Knowledge Co-Production Practices To Promote Climate Resilience In Global Cities: A Systematic Literature Review. Geography

Retno S. Dewi; Wiwandari Handayani; Muhammad Z. A. J. Ramadhan; Iwan Rudiarto

doi:10.24057/2071-9388-2025-3867

Knowledge Co-Production Practices To Promote Climate Resilience In Global Cities: A Systematic Literature Review. Geography

Retno S. Dewi, Wiwandari Handayani, Muhammad Z. A. J. Ramadhan, Iwan Rudiarto

https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2025-3867

Full Text:

PDF (Eng)

Generate QR code

Abstract

Climate change presents complex challenges for cities worldwide, requiring innovative and collaborative approaches to enhance resilience and adaptability. In response to this phenomenon, knowledge co-production plays a vital role in integrating diverse perspectives to address climate-related risks and promote adaptive urban environments. This research aims to investigate current consensus on how knowledge co-production is operationalised, particularly in climate resilience and urban settings. This study follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) protocol to identify, screen, and analyse relevant publications systematically. A total of 36 publications were reviewed to examine the types of disturbances, the dimensions of stakeholder engagement, and current practices of knowledge co-production. The findings highlight the growing significance of knowledge co-production in addressing climate-related challenges through strong stakeholder engagement, local knowledge integration, and effective science– policy interfaces. Moreover, these processes require balanced and meaningful participation among all stakeholders, particularly local community involvement, to ensure that initiatives can be scaled up and become systemic rather than fragmented.

Keywords

knowledge co-production, climate resilience, city resilience, systematic literature review

About the Authors

Retno S. Dewi

Center for Urban and Regional Resilience Research (CURE) – Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University
Indonesia

Jalan Prof. Soedarto, Semarang, 50275

Wiwandari Handayani

Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University
Indonesia

Jalan Prof. Soedarto, Semarang, 50275

Muhammad Z. A. J. Ramadhan

Center for Urban and Regional Resilience Research (CURE) – Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University
Indonesia

Jalan Prof. Soedarto, Semarang, 50275

Iwan Rudiarto

Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University
Indonesia

Jalan Prof. Soedarto, Semarang, 50275

References

1. Adams C., Frantzeskaki N., and Moglia M. (2023). Space for mainstreaming? Learning from the implementation of urban forest strategies in metropolitan Melbourne. Australian Planner, 59(2), 154–169, https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2023.2268222

2. Aguilar-Barajas I., Sisto N. P., Ramirez A. I., and Magaña-Rueda V. (2019). Building urban resilience and knowledge co-production in the face of weather hazards: flash floods in the Monterrey Metropolitan Area (Mexico). Environmental Science and Policy, 99, 37–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.021

3. Aldunce P., Bórquez R., Adler C., Blanco G., and Garreaud R. (2016). Unpacking resilience for adaptation: Incorporating practitioners’ experiences through a transdisciplinary approach to the case of drought in Chile. Sustainability, 8(9), https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090905

4. Ambole A., Musango J. K., Buyana K., Ogot M., Anditi C., Mwau B., Kovacic Z., Smit S., Lwasa S., Nsangi G., Sseviiri H., and Brent A. C. (2019). Mediating household energy transitions through co-design in urban Kenya, Uganda and South Africa. Energy Research and Social Science, 55, 208–217, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.05.009

5. Asian Development Bank. (2022). Strategy 2030: Urban sector directional guide. [online] ADB. Available at: https://www.adb.org/documents/strategy-2030-urban-sector-directional-guide [Accessed 4 Feb. 2025].

6. Borquez R., Aldunce P., and Adler C. (2017). Resilience to climate change: from theory to practice through co-production of knowledge in Chile. Sustainability Science, 12(1), 163–176, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0400-6

7. Cooke J., Langley J., Wolstenholme D., and Hampshaw S. (2017). “Seeing” the Difference: The Importance of Visibility and Action as a Mark of “Authenticity” in Co-production Comment on “Collaboration and Co-production of Knowledge in Healthcare: Opportunities and Challenges”. IJHPM: International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 6(6), 345-348. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.136

