Evaluating The Visitors’ Perception And Available Ecosystem Services In Urban Parks Of Lahore (Pakistan) Research Paper
https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2021-133
Abstract
Ecosystem services provided by urban parks play a significant role in visitors’ well-being. The provision of these services depends upon the well-designed green spaces built to fulfil the needs of people. As these services are linked with visitors’ well-being, particular emphasis to indicate them is needed. However, minimal documentation is found regarding these valuable services, particularly in the context of Lahore. So, in this study, an effort was made to highlight visitors’ preferences for the available ecosystem services provided by urban parks in Lahore, Pakistan. These ecosystem services are beneficial in enhancing the well-being of people. Fifteen parks in Lahore were selected in this study to highlight the visitors’ preferences in visiting the parks. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted in these parks to collect information. The questionnaire was compiled to record socio-demographical profiles, usage patterns, choices, and visitors’ opinions about the services provided by the parks. A total of 300 responses were recorded to depict the survey findings. The result highlights that 60-80% of visitors like to come to the parks having maximum services regardless of how distant is from their residence. It also reveals that large-sized parks with maximum facilities attract more visitors than small and medium-sized parks. As in these parks, people only from neighbouring areas visit due to their accessibility. The findings will be helpful for the managers and planners of the urban park to improve the ecosystem services for the well-being of people. It will also indicate the choices of people based on that information, the status of parks can be improved, and new parks can be developed to meet the visitors’ needs.
About the Authors
Aysha Hanif
Lahore College for Women University
Pakistan
Pakistan
Lahore
Safdar A. Shirazi
University of the Punjab
Pakistan
Pakistan
Lahore
Muhammad Jabbar
University of Malaya
Malaysia
Malaysia
Anum Liaqat
University of the Punjab
Pakistan
Pakistan
Lahore
Sahar Zia
Lahore College for Women University
Pakistan
Pakistan
Lahore
Mariney M. Yusoff
University of Malaya
Malaysia
Malaysia
References
1. Alam R., Shirazi S.A., Zia S., & Minallah M. (2014). SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF URBAN GREEN SPACES IN LAHORE, PAKISTAN: A CASE STUDY OF GULBERG TOWN. Pakistan journal of science, 66, 277-281.
2. Ambiental P., & del Distrito Federal O. T. (2010). Presente y Futuro de las Áreas Verdes y del Arbolado de la Ciudad de México. México, DF, México.
3. Ayala-Azcárraga C., Diaz D., & Zambrano L. (2019). Characteristics of urban parks and their relation to user well-being. Landscape and Urban Planning, 189, 27-35.
4. Battisti L., Pomatto E., & Larcher F. (2019). Assessment and Mapping Green Areas Ecosystem Services and Socio-Demographic Characteristics in Turin Neighborhoods (Italy). Forests, 11, 25, DOI:10.3390/f11010025
5. Dalton S.E. (2011). Application of the human ecosystem model in warfare ecology. In Warfare Ecology (pp. 245-257): Springer.
6. Delgadillo Polanco V.M. (2012). El derecho a la ciudad en la Ciudad de México.¿ Una retórica progresista para una gestión urbana neoliberal? Andamios, 9(18), 117-139.
7. Dushkova D., & Ignatieva M. (2020). New trends in urban environmental health research: from geography of diseases to therapeutic landscapes and healing gardens. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY, 13, 159-171, DOI:10.24057/2071-9388-2019-99
8. Gatersleben B., & Andrews M. (2013). When walking in nature is not restorative—The role of prospect and refuge. Health & place, 20, 91-101.
9. Giles-Corti B., Johnson M., Knuiman M., Collins C., Douglas K., Ng K., . . . Donovan R. (2005). Increasing walking:: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? American journal of preventive medicine, 28, 169-176.
10. Hanif A., Shirazi S.A., & Majid A. (2020a). ASSESSING QUALITY OF LIFE THROUGH PEOPLE’S PERCEPTION: A CASE STUDY OF LAHOREPAKISTAN. J. Agric. Res, 58(4), 289-295.
