Discovering Spatial Development Control For Indonesia: A Systematic Literature Review
https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2021-119
Abstract
As a developing country, Indonesia is experiencing rapid growth, necessitating the use of development-control instruments to achieve sustainable development. Furthermore, information about land reform implementation in Indonesia can only be found in academic journals written in Indonesian. As a result, determining the appropriate development-control model in Indonesia is critical. The appropriate concepts and development-control tools for Indonesia are discovered by reviewing papers that implement development control globally and the state of development-control implementation locally in Indonesia. However, by presenting the concept of controlling spatial development—beginning with defining development control, then capturing its typologies globally, and finally discussing the implementation condition in Indonesia—the model can also be adopted in countries with a similar planning system. The main gaps and challenges in implementing spatial development-control tools in Indonesia were identified in the final section of this article. In the meantime, a regulatory zoning system would be successful, but a discretionary system that includes economic development opportunities can be considered by strengthening human resources and institutions. The three elements in development control are spatial planning, land development, and regulation. Furthermore, the community’s successful traditional spatial development control can be incorporated into the existing control regulations.
About the Authors
Citra F. Utami
School of Environmental Science Programme, University of Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Salemba Raya Street No. 4 – Central Jakarta 10430
Kosuke Mizuno
School of Environmental Science Programme, University of Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Salemba Raya Street No. 4 – Central Jakarta 10430
Hayati S. Hasibuan
School of Environmental Science Programme, University of Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Salemba Raya Street No. 4 – Central Jakarta 10430
Tri E.B. Soesilo
School of Environmental Science Programme, University of Indonesia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Salemba Raya Street No. 4 – Central Jakarta 10430
References
1. Abass K., Buor D., Afriyie K., Dumedah G., Segbefi A.Y., Guodaar L., Garsonu E.K., Adu-Gyamfi S., Forkuor D., Ofosu A., Mohammed A. and Gyasi R.M. (2020). Urban Sprawl and Green Space Depletion: Implications for Flood Incidence in Kumasi, Ghana. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, 101915, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101915.
2. Acheampong R.A. (2019). The Concept of Spatial Planning and the Planning System. In: Spatial Planning in Ghana. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02011-8_2.
3. Agheyisi J.E. (2019). Inter-Communal Land Conflicts in Benin City, Nigeria: Exploring the Root Causes in the Context of Customary Land Supply. Land Use Policy, 83, 532-542, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.027.
4. Ahmad N. and Anjum G.A. (2012). Legal and Institutional Perplexities Hampering the Implementation of Urban Development Plans in Pakistan. Cities 29, 4, 271-277, DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2011.07.006.
5. Akil A. (2020). Penyuluhan Mekanisme Pengendalian Pemanfaatan Ruang Wilayah Kota di Kantor Kecamatan Biringkanaya Kota Makassar [Counseling on Urban Spatial Use Control Mechanisms at the Biringkanaya District Office, Makassar City]. Jurnal Teknologi Terapan Untuk Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3, 71-80 (in Indonesian).
6. Alexander E.R., Mazza L. and Moroni S. (2012). Planning Without Plans? Nomocracy or Teleocracy for Social-Spatial Ordering. Progress in Planning, 77, 2, 37-87, DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2011.12.001.
7. Aliyah I., Setioko B. and Pradoto W. (2017). Spatial Flexibility in Cultural Mapping of Traditional Market Area in Surakarta (A case study of Pasar Gede in Surakarta). City, Culture and Society, 10, 36, 41-51, DOI: 10.1016/j.ccs.2017.05.004.
8. Allouf D., Martel A. and March A. (2020). Discretion Versus Prescription: Assessing the Spatial Impact of Design Regulations in Apartments in Australia. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 47, 7, 1260-1278, DOI: 10.1177/2399808318825273.
9. Amri I. and Giyarsih S.R. (2022). Monitoring Urban Physical Growth In Tsunami-Affected Areas: A Case Study Of Banda Aceh City, Indonesia. GeoJournal, 87, 1929–1944, DOI: 10.1007/s10708-020-10362-6.
