<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">gesj</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2071-9388</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2542-1565</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Russian Geographical Society</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24057/2071-9388-2025-3561</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">gesj-4138</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>RESEARCH PAPER</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Variation in Cone and Seed Productions of Taurus Cedar (Cedrus Libani A. Rich.) Populations</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title></trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Bilir</surname><given-names>Nebi</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Isparta, 32260 </p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Novikova</surname><given-names>Tatyana P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>8, Timiryazeva str., Voronezh, 394087 </p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Novikov</surname><given-names>Arthur I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>14, Grazhdansky av., Saint-Peterburg, 195220 </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">arthur.novikov@agrophys.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-1"><institution>Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Forestry</institution><country>Turkey</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-2"><institution>Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies named after G.F. Morozov, Faculty of Computer Science and Technology</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-3"><institution>Agrophysical Research Institute</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>07</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>63</fpage><lpage>69</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Bilir N., Novikova T.P., Novikov A.I., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Bilir N., Novikova T.P., Novikov A.I.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Bilir N., Novikova T.P., Novikov A.I.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://ges.rgo.ru/jour/article/view/4138">https://ges.rgo.ru/jour/article/view/4138</self-uri><abstract><p>Reproductive characteristics are important tools for sustainable forestry and to transmit present gene diversity to future generations by forestry practices. Knowledge and estimation of fertility variation and its linkage parameters, such as population size and gene diversity in seed crops calculated by reproductive traits, are used widely because of their many advantages. Forestry practices use estimates of these parameters for various purposes, including natural regeneration, establishment, and management of seed sources.. In this study, cone and seed production and their effect on fertility variation were examined in two natural populations (P1 &amp; P2) of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) sampled from the southern part of Türkiye. Numbers of mature cones, which were two years old and filled with seeds, were counted from fifty trees selected phenotypically from each population in 2023. The averages of cone and seed number were 90 and 33, and 5321 and 3115 per tree in the populations P1 and P2, respectively. Among individuals within a population, and between populations, there were large differences in cone and seed production. The percentages of filled seeds were 94% in P1 and 83% in P2. There were significant differences (p&lt;0.05) between populations in terms of the production and percentage of filled seeds, according to results of analysis of variance. Estimated fertility variations (Ψ&lt;2) were in good accordance with the target (Ψ&lt;3). The effective number of parents ranged from 30.1 (60% of number of individuals) to 41.4 (83%). Besides, data sets can be used to fill the FLR-Library.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>gene diversity</kwd><kwd>population size</kwd><kwd>reproductive</kwd><kwd>sibling coefficient</kwd><kwd>stand</kwd><kwd>FLR-Library</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The synthesis of samples and genetic research was carried out by N.B. The development, conceptualization, and validation of the FLR-model were carried out by T.P.N. and A.I.N. within the framework of the grant from the Russian Science Foundation (RSF), grant number 23-26-00102, https://rscf.ru/project/23-26-00102/.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>C. libani is widely distributed in the Taurus Mountains of southern Türkiye, along with some local populations in the Black Sea region of Türkiye, and there are remaining populations in Lebanon and Syria (Boydak 2003). The species occurs mainly between 800 and 2100 m asl. Taurus cedar also has natural distribution as small populations, groups, or individuals both at 500-600 m and 2400 m as lower and higher altitudes (Boydak 2003; Odabaşı 1990). To improve legibility, replace with: Taurus cedar, which is a remarkable evergreen conifer, can live for up to 1000 years or more, growing into a monumental tree with a 3 m stem diameter and 50 m height (Boydak 2003).. Monoecious Taurus cedar has 3-5 cm male and 1-1.5 cm female strobili with mature cones that are 8-10 cm in length and 4-6 cm in diameter (Boydak 2003; Odabaşı 1990) (Fig. 1).