Enhancing Agricultural Protection Areas Under Spatial Restrictions: A Case Study Of Majalengka Regency, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2023-2939
Abstract
The escalating trend of urbanization in Indonesia, accompanied by the conversion of agricultural land into urbanized areas, necessitates the implementation of zoning regulations. These regulations are crucial to protect agricultural land and safeguard the finite land assets of the country. To ensure the preservation of scarce land resources and guarantee food security, it is paramount for the Indonesian government to establish agricultural land protection areas. This paper presents an innovative approach and integrated methods to define agricultural land protection zones in spatial form. Results of studies landscape structure classification; core farmland accounts for 33.59% of the study region, whereas edge farmland accounts for 36.43%. Furthermore, the corridor farmland area is 0.30%, the discrete farming area is 12.26%, the Edge-Patch area is 3.54%, and the Perforated area is 13.89%. Geographically, the primary agricultural land is stretched out as a continuous area located on the outskirts of Majalengka city. By integrating Geographic Information Systems (GIS), remote sensing, landscape structure, prime farmland identification, and agricultural «land interest» could have a conservationist bent. It can mean protecting specific areas for environmental reasons (reach calculated), the study aims to create optimal farmland protection areas. The techniques outlined here can aid in determining PFPA from a geographical science standpoint, and the research’s findings will be helpful for PFPA planning.
Keywords
prime farmland protection area (PFPA),
landscape structure classification,
Geographic Information System (GIS),
remote sensing,
reach calculation,
UrbanSCAD
Supporting agencies: The authors are grateful to BUDI-DN (LPDP) Indonesia Endowment Funds for Education and the Regional Development Planning and Research Agency for Majalengka Regency, who supported and funded this study. The authors are also grateful to all individuals and parties who assisted in completing this study, including the academic editor and the two anonymous reviewers.
About the Authors
. Adrian
Graduate School of Natural Resources and Environmental Management Science, IPB University; Departement of Education Geography, Islamic University
Indonesia
Indonesia
IPB Dramaga Campus, Bogor 16680, West Java
45 Bekasi, Bekasi 17113, West Java
. Widiatmaka
Department of Soil Science and Land Resource, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University
Indonesia
Indonesia
Khursatul Munibah
Department of Soil Science and Land Resource, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University
Indonesia
Indonesia
Irman Firmansyah
System Dynamics Center
Indonesia
Indonesia
. Adrian
Departement of Education Geography, Islamic University
Indonesia
Indonesia
45 Bekasi, Bekasi 17113, West Java
References
1. Adrian, Widiatmaka, Munibah K. and Firmansyah I. (2022). Evaluate land suitability analysis for rice cultivation using a GIS-based AHP multi-criteria decision-making approach: Majalengka Regency, West Java Province. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1109(1), 012062. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1109/1/012062
2. Bakker M.M., Hatna E., Kuhlman T. and Mücher C.A. (2011). Changing environmental characteristics of European cropland. Agricultural Systems, 104(7), 522–532. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2011.03.008
3. BPS. (2018). Kabupaten Majalengka dalam angka tahun 2018. In: BPS Kabupaten Majalengka. Badan Pusat Statistik.
4. Chen Z., Zhang X., Huang X. and Chen Y. (2019). Influence of government leaders’ localization on farmland conversion in Chinese cities: A “sense of place” perspective. Cities, 90, 74–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.037
5. Deng X., Huang J., Rozelle S., Zhang J. and Li Z. (2015). Impact of urbanization on cultivated land changes in China. Land Use Policy, 45, 1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.007
6. Deslatte A., Swann W.L. and Feiock R.C. (2017). Three sides of the same coin? A Bayesian analysis of strategic management, comprehensive planning, and inclusionary values in land use. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(3), 415–432. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muw054
7. Duan Q., Tan M., Guo Y., Wang X. and Xin L. (2019). Understanding the spatial distribution of urban forests in China using Sentinel-2 images with Google Earth Engine. Forests, 10(9). DOI: 10.3390/f10090729
8. Eastman J.R., Weigen Jin, Kyem P.A.K. and Toledano J. (1995). Raster procedures for multi-criteria/multi-objective decisions. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 61(5), 539–547.
