LAND USE CHANGES IN THE TRANS-BOUNDARY AMUR RIVER BASIN IN THE 20TH CENTURY
https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2013-6-2-4-19
Abstract
About the Authors
Victor ErmoshinRussian Federation
Deputy director, Pacific Institute of Geography, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, 690041, Radio str., 7, Russia
Sergey Ganzey
Russian Federation
Pacific Institute of Geography, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia
Takauyki Shiraiva
Japan
References
1. Anuchin D.N., (1896). East Manchuria. Physical geography I–II, pp. 149–157. (in Russian).
2. Anuchin V.A., (1948). Geographical sketches on Manchuria. Moscow: OGIZ-GeographGIZ,
3. p. (in Russian).
4. Baklanov P., Ganzey S., (2008). Trans-boundary territories: the problems of sustainable
5. nature use. Vladivostok: Dalnauka publishing house, 216 p. (in Russian).
6. Chinese Academy of Science, (2001). The vegetation atlas of China, 1:1,000,000. Beijing:
7. Science Press, 260 p.
8. Ganzei S., Ermoshin V., Mishina N., Shiraiva T. (2007). Current land use in the basin of the
9. Amur River. Geography and natural resources, № 2, pp. 17–25.
10. Ganzei S., Ermoshin V., Mishina N., (2009). The dynamics of land use within the Amur basin
11. in the 20th century. Geography and natural resources. Volume 31. Issue 1, pp. 18–24.
12. Ganzey S., Ermoshin V., Mishina N., (2010). The landscape changes after 1930 using two
13. kinds of Land Use maps (1930 and 2000) // Report on Amur-Okhotsk Project, Report on
14. Amur-Okhotsk Project, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 251–262.
15. Glushakov P.I., (1948). Manchuria. Economic and geographical description. Moscow:
16. OGIZ, 263 p. (in Russian).
17. He F, Ge Q, Dai J, Rao Y, (2008). Forest change of China in recent 300 years. Journal of
18. geographical sciences, 18 (1), pp. 59–72.
19. Himiyama Y., Ito H., Kikuchi T. et al., (1995). Land use in North-East China in the 1930. Report
20. of the Taisetsuzan Institute of Science, 30, pp. 25–35.
21. Himiyama Y., Morishita Y., Arai T., (2002). The use of Japanese topographical maps of
22. Norteast China at 1:50 000 for the LUCC study. Report of the Taisetsuzan Institute of Science,
23. , pp. 107–114.
24. Kachur A., (2001). Diagnostic analysis of the Lake Khanka Basin (People’s Republic of China
25. and Russian Federation). Nairobi: UNEP/CRAES/PGI FEBRAS, 136 p.
26. Karakin V., Sheingauz A., (2004). Land resources of Amur River watershed. Bulletin of the
27. Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 4, pp. 23–37. (in Russian).
28. Korotkii M., (1912). Sketch on vegetation of Zeisko-Bureinskii district of Amurskaya Oblast.
29. In: Works of the Amur Expedition. St. Petersburg, 3 (16), pp. 103–129. (in Russian).
30. Kryukov I.F., (1911). Lands of Amur Railway region. In: Works of the Amur Expedition, Issue
31. III. St. Petersburg, 400 p. (in Russian).
32. Liu Hongyu, Zhang Shikui, Li Zhaofu et al., (2004). Impact on wetlands of large-scale landuse
33. changes by agriculture development: the Small Sanjiang plain, China. Ambio, 33 (6),
34. pp. 306–310.
35. Liverovskii Y., Rubtsova L., (1962). Soil and geographic zoning of Pri-Amurye. Issues of natural
36. zoning of the Soviet Far East in connection with district lay-out. Moscow: Publishing
37. House of the Moscow State University, pp. 149–170. (in Russian).
38. Nakagane K., (1982). Structural changes in agricultural production in China: three Northeastern
39. provinces. The Developing Economies, 20 (4), pp. 414–436.
40. Nikolskaya V., Chichagov V., (1957). About joint researches of the Chinese and Soviet
41. geographers in Amur River watershed. Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Science,
42. Geographical Serials, 2, pp. 166–168. (in Russian).
43. Sheingauz A., (2006). Spatial-temporal changes of intensity of the Russian Far Eastern
44. forest resources’ utilization by timber industry from the middle of the 19th century to the
45. present days. Spatial Economics, 3, pp. 74–91. (in Russian).
46. Sochava V., (1969). Vegetation Map of Amur River Watershed, scale 1:2,500,000. Moscow:
47. The USSR Academy of Science. (in Russian).
48. Tattsenko K., (2006). Tendencies of economic interaction between the Far East of Russia
49. and Northeast China. Vladivostok: Dalnauka publishing house, 216 p. (in Russian).
50. The Mongolian People’s Republic, (1990). The national atlas. Ulan Bator–Moscow, 144 p.
51. Tibekin A, (1989). Management and economics of agriculture in the Far Eastern economical
52. region (1858–1985). Khabarovsk: Publishing house of Khabarovsk, 335 p. (in Russian).
53. Wang Z., Zhang B., Zhang S., Li X., Liu D., Song K., Li J., Duan H., (2006). Changes of land
54. use and of ecosystem service values in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Environment
55. monitoring and assessment, 112 (1–3), pp. 69–91.
56. Yamane M., (2007). Overview of forest degradation and conservation efforts in the Amur
57. River basin in the twentieth century, with a focus on Heilongjiang province, China. Report
58. on Amur–Okhotsk project, 4, pp. 111–122.
Review
For citations:
Ermoshin V., Ganzey S., Shiraiva T. LAND USE CHANGES IN THE TRANS-BOUNDARY AMUR RIVER BASIN IN THE 20TH CENTURY. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2013;6(2):4-19. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2013-6-2-4-19