gesjGEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITYGEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY2071-93882542-1565Russian Geographical Society10.24057/2071-9388-2019-69gesj-899Research ArticleSPECIAL ISSUE "Urban environmental geography: Mosсow and other megacities"Current Trends in Moscow Settlement Pattern Development: A Multiscale ApproachKirillovPavel L.

Leninskie Gory 1, Moscow, 119991

MakhrovaAlla G.

Leninskie Gory 1, Moscow, 119991

NefedovaTatiana G.

Staromonetniy pereulok 29, Moscow, 119017

trene12@igras.ruLomonosov Moscow State UniversityRussian FederationInstitute of Geography, Russian Academy of SciencesRussian Federation201930122019124623Copyright © Kirillov P.L., Makhrova A.G., Nefedova T.G., 20192019Kirillov P.L., Makhrova A.G., Nefedova T.G.Kirillov P.L., Makhrova A.G., Nefedova T.G.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://ges.rgo.ru/jour/article/view/899

The article studies current trends in Moscow population in context of socio- economic polarization strengthening between the capital city and other regions of the country. The study applies multiscale approach covering Moscow influence on Central Russia and other regions, interaction with the Moscow oblast and the level of internal population distribution within Moscow and particular settlements and villages in New Moscow territories. The gap in development is significantly noticeable for expanding Moscow and Moscow oblast against the background of depopulation in Central Russia regions and cities. Within the boundaries of Moscow the continuing model of extensive spatial growth of population has led to the most rapid growth of its periphery zone. Areas similar to bedroom communities in Old Moscow are forming in the municipalities of New Moscow located along the Moscow ring road (MKAD) and main radial highways, while large part of the new territories remain a typical countryside with villages and summer residents. Analysis of New Moscow suburban areas reveals the actual land use mosaics obscured by the official delimitation of Moscow and Moscow oblast and the formal division of population into urban and rural.

