6400 XT protocol

Analysis of the temperature dependence of photosynthetic parameters revealed that increasing leaf temperature within the 20–35°C range resulted in 5.6- and 3.1-fold increases in Vcmax in P. sylvestris and B. pendula, respectively (Fig. 2). In A. incana and P. tremula, Vcmax increased within a narrower temperature range (20–30°C) than in P. sylvestris and B. pendula. The increase was 2.2- and 3.1-fold, respectively, followed by a subsequent decrease of 1.2- and 2.1-fold at 35°C in A. incana and P. tremula, respectively. Analysis of the standardized Vcmax25 values at a reference temperature of 25°C revealed similar patterns of change for this parameter in each species. The Vcmax25 values were higher than the 20°C measured values (1.7-, 1.5-, 1.4-, and 1.5-fold for P. sylvestris, B. pendula, A. incana, and P. tremula, respectively) and lower at 30°C (1.4- to 1.6-fold) and 35°C (2- to 2.4-fold) for all species. At a leaf surface temperature of 25°C, Vcmax values were lowest for 1-year-old P. sylvestris needles (38.8 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹) and highest for B. pendula, A. incana, and P. tremula leaves (93.5, 86.1, and 58.6 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹, respectively).

Fig. 2. Maximum rates of carboxylation by Rubisco (Vcmax), electron transport (Jmax), and triose phosphate utilization (TPU) measured in the leaf temperature range of 20–35°C and standardized at a reference temperature of 25°C (Vcmax25, Jmax25, and TPU25) in Pinus sylvestris (Ps), Betula pendula (Bp), Alnus incana (Ai), and Populus tremula (Pt). Different lowercase letters on top of the bars (a, b, c) indicate significant differences in means (p <0.05) when comparing one species at different leaf temperatures, and different capital letters (A, B, C) indicate significant differences (p <0.05) between different species at each treatment level. An asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference in means (p <0.05) when comparing each pair of measured and standardized parameter values for each species

The Jmax values for P. sylvestris increased 2.5-fold within the temperature range of 20–35°C. However, the increase was significantly lower, at only 1.2-fold, at temperatures between 25 and 35°C. For B. pendula, the Jmax values increased 2-fold with an increase in leaf surface temperature from 20 to 35°C. For A. incana and P. tremula, this parameter increased up to 30°C (by 1.8 and 2.3 times, respectively) and then decreased at 35°C (by 1.4 and 2.6 times, respectively). Comparing the measured Jmax values with the reference Jmax values at 25°C revealed higher values for all species at 20°C (1.4, 1.3, 1.3, and 1.3 times higher for P. sylvestris, B. pendula, A. incana, and P. tremula, respectively). However, the corresponding values were lower at 30°C (by 1.3–1.4 times) and 35°C (by 1.6–1.8 times) in all species. The lowest Jmax25 values were observed for 1-year-old needles of P. sylvestris (70.7 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹), compared to the deciduous species: 172.1, 155.1, and 122 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ for B. pendula, A. incana, and P. tremula, respectively.

As the temperature of the leaf surface raised from 20 to 35°C, the TPU values increased 1.9-fold in P. sylvestris trees and 1.5-fold in B. pendula trees. For A. incana and P. tremula, the TPU values increased 1.2- and 1.7-fold, respectively, when the leaf temperature increased from 20 to 30°C. Then, it decreased 1.5- and 2.4-fold, respectively, at 35°C. As with Vcmax and Jmax, higher referenced TPU values were observed for all species at 20°C than the measured values (1.5, 1.3, 1.3, and 1.3 times higher for P. sylvestris, B. pendula, A. incana, and P. tremula, respectively). Lower values were observed at 30°C (1.2–1.3 times lower) and 35°C (1.3–1.4 times lower) in all species. 1-year-old needles of P. sylvestris had the lowest TPU25 values (5.5 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹) at a leaf temperature of 25°C compared to B. pendula (12.7 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹), A. incana (11.4 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹), and P. tremula (9.3 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹) leaves.

Importantly, decreases in Vcmax, Jmax, and TPU values occurred when the light intensity in the leaf chamber decreased from saturating to low levels at a leaf surface temperature of 25°C for all tree species (Fig. 3). At the same time, interspecific differences in the dynamics of these parameters were revealed. For example, P. sylvestris showed the smallest decrease in Vcmax25, Jmax25, and TPU25 values (1.2-, 1.5-, and 1.5-fold, respectively) within the PAR range of 100 to 1,600 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹compared to deciduous species (3.1- to 3.2-, 4.3- to 4.8-, and 4.1- to 4.4-fold, respectively). Conversely, a 4-fold decrease in light intensity (from 1,600 to 400 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹) led to a smaller decrease in Vcmax25, Jmax25, and TPU25 values in deciduous species (1.3–1.8, 1.4–1.6, and 1.4–1.6 times, respectively) than in P. sylvestris (Jmax25 and TPU25 by 1.3 times).

Fig. 3. Maximum rates of carboxylation by Rubisco (Vcmax25), electron transport (Jmax25), and triose phosphate utilization (TPU25) measured under different light intensities (100–1600 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹) on 1-year-old needles of Pinus sylvestris (Ps) and leaves of Betula pendula (Bp), Alnus incana (Ai), and Populus tremula (Pt) at a leaf temperature of 25°C. Different lowercase letters on top of the bars (a, b, c) indicate significant differences in means (p <0.05) when comparing one species at different light intensity, and different capital letters (A, B, C) indicate significant differences (p <0.05) between different species at each light level.

