Preview

GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY

Advanced search

Crowdsourcing Data To Visualize Potential Hotspots For Covid-19 Active Cases In Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2021-011

Full Text:

Abstract

 As the COVID-19 outbreak spread worldwide, multidisciplinary researches on COVID-19 are vastly developed, not merely focusing on the medical sciences like epidemiology and virology. One of the studies that have developed is to understand the spread of the disease. This study aims to assess the contribution of crowdsourcing-based data from social media in understanding locations and the distribution patterns of COVID-19 in Indonesia. In this study, Twitter was used as the main source to retrieve location-based active cases of COVID-19 in Indonesia. We used Netlytic (www.netlytic.org) and Phyton’s script namely GetOldTweets3 to retrieve the relevant online content about COVID-19 cases including audiences’ information such as username, time of publication, and locations from January 2020 to August 2020 when COVID-19 active cases significantly increased in Indonesia. Subsequently, the accuracy of resulted data and visualization maps was assessed by comparing the results with the official data from the Ministry of Health of Indonesia. The results show that the number of active cases and locations are only promising during the early period of the disease spread on March – April 2020, while in the subsequent periods from April to August 2020, the error was continuously exaggerated. Although the accuracy of crowdsourcing data remains a challenge, we argue that crowdsourcing platforms can be a potential data source for an early assessment of the disease spread especially for countries lacking the capital and technical knowledge to build a systematic data structure to monitor the disease spread.

About the Authors

Noorhadi Rahardjo
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Indonesia

Faculty of Geography 

Yogyakarta 55281



Djarot Heru Santosa
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Indonesia

Faculty of Cultural Sciences 

Yogyakarta 55281



Hero Marhaento
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Indonesia

Faculty of Forestry 

Yogyakarta 55281



References

1. Abdulhamid N.G., Ayoung D.A., Kashefi A., & Sigweni B. (2020). A survey of social media use in emergency situations: A literature review. Information Development, DOI: 10.1177/0266666920913894.

2. Acar A., & Muraki Y. (2011). Twitter for crisis communication: lessons learned from Japan’s tsunami disaster. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 7(3), 392-402.

3. Ahmad S., & Kim D.H. (2020). Quantum GIS based descriptive and predictive data analysis for effective planning of waste management. IEEE Access, 8, 46193-46205.

4. Al-Omoush K.S., Orero-Blat M., & Ribeiro-Soriano D. (2020). The role of sense of community in harnessing the wisdom of crowds and creating collaborative knowledge during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Research.

5. Arora G., Kroumpouzos G., Kassir M., Jafferany M., Lotti T., Sadoughifar R., Sitkowska Z., Grabbe S. and Goldust M. (2020). Solidarity and transparency against the COVID–19 pandemic. Dermatologic Therapy.

6. Carley K.M., Malik M.M., Kowalchuck M., Pfeffer J., & Landwehr P. (2015). Twitter usage in Indonesia. Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems (CASOS) Technical Report CMU-ISR-15-109. Available at SSRN 2720332.

7. Chakraborty K., Bhatia S., Bhattacharyya S., Platos J., Bag R., & Hassanien A.E. (2020). Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 tweets by Deep Learning Classifiers—A study to show how popularity is affecting accuracy in social media. Applied Soft Computing, 97, 106754.

8. Chung C.J., Nam Y., & Stefanone M.A. (2012). Exploring online news credibility: The relative influence of traditional and technological factors. Journal of Computer–Mediated Communication, 17(2), 171-186.

9. Franch-Pardo I., Napoletano B.M., Rosete-Verges F., & Billa L. (2020). Spatial analysis and GIS in the study of COVID-19. A review. Science of The Total Environment, 140033.

10. Gaffney D., & Puschmann C. (2013). Data collection on Twitter. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt, & C. Puschmann (Eds.), Twitter and Society, New York: Peter Lang, 55-68.

11. Gui X., Kou Y., Pine K.H., & Chen Y. (2017, May). Managing uncertainty: using social media for risk assessment during a public health crisis. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4520-4533.

12. Heipke C. (2010). Crowdsourcing geospatial data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(6), 550-557.

13. Hui D.S., Azhar E.I., Madani T.A., Ntoumi F., Kock R., Dar O., ... & Zumla A. (2020). The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health—The latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 91, 264-266.

14. Iyer M., Jayaramayya K., Subramaniam M.D., Lee S.B., Dayem A.A., Cho S.G., & Vellingiri B. (2020). COVID-19: an update on diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. BMB reports, 53(4), 191.

15. Jaya M.T.S., & Fajar A.N. (2019). Analysis of The Implementation Quantum GIS: Comparative Effect and User Performance. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol, 97, 2596-2605.

16. Kulshrestha J., Eslami M., Messias J., Zafar M.B., Ghosh S., Gummadi K.P., & Karahalios K. (2017, February). Quantifying search bias: Investigating sources of bias for political searches in social media. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 417-432.

17. Lamoureux Z. & Fast V. (2019). The tools of citizen science: An evaluation of map-based crowdsourcing platforms. Spatial Knowl. Inf. Canada, 7(4), 1.

18. Larson H.J. (2018). The biggest pandemic risk? Viral misinformation. Nature, 562(7726), 309-310.

19. Marwick A.E. & Boyd D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114-133, DOI: 10.1177/1461444810365313.

20. Moturu S.T., & Liu H. (2011). Quantifying the trustworthiness of social media content. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 29(3), 239-260.

21. Paniagua J. & Korzynski P. (2017). Social Media Crowdsourcing. E.G. Carayannis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer Science+Business Media LLC, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_200009-1.

22. Ponjavic M., Karabegovic A., Ferhatbegovic E., Tahirovic E., Uzunovic S., Travar M., Pilav A., Mulić M., Karakaš S., Avdić N., Mulabdić Z., Pavić G., Bičo M., Vasilj I., Mamić D., Hukić, M. (2020). Spatio-temporal data visualization for monitoring of control measures in the prevention of the spread of COVID-19 in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Med Glas (Zenica), 17(2), 265-274.

23. Thomson R., Ito N., Suda H., Lin F., Liu Y., Hayasaka R., ... & Wang Z. (2012, April). Trusting Tweets: The fukushima disaster and information source credibility on Twitter. In 9th ISCRAM conference, 10.

24. Wakefield R., & Wakefield K. (2016). Social media network behavior: A study of user passion and affect. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 25(2), 140-156.

25. World Health Organization W. (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Retrieved August 12, 2020, from https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019.

26. Xu C., Luo X., Yu C., & Cao S.J. (2020). The 2019-nCoV epidemic control strategies and future challenges of building healthy smart cities.

27. Zhang H., & Shaw R. (2020). Identifying research trends and gaps in the context of covid-19. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(10), 3370.


For citation:


Rahardjo N., Santosa D., Marhaento H. Crowdsourcing Data To Visualize Potential Hotspots For Covid-19 Active Cases In Indonesia. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 0;. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2021-011

Views: 46


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-9388 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1565 (Online)