Automated Monitoring The Temperature Under Buildings With Pile Foundations In Salekhard (Preliminary Results)
https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2021-021
Abstract
In the paper, we consider a method of ground temperature monitoring using the thermometric boreholes and computer modeling the residential buildings with the pile foundation in the city of Salekhard; note that it is located in the permafrost zone. Construction of the residential buildings and industrial structures in the permafrost zone and their operation is carried out according to the principle of preserving the frozen state of foundations. For ground temperature monitoring, thermometric boreholes are used. In a given time period, the measured temperatures are transferred to a server for further processing. Information about the temperature is an important factor for the safety of the buildings and it can be used to evaluate the piles bearing capacity. It allows to propose options for the soil thermal stabilization or to eliminate the detected technogenic heat sources. An approach of mathematical modeling to reconstruct the temperature fields in the pile foundation base of a building is discussed taking into account the data of temperature monitoring. 24 boreholes were equipped with more than 400 in-borehole thermal sensors for testing the method under the residential building I. The preliminary modeling is carried out for December and January 2020 for the contact thermal conductivity model with phase transition with the upper part of the geological section typical for Salekhard (the sandy soils). The modeling describes the freezing processes during the months in detail. The thermal monitoring allows to say that the ground in the base of the Residential building I is stable. But there are detected heat transfers near the borehole T1 at the depth of 12–14 m. The combination of monitoring and computer modeling makes it possible to assess the safety of the operation of the residential buildings in cities located in the permafrost zones.
About the Authors
Yaroslav K. Kamnev
Arctic Research Center of the Yamal-Nenets autonomous district
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Respubliki str. 20, Salekhard, Yamalo-Nenetskiy Autonomous District, Tyumen region, 629008
Mikhail Yu. Filimonov
Krasovskii Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics, Ural Branch of RAS;
Ural Federal University Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. Kovalevskaya str. 16, Yekaterinburg, 620108,
Mira str. 19, Yekaterinburg, 620002
Aleksandr N. Shein
Arctic Research Center of the Yamal-Nenets autonomous district
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Respubliki str. 20, Salekhard, Yamalo-Nenetskiy Autonomous District, Tyumen region, 629008
Nataliia A. Vaganova
Krasovskii Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics, Ural Branch of RAS;
Ural Federal University Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. Kovalevskaya str. 16, Yekaterinburg, 620108,
Mira str. 19, Yekaterinburg, 620002
References
1. Aalto J., Karjalainen O., Hjort J. and Luoto M. (2018). Statistical forecasting of current and future circum – Arctic ground temperatures and active layer thickness. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(10), 4889-4898, DOI: 10.1029/2018GL078007.
2. Anisimov Oleg A. and Nelson Frederick E. (1996). Permafrost distribution in the Northern Hemisphere under scenarios of climatic change. Global and Planetary Change, 14(1–2), 59-72, DOI: 10.1016/0921-8181(96)00002-1.
3. Arhgeo.com (2021). Automated system for collecting and transmitting geotechnical monitoring data [online] Available at: http://arhgeo.com/home/geo/data/ [Accessed 15 Feb. 2021 in Russian].
4. BBC News. Russian Arctic oil spill pollutes big lake near Norilsk (2020). [online] Available at: https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-52926977 [Accessed 15 Feb. 2021].
5. BBC News. Norway landslide: Buildings swept away in Alta disaster (2020). [online] Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/av/worldeurope-52920766 [Accessed 15 Feb. 2021].
6. Brown J., Ferrians Jr, O.J., Heginbottom J.A. and Melnikov E.S. (1997). Circum-Arctic map of permafrost and ground-ice conditions. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey, 45.
7. Brown J., Ferrians, Heginbottom J.A. and Melnikov E. (2002). Circum-Arctic Map of Permafrost and Ground-Ice Conditions, Version 2. [online]. Boulder, Colorado USA. NSIDC: National Snow and Ice Data Center, DOI: 10.7265/skbg-kf16. [Accessed 15 Feb. 2021].