8. Culwick C., Washbourne C. L., Anderson P. M. L., Cartwright A., Patel Z., and Smit W. (2019). CityLab reflections and evolutions: Nurturing knowledge and learning for urban sustainability through co-production experimentation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39, 9-16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.05.008

9. Cuomo F., Lambiase N., and Castagna A. (2021). Living lab on sharing and circular economy: The case of Turin. Health Informatics Journal, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458220987278

10. Djenontin I. N. S. and Meadow A. M. (2018). The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: lessons from international practice. Environmental Management, 61(6), 885–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1028-3

11. Dunn G., Brown R. R., Bos J. J., and Bakker K. (2017). The role of science-policy interface in sustainable urban water transitions: Lessons from Rotterdam. Environmental Science and Policy, 73, 71–79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.013

12. Eaton W. M., Burnham M., Kirchoff C., Hinrichs C. C. (2021). Expert habits of mind: Implications for knowledge co-production in energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 80, 102234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102234

13. Edelenbos J., Buuren A., and Schie N. (2011). Co-producing knowledge: Joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects. Environmental Science and Policy, 14(6), 675–684, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.004

14. Esmail B. A., Anderson C. C., Bast S., Cortinovis C., Suleiman L., Kato-Huerta J., Högström J., Balfors B., Arciniegas G., Geneletti D., Mörtberg U., and Albert C. (2024). Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions. Ambio, 54, 285-304, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8

15. Evans J., Jones R., Karvonen A., Millard L., Wendler J. (2015). Living labs and co-production: university campuses as platforms for sustainability science. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.005

16. Folke C., Jansson Å., Rockström J., Olsson P., Carpenter S. R., Chapin I., Crépin A. S., Daily G., Danell K., Ebbesson J., Elmqvist T., Galaz V., Moberg F., Nilsson M., Österblom H., Ostrom E., Persson Å., Peterson G., Polasky S., Steffen W., Walker B., Westley, F. (2011). Reconnecting to the biosphere. Ambio, 40(7), 719-738, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0184-y

17. Frantzeskaki N. and Kabisch N. (2016). Designing a knowledge co-production operating space for urban environmental governance—Lessons from Rotterdam, Netherlands and Berlin, Germany. Environmental Science and Policy, 62, 90–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.010

18. Gaffy E., Brijnath B., Dow B. (2022). Co-producing research with people impacted by dementia and service providers: issues and challenges. Public Health Research & Practice, 32(2), e3222216, https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp3222216

19. Handayani W., Chigbu U. E., Rudiarto I., and Putri I. H. S. (2020). Urbanization and increasing flood risk in the northern coast of Central Java – Indonesia: An assessment towards better land use policy and flood management. Land, 9(10), 343, https://doi.org/10.3390/land9100343

20. Handayani W., Fisher M. R., Rudiarto I., Setyono J. S., and Foley, D. (2019). Operationalizing resilience: A content analysis of flood disaster planning in two coastal cities in Central Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 35, 101073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101073

21. Haque C. E., Zaman J. R., and Walker D. (2023). Risk-Reduction, Coping, and Adaptation to Flood Hazards in Manitoba, Canada: Evidence from Communities in the Red River Valley. Geosciences, 13(3), 88, https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13030088

22. Harvey B., Cochrane L., Epp M. V. (2019). Charting knowledge co‐production pathways in climate and development. Environmental Policy and Governance, 29(2), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1834

23. Heinzlef C., Lamaury Y., and Serre D. (2024). Improving climate change resilience knowledge through a gaming approach: Application to marine submersion in the city of Punaauia, Tahiti. Environmental Advances, 15, 100467, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2023.100467

24. Holling C. S. (1973). Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245

25. Jabareen Y. (2013). Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk. Cities, 31, 220–229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004

26. Johnson C., Osuteye E., Ndezi T., and Makoba F. (2022). Co-producing knowledge to address disaster risks in informal settlements in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: pathways toward urban equality? Environment and Urbanization, 34(2), 349–371, https://doi.org/10.1177/09562478221112256

27. Krellenberg K. and Katrin, B. (2014). Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research for Planning Climate Change Adaptation Responses: The Example of Santiago de Chile. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 39(4), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1179/0308018814Z.00000000097

28. Kronsell A. and Mukhtar-Landgren D. (2018). Experimental governance: The role of municipalities in urban living labs. European Planning Studies, 26(5), 988-1007, https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1435631