10. Baics G. and Meisterlin L. (2016). Zoning Before Zoning: Land Use and Density in Mid-Nineteenth-Century New York City. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106, 5, 1152-1175, DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2016.1177442.
11. Baker D.C., Sipe N.G. and Gleeson B.J. (2006). Performance-Based Planning: Perspectives from the United States, Australia, and New Zealand. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25, 4, 396-409, DOI: 10.1177/0739456X05283450.
12. Bidandi F. and Williams J.J. (2020). Understanding Urban Land, Politics, and Planning: A Critical Appraisal of Kampala’s Urban Sprawl. Cities, 106, 102858, DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102858.
13. Biggar J. and Siemiatycki M. (2020). Tracing Discretion in Planning and Land-Use Outcomes: Perspectives from Toronto, Canada. Journal of Planning Education and Research, DOI: 10.1177/0739456X20904427.
14. Bird B.W., Barr R.C., Commerford J., Gilhooly W.P., Wilson J.J., Finney B., McLauchlan K. and Monaghan G.W. (2019). Late-Holocene Floodplain Development, Land-Use, And Hydroclimate–Flood Relationships on the Lower Ohio River, US. Holocene, 29(12), 1856-1870, DOI: 10.1177/0959683619865598.
15. Boamah N.A., Gyimah C. and Bediako Nelson J.K. (2012). Challenges to the Enforcement of Development Controls in the Wa Municipality. Habitat International, 36(1), 136-142, DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.06.010.
16. Booth P. (1993). The Cultural Dimension in Comparative Research: Making Sense of Development Control in France. European Planning Studies, 1(2), 217-229, DOI: 10.1080/09654319308720210.
17. Budhianti M.I. (2020). Penyimpangan dan Pelanggaran Pemanfaatan Ruang terhadap Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah yang Telah Ditetapkan Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Kasus di Beberapa Kabupaten/ Kota di Provinsi Jawa Barat). Supremasi Hukum, 16, 58-80 (in Indonesian).
18. Budiyono (2020). Pengaturan Zoning untuk Pengendalian Pemanfaatan Ruang Kawasan Kotagede (Studi Kasus Kawasan Preservasi Budaya Kotagede). Jurnal Ilmiah PlanoKrisna, 15(1), 79-92 (in Indonesian).
19. Chandra D., Aulia T.B. and Izziah I. (2019). Kesesuaian Pemanfaatan Ruang Dan Penyelenggaraan Penataan Ruang di Koridor Jalan Teuku Nyak Arief Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Arsip Rekayasa Sipil Dan Perencanaan, 2(3), 214-223 (in Indonesian), DOI: 10.24815/jarsp.v2i3.13458.
20. Cirolia L.R. and Berrisford S. (2017). ‘Negotiated Planning’: Diverse Trajectories of Implementation in Nairobi, Addis Ababa, and Harare. Habitat International, 59, 71-79, DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.11.005.
21. Collins M.P. (2017). The London County Council’s Approach to Town Planning: 1909–1945. London Journal, 42(2), 172-191, DOI: 10.1080/03058034.2017.1305253.
22. Deng F. (2018). Work Unit and Private Community in the Evolution of Urban Planning in Contemporary China. Planning Theory, 17(4), 533-550, DOI: 10.1177/1473095217734413.
23. Destratianto D. and Pramono R.W.D. (2020). Efektivitas Implementasi Advice Planning di Perkotaan Banyuwangi [The Effectiveness of Advice Planning Implementation in Banyuwangi Urban]. Jurnal Penataan Ruang, 1(1), 92 (in Indonesian).
24. Falco E. and Chiodelli F. (2018). The Transfer of Development Rights in the Midst of the Economic Crisis: Potential, Innovation and Limits in Italy. Land Use Policy, 72, 381-388, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.069.
25. Farhat R. (2019). Is Semi-Discretionary Design Review Wieldy? Evidence from Seattle’s Program. Planning Practice and Research, 34(1), 103-119, DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2018.1548213.