8. Filimonov M. and Vaganova N. (2017). Permafrost thawing from different technical systems in Arctic regions. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 72, 012006, DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/72/1/012006.
9. Filimonov M. and Vaganova N. (2013). Simulation of thermal stabilization of soil around various technical systems operating in permafrost. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 7(141-144), 7151-7160, DOI: 10.12988/ams.2013.311669.
10. Grebenets V., Streletskiy D. and Shiklomanov N. (2012). Geotechnical safety issues in the cities of Polar Regions. Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 5(3), 104-119, DOI: 10.15356/2071-9388_03v05_2012_08.
11. Gromadsky A.N, Arefiev S.V., Volkov N.G., Kamnev Y.K. and Sinitsky A.I. (2019). Remote temperature regime monitoring of permafrost soils under the buildings in Salekhard. Scientific Bulletin of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District, 104(3), 17-21, DOI: 10.26110/ARCTIC.2019.104.3.003. (in Russian with English summary).
12. Hjort J., Karjalainen O., Aalto J., Westermann S., Romanovsky V.E., Nelson F.E., Bernd Etzelmüller and Luoto M. (2018). Degrading permafrost puts Arctic infrastructure at risk by mid-century. Nature communications, 9(1), 1-9, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07557-4.
13. Kiselyov F. and Sergeyev F. (2020). Prediction of construction bases frozen soil temperature development under intense heating. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1425, 012208, DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1425/1/012208.
14. KrioLab. Equipment for geotechnical monitoring [online] Available at: https://kriolab.ru/ [Accessed 30 June 2021 in Russian].
15. Kuzin I.L. (1963). Geomorphological levels of the north of Western Siberia. Geology and oil-and-gas potential of the north of Western Siberia, Proceedings of VNIGRI, 225, 330-339.
16. McClymont A.F., Hayashi M., Bentley L.R. and Christensen B.S. (2013). Geophysical imaging and thermal modeling of subsurface morphology and thaw evolution of discontinuous permafrost. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 118(3), 1826-1837, DOI: 10.1002/jgrf.20114.
17. Msu-geophysics. Geotechnical monitoring. [online] Available at: http://www.msu-geophysics.ru/uslugi/geotexnicheskij-monitoring [Accessed 30 June 2021 in Russian].
18. Nelson F.E., Anisimov O.A. and Shiklomanov N.I. (2001). Subsidence risk from thawing permafrost. Nature, 410, 889-890, DOI:10.1038/35073746.
19. Nelson F.E., Anisimov O.A. and Shiklomanov N.I. (2002). Climate Change and Hazard Zonation in the Circum-Arctic Permafrost Regions. Natural Hazards, 26, 203-225, DOI: 10.1023/A:1015612918401.
20. Olenchenko V.V., Kartoziya A.A., Tsibizov L.V., Osipova P.S. and Esin E.I. (2019). Geoelectrical characteristics of Samoylov Island coastline (Lena River delta). Russian Journal of geophysical technologies, (4), 39-49, DOI: 10.18303/2619–1563–2018–4–5.
21. Pugach V.N. and Boiychov S.V. (2019). Experience in the application and development of systems for monitoring the temperature of permafrost soils production of JSC research-and-industrial enterprise «Etalon». Materials of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference. Architectural, construction and road transport complexes: problems, prospects, innovations, 262-268. (in Russian with English summary).
22. Resolution of the State Construction Committee of the Russian Federation of 27.09.2003 N 170 «On approval of the Rules and norms of technical operation of housing» [online] Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_44772/ [Accessed 15 Feb. 2021 in Russian].
23. Rivkin F.M. (2020) Changes in geocryological conditions in the foundations of buildings and structures in the Arctic and Subarctic. Bulletin of Engineering Surveys, 45(6), 18-22 (in Russian).
24. Romanovsky V.E. and Osterkamp T.E. (2001) Permafrost: Changes and impacts / In R. Paepe & V. Melnikov (eds), Permafrost Response on Economic Development, Environmental Security and Natural Resources, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 297-315.