11. Hanif A., Shirazi S.A., & Majid A. (2020b). Role of community for improvement of ecosystem services in urban parks. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 57(6).
12. Imran M., & Mehmood A. (2020). Analysis and mapping of present and future drivers of local urban climate using remote sensing: a case of Lahore, Pakistan. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13, DOI:10.1007/s12517-020-5214-2
13. Jabbar M., Yusoff M.M. & Shafie A. (2021). Assessing the role of urban green spaces for human well-being: a systematic review. GeoJournal, DOI:10.1007/s10708-021-10474-7
14. Jabbar M., Yusoff M.M. (2022a). Assessing The Spatiotemporal Urban Green Cover Changes and Their Impact on Land Surface Temperature and Urban Heat Island in Lahore (Pakistan). GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY, 15(1):130-140, DOI:10.24057/2071-9388-2021-005
15. Jabbar M., & Yusoff M.M. (2022b). Assessing and Modelling the role of urban green spaces for human well-being in Lahore (Pakistan), Geocarto International, DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2087757
16. Jardine A., Speldewinde P., Carver S., & Weinstein P. (2007). Dryland salinity and ecosystem distress syndrome: human health implications. EcoHealth, 4(1), 10-17.
17. Kothencz G., & Blaschke T. (2017). Urban parks: Visitors’ perceptions versus spatial indicators. Land Use Policy, 64, 233-244, DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.012
18. Liu Y., Fan Y., & Huang K. (2013). Service ecosystem evolution and controlling: A research framework for the effects of dynamic services. Paper presented at the 2013 International Conference on Service Sciences (ICSS).
19. Lü Y., Fu B., Feng X., Zeng Y., Liu Y., Chang R., . . . Wu, B. (2012). A policy-driven large scale ecological restoration: quantifying ecosystem services changes in the Loess Plateau of China. PloS one, 7(2), e31782.
20. Mak B.K.L., & Jim C.Y. (2019). Linking park users’ socio-demographic characteristics and visit-related preferences to improve urban parks. Cities, 92, 97-111, DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.008
21. McCormack G.R., Rock M., Toohey A. M., & Hignell D. (2010). Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health & place, 16(4), 712-726.
22. Pazhouhanfar M., & Kamal M. (2014). Effect of predictors of visual preference as characteristics of urban natural landscapes in increasing perceived restorative potential. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(1), 145-151.
23. Rechkemmer A., & Von Falkenhayn L. (2009). The human dimensions of global environmental change: Ecosystem services, resilience, and governance. Paper presented at the EPJ Web of Conferences.
24. Rey Gozalo G., Morillas J., González D., & Moraga P. (2017). Relationships among satisfaction, noise perception, and use of urban green spaces. Science of The Total Environment, 624, 438-450, DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.148
25. Sinchembe M., & Ellery W. (2010). Human impacts on hydrological health and the provision of ecosystem services: a case study of the eMthonjeni–Fairview Spring Wetland, Grahamstown, South Africa. African Journal of Aquatic Science, 35(3), 227-239.
26. Vieira J., Matos P., Mexia T., Silva P., Lopes N., Freitas C., . . . Pinho P. (2018). Green spaces are not all the same for the provision of air purification and climate regulation services: The case of urban parks. Environmental research, 160, 306-313.
27. Wang Z., Liu Z., Song K., Zhang B., Zhang S., Liu D., . . . Yang F. (2009). Land use changes in Northeast China driven by human activities and climatic variation. Chinese Geographical Science, 19 (3), 225-230.
Review
For citations:
Hanif A., Shirazi S.A., Jabbar M., Liaqat A., Zia S., Yusoff M.M. Evaluating The Visitors’ Perception And Available Ecosystem Services In Urban Parks Of Lahore (Pakistan) Research Paper. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2022;15(4):32-38. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2021-133
Views:
1022
Email this article 