Karst Landforms Of The Sinyaya River Valley, Prilenskoe Plateau
https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2025-3966
Abstract
Unique karst evolution in Siberia is attributed to climatic factors and the presence of permafrost. Climatic fluctuations in Northern Eurasia had occurred during the Quaternary period and significantly influenced the processes of permafrost aggradation and degradation, as well as the karst activity. Despite their wide popularity and impressive manifestations, the karst landforms on the Prilenskoe Plateau still remain tenuously studied in terms of landform classification and obtaining their morphometric characteristics. The article presents the results of field studies of karst terrain in the Sinyaya River valley in Central Yakutia. Based on field observations and the analysis of the generated digital surface models, we have determined the median relative heights of different types of karst ridges in the Sinyaya River valley: “incipient ridges” - 34 m, “young ridges” - 42 m, “mature ridges” - 79 m and “old ridges” - 58 m. Most ridges that exceed 100 m are “mature and old”. The highest ridges are located on the concave parts of river meanders and belong to the type of “mature ridges”. In addition, our observations in the Sinyaya River valley have shown “old ridges” are the most common, accounting for over 58% of the overall ridge length. “Mature ridges” make up approximately 25%, “young ridges” 13%, and “incipient” ridges only 4% of the total. This distribution reflects the long history of topographic development in the valley and the significant influence of erosion processes on these features. The most prominent forms of this landscape include karst ridges, which present as rock pillars formed through physical and chemical weathering, with very active frost shattering, gravitational, and erosion processes. Using field surveys conducted with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and subsequent processing in a geographic information system (GIS), it was determined that the highest ridges are located in the lower reaches of the Sinyaya River, where it cuts through the axial, most elevated part of the Prilenskoe Plateau. The morphometric characteristics of the identified types of karst ridges and their spatial change along the river meanders are associated mainly with the activity of lateral river erosion, which ensures the removal of weathering material and slope deposits.
Supporting agencies: This research was supported by the Grant of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) for young scientists, specialists, and students, MPI SB RAS Project № 122011800064-9, and MSU Project № 121051100164-0.
About the Authors
Nikolai V. Torgovkin
Melnikov Permafrost Institute SB RAS, Laboratory of General Geocryology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yakutsk, 677010
Alexander I. Kizyakov
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Cryolithology and Glaciology Department, Faculty of Geography
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow, 119991
Anastasia A. Gavrilova
Institute of Precambrian Geology and Geochronology RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
St.-Petersburg, 199034
Julustan E. Sivtsev
Melnikov Permafrost Institute SB RAS, Laboratory of General Geocryology; Lomonosov Moscow State University, Cryolithology and Glaciology Department, Faculty of Geography
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yakutsk, 677010
Moscow, 119991
Sebastian F.M. Breitenbach
Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Northumbria University
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE77XA
References
1. Cao H., Xiong L., Ma J., Wang H., Li S., Yu F. and Wang P. (2024) Karst landform classification considering surface flow characteristics derived from digital elevation models. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 49(1), P. 468–481, DOI: 10.1002/esp.5715
2. Davis W.M. (1899). The Geographical Cycle. Geographical Journal, Vol. 14, No. 5, 18, P. 481-504. doi:10.2307/1774538.
3. Doumit J. and Ghanem D. (2021). Using high-resolution Digital Surface Models and GIS-based geomorphometry to draw a karst landforms map. Mazedan Transactions on Engineering Systems Design, Vol-2, Issue-2, P. 1-4.
4. Gillieson D.S., Gunn J., Auler A., Bolger T. (editors) (2022). Guidelines for Cave and Karst Protection, 2nd Edition, Postojna, Slovenia: International Union of Speleology and Gland, Switzerland, IUCN. 112 p.
5. Kim J. and Hong I. (2024). Evaluation of the Usability of UAV LiDAR for Analysis of Karst (Doline) Terrain Morphology. Sensors, 24(21), 7062, DOI: 10.3390/s24217062
6. Konishchev V.N. Regularities of formation of rock composition in the cryolithozone (1981). (Zakonomernosti formirovaniya sostava porod v kriolitozone). Novosibirsk: Nauka. 218 p. (In Russian).
7. Korzhuev S.S. (1961). Merzlotnyi karst Srednego Prilen’ya i nekotorye osobennosti yego proyavleniya (The Middle-Lena frozen karst and its characteristics). Regionalnoe karstovedenie. Izdatelstvo AN SSSR, Moscow, P. 207-220. (In Russian).