</p><fig id="fig-1"><caption><p>Fig. 1. Male strobili and cones of Taurus cedar</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="gesj-18-2-g001.jpeg"><uri content-type="original_file">https://cdn.elpub.ru/assets/journals/gesj/2025/2/r7Oqus1qRDn2T7bFpuAVlF7sFurA2G7bsBCN3s8V.jpeg</uri></graphic></fig><p>Depending on its elevation, pollination occurs in September or early October. Between April and June of the following year, cone lets develop into mature cones in about 25-26 months after flowering (Evcimen 1963; Bilir, Kang 2021). C. libani is classified as one of the important species ecologically and commercially for Turkish forestry. It is also a target species of the “National Tree Breeding and Seed Production Programme” (Koski, Antola 1993) because of its valuable wood and non-wood products, social-cultural importance for rural area, and adaptation ability to various and changeable ecological conditions such as climate. Taurus cedar is widely used in plantation, afforestation, and other forestry practices such as forest restoration as a natural or exotic species due to these characteristics (Bilir, Kang 2021). Fertility data is one of the important guides to establishing successful plantations in different environmental conditions and to giving future direction to breeding programs and other forestry practices. Fertility is also one of the major tools used for various purposes in theoretical and applied forestry (Griffin 1982; Xie, Knowles 1992; Bila 2000; Kang et al. 2003; Kang, Bilir 2021). However, differences in fertility and related factors have been measured using reproductive features like strobili, cones, flowers, and seeds in different plant species. (Xie, Knowles 1992; Roeder et al. 1989; Savolainen et al. 1993). Although many studies have looked at fertility differences mainly through individual strobili production, there has been very little research on cone and seed production in different plant species like C. libani (i.e., Bilir, Kang 2014; Yazıcı, Bilir 2017; Bilir, Özel 2017; Bilir, Kang 2021; Yazıcı et al. 2023). Additionally, variation in cone and seed production and their fertility in C. libani has not yet been comparatively investigated.</p><p>The importance of both the quantity and quality of seed supply is being understood. Seed procurement and its quality using frontier techniques (Bernardes et al. 2022; Novikova et al. 2022; Novikova et al. 2023; Novikov et al. 2021a; Novikov et al. 2021b; Novikov et al. 2019a, 2019b) is an important stage of the program and practices. It is also known that the quality of genetically improved seed crops, along with other morphological (i.e., grading) and physiological characteristics, is very important for successful forestry practices (Yazıcı et al. 2023) like planting.</p><p>The aims of this study are to estimate variations of cone and seed productions, to calculate the fertility variation and linkage parameters (i.e., population size, gene diversity) in two natural populations of C. libani based on cone and seed productions, and to discuss possible forestry practices of the species.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title></sec><sec><title>Data collection</title><p>Two natural populations of Taurus cedar were sampled in the southern part of Türkiye (Fig. 2, Table 1). Data on the numbers of mature cones, two-years (NC) and filled seeds (NS) were collected from fifty trees selected phenotypically and 100 m apart in 2023. Four cones were harvested from each direction of sampled trees for seed extraction. Extracted seeds were floated to separate empty and filled seeds on water for 12-16 hours. Thereafter, the number of empty and filled seeds was counted (Fig. 3), and the percentage of filled seeds (NS%) was calculated.</p><fig id="fig-2"><caption><p>Fig. 2. Sampled P1 (a) and P2 (b) Taurus cedar populations</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="gesj-18-2-g002.jpeg"><uri content-type="original_file">https://cdn.elpub.ru/assets/journals/gesj/2025/2/KFgt3AhFrf4f1uSBbc7EXiyYmcrfUZY6NueZixjP.jpeg</uri></graphic></fig><table-wrap id="table-1"><caption><p>Table 1. Geographic details of studied Taurus cedar populations</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>Populations</td><td>Age (year)</td><td>Latitude (N)</td><td>Longitude (E)</td><td>Average Altitude (m)</td><td>Aspect</td></tr><tr><td>P1</td><td>60</td><td>38º49'</td><td>30º45’’</td><td>1500</td><td>North</td></tr><tr><td>P2</td><td>120</td><td>37º40’</td><td>30º51’</td><td>1580</td><td>Northwest</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig-3"><caption><p>Fig. 3. Mature cones (a) and filled seeds (b) of the species used in this study</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="gesj-18-2-g003.jpeg"><uri content-type="original_file">https://cdn.elpub.ru/assets/journals/gesj/2025/2/EVHtRbHIbQ3343inDwg4GY5PaWRxsGUvPFYSfl0p.jpeg</uri></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>Data analysis</title><p>The ANOVA-test of the SPSS statistical package (SPSS 2011) was used for analyzing the productivity indicators of cones and seeds in the Taurus cedar populations. If we define the letter l for the number of each surveyed tree, and the letter k for the population number, then the indicator variant is expressed by the symbol Ykl(C) or Ykl(S) for the productivity of cones (C) or productivity of seeds (S), respectively. A variant of the productivity indicator Ykl includes the terms μ+Rl+ekl, denoting for each specific Taurus cedar population k the average value of μ, the random effect of Rl in the k-th population (in this study k=2, the populations were designated as P1 and P2), and the error ekl of determination of the model. Guided by the methodology for calculating the fertility of cones (ΨC) and seed fertility (ΨS), presented by Kang and Lindgren (1999), and Bilir (2011), the fertility of the l-th tree was determined as the proportion of individual cones or individual seeds in the k population. In this case (ΨC) is the sum of one and the square of the coefficient of variation CVCF of the fertility values of cones, and (ΨS) is the sum of one and the square of the coefficient of variation CVS of the fertility values of seeds of each l-th (l = 1...N) tree. Further, as shown in Kang, Lindgren (1998), Park et al. (2017), Genetic Diversity (GD) was calculated as the difference between one (1) and half (1/2) of the Np index characterized by Kang et al. (2003) a quotient of dividing the census number N by the corresponding fertility Ψ.