Preview

GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY

Advanced search

CONTEMPORARY LAND REFORM POLICY AND PRACTICE IN SOUTH AFRICA AND ITS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS: NEW IDEAS, OLD PROBLEMS?

https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2012-5-4-33-45

Full Text:

Abstract

An extensive land reform programme is underway, which faces many challenges unique to the socio-political context of post-apartheid South Africa. The aim of this paper is to review the extent to which agrarian land reform policy, more particularly in respect to its land distribution element, incorporates environmental sustainability principles into resultant practice and whether or not this may lead to exacerbation of land degradation problems in the country. The paper briefly outlines the key land reform role-players, the policy and implementation process of land reform, and considers these in relation to the problem of land degradation. Ongoing problems of implementation with the land redistribution programme are discussed in relation to a number of significant challenges. The paper illustrates the lack of integration of environmental planning in the land reform process generally and points to the potentially deleterious impact of land reform on land degradation.

About the Author

Michael Meadows

South Africa
Department of Environmental & Geographical Science, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa


References

1. African National Congress, (1993). The Reconstruction and Development Programme.

2. ANC, Johannesburg.

3. Afriforum, (2012). Stop the Green Paper. www.stopthegreenpaper.co.za (accessed 7th

4. October, 2012).

5. Agri SA, (2011). Agri SA comments on the Green Paper on Land Reform, (2011)

6. http://www.agrisa.co.za/Dokumente/Green%20Paper.pdf (accessed 7th October, 2012).

7. Andersson, E., Brogaard S. and Olsson L. (2011). The political ecology of land degradation.

8. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 36: 295–319.

9. Boudreaux, K. (2010). Land reform as social justice: the case of South Africa. Journal of the

10. Institute of Economic Affairs.

11. Cousins, B. (2009). Land reform in South Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change 9 (3): 421–431.

12. Davis, J.S. (2011). Policy and implementation: land and agrarian reform in South Africa.

13. International Business and Economics Research Journal 10 (11): 37–46.

14. De Villiers, B. (2007). Land reform: a commentary. Policy Paper, Konrad-Adenauer Foundation,

15. Johannesburg.

16. DEAT (Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism), (2002). First draft National

17. Action Programme: combating land degradation to alleviate rural poverty. DEAT, Pretoria.

18. DLA (Department of Land Affairs), (1997). White Paper on South African land policy. Pretoria:

19. DLA, Pretoria.

20. DLA (Department of Land Affairs), (1999). Annual report. Pretoria: DLA.

21. DLA (Department of Land Affairs), (2000). Consolidated environmental implementation

22. and management plan. DLA, Pretoria.

23. DRDLR, (2011). Green Paper on Land Reform. Department of Rural Development and

24. Land Reform, Pretoria.

25. DRDLR, (2012). Annual Report. Department of Rural Development and Land Reform,

26. Pretoria.

27. Drimie, S. (2003). HIV/Aids and land: case studies from Kenya, Lesotho and South Africa.

28. Development Southern Africa 20 (5): 647–658.

29. Financial Mail, (2012). Progress still lacking. Financial Mail, 28th February 2011.

30. Geist, J.Y. and Lambin E.F. (2004). Dynamic causes of desertification. BioScience 54 (9): 817–829.

31. Giller, K.E., Leeuwis C., Andersson J.A., Andriesse W., Brouwer A., Frost P., Hebinck P., Heitkönig

32. I., van Ittersum M.K., Koning N., Ruben R., Slingerland M., Udo H., Veldkamp C., van de

33. Vijver T., van Wijk M.T. and Windmeijer P. (2008). Competing claims on natural resources:

34. what role for science? Ecology and Society 13 (2): 34.