26. Fazari S.L. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan dan Pemanfaatan Ruang Udara [Enforcement of Environmental Laws and Utilization of Air Space]. Jurnal Ekologi, Masyarakat and Sains, 1(1), 30-36 (in Indonesian).
27. Ferreira A. (2020). Reconsidering the Merit of Market-Oriented Planning Innovations: Critical Insights on Transferable Development Rights From Coimbra, Portugal. Land Use Policy, 99, 104977, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104977.
28. Firman T. (2004a). New Town Development in Jakarta Metropolitan Region: A Perspective of Spatial Segregation. Habitat International, 28(3), 349-368, DOI: 10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00037-7.
29. Firman T. (2004b). Major Issues in Indonesia’s Urban Land Development. Land Use Policy, 21(4), 347-355, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.04.002.
30. Firman T. and Fahmi, F.Z. (2017). The Privatization of Metropolitan Jakarta’s (Jabodetabek) Urban Fringes: The Early Stages of “PostSuburbanization” in Indonesia. Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(1), 68-79, DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2016.1249010.
31. Fuseini I. and Kemp, J. (2015). A Review of Spatial Planning in Ghana’s Socio-Economic Development Trajectory: A Sustainable Development Perspective. Land Use Policy, 47, 309-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.020
32. Gurran N., Gilbert C. and Phibbs P. (2015). Sustainable Development Control? Zoning and Land Use Regulations for Urban Form, Biodiversity Conservation and Green Design in Australia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(11), 1877-1902, DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2014.967386.
33. Hastuti S.D. (2020). Pengendalian Pemanfaatan Ruang Melalui Izin Lokasi dalam Rangka Perolehan Tanah yang Diperlukan Usaha [Control of Spatial Utilization through Location Permits in the Context of Acquisition of Land Required by Businesses]. Jurist-Diction, 3(3), 1099 (in Indonesian), DOI: 10.20473/jd.v3i3.18640.
34. Hexagraha S.A.A. and Setyorini S.N. (2019). Tinjauan Terhadap Konsep Keadilan Spasial Dan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Perencanaan Dan Pengendalian Pemanfaatan Ruang Pada Program Normalisasi Ciliwung Di Provinsi Dki Jakarta [Review of the Concept of Spatial Justice and Community Participation in Planning and Controlling Space Utilization in the Ciliwung Normalization Program in DKI Jakarta Province.]. Jurnal Hukum and Pembangunan, 49(2), 349 (in Indonesian), DOI: 10.21143/jhp.vol49.no2.2008.
35. Hong W., Guo R., Su M., Tang H., Chen L. and Hu W. (2017). Sensitivity Evaluation and Land-Use Control of Urban Ecological Corridors: A CASE STUDY of Shenzhen, China. Land Use Policy, 62, 316-325, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.010.
36. Hsu K.C., Lai T.Y. and Li C.N. (2016). Why is There an Urban Pattern Toward Sprawling Development?. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning, 169(4), 200-208, DOI: 10.1680/udap.14.00035.
37. Hu T. and Zhou J. (2018). Co-exist or Integrate ? Reviewing the Spatial Planning Reform of China from the Perspective of Central-Local Relations. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development A: Planning Strategies and Design Concepts, 6 (3), 168- 184.
38. Hubbard P. (2015). Law, Sex and the City: Regulating Sexual Entertainment Venues in England and Wales. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 7(1), 5-20, DOI: 10.1108/IJLBE-01-2014-0001.
39. Ioannou B. (2016). Post-colonial Urban Development and Planning in Cyprus: Shifting Visions and Realities of Early Suburbia. Urban Planning, 1(4), 79-88, DOI: 10.17645/up.v1i4.768.
40. Jaya G.N.P. (2019). Identifikasi Kerjasama Pengendalian Pemanfaatan Ruang dengan Pola Partisipatif di Kota Pamanukan Kabupaten Subang [Identification of Spatial Use Control Collaboration with Participatory Patterns in Pamanukan City, Subang Regency]. Jurnal Pakuan Bidang Keteknikan, 1(33), 1-8 (in Indonesian).