Analysis of Amax values revealed insignificant changes in P. sylvestris, B. pendula, and A. incana at leaf temperatures of 20–25°C, followed by a decrease in this parameter as the temperature increased to 35°C (decreasing by 1.9, 1.9, and 2.8 times, respectively) (Fig. 4a). P. tremula featured a greater stabilization of Amax in the 20–30°C range and a smaller decline in the parameter at 35°C (1.3 times) compared with other species. Increasing the CO₂ concentration in the leaf chamber to 800 and 1,200 μmol CO₂ mol⁻¹ for all tree species resulted in higher Amax values at a leaf surface temperature of 25°C (Fig. 4b). P. sylvestris exhibited the greatest increase in the parameter, with a 2- and 3-fold increase in CO₂ concentration relative to external conditions (1.9 and 2.6 times, respectively) compared to deciduous species, such as P. tremula (1.4 and 1.6 times, respectively), B. pendula (1.1 and 1.9 times, respectively), and A. incana (1.7 and 2.1 times, respectively).

Fig. 4. Maximum CO₂ assimilation rate (Amax) measured at leaf temperatures ranging from 20 to 35°C (a) and at different CO₂ concentrations ranging from 400 to 1200 μmol CO₂ mol⁻¹ at a leaf temperature of 25°C (b) on 1-year-old needles of Pinus sylvestris (Ps) and leaves of Betula pendula (Bp), Alnus incana (Ai), and Populus tremula (Pt). Different lowercase letters on top of the bars (a, b, c) indicate significant differences in means (p <0.05) when comparing one species at different leaf temperatures or CO₂ concentrations, and different capital letters (A, B, C) indicate significant differences (p <0.05) between different species at each treatment level

Analysis of the temperature dependence of the Jmax/Vcmax ratio, calculated from measured values between 20 and 35°C, revealed a negative linear relationship for all tree species (Fig. 5a). The decrease of the parameter with an increase in leaf temperature from 25 to 35°C was 2.2, 2.0, 1.7, and 1.8 times for P. sylvestris, B. pendula, A. incana, and P. tremula, respectively. The Jmax25/Vcmax25 ratio, calculated using reference values at 25°C, exhibited similar dependence, taking the form of a “bell curve” with a pronounced peak at 25°C for all species studied (Fig. 5b). The increase in the Jmax25/Vcmax25 ratio in response to leaf temperature elevation in the 20–25°C range and its decline in the 25–35°C range were, respectively, 1.2 and 1.6-fold for P. sylvestris versus 1.3–1.4 and 1.4–1.5-fold for the deciduous species. It is also important to note the similarity of the Jmax25/Vcmax25 ratio at 25°C for P. sylvestris, B. pendula, and A. incana (1.8), as well as higher value for P. tremula (2.1).

Fig. 5. Ratio of maximum electron transport rate (Jmax) and maximum rate of carboxylation by Rubisco (Vcmах) measured at leaf temperature ranging from 20 to 35°C (a) and standardized at 25°C (b) in Pinus sylvestris (Ps), Betula pendula (Bp), Alnus incana (Ai) and Populus tremula (Pt)

DISCUSSION

Temperature dependence of photosynthesis parameters

The study examining the temperature dependence of photosynthetic parameters in four boreal tree species (Pinus sylvestris, Betula pendula, Populus tremula, and Alnus incana) revealed significant species-specific differences in the responses of Vcmax, Jmax, and TPU to changes in leaf temperature and light conditions. These results provide a deeper understanding of how trees in cold climates adapt to changing environmental conditions, particularly in the context of global climate change.

Analysis of the temperature dependence of photosynthetic parameters (Fig. 2) revealed that P. sylvestris and B. pendula exhibited the greatest increase in Vcmax with temperature increases from 20 to 35°C. In contrast, A. incana and P. tremula demonstrated a narrower optimal temperature range (20 to 30°C) and a subsequent decrease in Vcmax at 35°C compared to 30°C. These results agreed with previous studies suggesting that coniferous species, including P. sylvestris, exhibit a broader temperature range for photosynthesis than deciduous species (Medlyn et al., 2002; Lin et al., 2013). The decrease in Vcmax in deciduous species at high temperatures may be related to the temperature-dependent activity of Rubisco, the inactivation of Rubisco due to reduced functioning of Rubisco activase, or the decreased stability of the enzyme (Sharkey, 1985; Galmés et al., 2015; Scafaro et al., 2023).

Similarly, Jmax increased gradually in P. sylvestris and B. pendula, whereas A. incana and P. tremula exhibited a sharp increase in Jmax, followed by a decrease, at 35°C. These results suggest that deciduous species, particularly A. incana and P. tremula, have more sensitive electron transport systems to elevated temperatures. This is likely due to the destabilization of thylakoid membranes and their components (Hikosaka et al., 2016). These results align with data indicating that high temperatures, which frequently occur during summer heat waves, can significantly limit the functioning of boreal deciduous species (Reich et al., 2018; Dusenge et al., 2020).

The TPU (triose phosphate utilization) parameter exhibited less variability in P. sylvestris and B. pendula than in A. incana and P. tremula within a temperature range of 25–35°C. This suggests that these species use carbohydrates (triose phosphates) more efficiently for synthesizing sucrose and starch under thermal stress compared to A. incana and P. tremula. However, the decrease in TPU in deciduous species at 35°C may result from limitations in starch and sucrose synthesis or phosphate recycling (Sharkey, 1985; von Caemmerer, 2000; Hikosaka et al., 2016). These findings have significant implications for long-term carbon accumulation under warming conditions.