35. Hall, R. (2010). Two cycles of land policy in South Africa: tracing the contours. In: Anseeuw,

36. W. and Alden, C. (eds). The Struggle over Land in Africa Conflicts, Politics and Change.

37. HSRC Press, Pretoria, pp xx-xx.

38. Hebinck, H. and Shackleton C. (2010). Reforming Land and Resource Use in South Africa.

39. Routledge, London and New York.

40. Hoffman, M.T. and Ashwell A. (2000). Nature divided: land degradation in South Africa.

41. University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town.

42. Hoffman, M.T., Todd S., Ntshona Z. and Turner S. (1999). Land Degradation in South Africa.

43. DEAT, Pretoria.

44. Ibsen, H. (2000). Visions of equity: land reform, environment and gender in post-apartheid

45. South Africa. In: Benjaminsen T.A., Cousins B. and Thompson L. (eds.) Contested Resources:

46. Challenges to the Governance of Natural Resources in South Africa. University of the

47. Western Cape, Bellville: Programme for Land and Agrarian Studies.

48. Jacobs, P. (2003). Support for agricultural development. Programme for Land and Agrarian

49. Studies, School of Government, University of the Western Cape, Bellville.

50. Kakembo, V. and Rowntree K.M. (2003). The relationship between land use and soil erosion

51. in the communal lands near Peddie Town, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Land Degradation

52. and Development 14: 39–49.

53. Lahiff, E. (2008). Land reform in South Africa: a status report 2008. PLAAS Research Report

54. , 49pp. Programme for Land and Agrarian Studies, Bellville.

55. Lemon, A. (2004). Apartheid and capitalism revisited. South African Geographical Journal

56. (2): 1–10.

57. MALA (Ministry of Agriculture and Land Affairs) (2001). Land redistribution for agricultural

58. development: a sub-programme of the land redistribution programme, Pretoria: Ministry

59. of Agriculture and Land Affairs.

60. McCann, J.C. (1999). Green Land, Brown Land, Black Land: an Environmental History of

61. Africa, 1800–1990. Oxford: James Currey.

62. Meadows, M.E. and Hoffman M.T. (2003). Land degradation and climate change in South

63. Africa. The Geographical Journal 169 (2): 168–177.

64. Moseley, W.G. and McCusker B. (2008). Fighting fire with a broken teacup: a comparative

65. analysis of South Africa’s land redistribution program. Geographical Review 98 (3):

66. –3338.

67. Reed, M.S. (and 30 co-authors) (2011). Cross-scale monitoring and assessment of land

68. degradation and sustainable land management: a methodological framework for knowledge

69. management. Land Degradation and Development 22: 261–271.

70. Republic of South Africa, (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 108 of

71. : Government Printer, Pretoria.

72. Seekings, J. and Nattrass N. (2004). The post-apartheid distributional regime. Cape Town:

73. Centre for Social Science Research Working Paper no. 76, University of Cape Town.

74. Shackleton, S., Shackleton C. and Cousins B. (1999). The economic value of land and natural

75. resources to rural livelihoods: case studies from South Africa. Cousins, B. (Ed) At the

76. crossroads: land and agrarian reform in South Africa into the 21st century. Programme for

77. Land and Agrarian Studies and National Land Committee (NLC), University of the Western

78. Cape, Bellville.

79. Thomas, D.S.G. and Middleton N. (1994). Desertification: Exploding the Myth. Chichester,

80. UK: John Wiley.

81. Turner, S. and H. Ibsen (2000). Land and Agrarian Reform in South Africa: a Status Report.

82. University of the Western Cape, Bellville: Programme for Land and Agrarian Studies.

83. UNCCD, (1995). United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in those countries

84. experiencing serious drought and/or desertification particularly Africa. United Nations

85. Environment Programme, Geneva.

86. Wittman, H.W. (2010). Agrarian reform and environment: fostering ecological citizenshop

87. in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Canadian Journal of Development Studies 29 (3–4): 281–298.

88. Wynberg, R.A. and Sowman M.F. (2007). Environmental sustainability and land reform in

89. South Africa: a neglected dimension. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

90. (6): 783–802.


For citation:


Meadows M. CONTEMPORARY LAND REFORM POLICY AND PRACTICE IN SOUTH AFRICA AND ITS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS: NEW IDEAS, OLD PROBLEMS?. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2012;5(4):33-45. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2012-5-4-33-45

Views: 206


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-9388 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1565 (Online)