Preview

GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY

Advanced search

Spatial Modelling of Key Regional- Level Factors of Covid-19 Mortality In Russia

https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2021-076

Full Text:

Abstract

Intensive socio-economic interactions are a prerequisite for the innovative development of the economy, but at the same time, they may lead to increased epidemiological risks. Persistent migration patterns, the socio-demographic composition of the population, income level, and employment structure by type of economic activity determine the intensity of socio-economic interactions and, therefore, the spread of COVID-19.

We used the excess mortality (mortality from April 2020 to February 2021 compared to the five-year mean) as an indicator of deaths caused directly and indirectly by COVID-19. Similar to some other countries, due to irregularities and discrepancies in the reported infection rates, excess mortality is currently the only available and reliable indicator of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Russia.

We used the regional level data and fit regression models to identify the socio-economic factors that determined the impact of the pandemic. We used ordinary least squares as a baseline model and a selection of spatial models to account for spatial autocorrelation of dependent and independent variables as well as the error terms.

Based on the comparison of AICc (corrected Akaike information criterion) and standard error values, it was found that SEM (spatial error model) is the best option with reliably significant coefficients. Our results show that the most critical factors that increase the excess mortality are the share of the elderly population and the employment structure represented by the share of employees in manufacturing (C economic activity according to European Skills, Competences, and Occupations (ESCO) v1 classification). High humidity as a proxy for temperature and a high number of retail locations per capita reduce the excess mortality. Except for the share of the elderly, most identified factors influence the opportunities and necessities of human interaction and the associated excess mortality.

About the Authors

Egor A. Kotov
Faculty of Urban and Regional Development, HSE University
Russian Federation

Myasnitskaya str. 13-4, Moscow 101000



Ruslan V. Goncharov
Faculty of Urban and Regional Development, HSE University
Russian Federation

Myasnitskaya str. 13-4, Moscow 101000



Yuri V. Kulchitsky
Faculty of Urban and Regional Development, HSE University
Russian Federation

Myasnitskaya str. 13-4, Moscow 101000



Varvara A. Molodtsova
Faculty of Urban and Regional Development, HSE University
Russian Federation

Myasnitskaya str. 13-4, Moscow 101000



Boris V. Nikitin
Institute of Regional Consulting; Faculty of Geography, Moscow State University
Russian Federation

office 903, Nakhimovsky prosp. 32, Moscow 117218

Leninskie Gory 1, Moscow 119899



References

1. Agnoletti M., Manganelli S. and Piras F. (2020). Covid-19 and rural landscape: The case of Italy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 204, 103955, DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103955.

2. Amdaoud M., Arcuri G. and Levratto N. (2021). Are regions equal in adversity? A spatial analysis of spread and dynamics of COVID-19 in Europe. The European Journal of Health Economics, 22(4), 629-642, DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01280-6.

3. Andersen L.M., Harden S.R., Sugg M.M., Runkle J.D. and Lundquist T.E. (2021). Analyzing the spatial determinants of local Covid-19 transmission in the United States. Science of The Total Environment, 754, 142396, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142396.

4. Anselin L., Ibnu S. and Youngihn K. (2006). GeoDa: An Introduction to Spatial Data Analysis. Geographical Analysis 38(1), 5-22, DOI: 10.1111/j.0016-7363.2005.00671.x.

5. Ascani A., Faggian A. and Montresor S. (2021). The geography of COVID-19 and the structure of local economies: The case of Italy. Journal of Regional Science, 61(2), 407-441, DOI: 10.1111/jors.12510.

6. Bański J., Mazur M. and Kamińska W. (2021). Socioeconomic Conditioning of the Development of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Global Spatial Differentiation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4802, DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094802.

7. Chakraborti S., Maiti A., Pramanik S., Sannigrahi S., Pilla F., Banerjee A. and Das D.N. (2021). Evaluating the plausible application of advanced machine learnings in exploring determinant factors of present pandemic: A case for continent specific COVID-19 analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 765, 142723, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142723.

8. Chen Y., Chen M., Huang B., Wu C. and Shi W. (2021). Modeling the Spatiotemporal Association Between COVID-19 Transmission and Population Mobility Using Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression. GeoHealth, 5, e2021GH000402, DOI: 10.1029/2021gh000402.

9. Desmet K. and Wacziarg R. (2021). JUE Insight: Understanding spatial variation in COVID-19 across the United States. Journal of Urban Economics, 103332, DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2021.103332.

10. Ehlert A. (2021). The socio-economic determinants of COVID-19: A spatial analysis of German county level data. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 101083, DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101083.

11. Franch-Pardo I., Napoletano B.M., Rosete-Verges F. and Billa L. (2020). Spatial analysis and GIS in the study of COVID-19. A review. Science of The Total Environment, 739, 140033, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140033.

12. Hägerstrand T. (1973). Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. University of Chicago press.

13. Hass F.S. and Jokar Arsanjani J. (2021). The Geography of the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Data-Driven Approach to Exploring Geographical Driving Forces. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 2803, DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18062803.

14. Henning A., McLaughlin C., Armen S. and Allen S. (2021). Socio-spatial influences on the prevalence of COVID-19 in central Pennsylvania. Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Epidemiology, 37, 100411, DOI: 10.1016/j.sste.2021.100411.