29. Larondelle N., Frantzeskaki N., and Haase D. (2016). Mapping transition potential with stakeholder- and policy-driven scenarios in Rotterdam City. Ecological Indicators, 70, 630–643, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.028

30. Leichenko R. (2011). Climate change and urban resilience. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3(3), 164–168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014

31. Lorencová E. K., Whitham C. E. L., Bašta P., Harmáčková Z. V., Štěpánek P., Zahradníček P., Farda A., and Vačkář D. (2018). Participatory climate change impact assessment in three Czech cities: The case of heatwaves. Sustainability, 10(6), 1906, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061906

32. Matsuura S. and Razak K.A. (2019). Exploring transdisciplinary approaches to facilitate disaster risk reduction. Disaster Prevention and Management, 28(6), 817-830, https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-09-2019-0289

33. McGeown H., Potter L., Stone T., Swede J., Cramer H., Horwood J., Carvalho M., Connell F., Feder G., Farr, M. (2023). Trauma-informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs. Health Expectations, 26(5), 1895-1914. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13795

34. Medema W., Adamowski J., Orr C. J., Wals A., and Milot N. (2015). Towards sustainable water governance: Examining water governance issues in Québec through the lens of multi-loop social learning. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 40(4), 373–391, https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2015.1088403

35. Meerow S., Newell J. P., and Stults M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38–49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011

36. Miguel J. C. H., Taddei R. R., Moscati M. C. L., Coelho C. A. S., Cavalcanti I. F. A., Rezende L. F., Randow, C. V. (2025). Co-production in climate services for the electricity sector in Brazil – Insights from the CLIMAX project. Climate Service, 38, 100570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2025.100570

37. Mills K. E., Armitage D., Eurich J. G., Kleisner K. M., Pecl G. T., Tokunaga K. (2023). Co-production of knowledge and strategies to support climate resilient fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 80, 358-361. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsac110

38. Morzillo A. T., Campbell L. K., King K. L., Lautar K. J., Scott L., Johnson M. L., Clarke M., Rhodes L., Pincetl S., Sonti N. F., Locke D. H., Schmit J. P., Fahey R. T., Baker M. E., Darling L., and Johnson L. R. (2022). A tale of urban forest patch governance in four eastern US cities. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 75, 127693, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127693

39. Mpofu-Mketwa T. J., Abrams A., and Black G. F. (2023). Reflections on measuring the soundness of the digital storytelling method applied to three Cape Flats vulnerable communities affected by drought, fire and flooding in Cape Town. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100407, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100407

40. Nesti, G. (2018). Co-production for innovation: The urban living lab experience. Policy and Society, 37(3), 310-325, https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1374692

41. Nicolletti M., Maschietto F., and Moreno T. (2020). Integrating social learning into climate change adaptation public policy cycle: Building upon from experiences in Brazil and the United Kingdom. Environmental Development, 33, 100486, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2019.100486

42. Noble K. and Enseñando E. M. (2022). Analyzing co-creation levels of urban living labs in Europe. Vision for Sustainability, 18. https://doi.org/10.13135/2384-8677/7060

43. Nochta T., Wan L., Schooling J. M., and Parlikad A. K. (2021). A Socio-Technical Perspective on Urban Analytics: The Case of City-Scale Digital Twins. Journal of Urban Technology, 28(1–2), 263–287, https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2020.1798177

44. Norström A. V., Cvitanovic C., Löf M. F., West S., Wyborn C., Balvanera P., Bednarek A. T., Bennett E. M., Biggs R., Bremond A., Campbell B. M., Canadell J. G., Carpenter S. R., Folke C., Fulton E. A., Gaffney O., Gelcich S., Jouffray J. B., Leach M., Le Tissier M., Martín-López B., Louder E., Loutre M., Meadow A. M., Nagendra h., Payne D., Peterson G. D., Reyers B., Scholes R., Speranza C. I., Spierenburg M., Stafford-Smith M., Tengö M., van der Hel S., van Putten I., and Österblom, H. (2020). Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability, 3, 182–190, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2

45. Nowotny H., Scott P., and Gibbons M. (2003). Introduction: `Mode 2’ Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge. Minerva, 41(3), 179–194, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025505528250