populationMoscowMoscow regionCentral RussiaWithin the framework of this paper, sections 2 and 5 were written by T.G. Nefedova under the project of the Russian Science Foundation of the Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences no. 19-17-00174 “Early Developed Regions under Socio-Economic Polarization and Shrinkage of the Active Areas in European Russia”. Sections 4 was written by A.G. Makhrova under the project supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, no. 17-06-00396 “Social and Natural–Ecological Factors of the Urbanization/Deurbanization Process in Modern Russia (Interdisciplinary Macro- and Microanalysis).”ReferencesAll-Russian agricultural census of 2016, (2017). Vol. 2. Moscow: Statistics of Russia. (in Russian).All-Russian agricultural census of 2016, (2017). Vol. 2. Moscow: Statistics of Russia. (in Russian).Argenbright R. (2013). Moscow on the Rise: From Primate City to Megaregion. The Geographical Review, 103 (1), pp. 20-36.Argenbright R. (2013). Moscow on the Rise: From Primate City to Megaregion. The Geographical Review, 103 (1), pp. 20-36.Argenbright R. (2016). Moscow under Construction: City-Building, Place-Based Protest, and Civil Society. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Argenbright R. (2016). Moscow under Construction: City-Building, Place-Based Protest, and Civil Society. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Argenbright R. (2018). The evolution of New Moscow: from panacea to polycentricity. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 59 (3-4), pp. 408-435.Argenbright R. (2018). The evolution of New Moscow: from panacea to polycentricity. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 59 (3-4), pp. 408-435.Between Home and …. Home. The Return Spatial Mobility of Population in Russia (2016). Ed.: Nefedova, T.G., Averkieva, K.V. and Makhrova, A.G. Moscow: Novyi Khronograf (in Russian). http://ekonom.igras.ru/data/bhah2016.pdf.Between Home and …. Home. The Return Spatial Mobility of Population in Russia (2016). Ed.: Nefedova, T.G., Averkieva, K.V. and Makhrova, A.G. Moscow: Novyi Khronograf (in Russian). http://ekonom.igras.ru/data/bhah2016.pdf.Brade I., Makhrova A. and Nefedova T. (2014). Suburbanization of Moscow s Urban Region. Confronting Suburbanization: Urban Decentralization in Postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe. Edited by K. Stanilov and L. Sykora. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 97-132.Brade I., Makhrova A. and Nefedova T. (2014). Suburbanization of Moscow s Urban Region. Confronting Suburbanization: Urban Decentralization in Postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe. Edited by K. Stanilov and L. Sykora. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 97-132.Büdenbender M. and Zupan D. (2017). The Evolution of Neoliberal Urbanism in Moscow, 1992-2015. Antipode, 49(2), pp. 294-313.Büdenbender M. and Zupan D. (2017). The Evolution of Neoliberal Urbanism in Moscow, 1992-2015. Antipode, 49(2), pp. 294-313.Cox W. (2012). The Evolving Urban Form: Moscow's Auto-Oriented Expansion. New Geography. 22/02. [online]. Available http://www.newgeography.com/content/002682-the-evolving-urban-form-moscows-auto-oriented-expansion. [Accessed 1 September 2017].Cox W. (2012). The Evolving Urban Form: Moscow's Auto-Oriented Expansion. New Geography. 22/02. [online]. Available http://www.newgeography.com/content/002682-the-evolving-urban-form-moscows-auto-oriented-expansion. [Accessed 1 September 2017].Ferencuhova S., Gentele M. (2016). Introduction: Post-Socialist cities and urban theory. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57 (4-5), pp. 483-496.Ferencuhova S., Gentele M. (2016). Introduction: Post-Socialist cities and urban theory. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57 (4-5), pp. 483-496.Fet A. (First published: 1871). Stepanovka's Life, or Lyrical economy. Zarya, 6, pp. 3-86 (in Russian). http://ruslit.traumlibrary.net/book/fet-stepanovka/fet-stepanovka.html#work007Fet A. (First published: 1871). Stepanovka's Life, or Lyrical economy. Zarya, 6, pp. 3-86 (in Russian). http://ruslit.traumlibrary.net/book/fet-stepanovka/fet-stepanovka.html#work007Golubchikov O., Badyina A. and Makhrova A. (2014). The Hybrid Spatialities of Transition: Capitalism, Legacy and Uneven Urban Economic Restructuring. Urban Studies, 51(4), pp. 617-633. DOI: 10.1177/0042098013493022Golubchikov O., Badyina A. and Makhrova A. (2014). The Hybrid Spatialities of Transition: Capitalism, Legacy and Uneven Urban Economic Restructuring. Urban Studies, 51(4), pp. 617-633. DOI: 10.1177/0042098013493022Golubchikov O. (2016). The urbanization of transition: ideology and the urban experience. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57 (4-5), pp. 607-623.Golubchikov O. (2016). The urbanization of transition: ideology and the urban experience. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57 (4-5), pp. 607-623.How to build the New Moscow, (2015). Ed. G. Revzin. Part 2. Moscow: Strelka. (in Russian) [online] Available at: http://2016.mosurbanforum.ru/files/2015/issledovanie/1504_new_moscow_book_part_2.pdf [Accessed 20 January 2018]. (in Russian).How to build the New Moscow, (2015). Ed. G. Revzin. Part 2. Moscow: Strelka. (in Russian) [online] Available at: http://2016.mosurbanforum.ru/files/2015/issledovanie/1504_new_moscow_book_part_2.pdf [Accessed 20 January 2018]. (in Russian).Immigrants in Moscow, (2009). Ed. J. A. Zaionchkovskaya. Moscow: Kennan Institute (in Russian).Immigrants in Moscow, (2009). Ed. J. A. Zaionchkovskaya. Moscow: Kennan Institute (in Russian).Jacobs J. (2011). Death and life of big cities. Moscow: New publishing house (in Russian).Jacobs J. (2011). Death and life of big cities. Moscow: New publishing house (in Russian).Kashnitsky I. and Gunko M. (2016). Spatial variation of in-migration to Moscow: testing the effect of housing market. Cities, 59, pp. 30-39.Kashnitsky I. and Gunko M. (2016). Spatial variation of in-migration to Moscow: testing the effect of housing market. Cities, 59, pp. 30-39.Kolossov V., Vendina O. and O'Loughlin J. (2002). Moscow as an emergent word city: international links, business development, and the entrepreneurial city. