Preview

GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY

Advanced search

Assessment Of The Kolyma River Hydrological Regime Dynamics In The 21st Century Based On Runoff Formation Model

https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2025-3482

Abstract

Using the physically-based model of runoff formation ECOMAG (ECOlogical Model for Applied Geophysics), the response of the Kolyma River’s water regime to ongoing and projected climate changes has been investigated. To operate the ECOMAG model, which calculates daily water discharges for control sections, information was gathered on the characteristics of the land surface and watershed relief, as well as archives of daily observations from meteorological stations within the basin. The calibration and validation of the model, performed for two sections on the Kolyma River and two sections on its tributaries – the Bolshoy Anyuy and Yasachnaya rivers – demonstrated strong agreement between the modelled and observed water discharges for the Kolyma River. Moreover, the analysis of observed water discharges and those calculated by the ECOMAG model reveals similar changes in the water regime that occurred from 1979 to 2020, such as an increase in annual and summer-autumn runoff, and a decrease in the duration of the winter low-flow period. To assess potential changes in the Kolyma River’s runoff in the 21st century, numerical experiments were conducted using the ECOMAG hydrological model and an ensemble of four global climate models. Calculations were performed for the periods 2020–2039, 2040–2059, 2060–2079, and 2080–2099 for four different Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios. Anomalies in annual runoff, peak water discharges, flood volumes, winter low-flow periods, and summer-autumn periods were considered. Under all scenarios, the calculations indicate an increase in the annual and summer-autumn runoff of the Kolyma River.

About the Authors

Anastasia A. Lisina
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Land Hydrology; Water Problems Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

GSP-1, Leninskie Gory, 119991, Moscow; Gubkina ul. 3, 119333, Moscow



Natalia L. Frolova
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Land Hydrology
Russian Federation

GSP-1, Leninskie Gory, 119991, Moscow



Andrey S. Kalugin
Water Problems Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Gubkina ul. 3, 119333, Moscow



Inna N. Krylenko
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Land Hydrology; Water Problems Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

GSP-1, Leninskie Gory, 119991, Moscow; Gubkina ul. 3, 119333, Moscow



Yuri G. Motovilov
Water Problems Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Gubkina ul. 3, 119333, Moscow



References

1. AIS GMVO 2024: Automated Information System for State Monitoring of Water Bodies (AIS GMVO). [online] Available at: https://gmvo. skniivh.ru [Accessed on 1 Apr. 2024], (In Russian).

2. Rushydro.ru 2024: Ust-Srednekanskaya HPP named after A.F. Dyakov. [online] Available at: http://www.usges.rushydro.ru/ [Accessed on 1 Apr. 2024], (In Russian)

3. Water of Russia 2022: Scientific-Popular Encyclopedia «Water of Russia». [online] Available at: https://water-rf.ru/Водные_объекты/434/Колыма [Accessed on 1 Jul. 2022], (In Russian)

4. Magritskiy D.V., Povalishnikova E.S., Frolova N.L (2019). History of the study of water discharge and water regime of rivers of the Arctic zone of Russia in the XX and early XXI centuries. Arctic and Antarctic, 3, 61–96, (In Russian), DOI: 10.7256/2453-8922.2019.3.29939.

5. Moreydo V.M., Kalugin A.S. (2017). Assessing possible changes in Selenga R. water regime in the XXI century based on a runoff formation model. Water Resources, 44(3), 275–284, DOI:10.1134/S0097807817030149.

6. Motovilov Yu.G. and Gelfan A.N. (2018) Models of runoff formation in the problems of hydrology of river basins. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences, 296, (In Russian).

7. Roshydromet, 2022: Katzov V.M. (2022). Third assessment report on climate change and its consequences on the territory of the Russian Federation. Knowledge-intensive technologies. St. Petersburg: Roshydromet, 676. (In Russian)

8. Ushakov M.V. (2013). Influence of the Kolyma HPP and climate change on the hydrological regime of the Kolyma River. Bulletin of the Northeastern Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2, 20–24, (In Russian).

9. Ushakov M.V., Lebedeva L.S. (2016). Climatic changes in the regime of water inflow formation into the Kolyma reservoir. Scientific Notes of BelSU, Ser. Natural sciences, 25(246), 120–127, (In Russian).

10. AMAP 2017: Snow, Water, Ice and Permafrost in the Arctic (SWIPA). (2017). Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP). Oslo, Norway.

11. Gelfan A., Motovilov Y., Krylenko I. et al. (2015). Testing the robustness of the physically-based ECOMAG model with respect to changing conditions, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 60(7–8), 1266–1285, DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2014.935780.

12. IPCC, 2013: Stocker T.F., Qin D., Plattner G.K., Tignor M. et al. Cambridge; N.Y. (2013). The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovern-mental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1535.

13. Krysanova V. et al. (2018). How the performance of hydrological models relates to credibility of projections under climate change. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63(5), 696–720.

14. Kundzewicz Z. W., Krysanova V., Benestad R.E., Hov O. (2018). Uncertainty in climate change impacts on water resources. Environmental Science & Policy, 79, 1–8, DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.008

15. Lebedeva L., Makarieva O., Vinogradova T. (2019). Analysis of spatial variability of river streamflow at the catchment area of the Kolyma reservoir, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 321(1), 012022, DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/321/1/012022.

16. Magritsky D.V., Frolova N.L., Evstigneev V.M. et al. (2018). Long-term changes of river water inflow into the seas of the Russian Arctic sector. Polarforschung, 87(2), 177–194, DOI: 10.2312/polarforschung.87.2.177.

17. Motovilov Yu.G., Moreido V.M., Millionshchikova T.D. (2022). An approximate formula for the vapor pressure deficit calculation to estimate the evaporation in runoff formation models of Russian rivers. Water Resources, 49(6), 1070–1081, DOI: 10.1134/S0097807822060094.

18. Motovilov Y., Gottschalk L., Engeland K., Rodhe A. (1999). Validation of a distributed hydrological model against spatial observations. Agric. For. Meteorol., 98–99, 257–277, DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00102-1.

19. Majhi I., Yang D. (2008). Streamflow characteristics and changes in Kolyma basin in Siberia. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 9(2), 267–279, DOI: 10.1175/2007jhm845.1.

20. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I – A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282–290.

21. Nasonova O.N., Gusev Ye.M., Volodin E.M., Kovalev E.E (2018). Application of the land surface model SWAP and global climate model INMCM4. 0 for projecting runoff of northern Russian rivers. 1. Historical simulations. Water resources, 45, 73–84, DOI:10.1134/S009780781806026X.

22. van Vuuren D.P., Edmonds J., Kainuma M. et al. (2011). The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Climatic Change, 109(5), 5–31, DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z..


Review

For citations:


Lisina A.A., Frolova N.L., Kalugin A.S., Krylenko I.N., Motovilov Yu.G. Assessment Of The Kolyma River Hydrological Regime Dynamics In The 21st Century Based On Runoff Formation Model. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2025;18(1):23-34. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2025-3482

Views: 272


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-9388 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1565 (Online)