Advanced search

Spatial Heterogeneity In Phenological Development Of Prunus Padus L. In The Yekaterinburg City

Full Text:


The possible impact of the climate changes on vegetation is a key topic of various research studies in geography and ecology. In this study we tried to provide a «one-time survey»  of the phenological development  of Prunus padus L.  in the Yekaterinburg city as a part of the large-scale project “A Single Phenological Day ” and show the data on a map. The registration of a seasonal development  of bird cherry was provided annually in the years of 2012-2018 on one and the same date in the city of Yekaterinburg,  on 15 May. Yekaterinburg is the largest city located on the eastern foothills of the Middle Urals, Russia. The city has residential  areas,  parks,  water reservoirs,  as well as large industrial facilities that affect microclimatic conditions, resulting in an increase of the temperatures. Such microclimatic heterogeneity results in uneven development of bird cherry in spring. It was revealed the slowing of the bird cherry development  in the areas situated close to large water reservoirs. At the same time bird cherry trees growing  inside large industrial areas, on the contrary, developed much faster. The development  rates of Prunus padus L. also differed though  years: in years with dry and warm weather during the period of late April - early May the vegetation began earlier.

About the Authors

Uliya R. Ivanova
Ural State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Nataliya V. Skok
Ural State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Oksana V. Yantser
Ural State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation


1. Asse D., Chuine I., Vitasse Y., Yoccoz N., Delpierre N., Badeau V., Delestrade A., Randin C. (2018). Warmer winters reduce the advance of tree spring phenology induced by warmer springs in the Alps. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 252, pp. 220–230. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.01.030.

2. Batmanov V.A. (1952). Nature calendar of Sverdlovsk and its environs. Sverdlovsk. 95 p. (in Russian).

3. Bennie J., Davies T., Cruse D., Bell F., Gaston K. (2018). Artificial light at night alters grassland vegetation species composition and phenology. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55, pp. 442–450. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12927.

4. Caffarra A., Donnelly A., Chuine I. (2011). Modelling the timing of Betula pubescens budburst. II. Integrating complex effects of photoperiod into process-based models. Climate Research, 46, pp. 159–170. doi:10.3354/cr00983.

5. Clark J., Melillo J., Mohan J., Salk C. (2014). The seasonal timing of warming that controls onset of the growing season. Global Change Biology, 20, pp. 1136–1145. doi:10.1111/gcb.12420.

6. Cleland E., Chuine I., Menzel A., Mooney H., Schwartz M. (2007). Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22, pp. 357–365. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.04.003.

7. Crepinsek z., Kajfez-Bogataj L., Bergant K. (2006). Modelling of wheather variability effect on fitophenology. Ecological Modelling, 194, pp. 256–265.

8. Denny E., Gerst K., Miller-Rushing A., Tierney G., Crimmins T., Enquist C., Guertin P., Rosemartin A., Schwartz M., Thomas K., Weltzin J. (2014). Standardized phenology monitoring methods to track plant and animal activity for science and resource management applications. International Journal of Biometeorology, 58, pp. 591–601. doi:10.1007/s00484-014-0789-5.

9. Gerst K., Kellermann J., Enquist C., Rosemartin A., Denny E. (2016). Estimating the onset of spring from a complex phenology database: trade-offs across geographic scales. International journal of biometeorology, 60, pp. 391–400. doi:10.1007/s00484-015-1036-4.

10. Golubyatnikov L.L. (2009). The impact of climate change on the vegetation cover of Russian regions In: Skvortsov E.V., Rogova T.V. (eds.): Environment and Sustainable Development of Regions: New Methods and Research Technologies. Volume III: Modeling in the Protection of the Environment. General Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation. Kazan: “Brig”. (in Russian).

11. Gorton A., Moeller D., Tiffin P. (2018). Little plant, big city: A test of adaptation to urban environments in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. The Royal Society. Available at: http:// [Accessed 3 Okt. 2018].

12. Grebenyuk G.N. and Kuznetsova V.P. (2012). Modern dynamics of climate and phenological change of northern territories. Fundamental research, 11, pp. 1063–1077. (in Russian with English summary).

13. Hopkins G., Gaston K., Visser M., Elgar M., Jones T. (2018). Artificial light at night as a driver of evolution across urban-rural landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16, pp. 472–479. doi:10.1002/fee.1828.

14. Kane J. and Beery K. (2009). Phenology of Plants at the Kleinstu ck Preserve Kalamazoo College.

15. König P., Tautenhahn S., Cornelissen J., Kattge J., Bönisch G., Römermann C. (2018). Advances in flowering phenology across the Northern Hemisphere are explained by functional traits. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 27, pp. 310–321. doi:10.1111/geb.12696.