9. Evangelista P.F. and Beskow D. (2019). Geospatial point density. R Journal, 10(2), 347–356. DOI: 10.32614/RJ-2018-061
10. Fadlalla R. and Elsheikh A. (2016). Physical Land Suitability Assessment Based On FAO Framework. IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN) Www.Iosrjen.Org ISSN, 06(12), 1–36. www.iosrjen.org
11. Girvetz E.H., Thorne J.H., Berry A.M. and Jaeger J.A.G. (2008). Integration of landscape fragmentation analysis into regional planning: A statewide multi-scale case study from California, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86(3–4). DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.02.007
12. Godfray H.C.J., Beddington J.R., Crute I.R., Haddad L., Lawrence D., Muir J.F., Pretty J., Robinson S., Thomas S.M. and Toulmin C. (2010). Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. In: Science , Vol. 327, Issue 5967, 812–818. DOI: 10.1126/science.1185383
13. Henneberg S.C., Jiang Z., Naudéc P. and Ormrod R.P. (2007). THE NETWORK RESEARCHERS ’ NETWORK: A Social Network Analysis of the IMP Group 1984-2006. The IMP Journal, 3(1), 28–49.
14. Holmes G. (2014). What is a land grab? Exploring green grabs, conservation, and private protected areas in southern Chile. Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(4), 547–567. DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2014.919266
15. Huang Z., Du X. and Castillo C.S.Z. (2019). How does urbanization affect farmland protection? Evidence from China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 145, 139–147. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.023
16. Jayasinghe S.L., Kumar L. and Sandamali J. (2019). Assessment of potential land suitability for tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) in Sri Lanka using a gis-based multi-criteria approach. Agriculture (Switzerland), 9(7). DOI: 10.3390/agriculture9070148
17. Jiang P., Cheng Q., Gong Y., Wang L., Zhang Y., Cheng L., Li M., Lu J., Duan Y., Huang Q. and Chen D. (2016). Using Urban Development Boundaries to Constrain Uncontrolled Urban Sprawl in China. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(6). DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2016.1198213
18. Jiang P., Cheng Q., Zhuang Z., Tang H., Li M., Cheng L. and Jin X. (2018). The dynamic mechanism of landscape structure change of arable landscape system in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 251, 26–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.09.006
19. Jiang P., Li M. and Sheng Y. (2020). Spatial regulation design of farmland landscape around cities in China: A case study of Changzhou City. Cities, 97. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102504
20. Knoke D., Wasserman S. and Faust K. (1996). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Contemporary Sociology, 25(2), 275. DOI: 10.2307/2077235
21. Liang C., Penghui J., Wei C., Manchun L., Liyan W., Yuan G., Yuzhe P., Nan X., Yuewei D. and Qiuhao H. (2015). Farmland protection policies and rapid urbanization in China: A case study for Changzhou City. Land Use Policy, 48, 552–566. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.014
22. Liu C., Wang Q. and Susilo Y.O. (2019). Assessing the impacts of collection-delivery points to individual’s activity-travel patterns: A greener last mile alternative? Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 121, 84–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2017.08.007
23. Liu T., Liu H. and Qi Y. (2015). Construction land expansion and cultivated land protection in urbanizing China: Insights from national land surveys, 1996-2006. Habitat International, 46, 13–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.019
24. Perrin C., Nougarèdes B., Sini L., Branduini P. and Salvati L. (2018). Governance changes in peri-urban farmland protection following decentralisation: A comparison between Montpellier (France) and Rome (Italy). Land Use Policy, 70, 535–546. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.027
25. Porta S., Latora V., Wang F., Rueda S., Strano E., Scellato S., Cardillo A., Belli E., Càrdenas F., Cormenzana B. and Latora L. (2012). Street Centrality and the Location of Economic Activities in Barcelona. Urban Studies, 49(7), 1471–1488. DOI: 10.1177/0042098011422570
26. Qianwen C., Penghui J., Lingyan C., Jinxia S., Yunqian Z., Liyan W., Manchun L., Feixue L., Axing Z. and Dong C. (2017). Delineation of a permanent basic farmland protection area around a city centre: Case study of Changzhou City, China. Land Use Policy, 60, 73–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.014
27. Reid W. V., Chen D., Goldfarb L., Hackmann H., Lee Y.T., Mokhele K., Ostrom E., Raivio K., Rockström J., Schellnhuber H.J. and Whyte A. (2010). Earth system science for global sustainability: Grand challenges. In: Science , Vol. 330, Issue 6006, 916–917. DOI: 10.1126/science.1196263
28. Robins G., Pattison P., Kalish Y. and Lusher D. (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29(2), 173–191. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2006.08.002
