Advanced search

Urban transformation of a post-soviet coastal city: the case of Saint Petersburg

Full Text:


At the turn of the XX-XXI centuries, post-socialist cities of Europe experienced an active transformation of their socio-demographic and economic structure. A striking feature of post-Soviet cities was the preservation of the disproportionate weight of industry in the economy against the background of a long absence of the real estate market. This phenomenon highlighted the need to solve the problems of socio-economic inequality within the city and restructuring its economy. This is especially true for Russian cities experiencing the shifts in the territorial structure of the population under the influence of transition to market economy, the third industrial revolution and the change of economic- geographical location. This study focuses on identifying trends in the social segmentation of the urban space of St. Petersburg as the second largest city in Russia and a socio-economic center of national importance. The social stratification of the city was studied at the grassroots administrative and territorial level based on the assessment of spatial distribution and the formation of territorial groups of the population with certain qualitative characteristics. The object of the study was 111 municipalities of St. Petersburg. The dynamics of their five most important indicators of demographic, social and economic development in 1989–2018 was analyzed: real estate tax on individuals per capita; the proportion of entrepreneurs; own incomes of municipalities per inhabitant; the proportion of people with an academic degree; cost of housing. Using the rank method, a social welfare rating was compiled. Information for the study was taken from the materials of the general urban planes of St. Petersburg in 1966, 1987 and 2005, the All-Russian population censuses of 2002 and 2010, the databases of the Federal State Statistics Service and the Federal Tax Service, and from the real estate «CIAN» company. The increasing social segregation by income was revealed. The existing differentiation of municipalities in terms of welfare is shown. The poorest are the municipalities of the southern part of the city (Kolpinsky, Nevsky, Krasnoselsky districts and Kronshtadt), while the most prosperous are the municipalities of Petrograd and Central districts, as well as certain territories of the municipal district of Moskovskaya Zastava, the villages of Komarovo, Repino and Solnechnoe.

About the Authors

Dmitry V. Zhitin
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg

Stanislav S. Lachininskii
Saint-Petersburg State University; Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
Russian Federation

St. Petersburg;


Anna A. Mikhaylova
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University; Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University «LETI»
Russian Federation


St. Petersburg

Alexander V. Shendrik
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg


1. Aksenov K., Brade I., Bondarchuk E. (2006). The transformation of urban space in post-Soviet Russia. New York: Routledge.

2. Aksenov K., Krupickaitė D., Morachevskaya K. and Zinovyev A. (2018). Retail sprawl in post-soviet urban residential communities: case studies of Saint-Petersburg and Vilnius. Moravian Geographical Reports, 26(3), 210-219.

3. Aksenov K.E. (2016). Evolution of the types of shopping and spatial organization of retail trade in the post-soviet metropolis. Regional Research of Russia, 6(4), 375-386.

4. Aksenov K.E., Bondarchuk E. and Brade I. (2001). Territorial shift in the tertiary sector in the economy of St.-Petersburg. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk, Seriya Geograficheskaya, 2, 58-70.

5. Anokhin A.A., Lachininskii S.S., Zhitin D.V., Shendrik A.V., Mezhevich N.M. and Krasnov A.I. (2017). Post-Soviet urban environment: the experience of St. Petersburg. Regional Research of Russia, 7(3), 249-258.

6. Bater J.H. (1980). The Soviet city: ideal and reality. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications

7. Bater J.H. and Staples J.R. (2000) Planning for change in Central St. Petersburg. Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, 41(2), 77-97.

8. Berki M. (2014). Return to the road of capitalism: Recapitulating the post-socialist urban transition. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 63 (3), 319-334. DOI: 10.15201/hungeobull.63.3.6.

9. Bertaud A. (2013). The Spatial Structures of Central and Eastern European cities: more European than Socialist? International symposium on post-communist cities the Russian and East European Center (REEC) «Winds of Societal Change: Remaking Post-Communist Cities» [online] Available at: [Accessed 9 March 2016].

10. Borodina T.L. (2017). Regional’nye osobennosti dinamiki naselenija Rossii v postsovetskij period. Izvestija RAN. Ser. Geograficheskaja, 1, 47-61. (In Russian).

11. Brade I., Mahrova A.G., Nefedova T.G. and Trejvish A.I. (2013). Osobennosti suburbanizacii v Moskovskoj aglomeracii v postsovetskij period. Izvestija Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Serija geograficheskaja, 2, 19-29. (In Russian).

12. Bugaev M.A. (2015). Majatnikovye migracii na rynke truda Sankt-Peterburga i Leningradskoj oblasti. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Serija 5. Ekonomika, 4, 86-116. (In Russian).

13. Degusarova V.S., Martynov V.L. and Sazonova I.G. (2018). Geodemography of the Saint Petersburg Suburbs. Baltic region, 10(3), 19-40.

14. Fedorov G.M. and Mikhaylov A.S. (2018). Regional divergence dynamics in the Baltic region: Towards polarisation or equalization? Geographia Polonica, 91(4), 399-411.

