Preview

GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY

Advanced search

RUSSIAN RURAL NECHERNOZEMYE: COLLAPSE OR NEW WAYS OF DEVELOPMENT?

https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2011-4-4-10-23

Full Text:

Abstract

The article describes the evolution and the crisis of the rural old-developed non-black soil zone (i.e., Nechernozemye), the differences between suburban and peripheral areas as exemplified by the Kostroma and other regions, basic models of economic contraction, as well as prospects for revival by urban residents.

About the Author

Tatyana Nefedova

Russian Federation
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Science Staromonetny per., 29, Moscow 119 017 Russia


References

1. Gritsay, O.V., Ioffe, G.V., Treyvish, A.I. (1991). Centre and Periphery in Regional Development.

2. Moscow: Nauka, 166 p. (in Russian).

3. Ioffe, G., Nefedova, T. (1997). Continuity & Change in Rural Russia. A Geographical

4. Perspective. WestviewPress, 308 p.

5. Ioffe, G., Nefedova, T., Zaslavsky, I. (2006). The End of Peasantry? The Disintegration of Rural

6. Russia. University of Pittsburg Press, 249 p.

7. Ioffe, G.V. (1990). Agriculture in the Non-Chernozem area: Regional problems. Moscow:

8. Nauka, 162 p. (in Russian).

9. Kaganskiy, V. (2001). Cultural Landscape and Soviet Habitable Space (Collected Articles).

10. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoye Obozreniye, 576 p. (in Russian).

11. Kuzminov, I.F. (2011). Socio-Economic Challenges to the Timber Industry in the North-

12. European Part of Russia (Case Study of Kostroma Oblast), ISSN 2079-9705, Regional

13. Research of Russia, vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 41–51. (in Russian).

14. Nefedova, T.G. (2003). Rural Russia at the Crossroads. Geographical essays. Moscow:

15. Novoye Izdatel’stvo, 403 p. (in Russian).

16. Nefedova, T.G. (2008a). Russia’s Periphery as a Socio-Economic Phenomenon // Regional

17. Studies, № 5, p. 14–31. (in Russian).

18. Nefedova, T.G. (2008b). Russian Remote Places Through the Eyes of their Inhabitants //

19. Ugorsky Project: Environment and People in the Middle North / ed. N.E. Pokrovski.

20. Moscow: Community of Professional Sociologists, p. 98–120. (in Russian).

21. Pallot, J., Nefedova, T. (2007). Russia’s Unknown Agriculture. Household Production in Post-

22. Socialist Rural Russia Oxford University Press, 214 p.

23. Pilyasov, A.N. (2008). And the Last will be the First. Northern Periphery on the Route for

24. Knowledge Economy, Moscow, URSS, 542 p. (in Russian).

25. Rodoman, B.B. (2002). The Polarized Biosphere. Smolensk: Oecumene, 336 p. (in Russian).

26. Serova, E.V., Shick, O.V. (2007). World Agrarian Policy. Moscow: State University – High

27. School of Economy, 402 p. (in Russian).

28. Treyvish, A.I. (2003). Centre, Region and Country. Inertia and Novations in the Development

29. of Russia’s Big Urban Archipelago // Large Cities and Challenges of Globalization. Smolensk:

30. Oecumene, pp. 54–71. (in Russian).

31. Treyvish, A.I. (2009). City, Region, Country and World. Development of Russia as Viewed by

32. a Regional Geographer) Moscow: Novyi Chronograph, 372 p. (in Russian).


For citation:


Nefedova T. RUSSIAN RURAL NECHERNOZEMYE: COLLAPSE OR NEW WAYS OF DEVELOPMENT?. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2011;4(4):10-23. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2011-4-4-10-23

Views: 137


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-9388 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1565 (Online)