The decrease in Amax observed in all species (Fig. 4a) as the temperature increases beyond the optimal range is due to the fact that the rate at which plants absorb CO₂ via photosynthesis is influenced by the photosynthetic apparatus and the degree of stomatal opening (Lin et al., 2012; Scafaro et al., 2023). Within the super-optimal temperature range, the decrease in photosynthetic intensity is due to a reduction in leaf turgor and stomatal closure. This hinders the diffusion of CO₂ from the atmosphere into the interior of the leaf and to the fixation centers. Additionally, as temperature rises, CO₂ solubility decreases, and the kinetic constants of carboxylating enzymes change (Sage & Kubien, 2007). As temperature increases, Rubisco’s affinity for oxygen grows, enhancing photorespiration and reducing the efficiency of carbon dioxide fixation. This results in a decrease in the overall rate of photosynthesis.

It is important to note the greater thermal stability of Amax in P. tremula compared to other species across a broader temperature range (20–30°C), as well as the higher Amax values observed at sub-optimal temperatures (30–35°C). However, P. tremula exhibits lower photosynthetic activity than other deciduous species, as evidenced by lower Vcmax, Jmax, and TPU values. Our observations align with prior research indicating that biochemical factors and mesophyll limitations primarily drive the decrease in photosynthesis in P. tremula at high temperatures and COconcentrations (Hüve et al., 2019; de Souza et al., 2024). During four growing seasons at the same clear-cut site, we observed higher values of stomatal conductance and transpiration rate for P. tremula than for other deciduous species and P. sylvestris (Pridacha et al., 2021). These findings are important because stomatal conductance determines the rate of CO₂ diffusion to carboxylation sites (Baillie, Fleming, 2020; Márquez, Busch, 2024), and transpiration provides leaf thermoregulation by evaporating water from the leaf surface. This cooling effect prevents overheating, especially at high ambient temperatures (Lin et al., 2017; Drake et al., 2018). Thus, the greater thermal stability of Amax in P. tremula relative to other species can be due to higher CO₂ diffusion flux and better leaf thermoregulation. This is consistent with noted relative independence of CO₂ concentration in P. tremula leaf chloroplasts from temperature (de Souza et al., 2024).

Additionally, the greater thermal stability range of Amax in P. tremula may be due to differences in hydraulic regulation among species, specifically the anisohydric nature of P. tremula compared to the isohydric characteristics of B. pendula (Pridacha et al., 2023). This hypothesis is supported by data from other studies (Klein, 2014; Meinzer et al., 2016; Sellin et al., 2019, 2022). A previous study (Mäenpää et al., 2011) on the effects of ozone and temperature on carbon assimilation in B. pendula and P. tremula seedlings found that B. pendula leaves experienced a greater decrease in stomatal conductance (1.7 times) than P. tremula leaves (1.2 times) when the air temperature increased by 1°C. This is consistent with the more pronounced decrease in Amax in B. pendula with an increase in temperature above the optimum relative to P. tremula (Fig. 4a). This is likely because of a greater decrease in CO₂ diffusion flux into the leaf due to stomatal limitation of photosynthesis, despite higher activity of the photosynthetic apparatus in B. pendula (Fig. 2).

At the same time, in all species we observed a similar consistent pattern of the Jmax/Vcmax ratio at temperatures between 20 and 25°C, which decreased as the temperature increased up to 35°C (Fig. 5). Despite interspecific differences, this pattern can be explained by the optimal temperature range for photosynthesis in C3 plants, which is typically between 20–25 °C for most C3 plants in the temperate zone (Laisk et al., 2009; Hikosaka et al., 2016). The decrease in the Jmax/Vcmax ratio from 1.7–2.1 to 0.8–1.1 with increasing temperature for all species may be associated with the higher activation energy for Vcmax relative to Jmax. Similar observations have been made by scientists studying other woody plants (Onoda et al., 2005; Ow et al., 2008; Riikonen et al., 2009). The similarity of the Rubisco specificity factor in gymnosperms and C3 angiosperms has also been noted, as a measure of the enzyme’s capacity to exhibit carboxylase and oxygenase activity relative to RuBP. This similarity is explained by the adaptation of Rubisco in different phylogenetic groups of plants to current CO₂/Oatmospheric levels (Miyazawa et al., 2020).

Response to light and CO₂

The study also revealed interspecific differences in photosynthetic responses to changes in light intensity and CO₂ levels. P. sylvestris exhibited greater stability in Vcmax and Jmax at low light levels (100–400 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹). In contrast, deciduous species demonstrated a more significant decline in these parameters (Fig. 3). This may reflect conifers’ adaptation to shading or high cloud cover in boreal regions (Oleksyn et al., 1998; Ma et al., 2014; Schmiege et al., 2023). Due to their higher photosynthetic activity, deciduous trees likely experience more pronounced inhibition of Rubisco activity at low light levels due to the strong binding of RuBP and other sugar phosphates formed during the Calvin cycle to the catalytic center (Sharkey, 1985; von Caemmerer, 2000).

