gesjGEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITYGEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY2071-93882542-1565Russian Geographical Society10.24057/2071-9388-2018-11-1-74-84gesj-382Research ArticleENVIRONMENTОкружающая средаCLEAR-SKY RADIATIVE AND TEMPERATURE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT AEROSOL CLIMATOLOGIES IN THE COSMO MODELChubarovaNatalianatalia.chubarova@gmail.comPoliukhovAlekseiShatunovaMarinaRivinGdaliyBeckerRalfKinneStefanLomonosov Moscow State UniversityRussian FederationLomonosov Moscow State University; Hydrometeorological Centre of RussiaRussian FederationHydrometeorological Centre of RussiaRussian FederationDeutscher Wetterdienst, Meteorologisches Observatorium Lindenberg/MarkGermanyMax Planck Institute for MeteorologyGermany2018310320181117484Copyright © Chubarova N., Poliukhov A., Shatunova M., Rivin G., Becker R., Kinne S., 20182018Chubarova N., Poliukhov A., Shatunova M., Rivin G., Becker R., Kinne S.Chubarova N., Poliukhov A., Shatunova M., Rivin G., Becker R., Kinne S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://ges.rgo.ru/jour/article/view/382

We estimated the effects of the different aerosol climatologies in the COSMO mesoscale atmospheric model using long-term aerosol measurements and the accurate global solar irradiance observations at ground at the Moscow State University Meteorological Observatory (Russia) and Lindenberg Observatory (Germany) in clear sky conditions. The differences in aerosol properties have been detected especially during winter months. There is a better agreement of MACv2 aerosol climatology with measurements forMoscowconditions compared with Tegen aerosol climatology. However, we still have a systematical negative bias of about 2-3% in global solar irradiance at ground for both sites. A noticeable sensitivity of air temperature at2 metersto the net radiation changes of about1°Cper 100 Wm-2 due to aerosol has been evaluated, which approximately is around -0.2 – -0.3°C, when accounting for real aerosol properties.

aerosolradiative processesCOSMO modelaerosol climatologiestemperature effectsAERONETReferencesBoucher O., Randall D., Artaxo P., Bretherton C., Feingold G., Forster P., Kerminen V.-M., Kondo Y., Liao H., Lohmann U., Rasch P., Satheesh S.K., Sherwood S., Stevens B., and Zhang X.Y. (2013). Clouds and Aerosols. In:T.FStocker, ed.,ClimateChange 2013:The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change1st ed. New York, Cambridge University Press, pp 571-659.Boucher O., Randall D., Artaxo P., Bretherton C., Feingold G., Forster P., Kerminen V.-M., Kondo Y., Liao H., Lohmann U., Rasch P., Satheesh S.K., Sherwood S., Stevens B., and Zhang X.Y. (2013). Clouds and Aerosols. In:T.FStocker, ed.,ClimateChange 2013:The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change1st ed. New York, Cambridge University Press, pp 571-659.Chubarova N. Y., Poliukhov A. A., and Gorlova I. D. (2016). Long-term variability of aerosol optical thickness in Eastern Europe over 2001–2014 according to the measurements at the Moscow MSU MO AERONET site with additional cloud and NO 2 correction. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 9(2), pp. 313-334.Chubarova N. Y., Poliukhov A. A., and Gorlova I. D. (2016). Long-term variability of aerosol optical thickness in Eastern Europe over 2001–2014 according to the measurements at the Moscow MSU MO AERONET site with additional cloud and NO 2 correction. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 9(2), pp. 313-334.Doms G. and Baldauf M. (2011a). A Description of the Nonhydrostatic Regional COSMO model. Part I: Dynamics and Numerics. Consortium for Small-Scale Modelling, Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD).Doms G. and Baldauf M. (2011a). A Description of the Nonhydrostatic Regional COSMO model. Part I: Dynamics and Numerics. Consortium for Small-Scale Modelling, Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD).Doms G., Foerstner J., Heise E., Herzog H.-J., Mironov D., Raschendorfer M., Reinhardt T., Ritter B., Schrodin R., Schulz J.-P., and Vogel G. (2011b). A Description of the Nonhydrostatic Regional COSMO-Model. Part II: Physical Parameterization. Consortium for Small-Scale Modelling, Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD).Doms G., Foerstner J., Heise E., Herzog H.-J., Mironov D., Raschendorfer M., Reinhardt T., Ritter B., Schrodin R., Schulz J.-P., and Vogel G. (2011b). A Description of the Nonhydrostatic Regional COSMO-Model. Part II: Physical Parameterization. Consortium for Small-Scale Modelling, Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD).Holben B.N., Eck T.F., Slutsker I., Tanre D., Buis J.P., Setzer A., Vermote E., Reagan J.A., Kaufman Y., Nakajima T., Lavenu F., Jankowiak I., and Smirnov A. (1998). AERONET—A federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization. Remote sensing of environment, 66(1), pp 1-16.Holben B.N., Eck T.F., Slutsker I., Tanre D., Buis J.P., Setzer A., Vermote E., Reagan J.A., Kaufman Y., Nakajima T., Lavenu F., Jankowiak I., and Smirnov A. (1998). AERONET—A federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization. Remote sensing of environment, 66(1), pp 1-16.Polukhov A.A., Chubarova N.Y., Rivin G.S., Shatunova M.V. and Tarasova T.A. (2017a). Assessment of the clear sky radiation simulated using COSMO model based on precise calculation and observation in Moscow. Proceedings of Hydrometcentre of Russia. 364. pp.38-52.Polukhov A.A., Chubarova N.Y., Rivin G.S., Shatunova M.V. and Tarasova T.A. (2017a). Assessment of the clear sky radiation simulated using COSMO model based on precise calculation and observation in Moscow. Proceedings of Hydrometcentre of Russia. 364. pp.38-52.Poliukhov A., Chubarova N., Kinne S., Rivin G., Shatunova M., and Tarasova T. (2017b). Comparison between calculations of shortwave radiation with different aerosol datasets and measured data at the MSU MO (Russia). AIP Conference Proceeding. 1810(1), p. 100006.Poliukhov A., Chubarova N., Kinne S., Rivin G., Shatunova M., and Tarasova T. (2017b). Comparison between calculations of shortwave radiation with different aerosol datasets and measured data at the MSU MO (Russia). AIP Conference Proceeding. 1810(1), p. 100006.Tanré D., Geleyn J. F., and Slingo J. M. (1984). First results of the introduction of an advanced aerosol-radiation interaction in the ECMWF low resolution global model. Aerosols and their climatic effects, pp 133-177.Tanré D., Geleyn J. F., and Slingo J. M. (1984). First results of the introduction of an advanced aerosol-radiation interaction in the ECMWF low resolution global model. Aerosols and their climatic effects, pp 133-177.Tarasova T. A. and Fomin B. A. (2007). The use of new parameterizations for gaseous absorption in the CLIRAD-SW solar radiation code for models. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 24(6), pp. 1157-1162.Tarasova T. A. and Fomin B. A. (2007). The use of new parameterizations for gaseous absorption in the CLIRAD-SW solar radiation code for models. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 24(6), pp. 1157-1162.Tegen I., Hollrig P., Chin M., Fung I., Jacob D., and Penner J. (1997). Contribution of different aerosol species to the global aerosol extinction optical thickness: Estimates from model results. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 102(D20), pp 23895-23915.Tegen I., Hollrig P., Chin M., Fung I., Jacob D., and Penner J. (1997). Contribution of different aerosol species to the global aerosol extinction optical thickness: Estimates from model results. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 102(D20), pp 23895-23915.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.