16. Körner C. and Basler D. (2010): Phenology under global warming. Science, 327, pp. 1461–1462. doi:10.1126/science.1186473.

17. Kuklina T.E. and Danchenko A.M. (2009). Autumn development BETULA PENDULA ROTH AND BETULA PUBESCENS ERHR. in the landscaping of the city of Tomsk and the suburbs. Tomsk State University Journal, № 322, pp. 239–242. (in Russian).

18. Kulagin A.A. and Nikolaev V.V. (2014). Spring phenorhythms of birch (BETULA PENDULA ROTH), growing in the city of Ufa (republic of Bashkortostan). Bulletin of Bashkir University. Biology, 19, pp. 1228–1231. (in Russian with English summary).

19. Kulygin А.А. (2001). Role of Temperature Factor in Fruit Ripening of Wood Plants. Bulletin of higher educational institutions. Lesnoy zhurnal, № 5-6, pp. 7–10. (in Russian with English summary).

20. Kupriyanova M.K. (2010). V.A. Batmanov - the founder of a new direction in phenology. In: The Modern State of Phenology and the Prospects of Its Development. pp. 42–56. (in Russian).

21. Lessard-Therrien M., Bolmgren K., Davies T. (2014). Predicting flowering phenology in a subarctic plant community. Botany, 92, pp. 749–756. doi:10.1139/cjb-2014-0026.

22. Massetti L. (2018). Assessing the impact of street lighting on Platanus x acerifolia phenology. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 34, pp. 71–77. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.05.015.

23. Menzel A. and Sparks T. (2007). Temperature and Plant Development: Phenology and Seasonality In: Plant Growth and Climate Change. pp. 70–95.

24. Minin A.A. (2002). Trees and birds on climate change. Chemistry and life, № 2, pp. 38–42. (in Russian)

25. Minin A.A. (2006). Ecosystems of the Amur basin under climate warming: experience of nature reserves In: The Impact of Climate Change on the Amur River Basin Ecosystems. WWF Russia, Moskow, pp. 17–22. (in Russian).

26. Minin A.A. and Voskova A.V. (2014): Homeostatic responses of plants to modern climate change: Spatial and phenological aspects. Russian Journal of Developmental Biology, Volume 45, pp. 162–169. (in Russian with English summary).

27. Morokov V.V. and Shver C.A. (1981). The climate of Sverdlovsk. Leningrad: Ural UGKS. (in Russian).

28. Penuelas J. (2001). Phenology: Responses to a Warming World. Science, 294, pp. 793–795. doi:10.1126/science.1066860.

29. Richardson A., Keenan T., Migliavacca M., Ryu Y., Sonnentag O., Toomey M. (2013). Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 169, pp. 156–173. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.012.

30. Schwartz M. (1990). Detecting the onset of spring: a possible application of phenological models.

31. Siljamo P., Sofiev M., Ranta H., Linkosalo T., Kubin E., Ahas R., Genikhovich E., Jatczak K., Jato V., Nekovář J., Minin A., Severova E., Shalaboda V. (2008). Representativeness of point-wise phenological betula data collected in different parts of Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 17, pp. 489–502. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00383.x.

32. Soloviev A.N. (2015). Climatogenic and anthropogenic dynamics of biota in the changing environmental conditions of the east of the Russian Plain. Abstract of the Dissert ... Doctor of Biological Sciences. Petrozavodsk: All-Russian Research Institute of Hunting and Animal Farming named after Professor B.M. zhitkov, 47 p. (in Russian)

33. Tooke F. and Battey N. (2010). Temperate flowering phenology. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61, pp. 2853–2862. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq165.

34. Ufimtseva M.D. and Terekhina N.V. (2017). Assessment of the ecological status of the central district (saint-petersburg) on the basis of ecophytoindication. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Earth Sciences, Volume 62, pp. 209–217. doi:10.21638/11701/spbu07.2017.206. (in Russian with English summary).

35. Visser M. and Both C. (2005). Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstick. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272, pp. 2561–2569. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3356.

36. Yantser O.V. (2018). Spring development of bird cherry on the territory of Russia (results of a Single phenological day) In: Chronicle of Nature of Russia: Phenology. Proceedings of I Intern. Phenological School-Seminar in the Central Forest State Natural Biosphere Reserve Reserve. Velikiye Luki, pp. 218–222. (in Russian).

37. Yantser O.V., Skok N.V., Terentyeva E.Y. (2010). Unpublished work on phenology V.A. Batmanova with comments from members of the phenological section of the Russian Geographical Society. Yekaterinburg. (in Russian with English summary).


For citations:

Ivanova U.R., Skok N.V., Yantser O.V. Spatial Heterogeneity In Phenological Development Of Prunus Padus L. In The Yekaterinburg City. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2019;12(2):273-281.

Views: 596

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2071-9388 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1565 (Online)