At elevated CO₂ concentrations (800–1200 μmol mol⁻¹), the greatest increase in Amax was observed in P. sylvestris (Fig. 4b), suggesting a stronger response to CO₂ enrichment than in deciduous species. These results are consistent with previous studies (Niinemets et al., 2011; Kurepin et al., 2018) that reported conifers’ superior adaptation to elevated CO₂ levels. Since CO₂ is a substrate for photosynthesis, its availability and concentration determine the activity of carbon metabolism. The increase in photosynthesis rate with increasing CO₂ levels is due to the realization of the carboxylase potential of Rubisco and the formation of a large RuBP acceptor pool in chloroplasts under these conditions (von Caemmerer, 2000; Busch et al., 2024). Among the deciduous species, the greatest increase in Amax with CO₂ growth was found in A. incana. We previously observed the highest values of specific nitrogen content and its biological absorption coefficient in A. incana relative to other species using the same model trees in the clear-cut (Pridacha et al., 2021). These results are consistent with previous studies reporting that trees of the genus Alnus can maintain high levels of photosynthesis after prolonged exposure to elevated CO₂ in nitrogen-poor soils due to high nitrogen availability from symbiosis with nitrogen-fixing actinomycetes (Vogel, Curtis, 1995; Rytter, Rytter, 2016). However, the weak response of P. tremula to increased CO₂ may indicate Rubisco activity saturation due to a greater supply of substrate (CO₂) in the leaf caused by the higher stomatal conductance of P. tremula leaves (Pridacha et al., 2021) or limitations in subsequent metabolic processes (Busch et al., 2024).

It is important to note that the influence of mesophyll conductance on photosynthesis has been demonstrated for all plant functional types (Flexas et al., 2014; Nadal et al., 2021; Knauer et al., 2022). In our study, coniferous species exhibited the lowest photosynthesis parameter values under all temperature, light, and CO₂ treatments compared to deciduous species. This finding aligns with prior studies indicating lower mesophyll conductance in coniferous trees than in deciduous trees, primarily due to the structural organization of their rigid leaves. Specifically, needles have thick mesophyll cell walls and chloroplasts, as well as a low ratio of chloroplast surface area to intercellular space per unit of leaf surface area (Veromann-Jürgenson et al., 2017; Carriquí et al., 2020). The low photosynthesis rates in coniferous trees are believed to be offset by their significantly longer active photosynthesis duration compared to deciduous trees in the boreal zone (Vasfilov, 2016; Shiklomanov et al., 2020). As temperatures and COlevels in the atmosphere rise in a changing climate, it is assumed that species with low mesophyll conductance, particularly evergreen gymnosperm, will gain an advantage over deciduous angiosperm tree species in terms of distribution, especially in the boreal zone (Niinemets et al., 2011; Flexas et al., 2014; Nadal et al., 2021).

The results of our study are consistent with previously published data, while also revealing some new findings. For example, Medlyn et al. (2002) observed similar Vcmax values for P. sylvestris at 25°C. However, our data show that this parameter is more sensitive to extreme temperatures. The decrease in Jmax in deciduous species at 35°C aligns with results obtained for temperate forest species (Togashi et al., 2018; de Souza et al., 2024), suggesting stability in photosynthetic temperature sensitivity across different plant biomes. Differences in TPU among species are consistent with Wullschleger’s (1993) data, which showed lower TPU values in woody perennials than in herbaceous plants. Our study extends these findings by demonstrating how these differences manifest with changes in temperature and light intensity.

The results highlight the vulnerability of boreal deciduous species, especially A. incana and P. tremula, to climate warming due to decreased photosynthetic efficiency at high temperatures. At the same time, all species exhibit a similar consistent pattern of the Jmax/Vcmax ratio within the 20–35°C temperature range. However, P. sylvestris demonstrates greater resilience, confirming its dominant role in boreal forests under future warming conditions (Bonan, 2008). Nevertheless, the stronger response of coniferous species to elevated CO₂ could be counterbalanced by other environmental stressors, such as drought. These factors were not considered in this study, yet they play a significant role in boreal ecosystem functioning (Reich et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2023; Martínez-García et al., 2024).

When considering the limitations of the identified patterns and prospects for future research, it should be noted that our study was conducted on young trees in a clear-cut area. This may not accurately reflect the functioning of a mature forest. Future studies should include mature trees and additional stress factors, such as drought and nutrient deficiency. Incorporating the data into ecosystem models based on the Farquhar approach will also improve predictions of the carbon cycle in boreal forests under climate change (Bernacchi et al., 2013).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study of the temperature dependence of photosynthetic parameters in four boreal tree species (Pinus sylvestris, Betula pendula, Populus tremula, and Alnus incana) revealed significant differences in their adaptation strategies to changing environmental conditions. P. sylvestris and B. pendula had a broader optimal temperature range for Jmax and Vcmax (20–35°C), whereas P. tremula and A. incana had optimal values between 20 and 30°C and experienced a sharp decline at 35°C compared to 30°C. These results indicate their greater vulnerability to increased temperatures and global warming. Additionally, P. sylvestris showed greater resilience in photosynthetic parameters under low light conditions, as well as a more pronounced response to elevated CO₂ concentrations compared to deciduous species. This suggests its greater potential to adapt to future climate changes. The sensitivity of deciduous angiosperm tree species to extreme temperatures and increased CO₂ levels could lead to shifts in the composition of boreal forests in the future.