</p></sec><sec><title>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title></sec><sec><title>Cone and seed production</title><p>The averages of cone and seed numbers in P1 and P2 populations were 90 and 33, and 5321 and 3115 per tree, respectively. Averages of cone production were 46 ranging from 19 to 76 for years of pooled aspects (Yazıcı, Bilir 2017), and 20 and 22 in two populations of Taurus cedar (Bilir, Kang 2014). The percentages of filled seeds were 94% and 83% in the populations. Among individual trees within a population and between populations, the numbers of cones, seeds, and filled seeds showed large differences (Table 2). For instance, there were more than twenty times the differences among individuals in both populations for the number of filled seeds (Table 2). Populations had significant differences (p&lt;0.05) for cone and seed production and percentage of filled seeds as shown by results of analysis of variance. The results showed the importance of the selection of individual trees and populations for higher reproductivity. The most productive 10 trees (20% of total trees) produced 40% and 35% of total cone production in P1 and P2, respectively, while the percentages were 48% and 41% for the number of filled seeds in P1 and P2, respectively. Many biotic (i.e., population) and abiotic (i.e., altitude, crown closure) factors could explain these differences (i.e., Bila, Lindgren 1998; Bilir et al. 2005; Yazıcı, Bilir 2017 and 2023; Çatal et al. 2018; Çerçioğlu, Bilir 2018; Kang, Bilir 2021; Yazıcı et al. 2023; Bilir, Yazıcı 2024). Parental-balance curves in the populations were shown by means of cumulative gamete contribution in Fig. 4. In both populations, individual seed productions were much closer to equal contribution than cone production (see Fig. 4). However, forestry practices could balance both characteristics.</p><table-wrap id="table-2"><caption><p>Table 2. Basic statistical values for cone and seed production in the populations</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>Statistics</td><td>P1</td><td>P2</td></tr><tr><td>NC</td><td>NS</td><td>NS%</td><td>NC</td><td>NS</td><td>NS%</td></tr><tr><td>Mean</td><td>90.2</td><td>5320.5</td><td>93.5</td><td>32.9</td><td>3114.9</td><td>83.3</td></tr><tr><td>Range</td><td>20-250</td><td>750-18144</td><td>78.3-99.7</td><td>20-90</td><td>418-9685</td><td>39.5-97.2</td></tr><tr><td>CV%</td><td>60.1</td><td>82.3</td><td>5.2</td><td>46.1</td><td>64.2</td><td>16.9</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig-4"><caption><p>Fig. 4. Parental-balance curves in the P1 (a) and P2 (b) populations</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="gesj-18-2-g004.jpeg"><uri content-type="original_file">https://cdn.elpub.ru/assets/journals/gesj/2025/2/IfvPXkK3k3DrFymIp4z5WhFRBzNdyjJdmO3q5l55.jpeg</uri></graphic></fig><p>Large differences in reproductivity were reported among trees within populations and among populations in Taurus cedar (i.e., Evcimen 1963; Odabaşı 1990; Bilir, Kang 2014; Çatal et al. 2018; Bilir, Kang 2021; Yazıcı, Bilir 2023), and in various plant species (e.g., Shea 1987; Kang et al. 2003; Bilir et al. 2005; Kang, Bilir 2021). Estimated coefficient of variations (CV) of the productions (Table 2) could be acceptable for natural populations CV ≤ 40% (Kang, Bilir 2021).</p><p>The average mature cone number was reported as 21 in the species (Bilir, Kang 2014), while the average cone number was 47 (Yazıcı, Bilir 2017), while the result of the study had higher cone production (Table 2). The results indicated the importance of populations and years in cone production. Good seed years occur once every two to three years, depending on altitude, in natural populations of the species (Boydak 2003). However, the present study had one-year data. Differences in biotic and abiotic characteristics of populations may have an impact on reproductive traits in the natural forest. Also, similar differences were found among individuals in populations regarding cone production and the number of filled seeds in natural populations of Taurus cedar (Evcimen 1963).</p></sec><sec><title>Fertility variation</title><p>Estimations of the cone and seed fertility and linkage parameters were given in Table 3. As seen from Table 3, seed fertility (ΨS) was higher than cone fertility (ΨC) in both populations.</p><table-wrap id="table-3"><caption><p>Table 3. Cone and seed fertility (ΨC &amp; ΨS), effective number of parents (Np(c) &amp; Np(s)) and gene diversity (GD) in the populations</p><p>* relative effective number of parents in the parenthesis.