41. Kim H.R. and Jang Y. (2017). Lessons from Good and Bad Practices in Retail-Led Urban Regeneration Projects in the Republic of Korea. Cities, 61, 36-47, DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.11.004.
42. Kim M. (2020). Upzoning and Value Capture: How U.S. Local Governments Use Land Use Regulation Power to Create and Capture Value from Real Estate Developments. Land Use Policy, 95, 104624, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104624.
43. Konyango C. O., Hayombe P. O. and Owino F. O. (2021). Effectiveness of Planning Tools in Managing the Spatial Stability of Peri-Urban Areas. Architecture Research, 11(2), 31-52. DOI: 10.5923/j.arch.20211102.01.
44. Kuusaana E.D., and Eledi J. A. (2015). Customary Land Allocation, Urbanization and Land Use Planning in Ghana: Implications for Food Systems in the Wa Municipality. Land Use Policy, 48, 454-466, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.030.
45. Lai L.W.C. and Lorne F.T. (2013). The Fourth Coase Theorem: State Planning Rules and Spontaneity in Action. Planning Theory, 14(1), 44- 69, DOI: 10.1177/1473095213510430.
46. Lawanson T. and Agunbiade M. (2018). Land Governance and Megacity Projects in Lagos, Nigeria: The Case of Lekki Free Trade Zone. Area Development and Policy, 3(1), 114-131, DOI: 10.1080/23792949.2017.1399804.
47. Lian X. (2018). Review on Advanced Practice of Provincial Spatial Planning: Case of a Western, Less Developed Province. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 6(3), 185-202, DOI: 10.14246/IRSPSDA.6.3_185.
48. Margiansyah D. (2020). Revisiting Indonesia’s Economic Diplomacy in the Age of Disruption: Towards Digital Economy and Innovation Diplomacy. JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies), 8(1), 15, DOI: 10.21512/jas.v8i1.6433.
49. Murti D.P.P.K. (2018). Efektivitas Pasal 72 Huruf A Angka 1 Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Buleleng No. 9 Tahun 2013 Dalam Pemanfaatan Ruang Sempadan Pantai Kawasan Bali Utara [Effectiveness of Article 72 Letter A Number 1 Buleleng Regency Regulation No. 9 of 2013 in the Utilization of Coastal Border Space in the North Bali Region]. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689-1699 (in Indonesian).
50. Nel V. (2016a). A Better Zoning System for South Africa?. Land Use Policy, 55, 257-264, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.007.
51. Nel V. (2016b). Spluma, Zoning and Effective Land Use Management in South Africa. Urban Forum, 27(1), 79-92, DOI: 10.1007/s12132-015-9265-5.
52. Owusu-Ansah J.K. and Atta-Boateng F. (2016). The Spatial Expression of Physical Development Controls in a Fast Growing Ghanaian City. Land Use Policy, 54, 147-157, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.012.
53. Oya M. (1970). Land Use Control and Settlement Plans in the Flooded Area of the City of Nagoya and its Vicinity, Japan. Geoforum, 4(C), 27-35, DOI: 10.1016/0016-7185(70)90056-4.
54. Peng J., Pan Y., Liu Y., Zhao H. and Wang Y. (2018). Linking Ecological Degradation Risk to Identify Ecological Security Patterns in a Rapidly Urbanizing Landscape. Habitat International, 71, 110-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.11.010.
55. Pratikto W.A., Suntoyo S., and Sholihin S. (2019). Analisa Pelaksanaan Reklamasi Teluk Lamong Berdasarkan Implementasi UU No. 27 Tahun 2007 [Lamong Bay Reclamation Implementation Analysis Based on the Implementation of Law no. 27 of 2007]. Sewagati, 3(3), 97–102 (in Indonesian), DOI: 10.12962/j26139960.v3i3.6091.
56. Qodriyatun S.N. (2020). Bencana Banjir: Pengawasan dan Pengendalian Pemanfaatan Ruang Berdasarkan UU Penataan Ruang dan RUU Cipta Kerja [Flood Disaster: Supervision and Control of Spatial Use Based on the Spatial Planning Law and the Job Creation Bill]. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 11(1), 29-42 (in Indonesian), DOI: 10.46807/aspirasi.v11i1.1590.