The results obtained are important for predicting the carbon balance of boreal ecosystems. The resilience of P. sylvestris to high temperatures and its efficiency in using CO₂ suggest that this species will maintain its dominant role in the warming climate. However, the vulnerability of deciduous angiosperm tree species requires further study, especially when considering additional stress factors such as drought. Integrating these data into the Farquhar approach-based ecosystem models will improve predictions of forest responses to climate change. Further studies should incorporate mature trees and complex stress scenarios to improve our understanding of the adaptive mechanisms of boreal species.

References

1. Afonin A.N., Greene S.L., Dzyubenko N.I., Frolov A.N. (eds.). (2008). Interactive agricultural ecological atlas of Russia and neighboring countries. Economic plants and their diseases, pests and weeds [Online]. Available at: https://agroatlas.ru.

2. Baillie A.L., Fleming A.J. (2020). The developmental relationship between stomata and mesophyll airspace. New Phytol, 225(3), 1120– 1126. DOI: 10.1111/nph.16341

3. Bernacchi C.J., Bagley J.E., Serbin S.P., Ruiz‐Vera U.M., Rosenthal D.M., Vanloocke A. (2013). Modelling C3 photosynthesis from the chloroplast to the ecosystem. Plant Cell Environ, 36(9), 1641–1657. DOI: 10.1111/pce.12118

4. Bonan G.B. (2008). Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science, 320, 1444–1449. DOI: 10.1126/science.1155121

5. Busch F.A. (2024). Photosynthetic gas exchange in land plants at the leaf level. In: Covshoff, S. (eds) Photosynthesis. Methods in molecular biology. V. 2790. Humana, New York, NY. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3790-6_3

6. Busch F.A., Ainsworth E.A., Amtmann A., Cavanagh A.P., Driever S.M., Ferguson J.N., Kromdijk J., Lawson T., Leakey A.D., Matthews J.S., Meacham-Hensold K.,Vath R.L.,Vialet-Chabrand S., Walker B.J.,Papanatsiou M. (2024). A guide to photosynthetic gas exchange measurements: Fundamental principles, best practice and potential pitfalls. Plant Cell Environ, 47, 3344–3364. DOI: 10.1111/pce.14815

7. Carriquí M., Nadal M., Clemente-Moreno M.J., Gago J., Miedes E., Flexas J. (2020). Cell wall composition strongly influences mesophyll conductance in gymnosperms. Plant J, 103, 1372–1385. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14806

8. de Souza V.F., Rasulov B., Talts E., Morfopoulos C., Albuquerque P.M., Junior S.D., Niinemets U., Goncales J.F. (2024). Thermal sensitivity determines the effect of high CO2 on carbon uptake in Populus tremula and Inga edulis. Theor Exp Plant Physiol, 36, 199–213. DOI: 10.1007/s40626-024-00312-9

9. Drake J.E., Tjoelker M.G., Vårhammar A., Medlyn B.E., Reich P.B., Leigh A., Pfautsch S., Blackman C.J., López R., Aspinwall M.J., Crous K.Y., Duursma R.A., Kumarathunge D., De Kauwe M.G., Jiang M., Nicotra A.B., Tissue D.T., Choat B., Atkin O.K., Barton C.V. (2018).Trees tolerate an extreme heatwave via sustained transpirational cooling and increased leaf thermal tolerance. Glob Change Biol, 24, 2390–2402. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14037

10. Dusenge M.E, Madhavji S., Way D.A. (2020). Contrasting acclimation responses to elevated CO2 and warming between an evergreen and a deciduous boreal conifer. Glob Change Biol, 26, 3639–3657. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15084

11. Farquhar G.D., von Caemmerer S., Berry J.A. (1980). A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 plants. Planta, 149, 78–90.

12. Flexas J., Carriquí M., Coopman R.E., Gago J., Galmés J., Martorell S., Morales F., Diaz-Espejo A. (2014). Stomatal and mesophyll conductances to CO2 in different plant groups: underrated factors for predicting leaf photosynthesis responses to climate change? Plant Sci, 226, 41–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.06.011

13. Gagne M.A., Smith D.D., McCulloh K.A. (2020). Limited physiological acclimation to recurrent heatwaves in two boreal tree species. Tree Physiol, 40(12), 1680–1696. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpaa102

14. Galmés J., Kapralov M.V., Copolovici L.O., Hermida-Carrera C., Niinemets Ü. (2015). Temperature responses of the Rubisco maximum carboxylase activity across domains of life: phylogenetic signals, trade-offs, and importance for carbon gain. Photosynth Res, 123, 183–201. DOI: 10.1007/s11120-014-0067-8

15. Groisman P., Shugart H., Kicklighter D. et al. (2017). Northern Eurasia Future Initiative (NEFI): facing the challenges and pathways of global change in the twenty-first century. Prog Earth Planet Sci, 41. DOI: 10.1186/s40645-017-0154-5

16. Gushchina D., Tarasova M., Satosina E., Zheleznova I., Emelianova E., Gibadullin R., Osipov A., Olchev A. (2023). The response of daily carbon dioxide and water vapor fluxes to temperature and precipitation extremes in temperate and boreal forests. Climate, 11(10), 206. DOI: 10.3390/cli11100206

17. Hikosaka K., Niinemets Ü., Anten N.P. (eds). (2016). Canopy photosynthesis: from basics to applications. Advances in photosynthesis and respiration.Vol. 42. Springer Dordrecht, 428 р. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-7291-4

18. Hüve K., Bichele I., Kaldmäe H., Rasulov B., Valladares F., Niinemets Ü. (2019). Responses of aspen leaves to heatflecks: both damaging and non-damaging rapid temperature excursions reduce photosynthesis. Plants, 8(6), 145. DOI: 10.3390/plants8060145

19. IPCC: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 34 p. DOI: 10.59327/IPCC/AR69789291691647.001

20. Juárez-López F.J., Escudero A., Mediavilla S. (2008). Ontogenetic changes in stomatal and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis of two co-occurring Mediterranean oaks differing in leaf life span. Tree Physiol, 28, 367–374. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/28.3.367

21. Kaipiainen E.L. (2009). Parameters of photosynthesis light curve in Salix dasyclados and their changes during the growth season. Russ J Plant Physiol, 56, 445–453. DOI: 10.1134/S1021443709040025.