15. Kelejian H.H. and Prucha I.R. (1998). A Generalized Spatial Two-Stage Least Squares Procedure for Estimating a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17(1), 99-121, DOI: 10/bxvhm4.

16. Kolosov V.A., Tikunov V.S. and Eremchenko E.N. (2021). Areas Of Socio-Geographical Study Of The Covid-19 Pandemic In Russia And The World. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY, 14(4), 109-116, DOI: 10.24057/2071-9388-2021-091.

17. Konstantinoudis G., Padellini T., Bennett J., Davies B., Ezzati M. and Blangiardo M. (2021). Long-term exposure to air-pollution and COVID-19 mortality in England: A hierarchical spatial analysis. Environment International, 146, 106316, DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106316.

18. Kotov E. (2022). e-kotov/ru-covid19-regional-excess-mortality article data and code. URL: https://github.com/e-kotov/ru-covid19regional-excess-mortality. Zenodo, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6515455.

19. LeSage J. and Pace R.K. (2009). Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. CRC Press.

20. Luo Y., Yan J. and McClure S. (2021). Distribution of the environmental and socioeconomic risk factors on COVID-19 death rate across continental USA: a spatial nonlinear analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(6), 6587-6599, DOI: 10.1007/s11356-02010962-2.

21. Maiti A., Zhang Q., Sannigrahi S., Pramanik S., Chakraborti S., Cerda A. and Pilla F. (2021). Exploring spatiotemporal effects of the driving factors on COVID-19 incidences in the contiguous United States. Sustainable Cities and Society, 68, 102784, DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102784.

22. Mogi R., Kato G. and Annaka S. (2020). Socioeconomic inequality and COVID-19 prevalence across municipalities in Catalonia, Spain [Preprint], DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/5jgzy.

23. Mollalo A., Vahedi B. and Rivera K.M. (2020). GIS-based spatial modeling of COVID-19 incidence rate in the continental United States. Science of The Total Environment, 728, 138884, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138884.

24. OpenStreetMap contributors (2017). OpenStreetMap. [online] Available at: https://www.openstreetmap.org [Accessed 01 Jul. 2021]

25. Oto-Peralías D. (2020). Regional correlations of COVID-19 in Spain [Preprint], DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/tjdgw.

26. Perone G. (2021). The determinants of COVID-19 case fatality rate (CFR) in the Italian regions and provinces: An analysis of environmental, demographic, and healthcare factors. Science of The Total Environment, 755, 142523, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142523.

27. Qi H., Xiao S., Shi R., Ward M.P., Chen Y., Tu W., Su Q., Wang W., Wang X. and Zhang Z. (2020). COVID-19 transmission in Mainland China is associated with temperature and humidity: A time-series analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 728, 138778, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138778.

28. Rahman M.H., Zafri N.M., Ashik F. and Waliullah M. (2020). Gis-Based Spatial Modeling to Identify Factors Affecting COVID-19 Incidence Rates in Bangladesh [SSRN Scholarly Paper], DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3674984.

29. Raymundo C.E., Oliveira M.C., Eleuterio T. de A., André S.R., da Silva M.G., Queiroz E.R. da S. and Medronho R. de A. (2021). Spatial analysis of COVID-19 incidence and the sociodemographic context in Brazil. PLOS ONE, 16(3), e0247794, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247794.

30. Rodríguez-Pose A. and Burlina C. (2021). Institutions and the uneven geography of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Regional Science, 61(4), 728-752, DOI: 10.1111/jors.12541.

31. Sannigrahi S., Pilla F., Basu B. and Sarkar Basu A. (2020). The overall mortality caused by COVID-19 in the European region is highly associated with demographic composition: A spatial regression-based approach. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020arXiv200504029S.

32. Scarpone C., Brinkmann S.T., Große T., Sonnenwald D., Fuchs M. and Walker B.B. (2020). A multimethod approach for county-scale geospatial analysis of emerging infectious diseases: a cross-sectional case study of COVID-19 incidence in Germany. International Journal of Health Geographics, 19(1), 32, DOI: 10.1186/s12942-020-00225-1.

33. Sun F., Matthews S.A., Yang T.-C. and Hu M.-H. (2020). A spatial analysis of the COVID-19 period prevalence in U.S. counties through June 28, 2020: where geography matters? Annals of Epidemiology, 52, 54-59.e1, DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.07.014.

34. Wang Q., Dong W., Yang K., Ren Z., Huang D., Zhang P. and Wang J. (2021). Temporal and spatial analysis of COVID-19 transmission in China and its influencing factors. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 105, 675-685, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.014.

35. Yarmol-Matusiak E.A., Cipriano L.E. and Stranges S. (2021). A comparison of COVID-19 epidemiological indicators in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 49(1), 69-78, DOI: 10.1177/1403494820980264.

36. Zemtsov S.P. and Baburin V.L. (2020). Risks of morbidity and mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in Russian regions. Population and Economics, 4(2), 158-181, DOI: 10.3897/popecon.4.e54055.


Review

For citations:


Kotov E.A., Goncharov R.V., Kulchitsky Yu.V., Molodtsova V.A., Nikitin B.V. Spatial Modelling of Key Regional- Level Factors of Covid-19 Mortality In Russia. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2022;15(2):71-83. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2021-076

Views: 212


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-9388 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1565 (Online)