57. Rahmat B. (2020). Implementasi Kebijakan Pengendalian Pemanfaatan Ruang dalam Meningkatkan Pelayanan Pemberian Fatwa Pengarahan Lokasi di Dinas Tata RUang Permukiman Kabupaten Tasikmalaya [Implementation of Spatial Use Control Policies in Improving Services for Providing Fatwas for Location Direction at the Tasikmalaya District Settlement Planning Service]. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 1, 16-31 (in Indonesian).
58. Robb A., Payne M., Stocker L., Middle G. and Trosic A. (2019). Development Control and Vulnerable Coastal Lands: Examples of Australian Practice. Urban Policy and Research, 37(2), 199-214, DOI: 10.1080/08111146.2018.1489791.
59. Rowan-Robinson J., Ross A. and Walton W. (1995). Sustainable development and the Development Control Process. Town Planning Review, 66(3), 269-286, DOI: 10.3828/tpr.66.3.2671800700r58j52.
60. Salal R.E.H. and Amirtham L.R. (2021). Impact of Building Regulations on the Perceived Outdoor Thermal Comfort in the Mixed-Use Neighbourhood of Chennai. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 10(1), 148-163, DOI: 10.1016/j.foar.2020.09.002.
61. Sam I.M., Setiowati and Riyadi R. (2020). Analisis Penguasaan, Pemilikan, Penggunaan Dan Pemanfaatan Tanah Di Sempadan Pantai Di Kelurahan Bintaroe [Analysis of Tenure, Ownership, Use and Utilization of Land on the Coastal Borders in Bintaroe Village]. Jurnal Tunas Agraria, 3, 2 (in Indonesian).
62. Sari G.D.P. (2020). Implementasi Pengawasan terhadap Pengendalian Pemanfaatan Ruang berdasarkan Peraturan Zonasi Kota Medan untuk Permukiman Zona Perumahan Kepadatan Rendah [Implementation of Supervision of Spatial Use Control based on Medan City Zoning Regulations for Low Density Housing Zone Settlements]. Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, 53(9) (in Indonesian).
63. Sataloff R.T., Johns M.M. and Kost K.M. (2005). Comparative Planning Cultures. New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
64. Saunders W., Grace E., Beban J. and Johnston D. (2015). Evaluating Land Use and Emergency Management Plans for Natural Hazards as a Function of Good Governance: A Case Study from New Zealand. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6(1), 62-74, DOI: 10.1007/s13753-015-0039-4.
65. Sciara G.C. (2020). Implementing Regional Smart Growth Without Regional Authority: The Limits of Information for Nudging Local Land Use. Cities, 103, DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102661.
66. Sejati A.P., Sitorus S.R. and Hidayat J.T. (2020). Analisis Keselarasan Pemanfaatan Ruang dengan Rencana Pola Ruang dan Pengendaliannya di Kota Jakarta Timur [Analysis of the Harmony of Space Utilization with the Spatial Pattern Plan and its Control in East Jakarta City]. Tataloka, 22(1), 108-123 (in Indonesian), DOI: 10.14710/tataloka.22.1.108-123.
67. Shatkin G. (2016). The Real Estate Turn in Policy and Planning: Land Monetization and the Political Economy of Peri-Urbanization in Asia. Cities, 53, 141-149, DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.015.
68. Shibeshi G.B., Fuchs H. and Mansberger R. (2015). Lessons from Systematic Evaluation of Land Administration Systems. The Case of Amhara National Regional State of Ethiopia. World Development, 68, 282-295, DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.12.006
69. Suroso D.S.A. and Firman T. (2018). The Role of Spatial Planning in Reducing Exposure Towards Impacts of Global Sea Level Rise Case Study: Northern Coast of Java, Indonesia. Ocean and Coastal Management, 153, 84-97, DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.12.007.
70. Tang B. and Ho W.K.O. (2015). Land-Use Planning and Market Adjustment Under De-Industrialization: Restructuring of Industrial Space in Hong Kong. Land Use Policy, 43, 28-36, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.022.