</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td> </td><td>P1</td><td>P2</td></tr><tr><td>NC</td><td>NS</td><td>NC</td><td>NS</td></tr><tr><td>ΨC &amp; ΨS</td><td>1.35</td><td>1.66</td><td>1.21</td><td>1.41</td></tr><tr><td>Np(c) &amp; Np(s)</td><td>36.97 (0.74)*</td><td>30.06 (0.6)</td><td>41.40 (0.83)</td><td>35.41 (0.71)</td></tr><tr><td>GD</td><td>0.987</td><td>0.983</td><td>0.988</td><td>0.986</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Cone and seed fertility variations (ΨC &amp; ΨS) estimated of the proportion of individual production in the population were acceptable for the ideal population suggested for natural stands (Ψ&lt;3) (Kang 2001; Kang, Bilir 2021). Seed fertility (ΨS) was lower than that of cone (ΨC) in both populations (Table 3). Fertility variations varied according to populations, years, and reproductive traits in Taurus cedar (Bilir, Kang 2014 and 2021; Yazıcı, Bilir 2023; Yazıcı et al. 2023).</p><p>The effective number of parents (Np) which a mirror of the fertility variation, ranged from 30.1 (for Ns in P1, for 60% of census number) to 41.4 (for Nc in P2 for 83%) (Table 3). The results of the present study indicated that about 83% of individuals for NC in the P2 behavior are under the ideal population. The size, equivalent to the target populations, was 12% (Nc) larger than Ns in P2. The difference in gene diversity was 0.004 between Nc and Ns (0.987 and 0.983) in P1 (see Table 3). The results indicated the importance of reproductive traits used in the estimations. Gene diversity was higher in P2 than P1 in both traits (see Table 3). However, it could be increased by forestry practices to harvest seed crops that have higher gene diversity for sustainable and adaptable forestry to different environmental conditions such as climate change.</p><p>Various reproductive traits, such as cone, strobili, fruit, and seed production, have been used to estimate fertility variation and linkage parameters in many plant species (Shea 1987; Roeder et al. 1989; Savolainen et al. 1993; Kang 2001; Bilir 2011; Kang, Bilir 2021). However, cone and seed were the last stage of reproductivity after pollination. Furthermore, collecting data on cone and seed production offers numerous advantages over strobilus counts. These advantages include ease of use, lower costs, and greater accuracy due to the longer lifespan and larger size of cones, as highlighted by various studies (Bilir, Kang 2014; Bilir, Kang 2021). The reproductive data for the study belonged to only two populations and one year. Therefore, more data is needed from different populations and years, including good and poor seed years, for estimating fertility variation and linkage parameters in the species.</p><p>The following steps are necessary for the practical application of the data from this study. In the tenth block (Novikova 2022a) (Fig. A.1(b)) of the third group of the FLR-algorithm, the which has six basic groups (Novikova 2022b) (Fig. A.1(a)) on the technological operations of the forest restoration process, it is necessary to additionally include data from this study (Fig. A.1(c)), along with data from a previous study (Yazıcı et al. 2023).</p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSIONS</title><p>Results of the present study belong to one year and a limited area and number of populations of Taurus cedar. Future studies should be carried out to give large conclusions depending on geographic variation in the natural distribution of Taurus cedar. However, results of the study could be used in the local area of the species for different purposes, such as balancing variation in seed crop for higher gene diversity by various forestry practices. Local foresters should observe fertility variation to transmit gene diversity to future generations in an environmentally friendly way.</p></sec><sec><title>APPENDIX A</title><fig id="fig-5"><caption><p>Fig. A.1. FLR-algorithm of the forest restoration technology (A), decomposing of the «Preparation of forest reproductive material» module (B), modification of block III of module 10 (Yazıcı et al. 2023) by evaluation algorithm operators of Taurus cedar cone and seed fertility (C) used in this study. Figures A) and B) are adapted and modified from the paper by co-author T.N. (Novikova 2022a), figure (C) is the T.N.’s own composition</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="gesj-18-2-g005.jpeg"><uri content-type="original_file">https://cdn.elpub.ru/assets/journals/gesj/2025/2/pRBGiR6N8HZsEtvfB498TslMm4hSLfdce8SerOy2.jpeg</uri></graphic></fig></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bernardes R.C., De Medeiros A., da Silva L., Cantoni L., Martins G.F., Mastrangelo T., Novikov A.I. and Mastrangelo C.B. (2022). Deeplearning approach for fusarium head blight detection in Wheat seeds using low-cost imaging technology. Agriculture, 12, 1801. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12111801.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bernardes R.C., De Medeiros A., da Silva L., Cantoni L., Martins G.F., Mastrangelo T., Novikov A.I. and Mastrangelo C.B. (2022). Deeplearning approach for fusarium head blight detection in Wheat seeds using low-cost imaging technology. Agriculture, 12, 1801. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12111801.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bila A.D. (2000). Fertility variation and its effects on gene diversity in forest tree populations [Ph.D. Thesis] Umeå, Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae, Silvestria.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bila A.D. (2000). Fertility variation and its effects on gene diversity in forest tree populations [Ph.D. Thesis] Umeå, Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae, Silvestria.