15. Hirt S. (2012). Iron Curtains. Gates, Suburbs and Privatization of Space in the Post-Socialist City. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

16. Hodachek A.M. (2017). O Sankt-Peterburgskoj aglomeracii na osnove koncepcii gradostroitel’nogo razvitija. Ekonomika Severo-Zapada: problemy i perspektivy razvitija, 4(1), 35-47. (In Russian).

17. Humphrey C. and Skvirskaja V. (2012). Post-Cosmopolitan Cities: Explorations of Urban Coexistence. New York and Oxford: Berghahn, Guide to Seattle Micro Urbanism. [online] [Accessed 9 March 2019].

18. Keivani R., Parsa A., McGreal S. (2001). Globalization, institutional structures and real estate markets in Central European Cities. Urban Studies, 38(13), 245-2476.

19. Kemper F-J. (1998). Restructuring of housing and ethnic segregation: recent developments in Berlin. Urban Studies, 35(10), 1765-1789.

20. Kenneth J.T. (1985). Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

21. Kirillov P.L. and Mahrova A.G. (2009). Suburbanizacija v Moskovskom stolichnom regione: sovremennoe i perspektivnoe sostojanie. Regional’nye issledovanija, 4(5), 42-54. (In Russian).

22. Kotus J. (2006). Changes in the spatial structure of a large Polish city – The case of Poznan. Cities, 23(5), 364-381.

23. Kryukova O.V., Martynov V.L., Sazonova I.Y. and Polyakova S.D. (2016). Main spatial problems of St. Petersburg. European Journal of Geography, 7(2), 85-95.

24. Kurichev N.K. and Kuricheva E.K. (2018). Vzaimosvjaz’ zhilishhnogo stroitel’stva v Moskovskoj aglomeracii i migracii v stolichnyj region. Izvestija RAN. Ser. Geograficheskaja, 1, 5-20. (In Russian).

25. Mahrova A. and Kirillov P. (2015). Rossijskaja urbanizacija i zhil’e gorozhan. Available at: Accessed: 21.01.2020.

26. Mahrova A.G. (2014). Osobennosti stadijnogo razvitija Moskovskoj aglomeracii. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 5: Geografija, 4, 10- 16. (In Russian).

27. Mahrova A.G. and Golubchikov O.Ju. (2012). Rossijskij gorod v uslovijah kapitalizma: social’naja transformacija vnutrigorodskogo prostranstva. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 5: Geografija, 2, 26-31 (In Russian).

28. Musterd S., Marcińczak S., van Ham M. and Tammaru T. (2017). Socioeconomic segregation in European capital cities: Increasing separation between poor and rich. Urban Geography, 38(7), 1062-1083. DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2016.1228371.

29. Ouředníček M., Temelová J. (2009). Twenty years after socialism: the transformation of Prague’s inner structure. Studia Universitatis BabeşBolyai, Sociologia, 54(1), 9-30.

30. Pacione M., (2005). Urban Geography: A Global Perspective. New York: Routledge.

31. Pavljuk S.G. (2015). Metodika differenciacii gorodskogo prostranstva (na primerah gorodov Rossii, Zapadnoj Evropy i SShA). Regional’nye issledovanija, 2(48), 26-36. (In Russian).

32. Reznikov I.L. (2017). Vyjavlenie granic Sankt-Peterburgskoj gorodskoj aglomeracii. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 62(1), 89-103. (In Russian).

33. Ruble B.A., (1990). Leningrad. Shaping a Soviet City. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

34. Sailer-Fliege U. (1999). Characteristics of post-socialist urban transformation in East Central Europe. GeoJournal, 49(1), 7-16.

35. Smith N. (1996). The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. New York: Routledge.

36. Stanilov K. Ed. (2007). The Post-Socialist City. Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after Socialism. Dordrecht: Springer.

37. Szafranska E. (2015). Transformations of large housing estates in Central and Eastern Europe after the collapse of communism // Geographia Polonica, 88 (4, 621-648.

38. Szafrańska E., Coudroy L. de Lille, Kazimierczak J. (2019). Urban shrinkage and housing in a post socialist city: relationship between the demographic evolution and housing development in Łódź, Poland. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 34(2), 441-464.

39. Vserossijskaja perepis’ naselenija (2010). Itogi. Kaliningradstat. URL: (In Russian).

40. Zhitin D.V. (2015). Prostranstvennaja obuslovlennost’ social’nogo rassloenija naselenija Sankt-Peterburga. Social’no-jekonomicheskaja geografija. Vestnik Associacii rossijskih geografov-obshhestvovedov, 4, 85-102. (In Russian).

41. Zubarevich N.V. (2017). Koncentracija naselenija i jekonomiki v stolicah postsovetskih stran. Regional’nye issledovanija, 1(55), 4-15 (In Russian).

For citation:

Zhitin D.V., Lachininskii S.S., Mikhaylova A.A., Shendrik A.V. Urban transformation of a post-soviet coastal city: the case of Saint Petersburg. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY. 2020;13(1):145-158.

Views: 249

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2071-9388 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1565 (Online)