Mapping Ecosystem Services of Forest Stands: Case Study of Maamora, Morocco
https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2021-047
Abstract
The concept of ecosystem services (ES) is increasingly used to analyze the relationships and interactions between humans and nature. Understanding the ecosystem services’ flow and the ecosystems’ capacity to generate these services is an essential element in considering the sustainability of ecosystem uses and the development of ecosystem accounts. For such purpose, we conduct spatially explicit analyses of nine ecosystem services in the Maamora forest, Morocco. The ecosystem services included are timber and industry wood harvest, firewood harvest, cork gathering, forage production, acorn gathering, forest carbon storage, and recreational hiking. Results make it possible to distinguish between the forest capacity to provide ecosystem services from their current use (demand) and assess them quantitatively. It came out that both capacity and flow differ in spatial extent as well as in quantity. Distinguishing capacity and flow of ES also provided an estimate of over-or under-utilization of services, and offer the possibility to map the ecosystem service provision hotspots (SPA) and degraded SPHs. The respective assessment of capacity and flux in a space-explicit manner can therefore support the monitoring of the forest ecosystem use sustainability.
About the Authors
Abdelkader Benabou
Mohammed V University, Faculty of Sciences;
Ministerial Department of Water and Forestry
Morocco
Morocco
Rabat
Said Moukrim
Mohammed V University, Faculty of Sciences
Morocco
Morocco
Rabat
Said Laaribya
Ibn Tofail University Laboratory of territories, environment, and development Kenitra
Morocco
Morocco
Abderrahman Aafi
National Forestry School of Engineers
Morocco
Morocco
Sale
Aissa Chkhichekh
Royal Technical Institute of Water and Forestry
Morocco
Morocco
Sale
Tayeb El Maadidi
Ministerial Department of Water and Forestry
Morocco
Morocco
Rabat
Ahmed El Aboudi
Mohammed V University, Faculty of Sciences
Morocco
Morocco
Rabat
References
1. Aafi A. (2007). Etude de la diversité floristique de l’écosystème de Chêne-liège de la forêt de la Maamora. Thèse de Doctorat D’Etat Es-Sc., Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, Rabat, Maroc, 190 p. [in French].
2. Aafi A., Achhal El Kadmiri A., Benabid A., Rouchdi M. (2005a). Richesse et diversité floristique de la subéraie de la Mamora (Maroc). Acta Botanica Malacitana 30: 127–138. Available at: http://www.bioveg.uma.es/abm/volumenes/vol30/08.mamora.pdf.
3. Aafi A., Achhal El Kadmiri A., Benabid A., Rouchdi M. (2005b). Utilisation des images satellitaires SPOT pour la cartographie des types de peuplements de la forêt de la Mamora (Maroc). Revue Française de Photogrammétrie et Télédétection 178 (2): 30–35.
4. Benabid A. (2000). Flore et écosystèmes du Maroc: Evaluation et préservation de la biodiversité. Ibis Press, Paris, France. 359 p.
5. Bendaanoun M. (1996). La Maâmora un patrimoine national vital pour l’avenir de Salé et de la région. Journée d’étude ‘Sauvons la Maâmora’, Ecole National Forestière d’Ingénieurs, Salé. 30 p
6. Boulmane M., Oubrahim H., Halim M., Bakker M.R., Augusto L. (2017). The potential of Eucalyptus plantations to restore degraded soils in semi-arid Morocco (NW Africa). Annals of Forest Science 74, 57, DOI: 10.1007/s13595-017-0652-z
7. Bryan B.A., Raymond C.M., Crossman N.D., King D. (2011). Comparing spatially explicit ecological and social values for natural areas to identify effective conservation strategies. Conservation Biology 25(1): 172–181.
8. Burkhard B., Kroll F., Nedkov S., Muller F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators 21: 17–29.
9. CBD, 1992.Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations.
10. Chan K.M.A., Satterfield T., Goldstein J. (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics 74: 8–18.
11. CRF (Centre de Recherche Forestière) (2011). Etude relative aux attentes sociales vis à vis de la forêt marocaine, Forestry Research Center, Ministerial Department of Water and Forests, Rabat, Morocco: 10–29.
12. Dahmani J. (2006). Etude de la régénération naturelle et artificielle du Chêne-liège (Quercus suber L.) dans les forêts de la Mamora et de Témara. Thèse de Doctorat d’Etat, Faculté des Sciences, Université Ibn Tofaïl, Kénitra, Maroc, 138 p.
13. DEF (Département ministériel des Eaux et Forêts) (2015). Management plan of the Maamora forest, Morocco. Ministerial Department of Water and Forests, Kenitra, Morocco. 206 p.