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bila A.D. and Lindgren D. (1998). Fertility variation in Milletia stuhlmannii, Brachystegia spiciformis, Brachystegya bohemii and Leucaena leucocephala and its effects on relatedness in seeds. For. Genet. 5, 119–129.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bila A.D. and Lindgren D. (1998). Fertility variation in Milletia stuhlmannii, Brachystegia spiciformis, Brachystegya bohemii and Leucaena leucocephala and its effects on relatedness in seeds. For. Genet. 5, 119–129.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bilir N. (1997). Nursery stage of provanence on Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich) in Eastern Black Sea region [MSc. Thesis] Trabzon, Türkiye, Black Sea Technical University.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bilir N. (1997). Nursery stage of provanence on Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich) in Eastern Black Sea region [MSc. Thesis] Trabzon, Türkiye, Black Sea Technical University.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bilir N., Kang K.-S. and Lindgren D. (2005). Fertility variation in six populations of Brutian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) over altitudinal ranges. Euphytica, 141, 163-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-6803-6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bilir N., Kang K.-S. and Lindgren D. (2005). Fertility variation in six populations of Brutian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) over altitudinal ranges. Euphytica, 141, 163-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-6803-6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bilir N., Prescher F., Lindgren D. and Kroon J. (2008) Variation in cone and seed characters in clonal seed orchards of Pinus sylvestris. New Forests, 36, 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-008-9092-9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bilir N., Prescher F., Lindgren D. and Kroon J. (2008) Variation in cone and seed characters in clonal seed orchards of Pinus sylvestris. New Forests, 36, 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-008-9092-9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bilir N. (2011). Fertility variation in wild rose (Rosa canina) over habitat classes. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 13, 110–114.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bilir N. (2011). Fertility variation in wild rose (Rosa canina) over habitat classes. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 13, 110–114.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bilir N. and Kang K.-S. (2014). Estimation of fertility variation by strobili and cone productions in Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) populations. In: Proceedings of the Proceedings of the IUFRO Forest Tree Breeding Conference; Prague, Czech Republic, 25-29 August, 2014.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bilir N. and Kang K.-S. (2014). Estimation of fertility variation by strobili and cone productions in Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) populations. In: Proceedings of the Proceedings of the IUFRO Forest Tree Breeding Conference; Prague, Czech Republic, 25-29 August, 2014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bilir N. and Özel H.B. (2017). Fertility variation in a natural stand of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.). In: Proceedings of the International Forestry and Environment Symposium (IFES); Trabzon, Türkiye, 7-10 November, 2017.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bilir N. and Özel H.B. (2017). Fertility variation in a natural stand of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.). In: Proceedings of the International Forestry and Environment Symposium (IFES); Trabzon, Türkiye, 7-10 November, 2017.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bilir N. and Kang K.-S. (2021). Fertility variation, seed collection and gene diversity in natural stands of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani). Eur. J. For. Res., 140, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-020-01324-1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bilir N. and Kang K.-S. (2021). Fertility variation, seed collection and gene diversity in natural stands of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani). Eur. J. For. Res., 140, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-020-01324-1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bilir N. and Yazıcı N. (2024). Effects of climatic factors on strobilus production of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) populations. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 155, 2151–2159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-023-04754-0</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bilir N. and Yazıcı N. (2024). Effects of climatic factors on strobilus production of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) populations. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 155, 2151–2159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-023-04754-0</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boydak M. (2003). Regeneration of Lebanon cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) on karstic lands in Türkiye. For. Ecol. Manage, 178, 231-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00539-X.