25. RUSGEOTECH. Realization of solutions in the field of geotechnical monitoring. [online] Available at: https://www.rgtekh.ru/ [Accessed 30 June 2021 in Russian].
26. Permafrost-engineering.com (2021). Services in geotechnics on permafrost LLC PermafrostEngineering [online] Available at: http://permafrost-engineering.com/ [Accessed 15 Feb. 2021 in Russian].
27. Shein A.N. and Kamnev Y.K. (2020). Review of Scientific Publications and Industrial Works Devoted to the Study of Permafrost Formations in Natural and Anthropogenic Conditions. Scientific Bulletin of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District, 108(3), 42-50, DOI: 10.26110/ARCTIC.2020.108.3.007 (in Russian with English summary).
28. SP 25.13330.2012 (2012). Construction Regulations. Soil bases and foundations on permafrost soil . Updated version SNiP 2.02.04–88 Construction Norms and Regulations for Foundations on Permafrost. Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Russia. (in Russian).
29. Streletskiy D.A., Shiklomanov N.I. and Grebenets, V.I. (2012). Changes of foundation bearing capacity due to climate warming in Northwest Siberia. Earth Cryosphere, 16(1), 22-32. (in Russian with English summary).
30. Streletskiy D.A., Suter L.J., Shiklomanov N.I., Porfiriev B.N. and Eliseev D.O. (2019). Assessment of climate change impacts on buildings, structures and infrastructure in the Russian regions on permafrost. Environmental Research Letters, 14(2), 025003, DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaf5e6.
31. Suter L., Streletskiy D. and Shiklomanov N. (2019). Assessment of the cost of climate change impacts on critical infrastructure in the circumpolar Arctic. Polar Geography, 42(4), 267-286, DOI: 10.1080/1088937X.2019.1686082.
32. System of automated geocryological monitoring (2021). [online] Available at: https://monitoring.arctic.yanao.ru/ [Accessed 15 Feb. 2021 in Russian].
33. The Siberian Times. Two-storey residential building breaks apart in Yakutsk, Russia’s permafrost capital (2020). [online] Available at: https://siberiantimes.com/other/others/news/two-storey-residential-building-breaks-apart-in-yakutsk-russias-permafrost-capital/ [Accessed 15 Feb. 2021].
34. Vaganova N.A. and Filimonov M.Yu (2019). Simulation of Cooling Devices and Effect for Thermal Stabilization of Soil in a Cryolithozone with Anthropogenic Impact. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11386, 580-587, DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-11539-5_68.
35. Vaganova N. and Filimonov M. (2017). Simulation of freezing and thawing of soil in Arctic regions. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ, 72, 012006, DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/72/1/012005.
36. Yeltsov I.N., Olenchenko V.V. and Faguet A.N. (2017). Electrotomography in the Russian Arctic based on field studies and threedimensional numerical modeling. Business magazine Neftegaz. RU, (2), 54-64 (in Russian).
37. You Y., Yu Q., Pan X., Wang X. and Guo L. (2013). Application of electrical resistivity tomography in investigating depth of permafrost base and permafrost structure in Tibetan Plateau. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 87, 19-26, DOI:10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.11.004.
38. Zhang T., Barry R.G., Knowles K., Heginbottom J.A. and Brown J. (1999). Statistics and characteristics of permafrost and ground-ice distribution in the Northern Hemisphere. Polar Geography, 23(2), 132-154, DOI:10.1080/10889379909377670.
39. Zhang Y., Chen W. and Cihlar J. (2003). A process-based model for quantifying the impact of climate change on permafrost thermal regimes. J. Geophys. Res., 108(D22), 4695, DOI: 10.1029/2002JD003354.
Review
For citations:
Kamnev Y.K., Filimonov M.Yu., Shein A.N., Vaganova N.A. Automated Monitoring The Temperature Under Buildings With Pile Foundations In Salekhard (Preliminary Results). GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2021;14(4):75-82. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2021-021
Views: 595
Email this article 