29. Saaty T. (1977). [Saaty, 1977]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15.
30. Saaty T.L. (1988). What is the Analytic Hierarchy Process? In: Mathematical Models for Decision Support , 109–121. DOI: 10.1007/978-3642-83555-1_5
31. Saaty T.L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
32. Sari N.M. and Kushardono D. (2019). Analisis Dampak Pembangunan Infrastruktur Bandara Internasional Jawa Barat Terhadap Alih Fungsi Lahan Pertanian Melalui Citra Satelit Resolusi Tinggi. Jurnal Geografi, 11(2), 146–162. DOI: 10.24114/jg.v11i2.13470
33. Sayer J. (2009). Reconciling Conservation and Development: Are Landscapes the Answer? In: Biotropica , Vol. 41, Issue 6, 649–652. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00575.x
34. Sayer J., Sunderland T., Ghazoul J., Pfund J.L., Sheil D., Meijaard E., Venter M., Boedhihartono A.K., Day M., Garcia C., Van Oosten C. and Buck L.E. (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , Vol. 110, Issue 21, 8349–8356. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1210595110
35. Scott J. (2020). The History of Social Network Analysis. In: Social Network Analysis , 11–39. DOI: 10.4135/9781529716597.n2
36. Singha M., Dong J., Zhang G. and Xiao X. (2019). High resolution paddy rice maps in cloud-prone Bangladesh and Northeast India using Sentinel-1 data. Scientific Data, 6(1). DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0036-3
37. Sutherland L.A., Peter S. and Zagata L. (2015). Conceptualising multi-regime interactions: The role of the agriculture sector in renewable energy transitions. Research Policy, 44(8), 1543–1554. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.013
38. Teshale G.A. (2016). Analyzing Social Networks , by S. P. Borgatti, M. G. Everett, and J. C. Johnson . Journal of Community Practice, 24(3), 353–355. DOI: 10.1080/10705422.2016.1209400
39. Uitermark J. and van Meeteren M. (2021). Geographical Network Analysis. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 112(4), 337–350. DOI: 10.1111/tesg.12480
40. Van Duin J.H.R., De Goffau W., Wiegmans B., Tavasszy L.A. and Saes M. (2016). Improving Home Delivery Efficiency by Using Principles of Address Intelligence for B2C Deliveries. Transportation Research Procedia, 12, 14–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.02.006
41. Xia N., Li M. and Cheng L. (2017). Demarcation of prime farmland protection areas from high-resolution satellite imagery. International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) 2017-July, 660–663. DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2017.8127040
42. Zhang H., Duan Y. and Han Z. (2021). Research on spatial patterns and sustainable development of rural tourism destinations in the yellow river basin of china. Land, 10(8). DOI: 10.3390/land10080849
43. Zheng Z., Morimoto T. and Murayama Y. (2020). Optimal location analysis of delivery parcel-pickup points using AHP and network huff model: A case study of shiweitang sub-district in Guangzhou city, China. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(4). DOI: 10.3390/ijgi9040193
Review
For citations:
Adrian , Widiatmaka , Munibah Kh., Firmansyah I., Adrian Enhancing Agricultural Protection Areas Under Spatial Restrictions: A Case Study Of Majalengka Regency, Indonesia. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2024;17(1):67-82. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2023-2939
Views:
798
Email this article 