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boydak M. (2003). Regeneration of Lebanon cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) on karstic lands in Türkiye. For. Ecol. Manage, 178, 231-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00539-X.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Çatal, Y., Bilir N. and Özel H.B. (2018). Effect of growth characteristics on cone and seed production in Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.). Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 27, 3832-3836.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Çatal, Y., Bilir N. and Özel H.B. (2018). Effect of growth characteristics on cone and seed production in Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.). Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 27, 3832-3836.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Çerçioğlu M. and Bilir N. (2018). Altitudinal fertility variation in natural populations of Anatolian black pine [Pinus nigra Arnold. Subsp. pallasiana (Lamb.) Holmboe]. Human Journals, 4(8), 136-142.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Çerçioğlu M. and Bilir N. (2018). Altitudinal fertility variation in natural populations of Anatolian black pine [Pinus nigra Arnold. Subsp. pallasiana (Lamb.) Holmboe]. Human Journals, 4(8), 136-142.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eler U. (1990). Seed yield in Calabrian cluster pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) by age. In Forest Research Institute, Technical Bulletin; Forest Research Institute: Antalya. Türkiye, 53–78. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14061130.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eler U. (1990). Seed yield in Calabrian cluster pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) by age. In Forest Research Institute, Technical Bulletin; Forest Research Institute: Antalya. Türkiye, 53–78. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14061130.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Evcimen B.S (1963). Commercial importance and management of Turkish Taurus cedar. Ankara, Türkiye, General Directorate of Forestry Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Evcimen B.S (1963). Commercial importance and management of Turkish Taurus cedar. Ankara, Türkiye, General Directorate of Forestry Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Griffin A.R. (1982). Clonal variation in radiata pine seed orchards. I. Some flowering, cone, and seed production traits. Australian Forest Research, 12, 4, 295-302.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Griffin A.R. (1982). Clonal variation in radiata pine seed orchards. I. Some flowering, cone, and seed production traits. Australian Forest Research, 12, 4, 295-302.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kamalakannan R., Varghese M., Park J.-M., Kwon S-H., Song J.-H. and Kang K.-S. (2015). Fertility variation and its impact on effective population size in seed stands of Tamarindus indica and Azadirachta indica. Silvae Genet., 64, 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2015-0008.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kamalakannan R., Varghese M., Park J.-M., Kwon S-H., Song J.-H. and Kang K.-S. (2015). Fertility variation and its impact on effective population size in seed stands of Tamarindus indica and Azadirachta indica. Silvae Genet., 64, 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2015-0008.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kang K.-S. and Lindgren D. (1998). Fertility variation and its effect on the relatedness of seeds in Pinus densiflora, Pinus thunbergii and Pinus koraiensis clonal seed orchards. Silvae Genet., 47, 196–201.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kang K.-S. and Lindgren D. (1998). Fertility variation and its effect on the relatedness of seeds in Pinus densiflora, Pinus thunbergii and Pinus koraiensis clonal seed orchards. Silvae Genet., 47, 196–201.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kang K.-S. and Lindgren D. (1999). Fertility variation among clones of Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis S. et Z.) and its implications on seed orchard management. For Genet 6:191–200.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kang K.-S. and Lindgren D. (1999). Fertility variation among clones of Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis S. et Z.) and its implications on seed orchard management. For Genet 6:191–200.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kang K.-S. (2001). Genetic gain and gene diversity of seed orchard crops [PhD Thesis], Umeå, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural Science.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kang K.-S. (2001). Genetic gain and gene diversity of seed orchard crops [PhD Thesis], Umeå, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural Science.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kang K.-S., Bila A.D., Harju A.M. and Lindgren D. (2003). Estimation of fertility variation in forest tree populations. Forestry, 76, 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/76.3.329.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kang K.-S., Bila A.D., Harju A.M. and Lindgren D. (2003). Estimation of fertility variation in forest tree populations. Forestry, 76, 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/76.3.329.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kang K.-S. and Bilir N. (2021). Seed orchards (Establishment, Management and Genetics. Ankara, Türkiye, OGEM-VAK Press, 189.