14. El Mokaddem A. (2016). Estimation of the economic and social value of the services provided by Mediterranean forest ecosystems: Mamora forest, Morocco. Plan Bleu, Valbonne. 85 p. Available at: https://planbleu.org/sites/default/files/publications/rapport_foret_maroc_c2_6oct2016.pdf
15. Fagerholm N., Käyhkö N., Ndumbaro F., Khamis M. (2012). Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments – mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecological Indicators 18: 421–433.
16. FAO/IUSS (2006). IUSS Working Group WRB World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006: a Framework for International Classification, Correlation and Communication. 2nd edition. World Soil Resources Reports no. 103. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Italy. 128 p.
17. García-Nieto A., Quintas-Soriano C., García-Llorente M., Palomo I., Montes C., & Martín-López B. (2015) Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: The role of stakeholders΄ profiles. Ecosystem Services 13: 141152, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.006
18. Geneletti D., Esmail B. A., Cortinovis C., Arany I., Balzan M., van Beukering P. J., & Burkhard B. (2020). Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy-and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of European case studies. One Ecosystem 5: e53111, DOI: 10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111
19. Hammoudi A. (2002). Suberaie and landscape biodiversity. Vivexpo conference, Institut Méditerannène de Liège, France, 5 p. Available at: http://www.vivexpo.org/foire/images/Abdelaziz%20Hammoudi.pdf
20. Hemmich H. (2003). Evaluation des activités anthropozoogènes exercées dans la Maâmora occidentale et processus de gestion durable. Mémoire de 3ème cycle ENFI, Salé. 89 p.
21. Laaribya S., Alaoui A., Ayan S., Benabou A., Labbaci A., Ouhaddou H., Bijou M. (2021). Prediction by maximum entropy of potential habitat of the cork oak (Quercus suber L.) in Maamora Forest, Morocco. Forestist. 7 p., DOI: 10.5152/forestist.2021.20059
22. Laaribya S., Alaoui A., Gmira N., Gmira N. (2014). Contribution to the assessment of pastoral pressure in the Maâmora forest. Forest routes and overgrazing. Nature et Technologie C- Sciences de l’Environnement 10: 39–50.
23. M’hirit O., Benzyane M., Naggar M. (1995). L’Aménagement sylvopastoral. Actes de l’atelier sur le sylvo-pastoralisme- ENFI (Maroc), 25–28 Octobre 1995. Annales de la Recherche Forestière au Maroc. Rabat: 20–35.
24. Maes J, Teller A, Erhard M, Grizzetti B, Barredo JI, Paracchini ML, Condé S, Somma F, Orgiazzi A, Jones A, Zulian A, Petersen JE, Marquardt D, Kovacevic V, Abdul Malak D, Marin AI, Czúcz B, Mauri A, Loffler P, Bastrup-Birk A, Biala K, Christiansen T, Werner B. 2018. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: An analytical framework for ecosystem condition. Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
25. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. 64 p.
26. Oubrahim H., Boulmane M., Bakker M.R., Augusto L., Halim M. 2015. Carbon storage in degraded cork oak (Quercus suber) forests on flat lowlands in Morocco. iForest 9: 125–137, DOI: 10.3832/ifor1364-008
27. van Oudenhoven A.P.E., Petz K., Alkemade R., Heina L., de Groot R. S. (2012). Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators 21 (2012) 110–122. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.012
28. Palomo I., Martıin- Lopez B., Potschin M., Haines-Young R., Montes C. 2012. National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosystem Services, 13 p., DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.001
29. Plieninger T., Bieling C. (2013). Resilience and the Cultural Landscape: Understanding and Managing Change in Human-Shaped Environments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Landscape Ecol 28: 1841–1843, DOI:10.1007/s10980-013-9922-9
30. Schröter M., Bartonb D.N., Remmea R.P., Heina L. (2014). Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: A conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway. Ecological Indicators. Volume 36, Pages 539-551, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018.
31. SEEA-EEA, 2012. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012: Experimental Ecosystem Accounting. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/eea_white_cover.pdf
32. Seppelt R., Dormann C.F., Eppink F.V., Lautenbach S., Schmidt S. (2011). A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 630–636, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x
33. TEEB, (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and economic foundation. Earthscan, Cambridge.
34. Turner K.G., Andersonc S., Gonzales-Chang M., Costanza R., Courvillef S., Dalgaarda T., Dominati E., Kubiszewski I, Ogilvye S., Porfirio L., Ratna N., Sandhui H., Suttonc P.C., Svenning J.C., Turner G.M., Varennes Y.D., Voinov Y., Wratten S. 2016. A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration. Ecological Modeling 319: 190–207.
Review
For citations:
Benabou A., Moukrim S., Laaribya S., Aafi A., Chkhichekh A., Maadidi T.E., Aboudi A.E. Mapping Ecosystem Services of Forest Stands: Case Study of Maamora, Morocco. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2022;15(1):141-149. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2021-047
Views:
1766
Email this article 