EVALUATION OF THE NATURAL RECREATION SYSTEM OF THE PERM REGION
Abstract
In this paper we suggest a formula to evaluate the recreational possibilities of natural recreational systems (NRS). The formula depends on economic activity, accessibility, climate, relief and landscape attraction of unsettled territories. Unsettled territories are consisted with unpopulated areals with different scales and at the most remote points from any infrastructure, the center of unpopulated areals are situated. The aggregate of these unpopulated areas constitutes a natural recreational system - a natural area slightly modified by human economic activities in which recreation can be still carried out.
The formula will allow choosing natural fit territories to develop recreational and tourist activities and create protected natural areas. Evaluation of the Perm region natural recreational system was conducted with the help of this formula. As a result, a map of the Perm region was portrayed on which there are some separate sections of similar NRS qualities. Most part of the region (48%) is at the average level of NRS quality. Only the north-eastern and a few particular sites on hills not affected by economic activities, are up to a high quality level (5%). None of the Perm region reaches the maximum score, due to climate severity and inability to fully use the territory for touristic activities throughout the whole year.
About the Authors
Andrey Yu. Korolev
Perm State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Perm
Azat A. Safarian
Perm State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Perm
References
1. Bull A. (1998). The Economics of Travel and Tourism. Longman.
2. Butler R. W. (1980). The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution. Canadian Geographer, 24 (1).
3. Clawson M. and Knetsch J. (1996). The Economics of Outdoor Recreation. Johns Hopkins University Press.
4. Danilova H.A. (1976). Problems of territorial organization of tourism and recreation. Proceedings of III Vses. conference on the geographical problems of tourism and recreation. M., pp. 62-439. (in Russian)
5. Dirin D.A., Popov E.S., Nikolaeva О.P. (2010). Aesthetic - recreational resources of the mountainous part of Altai region. World of Science, Culture, Education. № 6-1. pp. 262-269 (in Russian)
6. Faibusovich E.L. and Chechetova L.V. (1973). Methodology for assessing the natural conditions for tourism. Local studies and tourism. L., pp. 3-15. (in Russian)
7. Ganapolsky V.I. (1987). Method and principles of forecasting regional tourism development. geographical problems of nature protection in recreation and tourism / USSR Academy of Sciences. M., pp. 73-78. (in Russian)
8. Isachenko A.G. (1991). Landscape studies and physical-geographical zoning (textbook for universities). М: High school, 366 p. (in Russian)
9. Krippendorf J. (1980). Marketing im Fremdenverkehr. 2. Auflage. Bern; Frankfurt am Main; Las Vegas.
10. Likhonov B.N. and Stupina N.N. (1975). Program of characterization of natural components of landscape in the design of recreational complexes. Geographical problems of tourism and recreation. M., pp. 62-81. (in Russian)
11. Mironenko N.S. and Tverdokhlebov I.T. (1981). Recreational geography. Moscow, publisher Mosk. University. 207 p. (in Russian)
12. Nazarov N.N. and Postnikov D.A. (2001). Estimation of the scenery - aesthetic appeal of landscapes of the Perm Region for the purposes of tourism and recreation. Izvestiya Rossiiskogo giigicheskogo obshchestva. Vol. 134, no. 4. pp. 61-67. (in Russian)
13. Nefedova V.B. (1981). Recreational use of the lake coast territories. II Science notes of the Tartu University. pp. 27-32. (in Russian)
14. Preobrazhensky V.S., Zorin I.V., Vedenin Yu.A. (1972). Geographical aspects of construction of new types of recreational systems. Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Geographic series. № 1. P. 36. (in Russian)
15. Pritula T.Yu. (1974). Methodical experience of recreational evaluation of administrative area on the basis of landscape research. Questions of landscape studies. pp. 34-42. (in Russian)
16. Rodoman B.B. (2002). Polarized biosphere. Smolensk: Oikumena, 336 pp. (in Russian) 17.
17. Smirnova E.D. (1981). Methods of assessing landscapes for organizing recreation of the population. Science notes of the Tartu University, pp. 18-21. (In Russian)
18. Swarbrooke J. and Horner, S. (2001). Business Travel and Tourism. Elsevier ButterworthHeinemann.
19. Tarasov A.N. (1973). Experience of the tourist classification of the forests of the Caucasus // Issues of tourism development. Sukhumi. pp. 28-33. (In Russian)
20. Vedenin Yu.A. and Filippovich A.S. (1975). Experience in the identification and mapping of landscape diversity of natural complexes. Geographical problems of the organization of tourism and recreation. Issue. 2. (In Russian)
21. Vedenin Yu.A. and Miroshnichenko N.N. (1969). Estimation of natural conditions for the organization of leisure. Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Geographic series. № 4. P. 51-60.
22. Zyrianov A.I. (1995). Landscapes contrasts and territorial socio-economic systems. Perm: Publishing house of Perm. University. 144 pp. (In Russian)
23. Zyrianov A.I. and Myshlyavtseva S.E. (2012). Tourist clusters and dominants (on the example of the Perm region). Izv. RAS. geogr. 2012. № 2. pp. 13-20. (In Russian)
24. Preobrazhensky V.S., Zorin I.V., Vedenin Yu.A. (1972) Geographical aspects of construction of new types of recreational systems. Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Geographic series. № 1. P. 36. (In Russian)
For citation:
Korolev A.Y., Safarian A.A. EVALUATION OF THE NATURAL RECREATION SYSTEM OF THE PERM REGION. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2018;11(4):24-38. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2018-11-4-24-38
Views: 276
Email this article 