46. O’Donnell E. C., Thorne C. R., Yeakley J. A., and Chan F. K. S. (2020). Sustainable Flood Risk and Stormwater Management in Blue-Green Cities; an Interdisciplinary Case Study in Portland, Oregon. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(5), 757–775, https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12854

47. Odume O. N., Amaka-Otchere A. B., Onyima B. N., Aziz F., Kushitor S. B., and Thiam S. (2021). Pathways, contextual and cross-scale dynamics of science-policy-society interactions in transdisciplinary research in African cities. Environmental Science and Policy, 125, 116– 125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.014

48. Onyima B. N., Nwabueze L. N., Nnadozie C. F., Omovoh G. O., Mmachaka T., Omovoh B. O., Arimoro F. O., Uku J. E., Akamagwuna F. C., Onyima G. O., Odume O. N. (2025). Livelihood risks arising from urban river pollution in selected marginal communities in the Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria. Urban Ecosystem, 28(1), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01646-7

49. Özerol G., Dolman N., Bormann H., Bressers H., Lulofs K., and Böge M. (2020). Urban water management and climate change adaptation: A self-assessment study by seven midsize cities in the North Sea Region. Sustainable Cities and Society, 55, 102066, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102066

50. Page M. J., McKenzie J. E., Bossuyt P. M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T. C., Mulrow C. D., Shamseer L., Tetzlaff J. M., and Moher D. (2021a). Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 103–112, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003

51. Page M. J., Moher D., Bossuyt P. M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T. C., Mulrow C. D., Shamseer L., Tetzlaff J. M., Akl E. A., Brennan S. E., Chou R., Glanville J., Grimshaw J. M., Hróbjartsson A., Lalu M. M., Li T., Loder E. W., Mayo-Wilson E., McDonald S., McGuinness L. A., Stewart L. A., Thomas J., Tricco A. C., Welch V. A., Whiting P., McKenzie J. E. (2021b). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n160, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160

52. Pearsall H., Heck S., Tablas M., Pierce J., Hinrich C., Roman L. A., Shabazz J. (2022). Building knowledge infrastructure for diverse stakeholders to scale up co-production equitably. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 54, 101156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101156

53. Pillai S. and Narayanan N. C. (2022). Contextual knowledge co-production and capacity building for sanitation planning: experience from Kerala, India. Water Policy, 24(5), 839–855, https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2021.094

54. Polk M. and Kain J. (2015). Co-producing knowledge for sustainable urban futures. In: M. Polk, ed., Co-Producing Knowledge for Sustainable Cities: Joining Forces for Change, 1st ed. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315748030

55. Puerari E., De Koning J. I. J. C., Von With T., Karré P. M., Mulder I. J., and Loorbach D. A. (2018). Co-creation dynamics in urban living labs. Sustainability, 10(6), 1893, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061893

56. Radović V. (2020). Emergency Management/Response BT - Climate Action. In W. Leal Filho, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, P. G. Özuyar, and T. Wall, eds., Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 391–404, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95885-9_66

57. Ribeiro P. J. G. and Gonçalves L. A. P. J. (2019). Urban resilience: A conceptual framework. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101625, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625

58. Rosen J. and Painter G. (2019). From citizen control to co-production: Moving beyond a linear conception of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 335-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1618727

59. Roué M. and Nakashima D. (2022). Co-production between Indigenous Knowledge and Science: Introducing a Decolonized Approach. In M. Roué, D. Nakashima, and I. Krupnik, eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3-24, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108974349.002

60. Rudiarto I., Handayani W., and Setyono J. S. (2018). A regional perspective on urbanization and climate-related disasters in the northern coastal region of Central Java, Indonesia. Land, 7(1), 34, https://doi.org/10.3390/land7010034

61. Ryan D. and Bustos E. (2019). Knowledge gaps and climate adaptation policy: a comparative analysis of six Latin American countries. Climate Policy, 19(10), 1297-1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1661819

62. Schmidt L., Feital M., Cortekar J., di Guilio G., and Engels A. (2024). Understanding the science policy interface in urban climate governance from a co-production perspective: Insights from the cases of Hamburg and Saõ Paulo. Environmental Science and Policy, 156, 103750, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103750

63. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2023). The largest cities worldwide 2023. [online] Destatis. Available at: https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Countries-Regions/International-Statistics/Data-Topic/Population-Labour-Social-Issues/DemographyMigration/UrbanPopulation.html [Accessed 5 Dec. 2023].