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 43 (3), pp. 170-196.Kolossov V., Vendina O. and O'Loughlin J. (2002). Moscow as an emergent word city: international links, business development, and the entrepreneurial city. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 43 (3), pp. 170-196.Kolosov V. (2013). Will city limits expansion solve Moscow’s problems? Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 3, pp. 3-8.Kolosov V. (2013). Will city limits expansion solve Moscow’s problems? Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 3, pp. 3-8.Kurichev N. and Kuricheva E. (2018). Relationship of Housing Construction in the Moscow Urban Agglomeration and Migration to the Metropolitan Area. Regional Research of Russia, 8 (1), pp. 1–15.Kurichev N. and Kuricheva E. (2018). Relationship of Housing Construction in the Moscow Urban Agglomeration and Migration to the Metropolitan Area. Regional Research of Russia, 8 (1), pp. 1–15.Kuricheva E.K. (2017). Housing construction in Moscow agglomeration: spatial consequences. Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 5. Geogr. ;(3), pp. 87-90. (In Russian with English abstract)Kuricheva E.K. (2017). Housing construction in Moscow agglomeration: spatial consequences. Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 5. Geogr. ;(3), pp. 87-90. (In Russian with English abstract)List of settlements that became part of Moscow on July 1, 2012. (2012). (in Russian) [online]. Available at: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki_spisok_naselennyh_punktov_voshedshih_v_sostav_moskvy_1_iyulya_2012#cite_note-MosObl-1 [Accessed 15 January 2018]List of settlements that became part of Moscow on July 1, 2012. (2012). (in Russian) [online]. Available at: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki_spisok_naselennyh_punktov_voshedshih_v_sostav_moskvy_1_iyulya_2012#cite_note-MosObl-1 [Accessed 15 January 2018]Makhrova A. and Babkin R. (2018). Analysis of Moscow agglomeration settlement system pulsations based mobile operators data. Regional Research of Russia, 2 (60), pp. 68–78. (in Russian).Makhrova A. and Babkin R. (2018). Analysis of Moscow agglomeration settlement system pulsations based mobile operators data. Regional Research of Russia, 2 (60), pp. 68–78. (in Russian).Makhrova A., Kirillov P. and Bochkarev A. (2017). Work Commuting of the Population in the Moscow Agglomeration: Estimating Commuting Flows Using Mobile Operator Data. Regional Research of Russia, 7(1), pp. 36-44. 10.1134/S2079970517010051Makhrova A., Kirillov P. and Bochkarev A. (2017). Work Commuting of the Population in the Moscow Agglomeration: Estimating Commuting Flows Using Mobile Operator Data. Regional Research of Russia, 7(1), pp. 36-44. 10.1134/S2079970517010051Makhrova A., Nefedova T. and Treivish A. (2013). Moscow Agglomeration and ‘New Moscow’: The Capital City-region Case of Russia’s Urbanization. Regional Research of Russia, 3, pp. 131-141. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970513020081.Makhrova A., Nefedova T. and Treivish A. (2013). Moscow Agglomeration and ‘New Moscow’: The Capital City-region Case of Russia’s Urbanization. Regional Research of Russia, 3, pp. 131-141. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970513020081.Makhrova A., Nefedova T. and Treyvish A. (2016). Central Russian megalopolis: space polarization and population mobility. Vestnik Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5, 2, pp. 64–74 (in Russian).Makhrova A., Nefedova T. and Treyvish A. (2016). Central Russian megalopolis: space polarization and population mobility. Vestnik Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5, 2, pp. 64–74 (in Russian).Mkrtchyan N. (2011). Population dynamics in Russian regions and the role of migration: a critical assessment based on the 2002 and 2010 censuses. Izvestiya of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5, pp. 28-41 (in Russian).Mkrtchyan N. (2011). Population dynamics in Russian regions and the role of migration: a critical assessment based on the 2002 and 2010 censuses. Izvestiya of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5, pp. 28-41 (in Russian).Nefedova T. (2018). New Moscow outside its towns. Old and New Moscow: the trends and problems of development. Moscow: Russian Geographical Society, pp.184-219 (in Russian).Nefedova T. (2018). New Moscow outside its towns. Old and New Moscow: the trends and problems of development. Moscow: Russian Geographical Society, pp.184-219 (in Russian).New Moscow: how the new territories have changed in five years, (2017). PBC June 30. (in Russian) [online]. Available at: https://realty.rbc.ru/news/5956020a9a7947724f9d14e6 [Accessed 30 January 2018].New Moscow: how the new territories have changed in five years, (2017). PBC June 30. (in Russian) [online]. Available at: https://realty.rbc.ru/news/5956020a9a7947724f9d14e6 [Accessed 30 January 2018].Shuper V. and Em P. (2013). Moscow city expansion: an alternative based on central place theory. Regional Research of Russia 3(4), pp. 376-385.Shuper V. and Em P. (2013). Moscow city expansion: an alternative based on central place theory. Regional Research of Russia 3(4), pp. 376-385.Todd M. (2018). The political geographies of religious sites in Moscow’s neighborhoods. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 58 (6), pp. 642-669.Todd M. (2018). The political geographies of religious sites in Moscow’s neighborhoods. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 58 (6), pp. 642-669.Vendina O. (2005). Migrants in Moscow: is Moscow beading forwards ethnic segregation. Migration segregation in regions of Russia. Vol. 3. Moscow: Migration Research Center. (in Russian).Vendina O. (2005). Migrants in Moscow: is Moscow beading forwards ethnic segregation. Migration segregation in regions of Russia. Vol. 3. Moscow: Migration Research Center. (in Russian).Zubarevich N. (2018). Economic and budgetary advantages of Moscow: how they are formed and used. Old and New Moscow: the trends and problems of development. Moscow: Russian Geographical Society, pp. 25-37 (in Russian).Zubarevich N. (2018). Economic and budgetary advantages of Moscow: how they are formed and used. Old and New Moscow: the trends and problems of development. Moscow: Russian Geographical Society, pp. 25-37 (in Russian).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.