Advanced search


Full Text:


All distinctions in the economic and nature protection policy of the neighboring states are well reflected and shown within trans-boundary river basins. The parts of trans-boundary geosystem of one country can experience an essential negative influence from rash decisions in the field of nature use and nature protection policy of the neighboring state. The Amur River Basin covers the territories of Russia, the Peoples Republic of China, Mongolia and Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and occupies more than 2 million km2. The most intensive development of the basin territory has started since the middle of the 19th century. We compiled two maps of land use in the Amur River basin in the 1930–1940s and in the early 21st century. Results showed that, negative dynamics is marked for forest lands, meadows, wetlands and mountain tundra. The basic features in the change of land use within national parts of the basin in Russia, China and Mongolia are analyzed. The comparative analysis of land use peculiarities of the countries for the last 70 years has been done.

About the Authors

Victor Ermoshin

Russian Federation
Deputy director, Pacific Institute of Geography, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, 690041, Radio str., 7, Russia

Sergey Ganzey

Russian Federation
Pacific Institute of Geography, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia

Takauyki Shiraiva
Associate Professor, Hokkaido University, Institute of Low Temperature Science, The Pan-Okhotsk Research Center, Sapporo, 060-0819, N19W8, Japan


1. Anuchin D.N., (1896). East Manchuria. Physical geography I–II, pp. 149–157. (in Russian).

2. Anuchin V.A., (1948). Geographical sketches on Manchuria. Moscow: OGIZ-GeographGIZ,

3. p. (in Russian).

4. Baklanov P., Ganzey S., (2008). Trans-boundary territories: the problems of sustainable

5. nature use. Vladivostok: Dalnauka publishing house, 216 p. (in Russian).

6. Chinese Academy of Science, (2001). The vegetation atlas of China, 1:1,000,000. Beijing:

7. Science Press, 260 p.

8. Ganzei S., Ermoshin V., Mishina N., Shiraiva T. (2007). Current land use in the basin of the

9. Amur River. Geography and natural resources, № 2, pp. 17–25.

10. Ganzei S., Ermoshin V., Mishina N., (2009). The dynamics of land use within the Amur basin

11. in the 20th century. Geography and natural resources. Volume 31. Issue 1, pp. 18–24.

12. Ganzey S., Ermoshin V., Mishina N., (2010). The landscape changes after 1930 using two

13. kinds of Land Use maps (1930 and 2000) // Report on Amur-Okhotsk Project, Report on

14. Amur-Okhotsk Project, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 251–262.

15. Glushakov P.I., (1948). Manchuria. Economic and geographical description. Moscow:

16. OGIZ, 263 p. (in Russian).

17. He F, Ge Q, Dai J, Rao Y, (2008). Forest change of China in recent 300 years. Journal of

18. geographical sciences, 18 (1), pp. 59–72.

19. Himiyama Y., Ito H., Kikuchi T. et al., (1995). Land use in North-East China in the 1930. Report

20. of the Taisetsuzan Institute of Science, 30, pp. 25–35.

21. Himiyama Y., Morishita Y., Arai T., (2002). The use of Japanese topographical maps of

22. Norteast China at 1:50 000 for the LUCC study. Report of the Taisetsuzan Institute of Science,

23. , pp. 107–114.

24. Kachur A., (2001). Diagnostic analysis of the Lake Khanka Basin (People’s Republic of China

25. and Russian Federation). Nairobi: UNEP/CRAES/PGI FEBRAS, 136 p.

26. Karakin V., Sheingauz A., (2004). Land resources of Amur River watershed. Bulletin of the

27. Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 4, pp. 23–37. (in Russian).

28. Korotkii M., (1912). Sketch on vegetation of Zeisko-Bureinskii district of Amurskaya Oblast.

29. In: Works of the Amur Expedition. St. Petersburg, 3 (16), pp. 103–129. (in Russian).

30. Kryukov I.F., (1911). Lands of Amur Railway region. In: Works of the Amur Expedition, Issue

31. III. St. Petersburg, 400 p. (in Russian).

32. Liu Hongyu, Zhang Shikui, Li Zhaofu et al., (2004). Impact on wetlands of large-scale landuse

33. changes by agriculture development: the Small Sanjiang plain, China. Ambio, 33 (6),

34. pp. 306–310.

35. Liverovskii Y., Rubtsova L., (1962). Soil and geographic zoning of Pri-Amurye. Issues of natural

36. zoning of the Soviet Far East in connection with district lay-out. Moscow: Publishing

37. House of the Moscow State University, pp. 149–170. (in Russian).

38. Nakagane K., (1982). Structural changes in agricultural production in China: three Northeastern

39. provinces. The Developing Economies, 20 (4), pp. 414–436.

40. Nikolskaya V., Chichagov V., (1957). About joint researches of the Chinese and Soviet

41. geographers in Amur River watershed. Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Science,

42. Geographical Serials, 2, pp. 166–168. (in Russian).

43. Sheingauz A., (2006). Spatial-temporal changes of intensity of the Russian Far Eastern

44. forest resources’ utilization by timber industry from the middle of the 19th century to the

45. present days. Spatial Economics, 3, pp. 74–91. (in Russian).

46. Sochava V., (1969). Vegetation Map of Amur River Watershed, scale 1:2,500,000. Moscow:

47. The USSR Academy of Science. (in Russian).

48. Tattsenko K., (2006). Tendencies of economic interaction between the Far East of Russia

49. and Northeast China. Vladivostok: Dalnauka publishing house, 216 p. (in Russian).

50. The Mongolian People’s Republic, (1990). The national atlas. Ulan Bator–Moscow, 144 p.

51. Tibekin A, (1989). Management and economics of agriculture in the Far Eastern economical

52. region (1858–1985). Khabarovsk: Publishing house of Khabarovsk, 335 p. (in Russian).

53. Wang Z., Zhang B., Zhang S., Li X., Liu D., Song K., Li J., Duan H., (2006). Changes of land

54. use and of ecosystem service values in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Environment

55. monitoring and assessment, 112 (1–3), pp. 69–91.

56. Yamane M., (2007). Overview of forest degradation and conservation efforts in the Amur

57. River basin in the twentieth century, with a focus on Heilongjiang province, China. Report

58. on Amur–Okhotsk project, 4, pp. 111–122.


For citations:


Views: 815

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2071-9388 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1565 (Online)