64. Stephenson D. B. (2008). Definition, diagnosis, and origin of extreme weather and climate events. In H. F. Diaz and R. J. Murnane, eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11–23, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535840.004

65. Tian Z., Lyu X. Y., Zou H., Yang H. L., Sun L., Pinya M. S., Chao Q. C., Feng A. Q., and Smith B. (2022). Advancing index-based climate risk assessment to facilitate adaptation planning: Application in Shanghai and Shenzhen, China. Advances in Climate Change Research, 13(3), 432–442, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2022.02.003

66. Tiitu M., Viinikka A., Ojanen M., and Saarikoski H. (2021). Transcending sectoral boundaries? Discovering built-environment indicators through knowledge co-production for enhanced planning for well-being in Finnish cities. Environmental Science and Policy, 126, 177–188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.09.028

67. Tõnisson L., Kunz Y., Kecorius S., Madueño L., Tamayo E. G., Casanova D. M., Zhao Q., Schikowski T., Hornidge A. K., Wiedensohler A., and Macke A. (2020). From transfer to knowledge co-production: A transdisciplinary research approach to reduce black carbon emissions in metro manila, philippines. Sustainability, 12(23), 1–19, https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310043

68. Valkering P., Beumer C., Kraker J. D., and Ruelle C. (2013). An analysis of learning interactions in a cross-border network for sustainable urban neighbourhood development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 49, 85–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.010

69. Valve H., Lazarevic D., Hyysalo S., Lukkarinen J., Marttila T. (2023). The interrupting capacities of knowledge co-production experiments: A sociology of testing approach. Environmental Science & Policy, 147, 255-264, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.06.019

70. van der Graaf P., Kislov R., Smith H., Langley J., Hamer N., Cheetham M., Wolstenholme D., Cooke J., Mawson S. (2023). Leading coproduction in five UK collaborative research partnerships (2008–2018): responses to four tensions from senior leaders using auto-ethnography. Implementation Science Communications, 4(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00385-0

71. Vara-Sánchez I., Gallar-Hernández D., García-García L., Alonso N. M., Moragues-Faus A. (2021). The co-production of urban food policies: Exploring the emergence of new governance spaces in three Spanish cities. Food Policy, 103, 102120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102120

72. Visconti C. (2023). Co-production of knowledge for climate-resilient design and planning in Naples, Italy. Habitat International, 135, 102748, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102748

73. Voytenko Y., McCormick K., Evans J., and Schliwa G. (2016). Urban living labs for sustainability amd low carbon cities in Europe: Towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 45-54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelepro.2015.08.053

74. Walisser B., Mueller B., and McLean C. (2005). The resilient city. prepared for the world urban forum 2006 by the Vancouver Working Group. Canada: Ministry of Community, Aboriginal and Women’s Services, Government of British Columbia.

75. Wang L. and Xue X. (2018). Exploring the Evolution Trends of Urban Resilience Research. ICCREM 2018, [online], 18–27. Available at: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/9780784481745.003 [Accessed 11 Jan. 2024].

76. Wardani J., (Annette) Bos J. J., Ramirez-Lovering D., Capon A. (2025). From complexity to integration: Insights for process design from an empirical case study of transdisciplinary planetary health collaboration in Indonesia. Earth System Governance, 23, 100233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2024.100233

77. World Bank. (2024). Urban population. [online] World Bank. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL [Accessed 10 Dec. 2024]

78. Yumagulova L. and Vertinsky I. (2019). Moving beyond engineering supremacy: Knowledge systems for urban resilience in Canada’s Metro Vancouver region. Environmental Science and Policy, 100, 66–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.022

Review

For citations:

Dewi R.S., Handayani W., Ramadhan M.Z., Rudiarto I. Knowledge Co-Production Practices To Promote Climate Resilience In Global Cities: A Systematic Literature Review. Geography. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2025;18(4):115-126. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2025-3867

JATS XML