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kang K.-S. and Bilir N. (2021). Seed orchards (Establishment, Management and Genetics. Ankara, Türkiye, OGEM-VAK Press, 189.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Koski V. and Antola J. (1993). National tree breeding and seed production programme for Türkiye 1994-2003. [online] Available at: https://ortohum.ogm.gov.tr [accessed on May 12, 2024].</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Koski V. and Antola J. (1993). National tree breeding and seed production programme for Türkiye 1994-2003. [online] Available at: https://ortohum.ogm.gov.tr [accessed on May 12, 2024].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Novikov A.I., Sokolov S.V., Drapalyuk M.V., Zelikov V.A. and Ivetić V. (2019a). Performance of Scots pine seedlings from seeds graded by colour. Forests, 10, 1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10121064.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Novikov A.I., Sokolov S.V., Drapalyuk M.V., Zelikov V.A. and Ivetić V. (2019a). Performance of Scots pine seedlings from seeds graded by colour. Forests, 10, 1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10121064.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Novikov A., Ivetić V., Novikova T., Petrishchev E. (2019b). Scots pine seedlings growth dynamics data reveals properties for the future proof of seed coat color grading conjecture. Data, 4(3), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/data4030106.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Novikov A., Ivetić V., Novikova T., Petrishchev E. (2019b). Scots pine seedlings growth dynamics data reveals properties for the future proof of seed coat color grading conjecture. Data, 4(3), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/data4030106.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Novikov A.I., Zolnikov V.K. and Novikova T.P. (2021a) Grading of Scots pine seeds by the seed coat color: how to optimize the engineering parameters of the mobile optoelectronic device. Inventions, 6, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions6010007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Novikov A.I., Zolnikov V.K. and Novikova T.P. (2021a) Grading of Scots pine seeds by the seed coat color: how to optimize the engineering parameters of the mobile optoelectronic device. Inventions, 6, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions6010007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Novikov A.I., Lisitsyn V.I., Tigabu M., Tylek P. and Chuchupal S. (2021b) Detection of Scots pine single seed in optoelectronic system of mobile grader: mathematical modeling. Forests, 12, 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020240.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Novikov A.I., Lisitsyn V.I., Tigabu M., Tylek P. and Chuchupal S. (2021b) Detection of Scots pine single seed in optoelectronic system of mobile grader: mathematical modeling. Forests, 12, 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020240.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Novikova T.P., Mastrangelo C.B., Tylek P., Evdokimova S.A. and Novikov A.I. (2022). How can the engineering parameters of the NIR grader affect the efficiency of seed grading? Agriculture, 12, 2125. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122125.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Novikova T.P., Mastrangelo C.B., Tylek P., Evdokimova S.A. and Novikov A.I. (2022). How can the engineering parameters of the NIR grader affect the efficiency of seed grading? Agriculture, 12, 2125. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122125.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Novikova T.P. (2022a). Study of a set of technological operations for the preparation of coniferous seed material for reforestation. Forestry Engineering Journal, 11, 150-160. https://doi.org/10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2021.4/13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Novikova T.P. (2022a). Study of a set of technological operations for the preparation of coniferous seed material for reforestation. Forestry Engineering Journal, 11, 150-160. https://doi.org/10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2021.4/13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Novikova T.P. (2022b). The choice of a set of operations for forest landscape restoration technology. Inventions, 7, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions7010001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Novikova T.P. (2022b). The choice of a set of operations for forest landscape restoration technology. Inventions, 7, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions7010001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Novikova T.P., Tylek P., Mastrangelo C.B., Drapalyuk M.V., Kharin S.V. and Novikov A.I. (2023). The root collar diameter growth reveals a strong relationship with the height growth of juvenile scoots pine trees from seeds differentiated by spectrometric feature. Forests, 14, 1164. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14061164.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Novikova T.P., Tylek P., Mastrangelo C.B., Drapalyuk M.V., Kharin S.V. and Novikov A.I. (2023). The root collar diameter growth reveals a strong relationship with the height growth of juvenile scoots pine trees from seeds differentiated by spectrometric feature. Forests, 14, 1164. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14061164.