22. Klein T. (2014). The variability of stomatal sensitivity to leaf water potential across tree species indicates a continuum between isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Funct Ecol, 28, 1313–1320. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12289

23. Knauer J., Cuntz M., Evans J.R., Niinemets Ü., Tosens T., Veromann-Jürgenson L.-L., Werner C., Zaehle S. (2022). Contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types. New Phytol, 236, 357–368. DOI: 10.1111/nph.18363

24. Korzukhin M.D., Tselnicker Y.L. (2009). Analysis of the distribution and net primary production of four forest tree species in Russia using an ecophysiological model. In: Problems of ecological monitoring and ecosystem modeling, 22, 92–123.

25. Kurepin L.V., Stangl Z.R., Ivanov A.G., Bui V., Mema M., Hüner N.P., Öquist G., Way D., Hurry V. (2018). Contrasting acclimation abilities of two dominant boreal conifers to elevated CO2 and temperature. Plant Cell Environ, 41, 1331–1345. DOI: 10.1111/pce.13158

26. Laisk A., Nedbal L., Govindjee G. (eds). (2009). Photosynthesis in silico: understanding complexity from molecules to ecosystems. Advances in photosynthesis and respiration.Vol. 29. Springer Dordrecht, 503р. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9237-4

27. Lin H., Chen Y., Zhang H., Fu P., Fan Z. (2017). Stronger cooling effects of transpiration and leaf physical traits of plants from a hot dry habitat than from a hot wet habitat. Funct Ecol, 31, 2202–2211. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12923

28. Lin Y.-S., Medlyn B.E., Ellsworth D.S. (2012). Temperature responses of leaf net photosynthesis: the role of component processes. Tree Physiol, 32(2), 219–231. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpr141

29. Lin Y.-S., Medlyn В.Е., Kauwe M.G., Ellsworth D.S. (2013). Biochemical photosynthetic responses to temperature: how do interspecific differences compare with seasonal shifts? Tree Physiol, 33(8), 793–806. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpt047

30. Liu Q., Peng C., Schneider R., Cyr D., McDowell N.G., Kneeshaw D. (2023). Drought-induced increase in tree mortality and corresponding decrease in the carbon sink capacity of Canada’s boreal forests from 1970 to 2020. Glob Change Biol, 29, 2274–2285. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16599

31. Ma Z., Behling S., Ford E.D. (2014). The contribution of dynamic changes in photosynthesis to shade tolerance of two conifer species. Tree Physiol, 34(7), 730–743. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpu054

32. Mäenpää M., Riikonen J., Kontunen-Soppela S., Rousi M., Oksanen E. (2011). Vertical profiles reveal impact of ozone and temperature on carbon assimilation of Betula pendula and Populus tremula. Tree Physiol, 31, 819–830. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpr075

33. Márquez D.A., Busch F.A. (2024). The interplay of short-term mesophyll and stomatal conductance responses under variable environmental conditions. Plant Cell Environ, 47, 3393–3410. DOI: 10.1111/pce.14880

34. Martínez-García E., Nilsson M.B., Laudon H., Lundmark T., Fransson J.E.S., Wallerman J., Peichl M. (2024). Drought response of the boreal forest carbon sink is driven by understorey–tree composition. Nat Geosci, 17, 197–204. DOI: 10.1038/s41561-024-01374-9

35. Medlyn B.E., Dreyer E., Ellsworth D., Forstreuter M., Harley P.C., Kirschbaum M. U., Le Roux X., Montpied P., Strassemeyer J., Walcroft A., Wang K., Loustau D. (2002). Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. II. A review of experimental data. Plant Cell Environ, 25, 1167–1179. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00891.x

36. Meinzer F.C., Woodruff D.R., Marias D.E., Smith D.D., McCulloh K.A., Howard A.R., Magedman A.L. (2016). Mapping ‘hydroscapes’ along the iso- to anisohydric continuum of stomatal regulation of plant water status. Ecol Lett, 19, 1343–1352. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12670

37. Miyazawa S.I., Tobita H., Ujino-Ihara T., Suzuki Y. (2020). Oxygen response of leaf CO2 compensation points used to determine Rubisco specificity factors of gymnosperm species. J Plant Res, 133, 205–215. DOI: 10.1007/s10265-020-01169-0

38. Mndela M., Tjelele J.T., Madakadze I.C., Mangwana M., Samuels I.M., Muller F., Pule H.T. (2022). A global meta-analysis of woody plant responses to elevated CO2: implications on biomass, growth, leaf N content, photosynthesis and water relations. Ecological Processes, 11, 52–73. DOI: 10.1186/s13717-022-00397-7

39. Mokhov I.I. (2022). Climate change: causes, risks, consequences, and problems of adaptation and regulation. Herald Russ Academy Sci, 92(1), 3–14. DOI: 10.31857/S0869587322010066.