8. Lena Pillars Nature Park (2012). Moscow: ANNIE, 56 p. (In Russian).
9. Porter C., Howat I., Noh M.-J., Husby E., Khuvis S., Danish E., Tomko K., Gardiner J., Negrete A., Yadav B., Klassen J., Kelleher C.; Cloutier M., Bakker J., Enos J., Arnold G., Bauer G. and Morin P. (2023). “ArcticDEM, Version 4.1”, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/3VDC4W, Harvard Dataverse, V1, [Date Accessed 14 December 2023].
10. Samsonov T.E. (2024) Visualization and Analysis of Geographical Data in R. Moscow, Faculty of Geography Lomonosov MSU, (In Russian), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.901911.
11. Saroli M., Albano M., Moro M., Falcucci E., Gori S., Galadini F. and Petitta M. (2022). Looking Into the Entanglement Between Karst Landforms and Fault Activity in Carbonate Ridges: The Fibreno Fault System (Central Italy). Front. Earth Sci., 10:891319. DOI: 10.3389/feart.2022.891319
12. Silva O.L., Bezerra F. H.R., Maia R.P. and Cazarin C.L. (2017). Karst landforms revealed at various scales using LiDAR and UAV in semi-arid Brazil: Consideration on karstification processes and methodological constraints. Geomorphology, 295, P. 611-630, DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.07.025
13. Simonov Yu.G. (1998). Morfometricheskii analiz rel’efa (Geomorphometric analysis of terrain). Moscow–Smolensk: Izd-vo SGU (Publ.), 272 p. (in Russ.)
14. Simonov Yu.G. (1999). Ob’’yasnitelnaya morfometriya rel’efa (Explanational geomorphometry). Moscow: GEOS (Publ.), 251 p. (in Russ.)
15. Spektor V.B. and Spektor V.V. (2009). Karst processes and phenomena in the frozen carbonate rocks of the Middle Lena River basin. Permafrost and Periglac. Process. (20): P. 71-78.
16. The Foundation of Geocryology, Part 4: Dynamic Geocryology (2001). Ed. by E. D. Ezhov, L. S. Garagulya, S. N. Buldovich, Moscow State Univ., Moscow (in Russian).
17. Tolstikhin O.N. and Spektor V.V. (2004). Lena Pillars. Science and Techniques in Yakutia, P. 101–106 (In Russian).
18. Trofimova E.V. (2012). Karst in the «Lena Pillars» Nature Park is a unique natural phenomenon. Izvestiya RGO, vol. 144, 3, P. 68-75. (In Russian).
19. Trofimova E.V. (2013). Morphology of the relief of the Lena Pillars (Lena River valley). Izvestiya RGO, vol. 145, 5, P. 19-28. (In Russian).
20. Trofimova E.V. (2017). Amazing karst in the valley of the Sinyaya River. Priroda, Vol. 1, P. 48-54. (In Russian).
21. Trofimova E.V. (2018). UNESCO world karst natural heritage sites: geographical and geological review. Geography, Environment, Sustainability. Vol. 11 (2): P. 63-72. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2018-11-2-63-72.
22. Vaks A., Mason A.J., Breitenbach S.F.M., Kononov A.M., Osinzev A.V., Rosensaft M., Borshevsky A., Gutareva O.S. and Henderson G.M. (2020). Palaeoclimate evidence of vulnerable permafrost during times of low sea ice. Nature, 577, P. 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1880-1.
23. Veress M., Zentai Z., Péntek K., Döbröntei L. and Kiprijanova L.D. (2014). The development of the pinnacles (Lena pillars) along Middle Lena (Sakha Republic, Siberia, Russia). Proc. Geol. Assoc. 125, 452–462.
24. Waltham T. (2008). Fengcong, fenglin, cone karst and tower karst. Cave and Karst Science, 35(3). P. 77-88.
25. Zhang L., Du H., Yang Z., Song T.; Zeng F., Peng W. and Huang G. (2022). Topography and Soil Properties Determine Biomass and Productivity Indirectly via Community Structural and Species Diversity in Karst Forest, Southwest China. Sustainability, 14, 7644, DOI: 10.3390/su14137644
Review
For citations:
Torgovkin N.V., Kizyakov A.I., Gavrilova A.A., Sivtsev J.E., Breitenbach S.F. Karst Landforms Of The Sinyaya River Valley, Prilenskoe Plateau. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2025;18(3):99-106. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2025-3966
Views:
168
Email this article 