Preview

GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY

Advanced search

Estimation Of The Impact Of Climatic And Anthropogenic Factors On The Formation Of The Extreme Low-Flow Period In The Don River Basin During 2007-2016

https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2017-28

Abstract

The Don River is the largest river in the southwestern  part of European Russia and the second largest  river system  in European  Russia. The Don River  basin is one of the most water deficient regions in Russia and the long term average water usage in the basin amounts to 45%. The period 2007-2016 was the longest long-term low-flow period observed, with an estimated total water resources deficit of 40.4 km3  over 8 years. The main reason for this deficit were anomalously  warm  winters (2-4 degrees  over average) with a low degree of soil frost penetration. This resulted in low spring flood volume  (37% of the average) due to heavy seepage losses combined  with thin snow cover.  A similar low-flow situation was observed in 2014, when the drought caused great damage to ecosystem of Tsimlianskoye water reservoir and the River Don. Most of the fish breeding  grounds  had dried up by May 2014. This caused the number of round fish whitebait to drop 5-10 times below the 2002-2014 average.  Inland shipping  and hydropower  industry also sustained losses of 42 million euro (according to interview from State Shipping company) due to low water level. This study shows that the main reasons for the 2007-2016 extreme hydrological drought are exceptional hydro-climatic conditions and anthropogenic  transformations in the watershed,  such as urbanisation growth  and afforestation.  The analysis  shows that the main cause in water deficit is associated with the left tributaries  of Don – Khoper and Medveditsa, while the flow in Upper Don remained more or less normal. The results can be interpreted as a “warning sign” to reduce water consumption in these sub-basins to avoid similar drought situations in future.

About the Authors

Maria B. Kireeva
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Faculty of Geography.

Moscow.



Vladislav P. Ilich
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Faculty of Geography.

Moscow.



Natalia L. Frolova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Faculty of Geography.

Moscow.



Maksim A. Kharlamov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Faculty of Geography.

Moscow.



Aleksey A. Sazonov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Faculty of Geography.

Moscow.



Polina G. Mikhaylyukova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Faculty of Geography.

Moscow.



References

1. Alekseevsky N., Frolova N. Safety of water use in conditions of low water level (2011). Water management in Russia: problems, technologies, management, vol. 6, p. 6-17.

2. Alekseevsky N., Frolova N., Grechushnikova M., Pakhomova O. (2013). Assessment of the negative impact of low water in 2010 on the socio-economic complex of the country. Environmental Management, 3, p. 65-68.

3. Annual surface and ground water resources, it’s use and quality (State Water Cadastre) (1991-2016 yy.). Saint-Petersburg: SPH.

4. ERA-40 (2005). European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Official Website, datasets, data [online]. Available at: http://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/data/era40-daily/levtype=sfc/ [Accesed 20.11.2018].

5. ERA-Interim (2005). European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Official Website, datasets, data [online]. Available at: http://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/data/interim-full-daily/levtype=sfc/ [Accesed 20.11.2018].

6. Barabanov A., Dolgov S., Koronkevich N., Panov V., Petelko A. (2018). Surface runoff and infiltration of the melt water in the soil on the fields in step and forest-step zones of the Russian plain. Pochvovedenie, Vol. 1, 2018, p. 62-69.

7. Bordi I., Fraedrich K., Sutera A. (2009). Observed drought and wetness trends in Europe: an update. Hydrolоgy and Earth System Sciences: 13, pp. 1519–1530.

8. code.mpimet.mpg.de (2006). Climate Data Operators [online]. Available at https://code.mpimet.mpg.de/projects/cdo [Accesed 20.11.2018].

9. code.mpimet.mpg.de (2006). Climate Data Operators Guidelines [online] Available at: https://code.mpimet.mpg.de/projects/cdo/wiki/Cdo#Documentation [Accesed

10. 11.2018].

11. Dee D.P. (2011). The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 137, pp. 553-597.

12. Dmitrieva V. (2011). Intra-annual and long-term dynamics of seasonal river flow. Arid ecosystems, Vol. 17. No. 2 (47). Pp. 23-32.

13. Dmitrieva V. (2014). Extreme water content as a factor of disturbance of hydroecological safety in the Upper Don basin. Arid ecosystems, Vol 20, No. 2 (59), p. 12-18.

14. Dzhamalov R., Frolova N., Kireeva M. (2013). Modern Changes in the Water Regime of the Rivers in the Don Basin. Water Resources, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2013, p. 544-556.

15. Golubev G., Dronin N. (2004). Geography of Droughts and Food Problems in Russia (1900-2000). Report of the International Project on Global Environmental Change and Its Threat to Food and Water Security in Russia.

16. Karlin R.N. (2008). Hydrometeorological risks. Saint Petersburg: RHHMI.

17. Kireeva M.B., Frolova N.L., Rets E.P., Telegina E.A., Telegina A.A., and Ezerova N.N. (2015). The role of seasonal and occasional floods in the origin of extreme hydrological events. Proc. IAHS, 369, pp. 109-113. doi:10.5194/piahs-369-109-2015

18. Koronkevich N. (1990). Water balance of the Russian Plain and its anthropogenic changes. Moscow: Science.

19. Mouat D.A., Lancaster J. (2008). Use of remote sensing and GIS to identify vegetation change in the upper San Pedro River watershed. Arizona, Geocarto International: 11:2, 55-67.

20. Scheme of integrated use and protection of water bodies in the basin of the river Don (2013). Book 1: general characteristics of the river basin, 343 p.

21. Semenov V.A. (2009). Climate change due to the risk of flooding, flooding and water shortages in the major river basins of Russia. Water problems of large river basins and their solutions. Barnaul, pp. 194-203. (in Russian)

22. Semenov V.A., Gnilomedov E.V., Salugashviliy R.S., Golubev V.N., Frolov D.M. (2015). Geography and genesis of climate-forced changes of extreme water discharge, floods and droughts for Russian river basin. In Proceedings of RIHMI-WDC, Obninsk, Russia.

23. Sheeja R., Sabu J., Jaya D., Baiju R. (2011). Land use and land cover changes over a century (1914–2007) in the Neyyar River Basin, Kerala: a remote sensing and GIS approach. International Journal of Digital Earth: 4:3, 258-270, 2011. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2010.493959

24. Shiklomanov I. (1979). Anthropogenic changes in the water content of rivers Leningrad: Hydrometizdat.

25. Surface and groundwater resources, their use and quality (1981–2015). St. Petersburg: Hydrometizdat (from 2013 - Es Pe Ha).

26. Van Lanen H., Laaha G., Kingston D., Gauster T., Ionita M., Vidal J.-P., Vlnas R., Tallaksen L., Stahl K., Hannaford J., Delus C., Fendekova M., Mediero L., Prudhomme C., Rets E., Romanowicz R., Gailliez S., Wong W.K., Adler M.-J., Blauhut V., Caillouet L., Chelcea S., Frolova N., Gudmundsson L., Hanel M., Haslinger K., Kireeva M., Osuch M., Sauquet E., Stagge J. H., and Van Loon A. (2016). Hydrology needed to manage droughts: the 2015 European case. Hydrol. Process., 30: 3097–3104. doi: 10.1002/hyp.10838


Review

For citations:


Kireeva M.B., Ilich V.P., Frolova N.L., Kharlamov M.A., Sazonov A.A., Mikhaylyukova P.G. Estimation Of The Impact Of Climatic And Anthropogenic Factors On The Formation Of The Extreme Low-Flow Period In The Don River Basin During 2007-2016. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2019;12(2):62-77. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2017-28

Views: 1076


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-9388 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1565 (Online)