40. Molchanov A.G. (2007). CO2 balance in ecosystems of pine and oak forests in different forest vegetation zones. Tula, 284 p.

41. Nadal M., Carriquí M., Flexas J. (2021). Mesophyll conductance to CO2 diffusion in a climate change scenario: effects of elevated CO2, temperature and water stress. In: Becklin K.M., Ward J.K., Way D.A. (eds) Photosynthesis, respiration, and climate change. Advances in photosynthesis and respiration, 48. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-64926-5_3

42. Nazarova L.E. (2021). Climatic conditions in the Republic of Karelia. In: Current conditions of water basins of the North. Petrozavodsk, 7–16 (In Russian).

43. Niinemets Ü., Flexas J., Peñuelas J. (2011). Evergreens favored by higher responsiveness to increased CO2. Trends Ecol Evol, 26(3), 136– 142. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.12.012

44. Norby R.J., DeLucia E.H., Gielen B., et al. (2005) Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 102 (50), 18052–18056. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0509478102

45. Olchev A.V., Deshcherevskaya O.A., Kurbatova Y.A., Molchanov A.G., Novenko E.Y., Pridacha V.B., Sazonova T.A. (2013). CO2 and H2O exchange in the forest ecosystems of southern taiga under climate change. Doklady Biol Sci, 450(1), 173−176. DOI: 10.1134/S0012496613030216

46. Olchev A.V., Gulev S.K. (2024). Carbon flux measurement supersites of the Russian Federation: objectives, methodology, prospects. Izv Atmos Ocean Phys, 60 (Suppl 3), S428–S434. DOI: 10.1134/S0001433824700841

47. Olchev A.V. (2025). Estimation of carbon dioxide and methane emissions and absorption by land and ocean surfaces in the 21st century. Izv Atmos Ocean Phys, 61 (Suppl 1), S74–S100. DOI: 10.1134/S0001433825701166

48. Oleksyn J., Modrzynski J., Tjoelker M.G., Zytkowiak R., Reich P.B., Karolewski P. (1998). Growth and physiology of Picea abies populations from elevational transects: common garden evidence for altitudinal ecotypes and cold adaptation. Funct Ecol, 12, 573–590.

49. Oleksyn J., Żytkowiak R., Reich P.B., Tjoelker M.G., Karolewski P. (2000). Ontogenetic patterns of leaf CO2 exchange, morphology and chemistry in Betula pendula trees. Trees, 14, 271–281. DOI: 10.1007/PL00009768

50. Onoda Y., Hikosaka K., Hirose T. (2005). The balance between RuBP carboxylation and RuBP regeneration: a mechanism underlying the interspecific variation in acclimation of photosynthesis to seasonal change in temperature. Funct Plant Biol, 32, 903–910. DOI: 10.1071/FP05024

51. Ow L.F., Griffin K.L., Whitehead D., Walcroft A.S., Turnbull M.H. (2008). Thermal acclimation of leaf respiration but not photosynthesis in Populus deltoides×nigra. New Phytol, 178, 123–134. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02357.x

52. Peel M.C., Finlayson B.L., McMahon T.A. (2007). Updated world map of Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 11, 1633–1644. DOI: 10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007

53. Pridacha V.B., Makhmudova L.Sh., Semin D.E., Olchev A.V. (2022). Photosynthetic parameters of woody plant species in the foothills of northern Caucasian broadleaved forests. Grozny Natural Science Bulletin, 4(30), 105–112 (in Russian with English summary). DOI: 10.25744/ genb.2022.74.70.009

54. Pridacha V.B., Sazonova T.A., Novichonok E.V., Semin D.E., TkachenkoYu.N., Pekkoev A.N., Timofeeva V.V., Bakhmet O.N., Olchev A.V. (2021). Clear-cutting impacts nutrient, carbon and water exchange parameters in woody plants in an east Fennoscandian pine forest. Plant Soil, 466, 317–336. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-021-05058-w

55. Pridacha V.B., Semin D.E. (2024). Clear-cutting effects on components of the carbon balance in a bilberry-type pine forest in southern Karelia. Ecosystem Transformation, 7(3), 64–83. DOI: 10.23859/estr-230505

56. Pridacha V.B., Tarelkina T.V., Neronova Ya.А.,Tumanik N.V. (2023). Significance of coordination between stem xylem traits and leaf gas exchange parameters during adaptation formation in some boreal species of Karelia. Botanicheskii Zhurnal, 108(7), 690–708. DOI: 10.31857/S000681362306008X

57. Reich P.B., Sendall K.M., Stefanski A., Rich R.L., Hobbie S.E., Montgomery R.A. (2018). Effects of climate warming on photosynthesis in boreal tree species depend on soil moisture. Nature, 562, 263–267. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0582-4

58. Riikonen J., Mäenpää M., Alavillamo M., Silfver T., Oksanen E. (2009). Interactive effect of elevated temperature and O3 on antioxidant capacity and gas exchange in Betula pendula saplings. Planta, 230, 419–427. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-009-0957-8

59. Rytter L., Rytter R.-M. (2016). Growth and carbon capture of grey alder (Alnus incana (L.) Moench.) under north European conditions – estimates based on reported research. Forest Ecol Manag, 2016, 373, 56–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.04.034