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Odabaşı T. (1990). Research on cone and seed characteristics of Cedrus libani. [online] Available at: https://www.ogm.gov.tr [accessed on Jun 12, 2024].</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Odabaşı T. (1990). Research on cone and seed characteristics of Cedrus libani. [online] Available at: https://www.ogm.gov.tr [accessed on Jun 12, 2024].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Park J.M., Kwon S.H., Lee H.J., Na S.J., El-Kassaby Y.A. and Kang K.-S. (2017). Integrating fecundity variation and genetic relatedness in estimating the gene diversity of seed crops: Pinus koraiensis seed Orchard as an example. Can. J. For. Res., 47, 366-370. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2016-0223.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Park J.M., Kwon S.H., Lee H.J., Na S.J., El-Kassaby Y.A. and Kang K.-S. (2017). Integrating fecundity variation and genetic relatedness in estimating the gene diversity of seed crops: Pinus koraiensis seed Orchard as an example. Can. J. For. Res., 47, 366-370. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2016-0223.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Roeder K., Devlin B., Lindsay B.G. (1989). Application of maximum likelihood methods to population genetic data for the estimation of individual fertilities. Biometrics, 45, 363-379. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531483.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Roeder K., Devlin B., Lindsay B.G. (1989). Application of maximum likelihood methods to population genetic data for the estimation of individual fertilities. Biometrics, 45, 363-379. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531483.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Savolainen O., Karkkainen K., Harju A., Nikkanen T. and Rusanen M. (1993). Fertility variation in Pinus sylvestris: a test of sexual allocation theory. Am. J. Bot., 80, 1016-1020. https://doi.org/10.2307/2445748.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Savolainen O., Karkkainen K., Harju A., Nikkanen T. and Rusanen M. (1993). Fertility variation in Pinus sylvestris: a test of sexual allocation theory. Am. J. Bot., 80, 1016-1020. https://doi.org/10.2307/2445748.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shea K.L. (1987). Effects of population structure and cone production on out crossing rates in Engelmann spruce and Subalpine fir. Evolution, 41, 124-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/2445748.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shea K.L. (1987). Effects of population structure and cone production on out crossing rates in Engelmann spruce and Subalpine fir. Evolution, 41, 124-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/2445748.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">SPSS (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0., NY: IBM Corp.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">SPSS (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0., NY: IBM Corp.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yazıcı N. and Bilir N. (2017). Aspectual fertility variation and its effect on gene diversity of seeds in natural stands of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.). Int. J. Genomics, 2960624, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2960624.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yazıcı N. and Bilir N. (2017). Aspectual fertility variation and its effect on gene diversity of seeds in natural stands of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.). Int. J. Genomics, 2960624, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2960624.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yazıcı N. and Bilir N. (2023). Impact of crown closure on cone production and effective number of parents in natural stands of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.). Forests, 14, 1130. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14061130.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yazıcı N. and Bilir N. (2023). Impact of crown closure on cone production and effective number of parents in natural stands of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.). Forests, 14, 1130. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14061130.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yazıcı N., Novikova T.P., Novikov A.I., Bilir N. (2023). Gene diversity in seed crop of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) over an altitudinal range. Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 16, 4, 63-71. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2023-2922.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yazıcı N., Novikova T.P., Novikov A.I., Bilir N. (2023). Gene diversity in seed crop of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) over an altitudinal range. Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 16, 4, 63-71. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2023-2922.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Xie C.Y. and Knowles P. (1992). Male fertility variation in an open-pollinated plantation of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 22, 1463-1468. https://doi.org/10.1139/x92-196.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Xie C.Y. and Knowles P. (1992). Male fertility variation in an open-pollinated plantation of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 22, 1463-1468. https://doi.org/10.1139/x92-196.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