71. Tenrisau A. (2019). Kebijakan Pengendalian Pemanfaatan Ruang melalui Penegakan Hukum Pidana pada Pelanggaran Rencana Tata Ruang Dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang No.26 Tahun 2007 tentang Penataan Ruang [Spatial Use Control Policy through Criminal Law Enforcement on Spatial Planning Violations Connected to Law No.26 of 2007 concerning Spatial Planning]. Aktualita, 2(9), 402-421 (in Indonesian).
72. Van der Sterren M. and Rahman A. (2015). Single Lot on Site Detention Requirements in New South Wales Australia and its Relation to Holistic Storm Water Management. Sustainability of Water Quality and Ecology, 6, 48-56, DOI: 10.1016/j.swaqe.2015.01.001.
73. Wahidin A.A., Sutaryono and Riyadi R. (2019). Pertimbangan Teknis Pertanahan Sebagai Instrumen Pengendalian Pemanfaatan Ruang Di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Mamuju [Technical Considerations of Land as an Instrument for Controlling Spatial Use in the Land Office of Mamuju Regency]. Jurnal Tunas Agraria, 2(2) (in Indonesian).
74. Wulansari T.R. (2017). Keselarasan Pengendalian Pemanfaatan Ruang Formal dan Tradisional di Wilayah Desa Adat (studi Kasus: Tiga Desa Adat di Kabupaten Bangli, Provinsi Bali) [Alignment of Formal and Traditional Spatial Use Control in Traditional Village Areas (Case study: Three Traditional Villages in Bangli Regency, Bali Province). Thesis, Bandung Institute of Technology (in Indonesian).
75. Xiao H., Gao J. and Zou Z. (2017). Reserve Capacity Model Based on Variable Demand for Land-Use Development Control. Transportation Planning and Technology, 40(2), 199-212, DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2016.1266167.
76. Xu N. (2019). What gave rise to China’s land finance?. Land Use Policy, 87, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.034.
77. Yin I., and Abdullah, J. (2020). The development Control of Urban Centre in Kuala Lumpur. Planning Malaysia, 18(3), 313-325, DOI: 10.21837/PM.V18I13.795.
78. Yu K. and Hui, E.C. (2019). Pogodzinsk Land-Use Planning, Certainty and Flexibility: A Study of Planning Control Decisions on Residential Development in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 83, 85-98, DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.11.008.
79. Yu Z. (2020). The Practice and Principle of City Planning in Contemporary China. Man and the Economy, 7(2), 20200015. DOI: 10.1515/me-2020-0015.
80. Yudono A. (2018). Why Do Spatial Data and Information Have a Significant Role in Spatial Planning Process?: The Investigation of Spatial Data and Information Usage in Indonesian Spatial Planning Policies. Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning, 5(1), 131. DOI: 10.14710/geoplanning.5.1.131-146.
81. Yudono A., Dewi C. and Darmawan M. (2020). An Investigation of Inter-Agency Relationship Respecting One Map Policy: Does the Indonesian Open Spatial Data Policy Reinforce Innovation or Disrupted Bureaucracy?. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(12), 897-902, DOI: 10.31838/srp.2020.5.130.
82. Yustia D.A. (2019). Strategi Pnggabungan Sanksi bagi Pelanggaran HukumTata Ruang dalam Rangka Pemulihan Pemanfaatan Ruang [Strategy for Combining Sanctions for Violation of Spatial Planning Laws in the Context of Restoring Space Utilization]. Jurnal Litigasi, 20(1), 82-115 (in Indonesian).
83. Zhuang C., Liu J. and Xiong H. (2018). Digital Twin-Based Smart Production Management and Control Framework for the Complex Product Assembly Shop-Floor. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 96, 1149-1163, DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-1617-6.
Review
For citations:
Utami C.F., Mizuno K., Hasibuan H.S., Soesilo T.E. Discovering Spatial Development Control For Indonesia: A Systematic Literature Review. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2022;15(4):64-79. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2021-119
Views: 959
Email this article 