60. Sage R.F., Kubien D.S. (2007). The temperature response of C3 and C4 photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ, 30, 1086–1106. DOI: 10.1111/j.13653040.2007.01682.x

61. Scafaro A.P., Posch B.C., Evans J.R., Farquhar G.D., Atkin O.K. (2023). Rubisco deactivation and chloroplast electron transport rates co-limit photosynthesis above optimal leaf temperature in terrestrial plants. Nat Commun, 14, 2820. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38496-4

62. Schmiege S.C., Griffin K.L., Boelman N.T., Vierling L.A., Bruner S.G., Min E., Maguire A.J., Jensen J., Eitel J.U.H. (2023) Vertical gradients in photosynthetic physiology diverge at the latitudinal range extremes of white spruce. Plant Cell Environ, 46, 45–63. DOI: 10.1111/pce.14448

63. Sellin A., Alber M., Jasińska A.K., Rosenvald K. (2022). Adjustment of leaf anatomical and hydraulic traits across vertical canopy profiles of young broadleaved forest stands. Trees, 36, 67–80. DOI: 10.1007/s00468-021-02181-0

64. Sellin A., Taneda H., Alber M. (2019). Leaf structural and hydraulic adjustment with respect to air humidity and canopy position in silver birch (Betula pendula). J Plant Res, 132, 369–381. DOI: 10.1007/s10265-019-01106-w

65. Sharkey T.D. (1985). Photosynthesis in intact leaves of C3 plants: physics, physiology and rate limitations. The Botanical Review, 51, 53–105. DOI: 10.1007/BF02861058

66. Sharkey T.D. (2016). What gas exchange data can tell us about photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ, 39, 1161–1163. DOI: 10.1111/pce.12641

67. Sharkey T.D. (2024). The end game(s) of photosynthetic carbon metabolism. Plant Physiol, 195(1), 67–78. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiad601

68. Sharkey T.D., Bernacchi C.J., Farquhar G.D., Singsaas E.L. (2007). Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C3 leaves. Plant Cell Environ, 30, 1035–1040. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01710.x.

69. Shiklomanov A.N., Cowdery E.M., Bahn M., Byun C., Jansen S., Kramer K., Minden V., Niinemets U., Onoda Y., Soudzilovskaia N.A., Dietze M.S. (2020). Does the leaf economic spectrum hold within plant functional types? A Bayesian multivariate trait meta‐analysis. Ecological application, 30(3), 1–15. DOI: 10.1002/eap.2064

70. Stirbet A., Guo Y., Lazár D., Govindjee G. (2024). From leaf to multiscale models of photosynthesis: applications and challenges for crop improvement. Photosynth Res, 161, 21–49. DOI: 10.1007/s11120-024-01083-9

71. Sukhova E.M., Vodeneev V.A., Sukhov V.S. (2021). Mathematical modeling of photosynthesis and analysis of plant productivity. Biochem Moscow Suppl Ser A, 15, 52–72. DOI: 10.1134/S1990747821010062

72. Suvorova G.G., Popova E.V. (2015). Photosynthetic productivity of coniferous stands of the Irkutsk region. Novosibirsk, Geo, 95 p. (In Russian)

73. Togashi H.F., Prentice I.C., Atkin O.K., Macfarlane C., Prober S.M., Bloomfield K.J., Evans B.J. (2018). Thermal acclimation of leaf photosynthetic traits in an evergreen woodland, consistent with the coordination hypothesis. Biogeosciences, 15(11), 3461–3474. DOI: 10.5194/bg-15-34612018

74. TselnikerYu.L.(1982). A simplified method for determination of needle surface in pine and spruce trees. Russ J Forest Sci, 4, 85–88. (In Russian)

75. Tselniker Yu.L., Malkina I.S., Kovalev A.G., Chmora S.N, Mamaev V.V., Molchanov A.G. (1993). The growth and CO2-exchange in forest trees. Nauka, Moskva, 256 p. (In Russian)

76. Vasfilov S.P. (2016). The effect of photosynthesis parameters on leaf lifespan. Biol Bull Rev, 6(1), 96–112. DOI: 10.1134/S2079086416010084

77. Veromann-Jürgenson L.-L., Tosens T., Laanisto L., Niinemets U. (2017). Extremely thick cell walls and low mesophyll conductance: welcome to the world of ancient living! J Experimental Botany, 68(7), 1639–1653. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx045

78. Vogel C.S., Curtis P.S. (1995). Leaf gas exchange and nitrogen dynamics of N2-fixing, field-grown Alnus glutinosa under elevated atmospheric CO2. Glob Change Biol, 1, 55–61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.1995.tb00006.x

79. Von Caemmerer S. (2000). Biochemical models of leaf photosynthesis. CSIRO publishing, 165 р. DOI: 10.1071/9780643103405

80. Wullschleger S.D. (1993). Biochemical limitations to carbon assimilation in C3-plants – a retrospective analysis of the A/Ci curves from 109 species. J Experimental Botany, 44(5), 907–920.


About the Authors

Vladislava B. Pridacha
Forest Research Institute, Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Pushkinskaya St.,11, Petrozavodsk, 185910



Alexander V. Olchev
Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

GSP-1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991



Review

For citations:


Pridacha V.B., Olchev A.V. Environmental Controls Of Photosynthetic Parameters In Four Dominant Boreal Tree Species: Contrasting Responses Of Deciduous Angiosperms And Evergreen Gymnosperms. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2025;18(4):92-102. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2025-4190

Views: 539

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-9388 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1565 (Online)